RSS
America Must Stand Up to Iran’s Nuclear Threat — Before It’s Too Late
Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov shakes hands with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi during a meeting in Tehran, Iran, Feb. 25, 2025. Photo: Russian Foreign Ministry/Handout via REUTERS
The specter of a nuclear-armed Iran looms larger than ever, with Tehran aggressively advancing its uranium enrichment program and openly defying international pressure.
Despite previous diplomatic efforts and economic sanctions, Iran’s nuclear ambitions remain unchecked, posing a dire threat to regional stability and global security. At the heart of this crisis lies an urgent question: will the United States stand firmly against this threat — and stand firmly beside its closest Middle Eastern ally, Israel, to prevent an existential catastrophe?
Iran’s nuclear program has entered a dangerous new phase, with intelligence reports indicating uranium enrichment nearing weapons-grade levels. The Islamic Republic has long claimed that its nuclear activities are for peaceful purposes, but the evidence suggests otherwise. The fact that Iran continues to develop ballistic missile technology — capable of carrying nuclear warheads — only reinforces the fears of its adversaries.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has dismissed military threats against Iran’s nuclear facilities, asserting that “Iran’s nuclear program cannot be destroyed through military operations. .. this is a technology that we have achieved, and the technology is in the brains and cannot be bombed.” Such rhetoric reflects Iran’s growing confidence in its ability to defy the international community, while steadily advancing its nuclear capabilities.
Israel has never shied away from taking decisive action against hostile nations seeking nuclear weapons. In 1981, Israeli fighter jets carried out Operation Opera, destroying Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor. A similar strike was executed in 2007, when Israel bombed Syria’s nuclear reactor in Deir ez-Zor. These operations were not just acts of military aggression, but calculated moves to protect Israel’s very survival — and the security of the entire region.
Now, with Iran inching closer to nuclear breakout capacity, Israeli officials are signaling that time is running out. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has reiterated that Israel will not allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons, even if it means launching a unilateral military strike. The stakes are clear: a nuclear-armed Iran would embolden its proxies — Hezbollah, Hamas, and other terrorist organizations — to escalate attacks on Israel, destabilizing the entire region. And, of course, Iran has promised to destroy Israel, and complete a complete genocide against its people.
For decades, the United States has been Israel’s most steadfast ally, providing military aid, intelligence-sharing, and diplomatic backing. However, Iran’s nuclear advancements present a new test for Washington. President Donald Trump’s recent letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, offering negotiations for a nuclear deal, has been met with outright rejection. While diplomatic solutions should always be explored, history has shown that Iran only responds to strength, not appeasement.
Speaking in the Oval Office, Trump laid out the stark choice facing Tehran. “There are two ways Iran can be handled, militarily or you make a deal,” he told Fox News. “I would prefer to make a deal, because I’m not looking to hurt Iran. They’re great people. I know so many Iranians from this country.”
However, Iran’s Supreme Leader dismissed the offer, stating that “the insistence of some bullying governments to negotiate is not to solve problems, but to impose their own expectations.” His rejection signals that Iran remains uninterested in direct negotiations with Washington, a stance that further complicates efforts to curb its nuclear ambitions.
Yet, there is a small window for engagement. Iran’s UN mission recently indicated a willingness to discuss the “militarization” of its nuclear program, while rejecting outright dismantlement. This ambiguous position suggests Tehran may be open to negotiations only on its own terms — terms unlikely to satisfy the United States or Israel.
The consequences of failing to counter Iran’s nuclear ambitions extend far beyond Israel. A nuclear-armed Iran could trigger a regional arms race, with countries like Saudi Arabia and Turkey seeking their own nuclear capabilities in response. This would dismantle decades of non-proliferation efforts and heighten the risk of nuclear conflict in an already volatile region.
Moreover, an emboldened Iran would pose a direct threat to American interests. Iran has already demonstrated its willingness to attack US military bases and disrupt global energy markets through proxy warfare. If Iran acquires nuclear weapons, these threats would become exponentially more dangerous, as the country would operate with the ultimate deterrent against any retaliation.
The US must move beyond empty diplomatic gestures and take decisive action to counter Iran’s nuclear threat. This means strengthening Israel’s military capabilities, enforcing crippling economic sanctions on Iran, and ensuring that all options — including military intervention — remain on the table.
Backing Israel in this critical moment is not just about supporting an ally — it is about safeguarding global security and preventing a nuclear-armed rogue state from dictating the balance of power in the Middle East. A failure to act decisively now could lead to irreversible consequences, not only for Israel but for the entire world.
Iran’s nuclear ambitions must be met with an unequivocal response. The United States must do whatever it takes to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran, using every means necessary to ensure Tehran does not cross the red line. While diplomacy has a role to play, history has shown that only a firm, unwavering stance backed by credible military deterrence can force Iran to abandon its nuclear aspirations. Time is running out, and hesitation is not an option.
