Connect with us

RSS

Biden Defends Support For Israel, Refers To Himself As ‘Zionist’ In Interview

U.S. President Joe Biden speaks during a campaign event at Pullman Yards in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S. March 9, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

Joe Biden defended his support for Israel in a recent interview, referring to himself as a “Zionist” and painting an optimistic vision for the future of Israel and its Arab neighbors.

In a sit-down with Complex’s Speedy Morman, Biden was grilled over his relationship with Israel and whether he believes his support for the Jewish state will cost him votes among Arab and Muslim Americans. 

“Back in April, $26 million in aid was sent, or approved to be sent to Israel. Why?” Morman asked.

“I said defensive weapons,” Biden clarified, “I denied them offensive weapons that they were using, 2,000 lb. bombs and the rest.”

“I made it real clear they cannot use weapons that we provide them to use in civilian areas,” Biden continued. 

In May, the White House paused shipments of 2,000 lb. bombs to Israel, citing concern over the Jewish state’s military operations in the southern Gaza city of Rafah. The decision to halt the transfer of heavy-duty offensive weapons sparked outrage among Israeli officials, which insisted that extensive military operations in Rafah are necessary to dismantle the remaining Hamas battalions. 

Biden added that American support for the Jewish state is necessary because if Israel’s existence were endangered, “every Jew in the world would be at risk.” He stressed that Jews needed, “a place that was their own” following the horrific genocide of roughly six-million Jews during the Holocaust. 

“You don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist, and a Zionist is about whether or not Israel is a safe haven for Jews because of their history of how they have been persecuted,” Biden said, declaring his support for Jewish statehood. 

The president also outlined his record of supporting Palestinians, claiming he has “done more for” the civilians in Gaza and the West Bank than anyone. 

“I’m the guy that opened up all the assets. I’m the guy that made. . . Egyptians open the border to let goods [such as] medicine and food.,” Biden said to Morman. 

U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken pressured Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to release tax revenues belonging to the Palestinian Authority (PA), the governing body of the West Bank. Israeli minister of finance Bezalel Smotrich originally withheld the funds from the PA in response to the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel. Citing concern that the PA would soon collapse, the Biden administration pressed Israel to hand the funds back over. 

Following Israel’s capture of the Palestinian side of the Rafah crossing in early May, Egypt refused to coordinate with Israel on humanitarian aid delivery into Gaza. Egypt demanded that Israel relinquish control of the crossing back to Palestinians. In the face of American pressure, Egypt agreed to allow passage of aid through the Kerem Shalom border crossing. 

“And, I’m the guy that’s been able to pull together the Arab states to help agree to help the Palestinians with food and shelter,” Biden told the interviewer

Though Biden stressed that he has been “supportive of Palestinians” and remains sympathetic to their struggles, he condemned Hamas, the terrorist group that runs Gaza, as a group of “thugs.” 

Biden argued that Arab Americans and Muslim Americans should support his reelection campaign, touting himself as the best choice to achieve “peace” between Israel and its Arab neighbors. 

Biden claimed that Saudi Arabia has promised to recognize Israel in exchange for a guarantee that America will provide them weapons if they are attacked. The president also stated that Saudi Arabia wants a “civilian nuclear facility” to facilitate their transition away from fossil fuels to green energy. 

Biden’s relationship with Israel and the Jewish community has become increasingly more tense in the months following Hamas’ Oct. 7 slaughter of roughly 1200 people in southern Israel. The White House has issued several statements criticizing the Jewish state’s conduct in the Israel-Hamas war, actions which experts argue increases the terrorist group’s leverage. In December, after facing substantial pressure from progressive lawmakers, Biden accused Israel of “indiscriminate bombing” in Gaza.

However, Biden has attempted to hold together the bond between Israel and the Democratic Party, a relationship that seems to be rapidly deteriorating. In contrast to left-wing lawmakers such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Rashida Tlaib, Biden has not accused Israel of committing a “genocide” in Gaza. Biden has also defended Israel from accusations by fellow Democrats that is an “apartheid state”, praising the Jewish nation as a “democracy.” He has repeatedly condemned the surge of anti-Israel protests on college campuses and in front of synagogues following the Oct. 7 terrorist attacks on Israel.

