Uncategorized
House defeats Iran war powers resolution as Democrats wrestle with Israel
The House of Representatives on Thursday rejected a Democratic-led effort to limit President Donald Trump’s authority to expand U.S. military operations against Iran, voting largely along party lines with some defections on both sides.
The 212-to–219 vote exposed deep divisions within the Democratic Party, including among Jewish members who support confronting Tehran but say it should be up to Congress to authorize any broader war, as the constitution requires. Four Democrats joined Republicans, giving the GOP’s slim and fractured majority enough votes to defeat the measure.
The War Powers Act resolution, which would have required the administration to halt U.S. strikes against Iran, was introduced by Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, a libertarian and open critic of Israel, and co-sponsored by 94 Democrats.
The Senate rejected a similar effort to curb the president’s authority, largely along party lines.
Some members of the House offered a more moderate alternative that would order Trump to end the military campaign within 30 days unless Congress authorizes a formal declaration of war. That measure did not come up for a vote.
Rep. Greg Landsman of Ohio was the only Jewish Democrat to oppose the resolution. Reps. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey and Jared Moskowitz of Florida, two Democrats who have at times crossed party lines in support of Israel and offered forceful support for U.S. military action against the Iranian regime, ultimately voted with most of their party to invoke the War Powers Act after initially opposing the measure.
Even if a resolution restraining Trump did clear Congress, Trump could veto it, necessitating a two-thirds vote in both chambers to override it — a threshold unlikely to be reached.
Trump said on Wednesday that the joint U.S.-Israeli air campaign against Iranian military and nuclear infrastructure, which he said was intended to create the conditions for regime change, was proceeding beyond expectations. He added that he rated Operation Epic Fury “about a 15” on “a scale of 10.” U.S. officials signaled strikes will intensify in the coming days.
At least six U.S. servicemembers have been killed in Iranian missile strikes. Operations in the region include at least 200 fighter jets, two aircraft carriers and about 50,000 troops stationed there.
The House also approved a separate resolution introduced by Rep. Brian Mast, a Republican from Florida, reaffirming the U.S. position that Iran remains the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism. The measure passed with bipartisan support, 372 voting in favor and 53 — all Democrats — voting against.
Growing criticism of Israel and opposition to the war
The debate over the war exposed a growing divide between mainstream Democrats, who are largely supportive of Israel and back efforts to weaken Iran’s military and nuclear capabilities, and a party base that remains strongly opposed to U.S. military action. Those lawmakers say they support Israel’s right to defend itself and believe U.S. action against Iran’s missile and nuclear infrastructure may be justified, but they criticized the lack of congressional approval and the absence of a clear endgame that could lead to an endless and deadly conflict.
The position puts the centrist Democrats between progressives in their party who are demanding the strikes stop immediately and Republicans who overwhelmingly back Trump’s strategy — efforts by some on the far right to turn the party against the war notwithstanding. Some Democrats pointed to remarks by Secretary of State Marco Rubio that suggested that an Israeli decision to strike Iran forced Trump to act first.
The vote sends signals ahead of midterm primary elections for House seats. A CNN poll since the war began found that 82% of Democrats overwhelmingly disapprove of the U.S. action against Iran. Almost the same share of Israelis support the war.
Politicians are mindful that they can pay a price for supporting Israel in many districts: In an internal review of the 2024 presidential election, Democratic leaders acknowledged that the Biden administration’s support for Israel during the war in Gaza was a “net negative” politically and cost then-Vice President Kamala Harris crucial support among younger and progressive voters. Several progressive organizations have threatened to back primary challengers to Democrats who vote against limiting the war.
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries of Brooklyn, who has cultivated close ties with Jewish leaders since his election in 2012 and has visited Israel nine times, said in a House floor speech ahead of the vote that Trump has failed to make the case “to justify plunging America into another war that will cost more American lives and billions, if not trillions, in taxpayer resources.”
Speaking to reporters before that, Jeffries refused to say whether he’d back the alternative measure to give Congress a say on the war. “We will cross that bridge when we get to it,” he said.
