RSS
Amsterdam Club Slammed for ‘Gaslighting,’ ‘Lying,’ Succumbing to Pressure to Cancel Israeli Comedian’s Shows
Israeli comedian Yohay Sponder. Photo: Screenshot
An improv theater and comedy club in The Netherlands is being heavily criticized for “caving” to pressure from pro-Palestinian activists and making an “outrageous” decision to cancel performances by an Israeli stand-up comedian, while also allegedly lying about security concerns expressed by local police.
Israeli stand-up comedian Yohay Sponder was originally scheduled to perform two shows on Jan. 25 at Boom Chicago, located in Amsterdam, as part of his world tour called “Self-Loving Jew.” Sponder, who is based in Israel, is beginning the European leg of his tour in London this week and the second stop was scheduled to be in Amsterdam.
“Sponder is a comedian; his mission in life is to bring joy and laughter to people. He’s not looking for a fight. That being said, he is unapologetically proud to be Jewish and Israeli,” Kayla Sponder, who is the comedian’s booking manager and wife, told The Algemeiner on Monday. She added that her team is “incredibly disappointed” by Boom Chicago’s decision to cancel Yohay’s two shows after it faced criticism and backlash from pro-Palestinian activists.
“I knew that there would be feelings and reactions to a show that’s called ‘Self-Loving Jew,’ even though the message is self-love,” she explained. “We’re not tone deaf to the climate in Europe and the world, so we knew this was coming, I just didn’t expect it from club owners and venues. I expected protests and pushback, but it’s very disappointing. It’s a sad day not just for the Jewish community, but for culture and the arts when freedom of expression and freedom of speech is silenced and it’s not backed up.”
“I think they were honest about the concerns that were raised,” she added about Boom Chicago. “I think the concerns were real … [But] I think they made the wrong decision. They caved.” The venue’s decision even sparked outrage from politicians in The Netherlands who called the move “outrageous” and demanded that the country’s minister of education, culture, and science get involved to protect Jewish artists like Sponder.
Kayla explained to The Algemeiner that she had been working with Boom Chicago for roughly the last two months to coordinate Yohay’s performances on Jan. 25 at the venue. The first show sold out and the second show was nearly sold out.
“Everything was great. We had a great working relationship [with Boom Chicago]. Everything was running really smoothly until about two weeks ago,” Kayla said, before explaining an incident that took place at the comedy club.
A pro-Palestinian activist had walked into Boom Chicago, criticized the venue for allowing a Zionist Jewish comedian to perform there, and declared “Free Palestine.” After the incident, Boom Chicago’s sales and events coordinator told Kayla that Yohay’s performance at the venue would move forward but the club had some security concerns they wanted to discuss with her over a Zoom call.
Kayla said she and her team were already planning on hiring private security even prior to the incident, “because we’re not tone deaf to the current climate in Europe.” Only two months ago, fans of the Israeli soccer team Maccabi Tel Aviv were targeted with antisemitic violence and physically assaulted, and even run over by cars, in the streets of Amsterdam.
“The security and safety of Yohay’s fans, staff that is working with him, and of course his own safety is top priority,” Kayla said.
When Kayla had a Zoom meeting with two staff members of Boom Chicago, including its head of sales and events, they told her the pro-Palestinian activist who entered the club sent them an email and informed them about more organized efforts by anti-Israel groups to protest and boycott Yohay’s shows on Jan. 25. Online groups, such as one called Student Intifada NL, baselessly called Yohay a “genocide glorifier” and an “ultra-Zionist” who “makes jokes based on Israeli propaganda.”
In response, Kayla told Boom Chicago her team would be in touch with private security companies, increase security at the shows on Jan. 25, and pay for it out of pocket. At the time of the Zoom call, the venue still gave her the impression that the shows would take place, she told The Algemeiner.
On Friday morning, however, Boom Chicago’s director Andrew Moskos sent an email to Kayla. He said that after speaking to police in Amsterdam, the venue decided to cancel Yohay’s shows for security reasons.
“Due to the climate in Amsterdam, public reactions, and concerns from the police, we cannot allow Yohay Sponder’s performance at Boom Chicago on Jan. 25 to continue,” Moskos wrote in an email to Kayla that was shared with The Algemeiner. “Boom Chicago has always stood for free speech. This is not a decision we take lightly.”
“The situation is tense here, we got a lot of feedback, police was concerned about the performance as well. At the end of the day we just can’t go forward with this right now,” Moskos wrote in subsequent emails. “It is just a complicated situation, it’s almost the most complicated moment of a complicated situation, those 50 Maccabi [soccer] fans certainly didn’t help the situation, that is for sure. That’s what sort of kickstarted the situation.”
