RSS
Antisemitism on Campus: Harvard Is the Ultimate Trust Fund Kid
Demonstrators take part in an “Emergency Rally: Stand With Palestinians Under Siege in Gaza,” amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, Oct. 14, 2023. Photo: REUTERS/Brian Snyder
With 80% of its $53 billion endowment restricted by donors, Harvard announced plans to borrow $750 million as “contingency planning,” while facing a $2.26 billion freeze in Federal funding.
Harvard has spent two years throwing tantrums, making excuses, and avoiding accountability while Jewish students faced unprecedented bigotry on campus since October 7, 2023 — an event that prompted more than 30 student groups to issue a statement blaming Israel entirely for the massacre.
Harvard is widely regarded as a prestigious Ivy League school, a hedge fund with a campus, or the world’s top university. But its refusal to address anti-Jewish hatred reveals an undeniable truth: Harvard is the ultimate trust fund kid.
Playing by Different Rules
Trust fund kids operate by a simple principle: rules apply to others, not them. Harvard exemplifies this attitude in its response to campus hatred against Jews.
When the Department of Health and Human Services issued a 34-page Notice of Violation on June 30 documenting Harvard’s “deliberate indifference” to anti-Jewish harassment, the findings spoke for themselves. Federal investigators found Jewish students were spit on, stalked, physically assaulted, and excluded from campus spaces while Harvard administrators debated “context.”
The most revealing example, according to the federal Notice, is that Harvard police “essentially refused to investigate” the videotaped assault of Israeli student Yoav Segev in October 2023. Despite footage from multiple angles, including a news helicopter, police wouldn’t cooperate with prosecutors seeking to identify additional attackers.
When one officer showed determination to pursue justice, the Notice states that Harvard “swiftly removed him from the investigation” and told officers “to halt their investigation and not to cooperate with local authorities.”
Assistant District Attorney Ursula Knight called Harvard’s behavior “a surprise to the Commonwealth,” telling the court that Harvard police “essentially refused to do that work.” This wasn’t mere incompetence. It was a deliberate strategy to protect perpetrators of anti-Jewish violence.
When prosecutors agreed to a pretrial diversion allowing the students to avoid conviction entirely — they walked away with little more than 80 hours of community service for assault — Harvard still declined to discipline or even investigate the students under its own policies.
On the contrary, Harvard rewarded the two students that the prosecutor said were responsible for the assaults. One received a $65,000 Harvard Law Review fellowship to work at the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an organization whose executive director said he was “happy to see” Gazans “break the siege” on October 7 and declared that Israel “does not have that right to self-defense.” The other became a class marshal for graduation. This isn’t institutional failure. It’s institutional protection of bigotry.
Hollow Gestures
When pressured, Harvard responds with performative charity work. The university announced “partnerships” with Israeli universities that amount to existing exchange programs with new branding. It’s a masterclass in creating the appearance of action while changing nothing.
More telling is Harvard’s timing. The university published its antisemitism report the same day as its Islamophobia report, treating both communities’ suffering as equivalent public relations problems to be managed simultaneously. This wasn’t about reckoning with systemic issues. It was about damage control.
Harvard’s idea of accountability? Offering a course called Palestine 1000 Years, taught by three professors who participated in the illegal encampments that harassed and denigrated Jewish students in the spring of 2024. Imagine the outrage if Harvard offered a course on “Confederate Heritage” taught by professors who participated in white supremacist rallies.
Selective Compliance
Trust fund kids show a remarkable ability to choose which rules apply to them. When the Biden administration investigated Harvard for civil rights violations over legacy admissions in 2023, Harvard cooperated quietly without lawsuits or public complaints. An investigation that could justify admitting more full-tuition-paying international students while burnishing Harvard’s diversity credentials? No problem.
But when the Trump administration investigates Harvard for enabling anti-Jewish hatred, using Harvard’s own task force findings as evidence, suddenly Federal oversight becomes an assault on academic freedom requiring immediate legal action, especially to free Federal funding that Harvard wants.
The difference reveals Harvard’s calculation. Investigations that align with Harvard’s political positions and financial interests are acceptable. Investigations that threaten to expose institutional failures and demand real accountability? Outrageous government overreach.
Harvard’s selective enforcement reveals its true priorities. When removing professors for research misconduct, the university moved swiftly and publicly. Francesca Gino became the first tenured professor fired in 80 years after allegations of data falsification, a decision Harvard announced with fanfare and defended vigorously.