The post House defeats Iran war powers resolution as Democrats wrestle with Israel appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
London Police Set Up Specialist Jewish Protection Team
A police officer stands at the scene, after a man was arrested following a stabbing incident in the Golders Green area, which is home to a large Jewish population, in London, Britain, April 29, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Hannah McKay
British police are setting up a new team of 100 officers including counter terrorism specialists to help protect Jewish communities across London after a series of antisemitic attacks including the stabbing of two men.
The plan announced on Wednesday for a dedicated protection team comes as officers announced more arrests for antisemitism, including detaining a 35-year-old man on Saturday after rocks were thrown at an ambulance belonging to the Jewish community.
London‘s top police boss Mark Rowley said Jewish communities were facing “sustained threats” from hostile state actors as well as extreme right-wing groups, elements of the extreme left, and Islamist terrorists.
Detectives are examining whether the arson incidents have possible Iranian links, after British security officials warned that Iran was using criminal proxies to carry out hostile activity.
Since late March, there have been a number of high-profile arson attacks with four Jewish ambulances burned and synagogues targeted. Last week, two Jewish men were also stabbed. Both victims survived the attack.
Over the past four weeks, police said they had arrested around 50 people for antisemitic hate crimes and charged eight individuals. On top of that, 28 arrests have been made as part of investigations alongside counter terrorism policing for arson and other serious incidents.
“This new team will be primarily focused on protecting the Jewish community, which faces some of the highest levels of hate crime alongside significant terrorist and hostile state threats,” said a statement from London‘s Metropolitan Police force.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer convened a meeting on Monday with business, health and cultural leaders aimed at trying to tackle antisemitism.
Uncategorized
Iran Reviewing US Proposal to End War, Though Key Demands Remain Unaddressed
People walk on a street near a mural featuring an image of the late Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in Tehran, Iran, May 6, 2026. Photo: Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
Iran said on Wednesday it was reviewing a US peace proposal that sources said would formally end the war while leaving unresolved the key US demands that Iran suspend its nuclear program and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
An Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson cited by Iran‘s ISNA news agency said Tehran would convey its response. US President Donald Trump said he believed Iran wanted an agreement.
“They want to make a deal. We’ve had very good talks over the last 24 hours, and it’s very possible that we’ll make a deal,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday.
Earlier in the day, Trump had sounded more pessimistic about the chances of a deal. In a Truth Social post, he threatened to restart the US bombing campaign in Iran, calling the possibility of Tehran agreeing to the latest US proposal a “big assumption.”
Trump has repeatedly played up the prospect of an agreement that would end the war that started Feb. 28, so far without success. The two sides remain at odds over a variety of difficult issues, such as Iran‘s nuclear ambitions and its control of the Strait of Hormuz, which before the war handled one-fifth of the world’s oil and gas supply.
A Pakistani source and another source briefed on the mediation said an agreement was close on a one-page memorandum that would formally end the conflict. That would kick off discussions to unblock shipping through the strait, lift US sanctions on Iran, and set curbs on Iran‘s nuclear program, the sources said.
It was unclear how the memorandum differs from a 14-point plan proposed by Iran last week, and Iran has yet to respond to the latest US proposal.
Iran‘s semi-official Tasnim news agency, citing an unnamed source, said the US proposal contained some unacceptable provisions, without specifying which ones.
Iranian lawmaker Ebrahim Rezaei, a spokesperson for parliament’s powerful foreign policy and national security committee, described the text as “more of an American wish-list than a reality.”
“The Americans will not gain anything in a war they are losing that they have not gained in face-to-face negotiations,” he wrote on social media.
OIL PRICES TUMBLE
Reports of a possible agreement caused global oil prices to tumble to two-week lows, with benchmark Brent crude futures falling around 11% to around $98 a barrel at one point before rising back above the $100 mark.
Global share prices also leapt and bond yields fell on optimism about an end to a war that has disrupted energy supplies.
Trump on Tuesday paused a two-day-old naval mission to reopen the blockaded strait, citing progress in peace talks.
The US military has kept up its own blockade on Iranian ships in the region. US Central Command said forces fired at an unladen Iranian-flagged tanker on Wednesday, disabling the vessel as it attempted to sail toward an Iranian port in violation of the blockade.
NO MENTION OF KEY US DEMANDS
The source briefed on the mediation said the US negotiations were being led by Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner. If both sides agreed on the preliminary deal, that would start the clock on 30 days of detailed negotiations to reach a full agreement.
