Connect with us

RSS

Media’s Casualty Is the Truth as it Spreads Three Damaging Lies About Gaza

An UNRWA aid truck at the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and the Gaza Strip. Photo: Reuters/Amr Abdallah Dalsh

“The first casualty of war is the truth.”

The late Republican senator Hiram Johnson (CA)’s immortal observation has come to mind more than a few times with regard to the media’s coverage of the Israel-Hamas war.

Actually, a more accurate rendering of the statement during this war would be, “most of the casualties of war are the truth.”

For the truth was not the first victim when Hamas terrorists invaded Israel on that morning on October 7; raping and kidnapping festival-goers as the sun rose in the sky, and burning families alive in their homes within the formerly tranquil kibbutzim near the Gaza border.

In fact, the gruesome truth was there for everyone to bear horrified witness to as Hamas terrorists proudly documented their wicked actions using cell phones and body-worn cameras.

But truth has since taken a back seat in the reporting of Israel’s response to the attack and Hamas’ genocidal aims, with several glaring lies still being peddled by the media, twisting the public’s understanding of the war.

The media appears determined to paint Israel as a pariah state, eagerly spreading the most damaging misinformation and stubbornly refusing to correct themselves even when confronted with undeniable evidence to the contrary.

The ‘Genocide’ Ruling That Wasn’t

Perhaps the most damaging of all the mistruths still being promoted by the press is the International Court of Justice (ICJ)’s interim ruling in January on a case brought by South Africa that accused Israel of genocide.

As we pointed out at the time, organizations such as the United Nations and Human Rights Watch led the way in misinterpreting the ruling, falsely claiming that the court had decided that the allegation of genocide in Gaza by Israel was “plausible.”

Next to jump on the misinformation bandwagon was the international media, uncritically parroting the claims of politically-motivated human rights organizations instead of consulting legal experts to report the ruling accurately.

Months later, Joan Donoghue, head of the ICJ at the time, set the record straight.

Appearing on the BBC current affairs show HARDTalk in April, Donoghue expressed relief at the opportunity to explain the ruling’s effect — and, in doing so, exposed months of media negligence, including by the editorial team of the very program on which she was being interviewed.

“The court decided that the Palestinians had a plausible right to be protected from genocide and that South Africa had the right to present that claim in the court,” she clarified. “It then looked at the facts as well. But it did not decide — and this is something where I’m correcting what’s often said in the media — it didn’t decide that the claim of genocide was plausible.”

Despite Donoghue’s clear and public clarification, the “plausible genocide” lie continues to be promoted by numerous media outlets — demonstrating ignorance at best and naked bias by journalists at worst.

Just this week, The Guardian failed to remove the error from an opinion piece by a UK Member of Parliament, Zarah Sultana, which called on the UK’s newly-elected government to suspend arms sales to Israel.

No, MP Sultana and @guardian, the ICJ did NOT find Israel in breach of the genocide convention, as you can see the former ICJ president admit here: https://t.co/p36CTENXTO pic.twitter.com/I29DWHdXS0

— HonestReporting (@HonestReporting) July 17, 2024

The Famine That Never Happened

We recently addressed what can only be described as a campaign of disinformation surrounding the issue of food aid being delivered to the Gaza Strip.

But let’s go back to the beginning of this lie. Merely two weeks into the war, claims of starvation in the enclave were already being sounded. Oxfam, for example, alleged that “clean water has now virtually run out,” while stating that a “staggering 2.2 million people are now in urgent need of food.”

Since then, there have been almost daily headlines describing “catastrophic levels of hunger” in Gaza, with a population facing “imminent famine.”

Arab media outlets helped furnish this shaky narrative with questionable accounts of individual Palestinian children with preexisting and often life-threatening medical conditions supposedly dying from “malnutrition,” which are then reprinted wholesale by the Western media without editors or journalists ever bothering to probe a little deeper.

HonestReporting has repeatedly called out the media for continuing to allege a famine despite a paucity of evidence, and as further data is published that proves the opposite.

Last month, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) walked back on a widely-publicized March briefing after uncovering several flaws in the original data, leading them to amend their initial claims. Ultimately, the IPC concluded that they cannot consider the situation in Gaza a “famine.”

The Beginning of a New Lie

HonestReporting launched a new fight this month to stop a fresh, equally damaging lie from taking root and eventually being reported as fact.