The post Biden Defends Support For Israel, Refers To Himself As ‘Zionist’ In Interview first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Post Views: 528
Related Topics:
Continue Reading

RSS

Charlie Kirk Sought to Encourage Debate — His Murder Must Not Stop It

Charlie Kirk speaking at the inauguration of Donald Trump in January 2025. Photo: Brian Snyder via Reuters Connect

I first became familiar with Charlie Kirk after October 7, 2023, when my TikTok algorithm began showing me videos of him fiercely, and quite effectively, debating students on college campuses, often those in keffiyehs and with purple hair.

Thus began my fascination with what I soon learned was a man who was dedicating his life to debating and promoting what he believed in.

Charlie Kirk was the face of the young Republican movement, respected even by some Democrats. He had a promising future ahead of him. As Ben Shapiro wrote: “That kid is going to be the head of the Republican National Convention one day.”

Kirk dedicated his life to debate. To disagreement. To hearing the other side and persuading with facts and truth. And this, tragically, cost him his life. His assassination represents the meager and devastating state of the West, a state we have slowly, almost willingly, been accepting for years now.

There is a deep intolerance for differences. People do not want to be persuaded. They do not want to consider another perspective. Instead, they condemn what they believe is wrong, clinging to black-and-white narratives, even when an entire gray area holds the broader picture. They turn their heads away from nuance. Kirk aimed to change that. He devoted his life to it, fully aware of the risks.

As Adam Rubenstein wisely wrote for The Free Press: “Kirk was not naïve. In the video after he is shot, you can see a security team of at least half a dozen bodyguards surround him and spirit him away. Like anyone speaking their mind in public these days, he knew there was a risk.”

Kirk’s assassination signifies a low point for this country — and another attack on free speech. It was an assassination of dialogue, of diplomacy, of the ability to disagree without destruction. And perhaps the most bitter irony is that it all happened on a college campus, an environment that should foster growth mindsets and open-mindedness.

This attack was not only an attack on Charlie Kirk. It was an attack on freedom of thought and expression. And while it succeeded in killing the bright and young 31-year-old so many of us admired, I hope that is a rallying call to protect the broader freedom of speech we still enjoy — at least in part — in this country.

Alma Bengio is Chief Growth Officer at The Algemeiner Journal and founder and writer for @lets.talk.conflict

Post Views: 24
Continue Reading

RSS

Jews Are Indigenous to the Land of Israel — and Everyone Should Know It

The Western Wall and Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Few words in modern political discourse carry as much distortion as “Palestine.” Today, the term is wielded not as history but as a weapon — designed to delegitimize the Jewish State and recast Jews as foreign colonizers in their own homeland.

Take away the propaganda, however, and one unshakable truth remains: the Jewish people are the indigenous nation of the Land of Israel. The Arab claim to “Palestinian indigeneity” simply does not line up with history.

The Jewish people trace their roots back over 3,000 years to the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, who lived in the land of Canaan — later Israel. By the time of King David, Jerusalem was the capital of a united monarchy, and Solomon’s Temple stood as the spiritual and political center of Jewish life. Even after the Babylonian exile, Jews returned, rebuilt, and re-established their national life in Judea.

Despite invasions, destruction, and exile, Jews never abandoned their homeland. They remained in Jerusalem, Galilee, Hebron, Safed, and along the coast. Their prayers, rituals, and festivals kept the bond to Zion alive. This is not the story of outsiders — it is the story of the land’s first and most enduring nation.

Rome tried to sever that bond by force. After the Bar Kokhba revolt in the second century, Emperor Hadrian renamed Judea as Syria Palaestina , borrowing the name of the long-vanished Philistines, and turned Jerusalem into Aelia Capitolina. It was an act of erasure, meant to punish the Jews by striking even their name from the map.

But the attempt failed. Jews continued to live, pray, and return to their ancestral soil. A new label could not undo thousands of years of rootedness.

The Arab story is very different; their origins lie in the Arabian Peninsula. The earliest records available to us describe nomadic tribes in Arabia and the Syrian desert. Their cultural centers were Mecca, Medina, Yemen, and Petra. It was only in the 7th century, with the rise of Islam, that Arab armies exploded out of Arabia and conquered the region. By 636 CE, they had invaded Byzantine Judea; within a century they ruled from Spain to Persia. Their presence in Judea was the result of conquest, not continuity.

