Uncategorized
Food writer Alison Roman makes a comeback — and a brisket for Passover
(New York Jewish Week) — What first caught my eye about Jewish food writer Alison Roman was not any one recipe. Rather, it was a photo of her that was published in the New York Times in 2019: Roman was in her tiny Brooklyn kitchen, kneeling in front of her overstuffed and undersized refrigerator. She was wearing jeans and t-shirt — and her feet were bare and dirty. I simply loved the messiness, joy and imperfection of it all.
The photo accompanied a selection of Thanksgiving recipes written by the young and rising star, who was first introduced to the Times’ readership just over a year prior as an heir to Pierre Franey and his quick-to-prepare foods. Roman’s Thanksgiving menu included a dry-brined turkey, hand-torn sourdough bread stuffing with celery and leeks, leafy herb salad spiked with lemon zest, lemon juice and flaky sea salt. The recipes were a reflection of the author: approachable and decidedly not fussy.
That anti-perfect attitude is a hallmark of Roman’s style, and it’s certainly a theme of her latest cookbook, “Sweet Enough,” which comes out at the end of this month. It is her third (“Dining In” and “Nothing Fancy” preceded it) and, according to Variety, pre-publication it has already “shot to the top of bestseller lists.”
This new cookbook is devoted to desserts, although there are a handful of savory recipes, too. Many of the recipes, like her Summer Pudding with Summer Fruit, her bowl of Salted Chocolate Pudding, and her raspberries and sour cream, do not have to be baked, nor do they require fancy know-how or special equipment. She even encourages readers to eat these treats straight from the bowl or the pot in which they were cooked.
Roman became an important part of the food conversation in this country in an impressively short amount of time. By the time she was hired full-time at the Times, at 32, she had had a meteoric rise at Bon Appetit magazine, where she moved from freelance recipe tester to senior food editor in four years. By then, she had already published her first cookbook and had a cookie recipe that went viral on Instagram.
Her fall from grace in May 2020 was even faster. In an interview for the online publication The New Consumer, she criticized two prominent women of color, Japanese organizing guru Marie Kondo and Asian-American model, cookbook author and prominent Twitter user Chrissy Teigen, for licensing their names and essentially “selling out.” In the ensuing weeks, the backlash online was swift and fierce, accusing her of everything from inappropriateness to racism. Amid the moment’s perfect storm — the pandemic and the rapid rise of the Movement for Black Lives — her column at the Times was suspended.
Six weeks later, on June 21, she founded a Substack newsletter, simply titled, “A Newsletter.” She now cranks that out weekly to 229,000 subscribers, and her YouTube channel, “Home Videos,” has some 213,000 subscribers. Looking back, Roman describes that post-interview time period as “challenging,” but, as she told the New York Jewish Week, “it led me to writing more and writing more for myself. And I think that’s a good thing.”
These days, Roman, 37, who describes herself as “half Jewish,” is about to embark on her book tour. Ahead of the release of “Sweet Enough,” she spoke to the New York Jewish Week about her favorite Jewish dishes, her food philosophy, and what she loves about Passover, which begins this year at sundown on Weds., April 5.
This interview has been lightly condensed and edited.
New York Jewish Week: How did the idea for this book come to you?
Roman: I felt there was a need for a dessert book from the perspective of someone who was not a die-hard lover of baked goods or dessert — somewhere between indifferent and enthusiastic. I felt like there were probably others like me.
I embrace the fact that the desserts were not designed to be perfect and they don’t have to be. People accept the flaws of, say, a roast chicken, but if their cake is crooked it ruins their day.
I’m trying to normalize the fact that not everything will be perfect, and it’s OK.
You are from California. How has being in New York changed the way you cook?
Living in New York, I have an emphasis on accessibility. I don’t always have access to the best produce; when things are out of season it becomes more difficult. It makes my work stronger because you have to be resourceful. And since we don’t necessarily have cars in New York, I have to consider: How far do I have to schlep the groceries? Can I do this [dish] with fewer items?
You’ve said on the Jewish Food Society’s podcast that you made many Jewish friends in New York. You attended your first bar mitzvah here. Are you leaning more into Jewish recipes or foods since you are living in New York?
Not necessarily. I just did a new Passover menu, which will come out on March 30 in Passover Home Movies and in an accompanying newsletter. I think that the older I get the more I lean into hosting and doing Shabbat because it feels important to me.
Any Jewish foods that are favorites of yours?
Matzah ball soup is my favorite food of all time. Otherwise, most popular Jewish deli foods are something I gravitate towards, even before I realized they were “Jewish.” Latkes, and things like that. I like Jewish deli culture. And I liked that these foods, that my father and I love and enjoy, are connected to my father’s heritage, which is my heritage. It made me feel closer to it.
What is your favorite Passover dish?
I love my brisket. I don’t love brisket always but I think the one I make is fantastic. I like a really simple Passover menu. Braised meat. Crispy salad with lots of herbs and apples. Crispy potato — this year I made cheeseless gratin with olive oil, potatoes, salt and pepper. You are not grating potatoes or frying anything. It is not eggy like a kugel.
Part of why I like Passover is because, much like Thanksgiving, it’s a time of year when you know what you’re supposed to eat. You don’t have to give it a ton of thought.
Have the past three years, following your comments about Marie Kondo and Chrissy Teigen, changed you as a writer and a food person?
Yes and no. We are all different than we were three years ago. Whether it was time passing or the pandemic or whatever, I think everyone is a bit different. That time was challenging but it led me to writing more and writing more for myself. And I think that’s a good thing.