The discredited letter in The Lancet medical journal, which sensationally and without a shred of evidence, claims the Gaza death toll could be higher than 180,000, has been making the rounds.

 

This is how false info spreads:

1. @TheLancet publishes claims of 186,000 deaths in Gaza.
2. Media republish the false figure, ignoring the author’s prior justification of terrorism.
3. Israel is blamed for countless deaths that didn’t happen.https://t.co/rZmDKxjFP3 pic.twitter.com/Czc9daYP7m

— HonestReporting (@HonestReporting) July 8, 2024

Some media outlets jumped on the figure, producing sensationalist, click-bait headlines about the mass killing of Palestinians. However, the quick effort to counter The Lancet’s disinformation has had an impact.

The figure is not being quoted anymore in news articles in reputable mainstream media outlets, and HonestReporting is actively calling out the publications that do.

That’s how we’ll win the fight against media misinformation: by responding quickly and loudly across all platforms and publicly shaming news organizations that get it wrong.

The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.

The post Media’s Casualty Is the Truth as it Spreads Three Damaging Lies About Gaza first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Northwestern University Police Charge Four Individuals for Role in Pro-Hamas Demonstration

Signs cover the fence at a pro-Palestinian encampment at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. on April 28, 2024. Photo: Max Herman via Reuters Connect.

Three Northwestern University faculty members and one graduate student have been charged with misdemeanors for interfering with law enforcement’s efforts to clear an unlawful pro-Hamas demonstration which took place on the Deering Meadow section of campus during the final days of spring semester, The Daily Northwestern reported earlier this week.

The individuals were charged by the Northwestern University Police Department, which said that they allegedly engaged in “obstructing a police officer during the protests,” a crime for which they could, if convicted, spend a year in jail and pay a $2,500 fine, The Daily Northwestern said. They have already appeared before a judge and will do so again in August.

“While the university permits peaceful demonstrations, it does not permit activity that disrupts university operations, violates the law, or includes the intimidation or harassment of members of the community,” Northwestern University spokesperson Jon Yates said in a statement shared with the paper.

Northwestern University has struggled recently to correct an impression that it coddled pro-Hamas protesters and acceded to their demands for a boycott of Israel in exchange for an end to their protest, which included their setting up a “Gaza Solidarity Camp” — a cluster of tents in which the students lived and from which they refused to leave unless their conditions were met.

Northwestern president Michael Schill denied during a congressional hearing held in May that he made any concessions. As part of the deal to end the encampment, he agreed to establish a scholarship for Palestinian undergraduates, contact potential employers of students who caused recent campus disruptions to insist on their being hired, create a segregated dormitory hall that will be occupied exclusively by Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) and Muslim students, and form a new advisory committee in which anti-Zionists students and faculty may wield an outsized voice.

“It’s striking that you decided to negotiate a sweetheart deal with pro-Hamas students and professors who denied Oct. 7, either denied it, celebrated, or simply don’t care. I look at that as pure evil,” US Rep. Burgess Owens (R-UT) told Schill during the hearing, which was titled “Calling for Accountability: Stopping Antisemitic College Chaos.”

Following Schill’s testimony, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) called for his resignation, noting that he confessed to appointing accused antisemites to a task force on antisemitism that ultimately disbanded after its members could not agree on a definition of antisemitism.

The Northwestern University protesters are not the only ones facing consequences for alleged actions taken during the “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” demonstration, which exploded on college campuses across the country.

The University of Florida (UF) handed down severe and potentially life-altering punishments to seven pro-Hamas rioters earlier this month, going over the heads of a school disciplinary body that was set on slapping their wrists and sentencing most to probation. The individuals were issued full suspensions for as many as four years.

The suspensions may not be the only punishments that the students will face.

According to Fresh Take Florida, the students were part of a group of nine that were arrested by local law enforcement for trespassing and resisting arrest, charges that are being prosecuted by the Alachua County State Attorney’s Office. They are taking their chances at trial, the news service added, noting that all nine have rejected “deferred prosecution,” an agreement that would require them to plead guilty, or no contest, in exchange for the state’s expunging the convictions from their records in the future so long as they abstain from committing more criminal acts.

One of the nine, computer science student Parker Stanely Hovis, 26, — who was suspended for three years — has proclaimed that they will contest the state’s cases.

“We did not resist arrest, and we are prepared to fight our charges,” Hovis said in a statement. “We’re standing in solidarity with each other, and collectively demanding that the state drop the charges against us.”