Even during phone calls about the decision, Moskos repeatedly told Kayla that Amsterdam police had expressed security concerns about the performances. Kayla told The Algemeiner that when she asked Moskos directly if the request to cancel Yohay’s shows had come from police, he responded, “It has not come to that yet, but I think that that decision will and I don’t want to wait for that to come…we have negative advice is what where we are.”
However, the Amsterdam-based publication NL Times reported that Amsterdam police and the office of Mayor Femke Halsem denied any involvement in Boom Chicago’s decision. A police spokesperson was also cited as saying that they did not know about Yohay’s performances and never discussed security concerns with the venue.
“It seems like they [Boom Chicago] weren’t being honest,” Kayla told The Algemeiner. “Someone’s lying. They can’t be both telling the truth.”
Moskos also said in emails to Kayla throughout the weekend that Boom Chicago would help her team find a “Jewish venue or club space in Amsterdam that might accommodate you.” Kayla said the Boom Chicago team never ended up sending her suggestions for other venues.
“Who might be available at this late notice and willing to take the heat?” Moskos wrote in one email.
“He sent the most gaslighting email ever,” Kayla said. “I didn’t create this situation, I didn’t create the ‘heat.’ I didn’t create this ‘late notice.’”
In the aftermath of the event being canceled, Kayla said the Jewish community and pro-Israel allies have reached out and offered to help, showing what she called “an immense amount of support.” Her team tried to find an alternative venue in Amsterdam to keep Yohay’s shows on Jan. 25 but to no avail. They hope to bring his shows to Amsterdam at a later date.
In April, Boom Chicago will host a performance by Palestinian comedian Sammy Obeid, who recently concluded a tour called “Ceasefire.” Obeid has regularly posted anti-Israel messages on social media, accusing the country of genocide, comparing it to the Hezbollah terrorist organization, and criticizing US support for the Jewish state. He often makes jokes about Israel and has even done stand-up comedy routines ridiculing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
When The Algemeiner contacted Boom Chicago for a comment, and asked for them to clarify their involvement with Amsterdam police before making the decision to cancel Yohay’s show, Boom Chicago CEO Saskia Maas referred to a statement posted on the venue’s website.
“Unfortunately, following the announcement of the show, we received significant negative reactions, both online and from our visitors. Some of these responses were outright threatening,” they said in part. “As a result, we began to worry about the safety of our performers, audience, and colleagues. Therefore, we made the difficult decision to cancel the performance.”
“We are deeply saddened that this situation has escalated into a polarized debate about Gaza,” they added. “In our 32 years of existence, we have never experienced anything like this. Very nasty criticism has come at us from all sides, even though we genuinely tried to do what was best for everyone. We are using this experience to learn and grow. In the future, we will involve the City of Amsterdam immediately whenever safety concerns arise. Thankfully, we are now working closely with them on next steps.”
Boom Chicago concluded by saying that it will host an open discussion about the role of comedy in 2025. “The goal is to foster understanding and dialogue among diverse perspectives, without restrictions. We hope we can have a future where that is possible because humor can help bring people closer: Life is better when you laugh together.”
The post Amsterdam Club Slammed for ‘Gaslighting,’ ‘Lying,’ Succumbing to Pressure to Cancel Israeli Comedian’s Shows first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Colorado Attack Suspect Charged with Assault, Use of Explosives
FILE PHOTO: Boulder attack suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman poses for a jail booking photograph after his arrest in Boulder, Colorado, U.S. June 2, 2025. Photo: Boulder Police Department/Handout via REUTERS
A suspect in an attack on a pro-Israeli rally in Colorado that injured eight people was being held on Monday on an array of charges, including assault and the use of explosives, in lieu of a $10-million bail, according to Boulder County records.
The posted list of felony charges against suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, in the attack on Sunday also includes charges of murder in the first degree, although police in the city of Boulder have said on social media that no victims died in the attack. Authorities could not be reached immediately to clarify.
Witnesses reported the suspect used a makeshift flamethrower and threw an incendiary device into the crowd. He was heard to yell “Free Palestine” during the attack, according to the FBI, in what the agency called a “targeted terror attack.”
Four women and four men between 52 and 88 years of age were transported to hospitals after the attack, Boulder Police said.
The attack took place on the Pearl Street Mall, a popular pedestrian shopping district near the University of Colorado, during an event organized by Run for Their Lives, an organization devoted to drawing attention to the hostages seized in the aftermath of Hamas’ 2023 attack on Israel.
Rabbi Yisroel Wilhelm, the Chabad director at the University of Colorado, Boulder, told CBS Colorado that the 88-year-old victim was a Holocaust refugee who fled Europe.
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said Soliman had entered the country in August 2022 on a tourist visa that expired in February 2023. He filed for asylum in September 2022. “The suspect, Mohamed Soliman, is illegally in our country,” the spokesperson said.