The full agreement would end the competing US and Iranian blockades on the strait, lift US sanctions, and release frozen Iranian funds. It would also include some curbs on Iran‘s nuclear program, with the aim of a pause or moratorium on Iranian enrichment of uranium.
While the sources said the memorandum would not initially require concessions from either side, they did not mention several key demands Washington has made in the past, which Iran has rejected, such as curbs on Iran‘s missile program and an end to its support for proxy militias in the Middle East.
The sources also made no mention of Iran‘s existing stockpile of more than 400 kg (900 pounds) of near-weapons-grade uranium.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump’s ally against Iran, said on Wednesday the two leaders agreed that all enriched uranium must be removed from Iran to prevent it from developing a nuclear bomb.
Tehran denies wanting to acquire a nuclear weapon.
Uncategorized
Brussels cathedral installs plaques apologizing for medieval antisemitic persecution depicted in stained glass
(JTA) — More than 650 years after Jews in Brussels were executed and expelled following false antisemitic accusations, church officials at the Cathedral of St. Michael and St. Gudula have installed a plaque apologizing for the persecution commemorated in its stained glass windows.
At a ceremony on April 27, Archbishop Luc Terlinden of Mechelen-Brussels and Rabbi Albert Guigui, the chief rabbi of Brussels, unveiled four plaques, written in Dutch, French, English and Hebrew, providing historical context for the windows and an apology for the antisemitic persecution tied to the events they depict.
The plaques, which Terlinden signed, state that “baseless accusations of the desecration of the Eucharistic host were made against Jewish communities” in medieval Europe and that the accusations “led to persecution, massacres, and unjustifiable expulsions.” The windows show Jews being executed at the stake in response to their alleged attacks on the Eucharist, bread that Catholic doctrine considers a literal representation of Jesus’ body.
“Theological and social anti-Judaism is in direct contradiction with the Gospel of Christ, which calls for truth, justice, and brotherhood,” the plaques say. “We ask forgiveness from the Jewish people for the suffering these accusations have caused.”
The stained glass windows in the cathedral depict the “Brussels Host Desecration,” an antisemitic accusation in 1370 that Jews had desecrated communion wafers, leading to the execution of Jews in Brussels and the expulsion of the city’s Jewish community.
The windows have drawn scrutiny for decades, particularly as the Catholic Church sought to reckon with its history of antisemitism. In 1969, shortly after the landmark Nostra Aetate declaration rejecting longstanding anti-Jewish Catholic doctrine, the Archbishop of Brussels ordered that several paintings be removed and a plaque be mounted to offer context about the remaining depictions.
Several years later, the European Jewish Congress noted last week, Catholic leaders did install a plaque that drew readers’ attention to “the biased nature of the accusations [against the Jews accused of the desecration] and to the legendary presentation of the ‘miracle.’”
But Flora Cassen, the director of the Brandeis Center for Jewish Studies and a scholar of European antisemitism, said the existing plaque was “very ambiguous about the responsibility and what happened” and installed in an easy-to-miss location. The new plaques, she said, contain a clear and “very moving” apology and cannot be missed by anyone who comes to see the windows.
“The significance is enormous of the church finally putting a plaque there that tells the story, that acknowledges the antisemitism behind it, that acknowledges that it was a slander and that it resulted in persecution and in the execution of Jews in Brussels and their expulsion,” Cassen said.
The new plaques cite Nostra Aetate and the Catholic Church’s subsequent effort under Pope John Paul II to reckon with historical antisemitism in 2000. They affirm the church’s “commitment to combat all forms of antisemitism, to deepen dialogue between Jews and Christians, and to pass on to future generations a clear remembrance, based on the acknowledgement of truth and mutual respect.”
While some have called for the historic windows to be removed, Guigui said in a statement that the plaques represented an appropriate way to address relics of historical antisemitism.
“What matters today is how we look at these images,” the rabbi said. “They must not be erased, because they are part of history, but they must be accompanied by explanation and moral insight in order to understand the context and avoid repeating past mistakes.”
The post Brussels cathedral installs plaques apologizing for medieval antisemitic persecution depicted in stained glass appeared first on The Forward.