RSS
A Foundation Led by a Terror Sympathizer Is Waging Lawfare Against Israel
International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan speaks during an interview with Reuters in The Hague, Netherlands, Feb. 12, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Piroschka van de Wouw
The Hind Rajab Foundation (HRF) — a Belgium-based advocacy organization — is hunting IDF soldiers and government officials all over the world, attempting to manipulate the international legal system to arrest and prosecute Israelis for alleged crimes.
Today, the HRF is primarily targeting Israelis, but it is also establishing a dangerous precedent, whereby organizations with a radical agenda could use the same legal playbook to persecute US and NATO troops in the future.
In July, HRF submitted its most recent complaint to the International Criminal Court (ICC), after the IDF targeted Al Jazeera reporter Anas al Sharif — who Israel says was moonlighting as a Hamas operative.
The complaint accuses IDF members allegedly involved in Sharif’s death of war crimes and genocide. The complaint goes on to urge the ICC to issue arrest warrants for the IDF members.
Since its founding in 2024, HRF has filed several complaints against Israelis with the ICC, including a sweeping complaint in October 2024 that identified 1,000 IDF soldiers purportedly involved in the war in Gaza.
According to HRF, the organization submitted 8,000 pieces of “verifiable evidence … including videos, audio recordings, forensic reports, and social media documentation” that allegedly document the guilt of the named soldiers. Included in the list were 12 unwitting American dual nationals.
While framed as the pursuit of justice under international law, HRF’s campaign is grounded in hatred. The group’s founder, Dyab Abou Jahjah, has been open and on the record for more than two decades regarding his affinity for terrorists, as well as his antisemitic, anti-American, and anti-Israeli beliefs.
Abou Jahjah admitted to joining Hezbollah as a young man, where he claims to have received military training. He has used social media to amplify messages from former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah. Shortly after 9/11, Abou Jahjah voiced his animosity towards the United States, saying that the attacks elicited feelings of “sweet revenge.” The following year, Belgian authorities arrested Abou Jahjah for his involvement in riots.
In 2005, Abou Jahjah agreed with former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that wiping Israel off the map was the “only possible moral position.” He has repeatedly glorified armed resistance, and was eventually fired in 2017 from his position with a Belgian newspaper for praising the slaying of four Israeli soldiers. In addition to its efforts at the ICC, HRF has attempted to spur the prosecution of Israelis in more than 20 countries.
HRF’s methodology for building cases against IDF soldiers is to comb through the targets’ social media accounts, collecting data to use in complaints. Meanwhile, the group monitors the soldiers’ movements, filing cases in foreign jurisdictions, as the IDF soldiers travel abroad. The organization’s efforts have also included an attempt to extradite Israelis from Nepal, and a request to Interpol to flag an Israeli citizen for apprehension.
This approach has generated some results: authorities in Lima, Peru, opened a criminal case against an IDF soldier, and Belgian authorities questioned two Israeli citizens at a music festival near Antwerp. However, none of HRF’s cases have resulted in a successful prosecution — yet.
HRF’s attempts to trigger a prosecution at the ICC should be of special concern to the United States, which — like Israel — decided not to join the ICC when it was formed, fearing that it would become a venue for lawfare. The US Congress was so concerned with the threat of ICC judicial overreach that in 2001 it passed a law authorizing the president to “use all means necessary” to liberate Americans held by the ICC.
Meanwhile, the ICC has shown it is determined to find ways to prosecute troops from countries that are not parties to the court’s founding treaty.
In 2017, the ICC announced that it would proceed with an investigation of US troops that it said committed war crimes in Afghanistan. The court argued that since Afghanistan was part of the ICC, Americans in Afghanistan were subject to its jurisdiction.
The ICC has extended that argument to Israel, claiming that because the unrecognized “State of Palestine” is an ICC member, IDF troops in Gaza are subject to the court’s jurisdiction. HRF seeks to turn that theory into reality by serving up defendants for the ICC to prosecute.
The Trump administration commendably fought back against the ICC’s overreach with Executive Orders in its first and second administrations, authorizing a series of sanctions against members of the court, with four additional ICC officials sanctioned in August.
Now, the administration should turn its attention to HRF. First, there are grounds to investigate the ties to Hezbollah of HRF and its founder Abou Jahjah, with an eye to imposing sanctions under Executive Order 13224 (as amended), which authorizes sanctions on terrorists and their material supporters, agents, and trainees. Second, HRF could be subject to sanctions if it meets the criteria laid out in Executive Order 14203, which applies to those who have “directly engaged in” or “materially assisted” the ICC pursuit of targets from countries that are not members of the court.
By standing on principle today, when the court is targeting Israelis, the US government can ensure that Americans do not become the court’s targets tomorrow.