The University of Texas at Austin has also meted out lengthy suspensions to pro-Hamas protesters who violated school rules.

Three students have been sentenced to deferred suspensions, a form of probation which allows them to continue their studies so long as they comply with school rules going forward, according KUT News, a National Public Radio (NPR) affiliate. As part of their punishment, they must pass an exam testing their knowledge of school policies on free speech and protests and formally declare their awareness of the harsher, full suspensions they will receive should they violate school rules again.

One student, KUT added, was given a “full” two-year suspension during which he is banned from campus. The suspension effectively disenrolled him from the university, but he can reapply for readmission in 2026.

“The University of Texas at Austin provided a world-class learning environment where every student can thrive,” said a letter, as quoted by the outlet, sent to one of the students who was placed on deferred suspension. “At this juncture, suspension appears to be the appropriate consequences for these serious infractions.”

Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.

The post Northwestern University Police Charge Four Individuals for Role in Pro-Hamas Demonstration first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Trump Demands Release of US Hostages, Vows to Resolve Israel-Hamas War in RNC Speech

Republican presidential nominee and former US President Donald Trump raises his fist from the stage on Day 4 of the Republican National Convention (RNC), at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US, July 18, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

Republican presidential nominee and former US President Donald Trump called for the release of all American hostages around the world during the final night of the Republican National Convention (RNC) in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on Thursday.

While accepting the Republican Party’s presidential nomination, Trump vowed to make foreign countries pay “a very big price” if American hostages are not returned before he enters the White House.

To the entire world, I tell you this: We want our hostages back, and they better be back before I assume office, or you will be paying a very big price,” Trump said. 

Eight Americans — Edan Alexander, Itay Chen, Sagui Dekel-Chen, Hersh Goldberg-Polin, Gadi Haggai, Judith Weinstein Haggai, Omer Neutra, and Keith Siegel — remain in captivity in Gaza after they were taken hostage by Hamas during the Palestinian terrorist group’s rampage across southern Israel on Oct. 7.

The parents of Neutra addressed the RNC on Wednesday night, telling the audience that Trump “stands with the American hostages.”

Trump also stated during his speech that multiple ongoing wars — including the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza — would not have occurred if he still occupied the White House. The Republican nominee and former president vowed to resolve these global crises upon his return to the Oval Office. 

Trump also promised to “end every single international crisis that the current administration has created, including the horrible war with Russia and Ukraine — which would have never happened if I was president — and the war caused by the attack on Israel, which would have never happened if I was president.”

Iran was broke. Iran had no money. Now Iran has $250 billion. They made it all over the last two and a half years,” Trump said.

When Trump was president, he withdrew the US from a nuclear deal with Iran that was brokered by the former Obama administration, reimposing harsh economic sanctions on the Iranian regime. Current US President Joe Biden has attempted to restart negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program, allowing sanctions waivers which, critics argue, benefit Tehran and allow it to spend more money on supporting terrorism.

From 2018 to 2023, for example, the US State Department allowed Iraq to import energy from Iran under the condition that all payments were kept in an escrow account out of the Iranian government’s reach. In the summer of 2023, however, the Biden administration changed the sanctions waiver to allow Iraq to transfer $10 billion to Iran. 

The US intelligence community has consistently labeled Iran — which provides funding, weapons, and training to Hamas — as the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism. Republicans have argued that the Biden administration’s decision to ease certain sanctions on Iran will allow the regime to give more support to its terrorist proxies, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Meanwhile, Iran has been ramping up its nuclear program without a nuclear accord in place.

“Now Iran is very close to having a nuclear weapon, which would have never happened,” Trump said.

Trump also promised to build an Iron Dome air defense system on US soil similar to the one that Israel has.

“Why should other countries have this and we don’t? No, we’re going to build an Iron Dome over our country, and we’re going to be sure that nothing can come and harm our people,” Trump said.

It was unclear what threats Trump had in mind to thwart with Iron Dome, which was designed to stop short-range rockets and missiles — not a danger the US has ever faced along its borders.

The post Trump Demands Release of US Hostages, Vows to Resolve Israel-Hamas War in RNC Speech first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Anti-Israel UN Special Rapporteur Calls for UN to Expel Jewish State

Francesca Albanese, UN special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, attends a side event during the Human Rights Council at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, March 26, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Denis Balibouse

The United Nations’ notoriously controversial special rapporteur on the human rights situation in the Palestinian territories has called for the UN to expel Israel as a member state of the world body, once again raising questions of her impartiality.