For over a thousand years, under successive empires — Umayyad, Abbasid, Crusader, Mamluk, Ottoman, and finally British — the local Arab population never called itself “Palestinian.” They identified as Arabs, Muslims, Christians, or by their city and clan. In fact, during the British Mandate, the word Palestinian referred almost exclusively to Jews: the Palestine Post was a Jewish newspaper, the Palestine Symphony Orchestra was Jewish, and the Palestine Brigade that fought in World War II was Jewish.

Many Arabs in the region rejected the label, insisting instead that they were part of greater Syria or the wider Arab nation.

Only in the mid-20th century, particularly under Yasser Arafat and the PLO, did a separate “Palestinian” identity emerge. It was born not from centuries of shared history but from a political need: to create a narrative that could challenge Jewish nationhood and delegitimize Israel. It was, and remains, a tool of war by other means.

This is the historical bottom line: Jews are the only people with an unbroken, 3,000 year bond to the Land of Israel. The name Palestine was a Roman punishment, not an Arab heritage. Arabs arrived in the 7th century as conquerors from Arabia. The idea of a Palestinian people is a modern invention, forged in the 20th century as part of a political campaign against the Jewish State.

Israel is not a colonial project. It is the restoration of an ancient nation to its ancestral homeland. Jews are not foreigners in Judea; they are Judea’s people. By every measure — historical, cultural, and even genetic — the Jewish nation’s claim is authentic, continuous, and undeniable.

Sabine Sterk is the CEO of Time To Stand Up For Israel.

Post Views: 19
Continue Reading

RSS

Israel Attacked Terrorists in Qatar — and the Media Attacked Israel

Vehicles stop at a red traffic light, a day after an Israeli attack on Hamas leaders, in Doha, Qatar, Sept. 10, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa

On Tuesday, September 9, Israel targeted those who sought its destruction and planned the barbaric October 7, 2023 massacre.

Israel launched the daring attack on the Hamas leadership in their Qatari safe haven, after their ongoing refusal to agree to a Gaza ceasefire deal and in the aftermath of a deadly terror attack in Jerusalem, which Hamas claimed responsibility for.

But the media still shilled for Hamas by making Israel look like a rogue state attacking a key diplomatic player and destroying any chance for peace.

News outlets used three methods to achieve this goal:

  • Direct accusations
  • Subtle differentiation between a “legitimate” Hamas political wing and its military one
  • The glorification of Qatar as a business hub rather than a terrorist hub

The Independent and The Washington Post shamelessly employed headlines that portrayed Israel as the regional bully and an aggressor randomly attacking other Middle East countries in a bid for regional domination.

Sky News even blamed Israel for a previous attack on Qatar, although the Iranian regime carried it out:

After we publicly highlighted it, Sky quietly rectified its faux pas with no acknowledgment of the correction.

Meanwhile, the Economist was worried that attacking the very terrorists who ordered the mass murder of Jews on Oct. 7 was “a bridge too far” and that Israel had “crossed a line:”

And the BBC’s security correspondent called Israel’s surprising act of self defense “a campaign of score settling:”

NPR and The Wall Street Journal took the subtle approach of creating a false dichotomy between Hamas’ military and political wings — although the entire group is internationally designated as a terror organization.

This naive approach depicted the targeted Hamas leaders as legitimate officials simply because they carried pens and wore suits instead of AK-47s and green headbands.

They may not have got their hands dirty but this does not absolve them from orchestrating numerous bloody terror attacks, including the slaughter and kidnapping of thousands of people in Israel on October 7, 2023.

Finally, many outlets decried the violation of Qatar’s sovereignty, painting it as a peace-seeking state focused on business and regional cooperation, rather than a patron of terrorists.

The New York Times went as far as calling Qatar “a safe haven for business and tourism in a volatile region,” while it was, in fact, a safe haven for the region’s top jihadists.

How can this media distortion be explained? Why is a facade of legitimacy conferred upon terrorists in suits?

There are only two possible answers: Either the media believe the facade the terrorists want to sell, or they are carrying out an anti-Israel agenda.

Both options are detrimental to professional journalism, as well as to basic human ethics.

The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.

Post Views: 24
Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News