Enia Krivine is the senior director of the Israel Program and the National Security Network at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Follow her on X @EKrivine.
RSS
‘Make Zionists Afraid’: Pro-Hamas Agitators in Germany Vandalize Gov’t Buildings, Intimidate Local Business
Anti-Israel protesters march in Germany, March 26, 2025. Photo: Sebastian Willnow/dpa via Reuters Connect
Pro-Hamas agitators in Germany carried out a series of antisemitic attacks this week, vandalizing government offices and targeting a Berlin bar with death threats and intimidation.
On Tuesday, an antisemitic flyer began circulating in Berlin, targeting the owners of Bajszel, a local bar in the city’s southeastern Neukölln neighborhood, with threats of violence and death, German media reported.
Since the start of the war in Gaza, the local bar — which hosts cultural programs and political events dedicated to fighting antisemitism — has been repeatedly targeted, with customers and staff threatened as “Jewish child killers” and the establishment repeatedly vandalized.
In this latest targeted incident, unknown individuals plastered flyers on the bar’s facade bearing the headline “Make Zionists Afraid.” Designed like a wanted poster, the handout showed photos of the three owners, each stamped with an inverted red triangle, which Hamas has used in its propaganda videos to indicate Israeli targets about to be attacked. The symbol has become a demonstration of support for the Palestinian terrorist group amid the war in Gaza.
The flyer accused the owners of “openly expressing their support for the colonial state of Israel” through the events they host at their bar.
“Anyone who sides with the perpetrators of genocide should feel unsafe everywhere. We want these three to be silenced forever and serve as a warning to all Zionists in Berlin and Neukölln,” the flyer read, referring to the bar’s owners.
The handout also included the antisemitic phrase “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” — a popular slogan among anti-Israel activists that has been widely interpreted as a genocidal call for the destruction of the Jewish state, which is located between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.
Local authorities have launched a criminal investigation into the incident, but no arrests have been made so far.
Volker Beck, president of the German-Israeli Society, strongly condemned the attack, calling on law enforcement to act swiftly and urging immediate protection for the bar’s owners.
“Supporting Israel … should never put anyone’s life in danger. The antisemitic death threats against Bajszel in Berlin-Neukölln are completely unacceptable,” Beck said in a statement.
“Threatening people … with death for openly expressing their loyalty to Israel is a form of everyday terrorism that cannot be tolerated,” he continued.
In a separate incident on Thursday, the office of Germany’s center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) in Württemberg-Hohenzollern, a southwestern region of the country, was vandalized with antisemitic slogans. This marks one of the latest in a string of attacks by anti-Israel protesters targeting CDU offices nationwide.
Unknown perpetrators covered the office facade in red paint, scrawling messages such as “Accomplice,” “Stop the Genocide,” and “Flotilla Sumud.”
On Wednesday, the CDU building in Göttingen, a central German city, was vandalized, with several windows smashed and antisemitic slogans scrawled across the facade.
The perpetrators spray-painted slogans on the walls, including “Free Palestine,” “From the River to the Sea,” “Kill Zionists,” and “FCK CDU.”
Anti-Israel demonstrators even vandalized the German Foreign Ministry in Berlin-Mitte, covering the facade with red paint and scrawling antisemitic slogans.
Shortly after this incident, a pro-Palestinian demonstration was held outside the Foreign Ministry, where protesters chanted slogans such as “Free Palestine,” “Genocide,” and “All of Berlin hates the police.”
Berlin: Aktivisten beschmieren Auswärtiges Amt mit roter Farbe
Mehrere Aktivisten haben am Donnerstag die Fassade des Auswärtigen Amtes in Berlin mit roter Farbe beschmiert. Zudem sei ein Schriftzug angebracht worden. Dieser soll einen Bezug zum Nahost-Konflikt aufweisen. pic.twitter.com/dgPBqL5lHv
— TAVI (@xTAVIx) October 2, 2025
According to local authorities, an investigation has been launched into these latest incidents, and four activists have been arrested in connection with them.
Carina Hermann, chair of CDU’s municipal association, strongly condemned the recent wave of violence and vandalism, calling for immediate measures to ensure public safety.
“With broken windows, political slogans, and destroyed locks, the goal is to silence opposing voices and intimidate them with all the force possible,” Hermann said in a statement. “This is no longer a simple protest; it is a direct attack by extremists who have no regard for democracy or free discourse.”
In recent weeks, CDU offices in Hanover, Oldenburg, and other cities have also been vandalized. In Göttingen, additional buildings — including those of the Social Democratic Party of Germany — have been defaced.