“Time to #UNseatIsrael from the UN,” Francesca Albanese wrote on X/Twitter on Thursday.

Albanese was responding to a tweet from Balakrishnan Rajagopal, the UN special rapporteur “on the right to adequate housing,” who wrote it was “high time to take action against Israel including through unseating from the UN, as was done with apartheid South Africa.”

The outrage came after Israeli forces struck a UN facility in Gaza which, according to the military, was being used by Hamas terrorists as a command center. Hamas, the Palestinian terrorist group that rules Gaza, notoriously embeds its fighters within Gaza’s civilian population and commandeers civilian facilities like hospitals, schools, and mosques to run operations and direct attacks.

The UN facility hit in Gaza belonged to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), the UN organization dedicated solely to Palestinian refugees and their descendants. UNRWA has been accused of aiding Hamas, and Israel has said employees of the agency participated in the terrorist group’s Oct. 7 onslaught across southern Israel. UN officials deny the allegations, arguing their mission in Gaza is critical to ensuring humanitarian aid gets to the civilian population.

“Our troops found UAVs, war rooms used for surveillance operations, and large quantities of weapons, including tactical drones, rockets, machine guns, mortars, explosives, and grenades in a compound near UNRWA’s HQ in Gaza City, following intelligence that Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists and infrastructure were embedded inside,” the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said in a statement regarding its operation targeting the facility. The IDF also said there were tunnel routes near the compound.

In response to Albanese’s tweet, Hillel Neuer — the executive director of UN Watch, a Geneva-based NGO that monitors the UN — lambasted the special rapporteur for what he described as an anti-Israel bias.

“You are violating your duty to act with impartiality. Under no circumstances is a UN mandate holder entitled to call for the removal of a member state,” he wrote.

Albanese’s call to expel Israel is the latest chapter of her extensive history of using her role at the UN to denigrate Israel and seemingly rationalize Hamas’ attacks on the Jewish state.

The UN recently launched a probe into Albanese’s conduct over allegedly accepting a trip to Australia funded by pro-Hamas organizations.

In April, Albanese issued public support for the pro-Hamas protests and encampments on US university campuses, saying that they gave her “hope.” Earlier that month, she accused Israel of destroying Gaza and committing genocide in the Hamas-ruled Palestinian enclave, from which the terrorist group launched the current war by invading the Jewish state on Oct. 7, massacring 1,200 people, and kidnapping 250 others as hostages. At a public hearing at the European Parliament on April 9, the UN rapporteur devoted much of her time to accusing Israel — but not Hamas — of lying about its conduct in Gaza.

That hearing came about two weeks after Albanese released a report accusing Israel of carrying out “genocide” in Gaza, continuing a pattern of the UN official singling out the Jewish state for particularly harsh condemnation. Albanese’s report did not mention any details about Hamas’ Oct. 7 massacre across southern Israel. Israeli officials lambasted her findings, arguing they were misleading and excused terrorism.

In February, Albanese claimed Israelis were “colonialists” who had “fake identities.” Previously, she defended Palestinians’ “right to resist” Israeli “occupation” at a time when over 1,100 rockets were fired by Gaza terrorists at Israel. Last year, US lawmakers called for the firing of Albanese for what they described as her “outrageous” antisemitic statements, including a 2014 letter in which she claimed America was “subjugated by the Jewish lobby.”

Albanese’s anti-Israel comments have earned her the praise of Hamas officials in the past.

In response to French President Emmanuel Macron calling Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel the “”argest antisemitic massacre of the 21st century,” Albanese said, “No, Mr. Macron. The victims of Oct. 7 were not killed because of their Judaism, but in response to Israel’s oppression.”

Video footage of the Oct. 7 onslaught showed Palestinian terrorists led by Hamas celebrating the fact that they were murdering Jews.

Nevertheless, Albanese has argued that Israel should make peace with Hamas, saying that it “needs to make peace with Hamas in order to not be threatened by Hamas.”

When asked what people do not understand about Hamas, she added, “If someone violates your right to self-determination, you are entitled to embrace resistance.”

The post Anti-Israel UN Special Rapporteur Calls for UN to Expel Jewish State first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News