But when Harvard quietly removed professors connected to anti-Jewish hatred on campus, it did so without public announcements or victory laps. The message was clear: some forms of misconduct deserve public accountability, while others merit quiet protection.
The HHS Notice of Violation documented this pattern extensively. Students who violated identical campus policies received wildly different punishments depending on which of Harvard’s 13 schools they attended. When even these minimal consequences faced faculty criticism, Harvard reversed suspensions and downgraded sanctions. The Palestine Solidarity Committee, which repeatedly violated campus rules, faced the same ineffectual temporary probation year after year, restrictions that barely limited activities during the academic year.
Real Consequences Arrive
Trust fund kids can’t be trusted to change. They double down on anything that maintains their fragile appearance of respectability among their peers. Harvard’s been prioritizing its fight against the Trump administration. It fights the Trump administration harder than it ever fought antisemitism.
The government’s Notice of Violation gives Harvard a choice: implement meaningful reforms or face US Justice Department intervention.
Given Harvard’s track record of broken promises and cosmetic changes, Federal enforcement may be the only opportunity for a new path. For an institution claiming to educate leaders, Harvard’s own leadership has been conspicuously absent when moral courage mattered most. Harvard would strengthen its case against government overreach if it had actually protected Jewish students instead of enabling their harassment.
Roni Brunn is a writer and advocate for Jewish life in higher education.
RSS
Antisemitism at European Universities Has Created ‘Climate of Fear,’ New Report Finds
Krakow, Poland, October 5: Pro-Palestinian activists in front of the Institute of Sociology at Jagiellonian University in Kraków. Photo: Artur Widak via Reuters Connect
Antisemitism on European university campuses rivals what has ensued in the US since the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel, fostering a “climate of fear” for Jewish students, according to a new report by two Jewish groups and a German watchdog.
B’nai B’rith International, the European Union of Jewish Students, and democ, a Berlin-based organization of academics and media professionals, on Tuesday published a comprehensive report titled “A Climate of Fear and Exclusion: Antisemitism at European Universities.”
“When Jewish students fear being violently harassed on campus, when in the most prestigious universities Jewish students might find swastikas or death threats on their personal property, when they are not allowed access to spaces and events due to their presumed Zionism — the free speech argument is a canard,” B’nai B’rith director of European Union affairs Alina Bricman said in a statement. “The lack of action on the part of academic institutions is shameful.”
The document recounts a slew of incidents that took place at the most prestigious higher education institutions across the continent, including Cambridge University, the University of Amsterdam, and Delft University of Technology. Some were perpetrated by extreme anti-Zionist groups tied to terrorist organizations while others struck as random acts of hatred, terrorizing in themselves for intimidating Jewish members of the campus community.
At the University of Strasbourg, someone assaulted a group of Jewish students while shouting “Zionist fascists”; the University of Vienna hosted an “Intifada Camp,” a pro-Hamas encampment; at the Free University of Brussels campus in Solbosch, a pro-Hamas group illegally occupied an administrative building and renamed it after a terrorist. Throughout Europe, anti-Zionists damaged property to the tune of hundreds of thousands of Euros, desecrated Jewish religious symbols, graffitied Jewish students’ dormitories with swastikas, and carried out gang assaults on Jewish student leaders.
In many cases, university leaders acceded to the demands of these pro-Hamas activists and terminated partnerships with Israeli institutions, as happened in Belgium.
“By renouncing limited partnerships with Israel, the authorities not only gave in to political pressure but also endangered freedom of expression and the diversity of ideas on their campuses,” the report’s authors wrote. “This attitude, far from protecting academic values, allowed ideologies to take precedence over fundamental principles of research and academic freedom.”
It continued, “These events are not isolated acts. They reflect a climate of siege-like hostility towards Israel that now permeates Belgium, from the media to universities, from the north to the south, from the right to the left. The Palestinian cause has gradually become the core of a genuine ‘civil religion’ or ‘secular religion.’”
The situation calls for a prompt defense of the university’s values, as well as the universal principles Europe claims to hold.
“The documentation gathered in this report makes it clear that we are dealing with highly coordinated, transnational networks that operate as part of a global movement,” said Grischa Stanjek, co-executive director of democ. “They strategically disguise an antisemitic agenda in the language of human rights to gain legitimacy. University leaders are making a grave mistake if they treat these events as local flare-ups instead of what they are: calculated manifestations of a global, anti-democratic campaign.”