RSS
Democrats More Likely to Vote for Lawmakers Who Oppose US Military Aid to Israel, Poll Finds
US Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA). Photo: Bryan Olin Dozier/NurPhoto via Reuters Connect
Voters who support the Democratic Party in the US are increasingly open to candidates who oppose American military assistance to Israel, according to a new poll from the Institute for Middle East Understanding (IMEU) Policy Project, an organization critical of the Jewish state and supportive of the Palestinian cause
The survey, conducted in partnership with YouGov, found that 57 percent of Democrats indicated they would be more likely to vote in the 2026 midterm elections for a member of Congress who opposed sending billions of dollars in weapons to Israel, while 9 percent stated they would be less likely and 34 percent said it would make no difference. The poll also showed that 55 percent of Democratic voters would look favorably on a lawmaker sponsoring the Block the Bombs Act, legislation aimed at restricting certain arms sales to Israel.
The Block the Bombs Act, sponsored by progressive Democratic Reps. Delia Ramirez (IL), Marc Pocan (WI), Sara Jacobs (CA), and Pramila Jayapal (WA), would restrict the transfer of offensive weapons to Israel. The legislation, if enacted, would only allow the transfer of offensive weapons to Israel if Congress passed a law outlining the scenarios in which they could be deployed. Jerusalem would also be mandated to provide written assurances that the weapons would be used in accordance with international law.
According to the new poll, a striking 71 percent of Democrats said they would prefer to support a presidential candidate in the 2028 election who “voted to withhold weapons to Israel. In comparison, 10 percent responded they would rather back someone who “voted against withholding weapons to Israel,” and 19 percent were not sure.
The poll, which was released on Friday, surveyed 1,221 registered voters who said they typically participate in Democratic primaries from Sept. 11–24, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
While the results pointed to growing opposition to Israel within the Democratic activist base, critics noted on social media that IMEU’s framing of the questions, such as invoking the South African apartheid analogy in related surveys, may misrepresent responses in ways that do not mirror broader public sentiment.
In Washington, support for Israel remains one of the few issues that consistently draws bipartisan consensus. Congress has continued to approve annual military aid packages to the Jewish state by wide margins, and US President Donald Trump has repeatedly affirmed his administration’s commitment to Israel’s security, describing the partnership as vital for both American interests and regional stability.
Polling from Gallup and Pew has also found that while Democratic voters are more divided over Israel than Republicans, the US public overall maintains a broadly favorable view of Israel and the US-Israel relationship.
RSS
Hamas Agrees to Release All Israeli Hostages Under Trump Gaza Plan, Seeks Negotiations Over Other Terms
Palestinian Hamas terrorists stand guard on the day of the handover of hostages held in Gaza since the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attack, as part of a ceasefire and a hostages-prisoners swap deal between Hamas and Israel, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, Feb. 22, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Hatem Khaled
The Palestinian terrorist group Hamas said on Friday it had agreed to release all Israeli hostages, alive or dead, under the terms of US President Donald Trump’s Gaza proposal, and signaled readiness to immediately enter mediated negotiations to discuss the details.
Hamas, which has ruled Gaza for nearly two decades, started the current war in the enclave with its Oct. 7, 2023, invasion of and massacre across southern Israel. The Islamist group said it would agree to some aspects of Trump’s plan to end the Gaza war, including releasing hostages and handing over administration of the enclave, but that it would seek negotiations over many of its other terms.
In a copy of the statement seen by Reuters, Hamas issued its response to Trump’s 20-point plan after the US president gave the Palestinian terrorist group until Sunday to accept or reject the proposal. Trump has not said whether the terms would be subject to negotiation, as Hamas is seeking.
Notably, Hamas did not say whether it would agree to a stipulation that it disarm, a demand by Israel and the US that it has previously rejected.
In its statement, Hamas said it “appreciates the Arab, Islamic, and international efforts, as well as the efforts of US President Donald Trump, calling for an end to the war on the Gaza Strip, the exchange of prisoners, [and] the immediate entry of aid,” among other terms.
It said it was announcing its “approval of releasing all occupation prisoners — both living and remains — according to the exchange formula contained in President Trump’s proposal, with the necessary field conditions for implementing the exchange.”
But Hamas added: “In this context, the movement affirms its readiness to immediately enter, through the mediators, into negotiations to discuss the details.”
The group said it was ready “to hand over the administration of the Gaza Strip to a Palestinian body of independents [technocrats] based on Palestinian national consensus and supported by Arab and Islamic backing.”
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Hamas’s response to the proposal, which is backed by Israel as well as Arab and European powers.
Trump’s plan specifies an immediate ceasefire, an exchange of all hostages held by Hamas for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel, a staged Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, the disarmament of Hamas, and the introduction of a transitional government led by an international body.