The FBI raided and searched Soliman’s home in El Paso County, Colorado, the agency said on social media. “As this is an ongoing investigation, no additional information is available at this time.”
The attack in Boulder was the latest act of violence aimed at Jewish Americans linked to outrage over Israel’s escalating military offensive in Gaza. It followed the fatal shooting of two Israel Embassy aides that took place outside Washington’s Capital Jewish Museum last month.
Ron Halber, CEO of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington, said after the shooting there was a question of how far security perimeters outside Jewish institutions should extend.
Boulder Police said they would hold a press conference later on Monday to discuss details of the Colorado attack.
The Denver office of the FBI, which is handling the case, did not immediately respond to emails or phone calls seeking clarification on the homicide charges or other details in the case.
Officials from the Boulder County Jail, Boulder Police and Boulder County Sheriff’s Office did not immediately respond to inquiries.
The post Colorado Attack Suspect Charged with Assault, Use of Explosives first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Iran Poised to Dismiss US Nuclear Proposal, Iranian Diplomat Says
Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi attends a press conference following a meeting with Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Moscow, Russia, April 18, 2025. Photo: Tatyana Makeyeva/Pool via REUTERS
Iran is poised to reject a US proposal to end a decades-old nuclear dispute, an Iranian diplomat said on Monday, dismissing it as a “non-starter” that fails to address Tehran’s interests or soften Washington’s stance on uranium enrichment.
“Iran is drafting a negative response to the US proposal, which could be interpreted as a rejection of the US offer,” the senior diplomat, who is close to Iran’s negotiating team, told Reuters.
The US proposal for a new nuclear deal was presented to Iran on Saturday by Omani Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr Albusaidi, who was on a short visit to Tehran and has been mediating talks between Tehran and Washington.
After five rounds of discussions between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and President Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, several obstacles remain.
Among them are Iran’s rejection of a US demand that it commit to scrapping uranium enrichment and its refusal to ship abroad its entire existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium – possible raw material for nuclear bombs.
Tehran says it wants to master nuclear technology for peaceful purposes and has long denied accusations by Western powers that it is seeking to develop nuclear weapons.
“In this proposal, the US stance on enrichment on Iranian soil remains unchanged, and there is no clear explanation regarding the lifting of sanctions,” said the diplomat, who declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter.
Araqchi said Tehran would formally respond to the proposal soon.
Tehran demands the immediate removal of all US-imposed curbs that impair its oil-based economy. But the US says nuclear-related sanctions should be removed in phases.
Dozens of institutions vital to Iran’s economy, including its central bank and national oil company, have been blacklisted since 2018 for, according to Washington, “supporting terrorism or weapons proliferation.”
Trump’s revival of “maximum pressure” against Tehran since his return to the White House in January has included tightening sanctions and threatening to bomb Iran if the negotiations yield no deal.
During his first term in 2018, Trump ditched Tehran’s 2015 nuclear pact with six powers and reimposed sanctions that have crippled Iran’s economy. Iran responded by escalating enrichment far beyond the pact’s limits.
Under the deal, Iran had until 2018 curbed its sensitive nuclear work in return for relief from US, EU and U.N. economic sanctions.
The diplomat said the assessment of “Iran’s nuclear negotiations committee,” under the supervision of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was that the US proposal was “completely one-sided” and could not serve Tehran’s interests.
Therefore, the diplomat said, Tehran considers this proposal a “non-starter” and believes it unilaterally attempts to impose a “bad deal” on Iran through excessive demands.
NUCLEAR STANDOFF RAISES MIDDLE EAST TENSIONS
The stakes are high for both sides. Trump wants to curtail Tehran’s potential to produce a nuclear weapon that could trigger a regional nuclear arms race and perhaps threaten Israel. Iran’s clerical establishment, for its part, wants to be rid of the devastating sanctions.
Iran says it is ready to accept some limits on enrichment, but needs watertight guarantees that Washington would not renege on a future nuclear accord.
Two Iranian officials told Reuters last week that Iran could pause uranium enrichment if the US released frozen Iranian funds and recognized Tehran’s right to refine uranium for civilian use under a “political deal” that could lead to a broader nuclear accord.
Iran’s arch-foe Israel sees Iran’s nuclear program as an existential threat and says it would never allow Tehran to obtain nuclear weapons.
Araqchi, in a joint news conference with his Egyptian counterpart in Cairo, said: “I do not think Israel will commit such a mistake as to attack Iran.”
Tehran’s regional influence has meanwhile been diminished by military setbacks suffered by its forces and those of its allies in the Shi’ite-dominated “Axis of Resistance,” which include Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis in Yemen, and Iraqi militias.
