Connect with us

Uncategorized

Is this Netanyahu’s Winston Churchill moment?

Much of Israeli society is living with a profound cognitive dissonance, one that few articulate openly and many would rather not confront.

On one hand, there is a broad and deeply felt desire to see the jihadist Iranian regime weakened or deposed. On the other, there is a pervasive fear that any success on that front will redound to the political benefit of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

A boost significant enough to keep Netanyahu in power would prolong a domestic trajectory that many Israelis consider to be existentially dangerous. Within my own circles, I have seen a growing conviction that this trajectory poses such a profound threat to the country’s ability to survive that fears about it should dwarf fears of any external foe — including Iran.

The idea is that the entrenchment of Netanyahu’s right-religious bloc challenges the liberal-democratic foundations of the state in a way that is for many people foundational. As a consequence, should it truly and irreversibly prevail, many people expect that they or their children will leave the country.

A popular war

To be clear: most Israelis do support the war. The Iranian regime has posed a threat for decades. Its stated hatred for Israel, its sponsorship of armed proxies devoted to harassing the Jewish state, and its nuclear program have defined Israel’s strategic environment for decades.

Even if the regime does not fall, the consensus position in Israel holds that hitting it carries real value. Setting an enemy regime back is worthwhile; so is creating space for the Iranian people to overthrow their oppressors — although no such domestic movement has manifested since the onset of war.

That consensus creates a willingness to sacrifice. But within Israel’s productive classes — the several million people responsible for the technological miracle known collectively as Start-Up Nation — there is a growing fear that some of the sacrifices to which this war might lead may prove to be too dear.

History offers examples of leaders who converted battlefield achievements into electoral advantage, reshaping their nations in the process. If Netanyahu, who is facing elections this year, succeeds in doing the same, the consequences for Israel could be severe.

Netanyahu’s efforts to establish an authoritarian regime might move forward; his pandering to the Haredim, whose rapid growth risks creating a devastating demographic crisis, would continue; and any prospect for a lasting future peace with the Palestinians would fade away. Emboldened by once more scraping out an electoral victory, the Netanyahu coalition, which depends on the messianic settler lobby, would keep expanding settlements in the West Bank. It might succeed in making the attachment of that territory to Israel irreversible.

Without offering the millions of Palestinians who live in the West Bank citizenship, charges of apartheid, including from liberal Israeli Jews, will grow. Israel will become a non-democratic and totally binational state at permanent war with itself.

Is potentially sacrificing the country’s democracy worth it to defeat — or temporarily hamstring — a bitter foe?

A looming mass departure

For many Israelis, the answer will be no. Although this prospect is heartbreaking, it is being seriously discussed as something close to an inevitability if Netanyahu spins this war into a renewed grasp on power.

The good news: Right now, the Netanyahu coalition is significantly behind in the polls. That’s true even though he can already, in a way, claim success: even if the war ends now, Iran’s regime will have been degraded and humiliated, its military power and nuclear program set back considerably.

Israeli public opinion has defied easy assumptions. The current polls have remained strikingly stable since before the war, despite Israel’s remarkable military successes. This stability hints at a public capable of distinguishing between the campaign in Iran and the desirability of the country’s current path.

This duality offers a way out of the current bind. It allows Israelis to support efforts that genuinely enhance national security without conceding the domestic future.

How does a country survive?

I hope that continuing skepticism about Netanyahu suggests that Israelis see a deeper principle at stake in these elections: the sense that the country’s worth lies not only in its survival, but also in its nature.

There is a perhaps useful analogy from recent history. Netanyahu has long admired Winston Churchill and frequently invokes him in his speeches. He celebrates how Churchill stood uncompromising before external threats. Indeed, Churchill won admiration for his style, and gets much credit for the Allies’ victory in the war against Nazi Germany.

Yet soon after the war’s end he was unceremoniously turfed out by British voters. They understood that their post-war domestic concerns required something a little different. More blood, toil, sweat and tears wouldn’t cut it.

If Netanyahu wishes to be the Israeli Churchill, then he may get that wish — just not quite in the manner he’d hoped. Democracies are shaped by choices, and sometimes those choices become a test of maturity. Israel’s voters are about to show us whether, when it comes to Netanyahu, they’re really ready to grow up.

The post Is this Netanyahu’s Winston Churchill moment? appeared first on The Forward.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

New Report Reveals Rampant Human Rights Abuses in Iran as Activists Warn of Another Wave of Mass Executions

People attend Eid al-Fitr prayers, marking the end of Muslim holy fasting month of Ramadan, amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 21, 2026. Photo: Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS

A new report reveals the widespread scale of human rights abuses in Iran over the past year, as activists warn the regime may carry out another wave of mass executions to suppress growing opposition amid deepening unrest.

The Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA), an independent group monitoring Iran, released a report last week, timed for Nowruz, the Persian New Year, outlining a deeply concerning human rights situation over the past 12 months, citing crackdowns on protesters, harassment of activists, threats to minorities, executions of children, violations of women’s rights, and dire prison conditions.

According to HRANA’s Statistics and Documentation Center, 78,907 people were arrested on ideological or political grounds from March 2025 to March 2026, highlighting a pervasive climate of repression across the country.

But the report warns that the number of arrests is likely much higher, given the difficulty of tracking such cases — especially earlier this year during recent nationwide anti-government protests, which security forces violently crushed, leaving thousands of demonstrators tortured or killed.

HRANA reports that at least 6,724 protesters, including 236 children, were killed during these protests, with an additional 11,744 cases still under verification. Multiple reports have put the death toll at over 30,000.

During the regime’s violent crackdown, the group also recorded 25,877 people sustaining serious injuries, with 53,777 arrests occurring on just Jan. 8 and 9 alone.

On women’s rights, HRANA reports that 105 women were murdered, including seven so-called “honor killings” — murders committed under the pretext of preserving family honor — and documents 68 cases of rape or sexual abuse.

Recent media reports indicate that Iranian security forces raped and tortured medical staff who treated wounded anti-regime protesters during the country’s nationwide uprising in January, targeting them in a campaign of intimidation against those aiding demonstrators.

As in past years, executions remain one of the starkest manifestations of human rights abuses in Iran, with at least 2,488 people executed last year, including 63 women and two children, 13 of them carried out publicly.

According to a report by Harm Reduction International (HRI), a global organization tracking drug policy and human rights, 955 people were executed for drug-related offenses in 2025 — an average of roughly three per day — with over 1,000 more currently on death row.

Nearly one in four of those executed were from ethnic minority groups, more than one in five were foreign nationals, and the majority were poor, accused of minor drug offenses, and denied proper legal protections, the report notes.

As the regime continues its campaign of executions, the report says at least 222 children have been left without parents.

United Nations Special Rapporteur on human rights in Iran Mai Sato denounced the regime’s brutal treatment of individuals accused of drug crimes, highlighting the disproportionate impact on vulnerable families.

“Many of the drugs-related cases in Iran involve young fathers from minority ethnic backgrounds experiencing economic hardship who face not only execution but also confiscation of their limited assets – including family homes and farmland – devastating their families long after their execution,” Sato said in a statement.

According to HRI’s latest report, at least 65 executions were carried out in secret without prior notice, denying families the chance to say goodbye, and some occurred despite ongoing legal proceedings.

Iranian security forces also systematically used coercion and torture, while denying prisoners access to legal counsel, to force illegitimate confessions.

HRI also reports that under Iran’s Islamic Penal Code, the principle of elm‑e‑qazi — which allows judges to determine guilt based solely on circumstantial evidence without confessions or witnesses — is frequently applied arbitrarily.

With an increasing number of reports exposing the scale of systematic abuses across the country, human rights groups are warning that the death toll may climb sharply, with over 100 detainees at risk of execution.

Last week, three young Iranian men, including 19-year-old wrestling champion Saleh Mohammadi, were executed as the regime intensifies its crackdown on dissent, The Associated Press reported.

Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, head of Oslo-based Iran Human Rights, told the AP the executions are “intended to instill fear in society and deter new protests” amid deepening unrest. 

On Monday, Iran’s judiciary confirmed that cases tied to the January protests have reached final verdicts and warned that those convicted would face no leniency.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

‘Verbal sparring’ at a conference for religious Jews breaking from Israel orthodoxy? That’s not what I experienced

To the editors:

The Forward‘s article about the recent Smol Emuni conference seems to describe a different event than the one that I attended. There were certainly different viewpoints among the people assembled at the gathering for religious Jews who, per the organization’s mission, seek “justice, equality, and dignity for Jews and Palestinians.” And there were views and perspectives shared that felt challenging or even difficult to hear.

But to assert, as the Forward‘s article did, that the conference was riven by strife and anger is simply not true.

The basis of the article’s claim, and the focus of a flurry of subsequent op-eds and blog posts, was Rabbi Saul Berman’s address to open the afternoon session. Berman used his remarks to criticize the Palestinian activist who had spoken in the morning; in doing so, he invoked a broad, monochromatic description of Islamic theology that felt out of place to some of us, including me.