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
RSS
Synagogue in Chile Vandalized With Antisemitic Graffiti, Prompting Outrage, Investigation
The gate of Santiago’s Bikur Cholim Synagogue defaced with red paint and antisemitic graffiti, including a poster targeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Photo: Screenshot
Chile’s authorities launched an investigation after a synagogue in Santiago was defaced with antisemitic graffiti and slogans, an act that has sparked outrage in the local Jewish community.
On Friday night, the gate of Santiago’s Bikur Cholim Synagogue was vandalized with red paint and a poster depicting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with a bullet hole in his forehead.
An unknown individual spray-painted antisemitic slogans, including “If you keep silent, you’re part of genocide,” an apparent reference to the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza.
Israeli Ambassador to Chile Peleg Lewi condemned the outrage, noting that antisemitic incidents are rare in the country.
Vandalizacion y ataques a Sinagogas anoche en Santiago !
Estoy seguro que @GobiernodeChile luchará contra el antisemistismo en Chile! pic.twitter.com/feWR09cny1— פלג לוי – Peleg Lewi (@peleg_lewi) August 23, 2025
Since the Hamas-led invasion of and massacre across southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Lewi explained, Chile has seen only a few minor antisemitic incidents — a stark contrast to other countries around the world, which have experienced a surge in anti-Jewish hate crimes.
He also stressed the importance of maintaining calm and warned against bringing the Middle East conflict into Chile.
Local authorities have launched an investigation into the vandalism, but no arrests have been made so far.
The Jewish Community of Chile denounced the incident, stressing that such antisemitic acts cannot be accepted or tolerated.
“Acts of hatred cannot be downplayed, normalized, or justified by political or ideological slogans; they must be forcefully and universally condemned,” the group said in a post on X.
“Chile is a country that values freedom of worship, and that means we must respect, care for, and protect one another, regardless of our beliefs,” the statement read. “Vandalism of a holy site is not just an attack on a community but on the coexistence and peace of the entire country.”
Condenamos rotundamente el ataque a una sinagoga de Santiago. Lamentablemente no es la primera vez que ocurre.
Los actos de odio no pueden ser relativizados, normalizados o justificados bajo consignas políticas o ideológicas: deben ser condenados con fuerza y de manera… pic.twitter.com/CTAHqDs6yh
— Comunidad Judía de Chile (@comjudiachile) August 24, 2025
Alberto van Klaveren, Chile’s Foreign Minister, also condemned the vandalism of the Bikur Cholim Synagogue.
“No expression of hatred or violence can be normalized; there is no argument that justifies intimidation or discrimination,” Klaveren said in a post on X. “The only way to express dissent in a democracy is through open and respectful dialogue.”
On Sunday, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) warned that the incident in Chile was the latest reminder that antisemitism remains a global threat.
“No synagogue should ever be vandalized,” the statement read.
RSS
Trump Admin Reviewing Visas of ‘Terrorist Sympathizers’ Set to Appear at Palestinian Conference in Detroit
Marco Rubio speaks after he is sworn in as Secretary of State by US Vice President JD Vance at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington, DC, Jan. 21, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
The Trump administration is reviewing and may block the visa applications of speakers scheduled to appear at the People’s Conference for Palestine in Detroit, Michigan later this week over links to terrorism, The Algemeiner has learned.
A spokesperson for the US State Department told The Algemeiner that officials have “noted” the gathering, set to take place from Aug. 29-31, and will closely monitor visa applications for invited international speakers, citing a preponderance of “terrorist sympathizers” on the program’s lineup.
“Given the public invite lists seems to include a number of terrorist sympathizers, we are going through and ensuring all international speakers slated to attend the conference are being placed on a ‘look out’ status for visa applications, so we are alerted if a request is submitted and can ensure they are appropriately processed,” the spokesperson said.
“In every case, we will take the time necessary to ensure an applicant does not pose a risk to the safety and security of the United States and that he or she has credibly established his or her eligibility for the visa sought, including that the applicant intends to engage in activities consistent with the terms of admission,” the spokesperson added.
The conference will feature dozens of radical anti-Zionist activists, academics, artists, and political organizers, including US Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI).
Tlaib’s appearance at last year’s iteration of the People’s Conference for Palestine sparked intense backlash, with critics pointing out the event’s connections to Wisam Rafeedie and Salah Salah, members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), an internationally designated terrorist organization.