Amine Ayoub, a Middle East Forum fellow, is a policy analyst and writer based in Morocco.
The post America Must Stand Up to Iran’s Nuclear Threat — Before It’s Too Late first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Syria’s Sharaa Says Talks With Israel Could Yield Results ‘In Coming Days’
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa speaks at the opening ceremony of the 62nd Damascus International Fair, the first edition held since the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, in Damascus, Syria, Aug. 27, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi
Syria’s President Ahmed al-Sharaa said on Wednesday that ongoing negotiations with Israel to reach a security pact could lead to results “in the coming days.”
He told reporters in Damascus the security pact was a “necessity” and that it would need to respect Syria’s airspace and territorial unity and be monitored by the United Nations.
Syria and Israel are in talks to reach an agreement that Damascus hopes will secure a halt to Israeli airstrikes and the withdrawal of Israeli troops who have pushed into southern Syria.
Reuters reported this week that Washington was pressuring Syria to reach a deal before world leaders gather next week for the UN General Assembly in New York.
But Sharaa, in a briefing with journalists including Reuters ahead of his expected trip to New York to attend the meeting, denied the US was putting any pressure on Syria and said instead that it was playing a mediating role.
He said Israel had carried out more than 1,000 strikes on Syria and conducted more than 400 ground incursions since Dec. 8, when the rebel offensive he led toppled former Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad.
Sharaa said Israel’s actions were contradicting the stated American policy of a stable and unified Syria, which he said was “very dangerous.”
He said Damascus was seeking a deal similar to a 1974 disengagement agreement between Israel and Syria that created a demilitarized zone between the two countries.
He said Syria sought the withdrawal of Israeli troops but that Israel wanted to remain at strategic locations it seized after Dec. 8, including Mount Hermon. Israeli ministers have publicly said Israel intends to keep control of the sites.
He said if the security pact succeeds, other agreements could be reached. He did not provide details, but said a peace agreement or normalization deal like the US-mediated Abraham Accords, under which several Muslim-majority countries agreed to normalize diplomatic ties with Israel, was not currently on the table.
He also said it was too early to discuss the fate of the Golan Heights because it was “a big deal.”
Reuters reported this week that Israel had ruled out handing back the zone, which Donald Trump unilaterally recognized as Israeli during his first term as US president.
“It’s a difficult case – you have negotiations between a Damascene and a Jew,” Sharaa told reporters, smiling.
SECURITY PACT DERAILED IN JULY
Sharaa also said Syria and Israel had been just “four to five days” away from reaching the basis of a security pact in July, but that developments in the southern province of Sweida had derailed those discussions.
Syrian troops were deployed to Sweida in July to quell fighting between Druze armed factions and Bedouin fighters. But the violence worsened, with Syrian forces accused of execution-style killings and Israel striking southern Syria, the defense ministry in Damascus and near the presidential palace.
Sharaa on Wednesday described the strikes near the presidential palace as “not a message, but a declaration of war,” and said Syria had still refrained from responding militarily to preserve the negotiations.
RSS
Anti-Israel Activists Gear Up to ‘Flood’ UN General Assembly
US Capitol Police and NYPD officers clash with anti-Israel demonstrators, on the day Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses a joint meeting of Congress, on Capitol Hill, in Washington, DC, July 24, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Umit Bektas
Anti-Israel groups are planning a wave of raucous protests in New York City during the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) over the next several days, prompting concerns that the demonstrations could descend into antisemitic rhetoric and intimidation.
A coalition of anti-Israel activists is organizing the protests in and around UN headquarters to coincide with speeches from Middle Eastern leaders and appearances by US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The demonstrations are expected to draw large crowds and feature prominent pro-Palestinian voices, some of whom have been criticized for trafficking in antisemitic tropes, in addition to calling for the destruction of Israe.
Organizers of the demonstrations have promoted the coordinated events on social media as an opportunity to pressure world leaders to hold Israel accountable for its military campaign against Hamas in Gaza, with some messaging framed in sharply hostile terms.
On Sunday, for example, activists shouted at Israel’s Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon.
“Zionism is terrorism. All you guys are terrorists committing ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza and Palestine. Shame on you, Zionist animals,” they shouted.
BREAKING: PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTORS CONFRONT “ISRAELI” AMBASSADOR DANNY DANON AT THE UNITED NATIONS
1/5 pic.twitter.com/4G1VYEMGzV
— Within Our Lifetime (@WOLPalestine) September 14, 2025
The Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM), warned on its website that the scale and tone of the planned demonstrations risk crossing the line from political protest into hate speech, arguing that anti-Israel activists are attempting to hijack the UN gathering to spread antisemitism and delegitimize the Jewish state’s right to exist.
Outside the UN last week, masked protesters belonging to the activist group INDECLINE kicked a realistic replica of Netanyahu’s decapitated head as though it were a soccer ball.