Berman argued that Islamic Law prohibits any territorial concession, suggesting that Islamic law, but not Jewish law, continues to make peace impossible. The implication that Jewish theology has not blocked work toward peace is quite problematic, given the central role of religious leaders and communities in building settlements and in right-wing politics in Israel.

It is precisely this line of argument that many came to this conference to escape. In too many Jewish communities, it feels impossible to acknowledge the ways in which Judaism has contributed to Palestinian suffering and injustice. Smol Emuni was created in part to end that silence. That is why Berman’s words felt jarring.

But reading the Forward‘s article, one might think that Berman spoke with anger or that the audience actively derided him.

In fact, Berman spoke for close to 20 minutes. As far as I could see, everyone listened to him attentively. Most of the audience applauded when he concluded; I heard no boos. While a few people came and went during his remarks, as is the case at any such event, I saw no evidence that anyone “walked out in protest.”

One of the organizers did feel the need to note, after Berman concluded, that the conference organizers specifically did not share all of his views. She did so gracefully, while thanking him warmly for speaking and affirming her deep respect for him. I do not know how Berman felt, but he was not visibly angered and he stayed for the remainder of the program.

It was an awkward moment, to be sure, but not one of rancor or disrespect. It certainly did not define the conference, which elevated a range of important voices and viewpoints that I found both thoughtful and thought-provoking.

The post ‘Verbal sparring’ at a conference for religious Jews breaking from Israel orthodoxy? That’s not what I experienced appeared first on The Forward.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Iran Launches Missile Featuring Poster Thanking Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez

An Iranian missile carries a poster of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, featuring a message in Farsi and English thanking him for condemning the war and praising Tehran. Photo: Screenshot

Iran has launched a missile toward “US-Israeli assets” bearing a poster thanking Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez for what it portrayed as his support for the regime and condemnation of the ongoing US-Israeli military campaign in the Middle East.

According to Iranian state-owned and semi-official media, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) on Sunday released footage of a missile carrying a poster of the Spanish leader, thanking him for his message of solidarity as part of one of the regime’s latest propaganda moves.

“We praise the Spanish minister who calls this war illegal. We say: not only is this war illegal, it is also inhuman. Thank you, Prime Minister,” the poster reads, featuring a portrait of Sánchez in both Farsi and English.

Ahead of a European Union summit in Brussels last week, Sánchez once again denounced the ongoing war against Iran, saying Madrid “has condemned the war from the very first moment” and describing the US-Israeli operations against the regime as “illegal.”

As diplomatic ties between Madrid and both Washington and Jerusalem fray over Spain’s refusal to back the US–Israeli offensive and its increasingly outspoken posture on the conflict, Israel’s Foreign Ministry blasted the move as a troubling alignment with Tehran’s narrative.

“Pedro Sánchez – Iran’s mullah regime is thanking you by putting your words on the missiles it fires at civilians in Israel and the Arab world,” the statement read.

“How does it feel knowing your face & words are on these missiles?” it continued. “Keep in mind that Europe – including Spain – is within range of these missiles.”

In one of its most recent moves, the Spanish government blocked the United States from using its bases for military operations against the Islamist regime, prompting US President Donald Trump to threaten Madrid with the suspension of trade ties.

Iran earlier this month praised Spain for its decision.

Since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023, Spain has become one of Israel’s fiercest critics, a stance that has only intensified in recent months, coinciding with a shocking rise in antisemitic incidents targeting the local Jewish community — from violent assaults and vandalism to protests and legal actions.

From unilaterally recognizing a Palestinian state to repeatedly branding the war in Gaza a “genocide,” Sánchez has spearheaded an aggressive diplomatic campaign aimed at undermining and isolating the Jewish state on the international stage.

Most recently, Spain permanently withdrew its ambassador from Israel, further straining relations and garnering the praise of the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas.

Last year, the Spanish government announced a ban on imports from hundreds of Israeli communities in the West Bank, eastern Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights.

In September, Spain passed a law to take “urgent measures to stop the genocide in Gaza,” banning trade in defense material and dual-use products from Israel, as well as imports and advertising of products originating from Israeli settlements.

Spanish officials also announced that they would bar entry to individuals involved in what they called a “genocide against Palestinians” and block Israel-bound ships and aircraft carrying weapons from Spanish ports and airspace.

As the local Jewish community continues to face an increasingly hostile climate and targeted violence, Sánchez has drawn mounting criticism from political opponents and Jewish leaders who accuse his rhetoric of fueling antisemitic hostility across the country.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News