The conference is convened by a coalition that includes the Palestinian Youth Movement, Al-Awda: The Palestine Right to Return Coalition, and the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, among others. Several of these groups have maintained ties with PFLP, openly supported boycott efforts against Israel, and called for an arms embargo in the wake of Israel’s military campaign against Hamas. The programming highlights sessions on “Documenting Genocide” and “Breaking the Siege,” rhetoric that critics argue mischaracterizes Israel’s actions as it seeks to defend itself against terrorist attacks following Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, invasion of and massacre across southern Israel.
The Detroit gathering is expected to attract thousands of attendees, with dozens of speakers and activists scheduled to participate. Among the roster are well-known anti-Israel figures such as Linda Sarsour, Miko Peled, and Chris Smalls. Sarsour has erroneously compared Zionism to “white supremacy in America” and accused Israel of perpetuating “Jewish supremacy.”
Arabs comprise about 21 percent of Israel’s population and include full rights of citizenship, including the ability to serve in parliament and on the Supreme Court as well as the ability to protest openly against the government.
The planned presence of several foreign terror sympathizers has sparked outrage among observers.
Abed Abubaker, a self-described “reporter” from Gaza, is expected to make a physical appearance at the Detroit conference. Abubaker has repeatedly praised the Hamas terrorist group as “resistance fighters” on social media and won a “journalist of the year” award from Iran’s state-controlled media outlet PressTV. In a January 2025 post, he showered praise on long-time Hamas leader and Oct. 7 mastermind Yahya Sinwar, saying that the terrorist’s “love of resistance and land is seen very clearly.” In a March 2025 post, Abubaker posted that international supporters of the Palestinian cause should “attack your governments.” He also defended Hamas’s murdering of dissidents, saying that the victims were “collaborating” with Israel.
Some of the speakers have been convicted and imprisoned in Israel for terrorist activity.
Omar Assaf, a former member of the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP), and Lama Ghosheh, a Palestinian journalist from East Jerusalem, are scheduled to speak at the conference. Assaf spent eight years in jail for his role in the DFLP, which was previously a US-designated terrorist group, and Ghosheh received a three-year sentence from an Israeli court in 2023 for inciting violence and praising terrorism in the West Bank and Gaza.
Mosab Abu Toha, a Gaza-born writer, is also set to appear at the conference. Abu Toha’s social media posts reveal he has denigrated the Israeli hostages held in Gaza, denied the murder of the Bibas children, and spread fake news and antisemitic remarks. In other posts, he referred to Israeli soldiers as “killers” and criticized international media for “humaniz[ing]” them.
Perhaps most striking, Hussam Shaheen was slated to speak at the conference. He spent 27 years in prison for attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder but was released earlier this year as part of a temporary Israel-Hamas ceasefire that saw Palestinian prisoners released in exchange for Israeli hostages. However, Shaheen’s name no longer appears on the list of speakers on the conference’s website.
US-based speakers also have extremist associations. Hatem Bazian, for example, co-founded Students for Justice in Palestine, a group that has become notorious for intimidating Jews on university campuses, as well as American Muslims for Palestine (AMP), a nonprofit he now chairs which has sponsored a series of anti-Israel protests following Hamas’s Oct. 7 terrorist attacks. Bazian works as a senior lecturer at the University of California, Berkeley. On Tuesday, The Algemeiner reported on recent comments by Bazian in which he accused Jews of exploiting antisemitism to make money and claimed that Israel wants to conquer most of the Middle East, including Mecca and Medina, the holiest sites in Islam.
The event will also host Mahmoud Khalil, one of the leaders of the anti-Israel encampment movement at Columbia University. Khalil rose to national prominence after US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detained him in March for what the Department of Homeland Security alleged to be leading “activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization.” Khalil, who became a permanent US resident last year, was released from detention in June when a federal judge ordered his release. The activist also drew scrutiny last month after he refused to condemn Hamas’s Oct. 7 atrocities during a CNN interview.
Since returning to the White House earlier this year, the Trump administration has launched an overhaul of the US visa system, part of what officials describe as an effort to root out individuals sympathetic to terrorism or those espousing antisemitic views. The sweeping measures include expanded social media vetting for new applicants, continuous monitoring of the 55 million current visa holders, and the revocation of thousands of student visas.
Panels at this week’s conference in Detroit will touch on subjects such as US military aid, legal accountability, and grassroots organizing, all presented through an anti-Israel lens, according to the event website.