US activist group plays soccer with Bibi’s mock decapitated HEAD right outside NYC UN HQ
Peep shot at 00:40
Footage posted by INDECLINE collective just as UN General Assembly about to kick off
‘Following the game, ball was donated to Palestinian Genocide Museum’ pic.twitter.com/TQ84sgZhKr
— RT (@RT_com) September 9, 2025
Within Our Lifetime (WOL), a radical anti-Israel activist group, has vowed to “flood” the UNGA on behalf of the pro-Palestine movement.
WOL, one of the most prolific anti-Israel activist groups, came under immense fire after it organized a protest against an exhibition to honor the victims of the Oct. 7 massacre at the Nova Music Festival in southern Israel. During the event, the group chanted “resistance is justified when people are occupied!” and “Israel, go to hell!”
“We will be there to confront them with the truth: Their silence and inaction enable genocide. The world cannot continue as if Gaza does not exist,” WOL said of its planned demonstrations in New York. “This is the time to make our voices impossible to ignore. Come to New York by any means necessary, to stand, to march, to demand the UN act and end the siege.”
Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM), two other anti-Israel organizations that have helped organize widespread demonstrations against the Jewish state during the war in Gaza, also announced they are planning a march from Times Square to the UN headquarters on Friday.
“The time is now for each and every UN member state to uphold their duty under international law: sanction Israel and end the genocide,” the groups said in a statement.
JVP, an organization that purports to fight for “Palestinian liberation,” has positioned itself as a staunch adversary of the Jewish state. The group argued in a 2021 booklet that Jews should not write Hebrew liturgy because hearing the language would be “deeply traumatizing” to Palestinians. JVP has repeatedly defended the Oct. 7 massacre of roughly 1,200 people in southern Israel by Hamas as a justified “resistance.” Chapters of the organization have urged other self-described “progressives” to throw their support behind Hamas and other terrorist groups against Israel
Similarly, PYM, another radical anti-Israel group, has repeatedly defended terrorism and violence against the Jewish state. PYM has organized many anti-Israel protests in the two years following the Oct. 7 attacks in the Jewish state. Recently, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) called for a federal investigation into the organization after Aisha Nizar, one of the group’s leaders, urged supporters to sabotage the US supply chain for the F-35 fighter jet, one of the most advanced US military assets and a critical component of Israel’s defense.
The UN General Assembly has historically been a flashpoint for heated debate over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Previous gatherings have seen dueling demonstrations outside the Manhattan venue, with pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian groups both seeking to influence the international spotlight.
While warning about the demonstrations, CAM noted it recently launched a new mobile app, Report It, that allows users worldwide to quickly and securely report antisemitic incidents in real time.
RSS
Nina Davidson Presses Universities to Back Words With Action as Jewish Students Return to Campus Amid Antisemitism Crisis
Nina Davidson on The Algemeiner’s ‘J100’ podcast. Photo: Screenshot
Philanthropist Nina Davidson, who served on the board of Barnard College, has called on universities to pair tough rhetoric on combatting antisemitism with enforcement as Jewish students returned to campuses for the new academic year.
“Years ago, The Algemeiner had published a list ranking the most antisemitic colleges in the country. And number one was Columbia,” Davidson recalled on a recent episode of The Algemeiner‘s “J100” podcast. “As a board member and as someone who was representing the institution, it really upset me … At the board meeting, I brought it up and I said, ‘What are we going to do about this?’”
Host David Cohen, chief executive officer of The Algemeiner, explained he had revisited Davidson’s remarks while she was being honored for her work at The Algemeiner‘s 8th annual J100 gala, held in October 2021, noting their continued relevance.
“It could have been the same speech in 2025,” he said, underscoring how longstanding concerns about campus antisemitism, while having intensified in the aftermath of Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel, are not new.
Davidson argued that universities already possess the tools to protect students – codes of conduct, time-place-manner rules, and consequences for threats or targeted harassment – but too often fail to apply them evenly. “Statements are not enough,” she said, arguing that institutions need to enforce their rules and set a precedent that there will be consequences for individuals who refuse to follow them.
She also said that stakeholders – alumni, parents, and donors – are reassessing their relationships with schools that, in their view, have not safeguarded Jewish students. While supportive of open debate, Davidson distinguished between protest and intimidation, calling for leadership that protects expression while ensuring campus safety.
The episode surveyed specific pressure points that administrators will face this fall: repeat anti-Israel encampments, disruptions of Jewish programming, and the challenge of distinguishing political speech from conduct that violates university rules. “Unless schools draw those lines now,” Davidson warned, “they’ll be scrambling once the next crisis hits.”
Cohen closed by framing the discussion as a test of institutional credibility, asking whether universities will “turn policy into protection” in real time. Davidson agreed, pointing to students who “need to know the rules aren’t just on paper.”
The full conversation is available on The Algemeiner’s “J100” podcast.