In April, Saudi Arabia’s defence minister delivered a blunt message to Iranian officials to take Trump’s offer of a new deal seriously as a way to avoid the risk of war with Israel.
The post Iran Poised to Dismiss US Nuclear Proposal, Iranian Diplomat Says first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
The Islamist Crescent: A New Syrian Danger
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa speaks during a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron after a meeting at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, May 7, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Stephanie Lecocq/Pool
The dramatic fall of the Assad regime in Syria has undeniably reshaped the Middle East, yet the emerging power dynamics, particularly the alignment between Saudi Arabia and Turkey, warrant profound scrutiny from those committed to American and Israeli security. While superficially presented as a united front against Iranian influence, this new Sunni axis carries a dangerous undercurrent of Islamism and regional ambition that could ultimately undermine, rather than serve, the long-term interests of Washington and Jerusalem.
For too long, Syria under Bashar al-Assad served as a critical conduit for Iran’s destabilizing agenda, facilitating arms transfers to Hezbollah and projecting Tehran’s power across the Levant. The removal of this linchpin is, on the surface, a strategic victory. However, the nature of the new Syrian government, led by Ahmed al-Sharaa — a figure Israeli officials continue to view with deep suspicion due to his past as a former Al-Qaeda-linked commander — raises immediate red flags. This is not merely a change of guard; it is a shift that introduces a new set of complex challenges, particularly given Turkey’s historical support for the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization deemed a terror group by Saudi Arabia and many other regional states.
Israel’s strategic calculus in Syria has always been clear: to degrade Iran’s military presence, prevent Hezbollah from acquiring advanced weaponry, and maintain operational freedom in Syrian airspace. Crucially, Israel has historically thought it best to have a decentralized, weak, and fragmented Syria, with reports that it has actively worked against the resurgence of a robust central authority. This preference stems from a pragmatic understanding that a strong, unified Syria, especially one under the tutelage of an ambitious regional power like Turkey, could pose much more of a threat than the Assad regime ever did. Indeed, Israeli defense officials privately express concern at Turkey’s assertive moves, accusing Ankara of attempting to transform post-war Syria into a Turkish protectorate under Islamist tutelage. This concern is not unfounded; Turkey’s ambitious, arguably expansionist, objectives — and its perceived undue dominance in Arab lands — are viewed by Israel as warily as Iran’s previous influence.
The notion that an “Ottoman Crescent” is now replacing the “Shiite Crescent” should not be celebrated as a net positive. While it may diminish Iranian power, it introduces a new form of regional hegemony, one driven by an ideology that has historically been antithetical to Western values and stability. The European Union’s recent imposition of sanctions on Turkish-backed Syrian army commanders for human rights abuses, including arbitrary killings and torture, further underscores the problematic nature of some elements within this new Syrian landscape. The fact that al-Sharaa has allowed such individuals to operate with impunity and even promoted them to high-ranking positions should give Washington pause.
From an American perspective, while the Trump administration has pragmatically engaged with the new Syrian government, lifting sanctions and urging normalization with Israel, this engagement must be tempered with extreme caution. The core American interests in the Middle East — counterterrorism, containment of Iran, and regional stability — are not served by empowering Islamist-leaning factions or by enabling a regional power, like Turkey, whose actions have sometimes undermined the broader fight against ISIS. Washington must demand that Damascus demonstrate a genuine commitment to taking over the counter-ISIS mission and managing detention facilities, and unequivocally insist that Turkey cease actions that risk an ISIS resurgence.
The argument that Saudi Arabia and Turkey, despite their own complex internal dynamics, are simply pragmatic actors countering Iran overlooks the ideological underpinnings that concern many conservatives. Turkey’s ruling party, rooted in political Islam, and its historical ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, present a fundamental challenge to the vision of a stable, secular, and pro-Western Middle East. While Saudi Arabia has designated the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, its alignment with Turkey in Syria, and its own internal human rights record, means that this “new front” is far from a clean solution.
The Saudi-Turkey alignment in Syria is a double-edged sword. While it may indeed serve to counter Iran’s immediate regional ambitions, it simultaneously risks empowering actors whose long-term objectives and ideological leanings are deeply problematic for American, Israeli, and Western interests. Washington and Jerusalem must approach this new dynamic with extreme vigilance, prioritizing the containment of all forms of radicalism — whether Shiite or Sunni — and ensuring that any strategic gains against Iran do not inadvertently pave the way for a new, equally dangerous, Islamist crescent to rise in the heart of the Levant.
Amine Ayoub, a fellow at the Middle East Forum, is a policy analyst and writer based in Morocco. Follow him on X: @amineayoubx
The post The Islamist Crescent: A New Syrian Danger first appeared on Algemeiner.com.