How would you frame your food philosophy?
“Unfussy” pretty much sums it up. I don’t believe in overthinking too much. The way I cook is very instinctual and very natural. I don’t try to manipulate anything into something it is not. I feel very intuitive. It feels not performative. It feels very genuine to me.
Where did your aesthetic for rustic, carefree, approachable food come from?
I consider myself independent, and most things I do are born from myself and my own intuition. I think, like any person, you will be impacted and influenced by the world around you but ultimately you need to be authentically yourself.
—
The post Food writer Alison Roman makes a comeback — and a brisket for Passover appeared first on Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
Uncategorized
Poetry in drama: Sutzkever’s stories come alive on the stage
יעדע פּיעסע איז נישט נאָר אַן אױפֿפֿירונג פֿון אַ סקריפּט, נאָר אױך אַן אינטערפּרעטאַציע דערפֿון. דאָס איז נאָך מער שײך אַ פּיעסע װאָס איז אַן אינסצענירונג פֿון די שאַפֿונגען פֿון אַ פּאָעט.
די פֿאָרשטעלונג „נאַכט־מעשׂיות“, װאָס שפּילט אין מאַנהעטן ביזן 11טן יאַנואַר, איז כּדאַי צו זען נישט נאָר צוליב די געניטע, פּרעציזע אַקטיאָרן װאָס שפּילן אין איר (שײן בייקער און מרים־חיה סגל), און נישט נאָר צוליב דער מוזיקאַלישער באַגלײטונג פֿון אורי שרעטער, נאָר אױך, און לױט מײַן מײנונג אפֿשר דער עיקר, צוליב די געלונגענע פֿאַרשטאַנדן פֿון אַבֿרהם סוצקעװערס װערק װאָס דער רעזשיסאָר משה יאַסור שטעלט אַרױס אױף דער בינע.
די דאָזיקע „מעשׂיות“ זײַנען באַזירט אױף פֿיר קורצע שאַפֿונגען פֿון פּאָעטישער פּראָזע, אַן אָפּקלײַב פֿון אַ צאָל אַזעלכע װאָס סוצקעװער האָט אַלײן גערופֿן „באַשרײַבונגען.“ די דאָזיקע טעקסטן זײַנען נישט קײן געװײנטלעכע קורצע דערצײלונגען. עס פֿעלט אָפֿט מאָל אַ קלאָרער נאַראַטיװ, און דערצו איז די אידענטיטעט פֿון נאַראַטאָר נישט קײן קלאָרע. די אמתע שװעריקײט, בײַם לײענער, שטעקט אָפֿט מאָל אינעם לשון אַלײן. דער װאָקאַבולאַר ניצט אױס די גאַנצע פּאַליטרע פֿון אַ צאָל תּחומען פֿון קונסט, װילנער קאָלאָריט, ייִדישן לעבן, און דער אונטערװעלט. ס׳איז אַ ליטעראַרישער מאָדערניזם װאָס שרעקט זיך נישט פֿאַר קײן טעמע. אױך די זאַצן זײַנען נישט אַלע מאָל גרינג צו דעשיפֿרירן.
מע דאַרף אױך דערמאָנען אַז די מעשׂיות קומען פֿאָר אין אַ װעלט װאָס איז פֿאַרשאָטנט מיטן ייִדישן חורבן, אין אַ מין גרענעץ־זאָנע צװישן דער איצטיקײט פֿון טראַװמאַטיזירטן זכּרון, דעם היסטאָרישן אַמאָל, און די נאָך־װײענישן פֿון אומקום, פֿון די ערשטע יאָרצענדליקער נאָכן חורבן, װען דער מחבר האָט באַשאַפֿן אָט די פּראָזעװערק.
די קאָמפּליצירטקײט פֿון טעקסט, און דער דוחק פֿון אַ קלאָרן סיפּור־המעשׂה, שטעלט צו צװײ געלעגנהײטן, אָדער מע קען זאָגן — שוועריקייטן: ערשטנס, אַז די אַקטיאָרן אַלײן זאָלן באַהערשן יעדן פּרט פֿון דער שפּראַך, און אַרײַנהױכן אין די װערטער די עמאָציעס און זשעסטן װאָס זאָלן העלפֿן אָריענטירן דעם צוקוקער (בפֿרט די װאָס פֿאַרלאָזן זיך אױף די ענגלישע אײבערטיטלען) דורכן טונקעלן װאַלד פֿון האַלב־פֿאַנטאַזירטן, האַלב־היסטאָרישן אומקום.
דער צװײטער ציל בײַם פֿאַרשטיין די פּיעסע איז אַ דראַמאַטישע: װי אַזױ קען דער רעזשיסאָר אינסצענירן די פּאָעטישע טעקסטן אױף דער בינע? יאַסור ספּראַװעט זיך דערמיט מיט קלאָרע באַשלוסן. זײַן טענדענץ איז צו זײַן מינימאַליסטיש. ער פּרוּװט נישט קאָנקרעט שילדערן די מאָדנע אימאַזשן און געשעענישן װאָס שװעבן דורך סוצקעװערס מעשׂיות. דער גראַפֿישער דיזײַן, און די מוזיק, דינען גיכער ווי אַ ציל פֿון סוגעסטיע, דמיונדיקע רמזים. צום קלערסטן קומט דאָס צום אױסדרוקן אין דער ערשטער מעשׂה „קינדערשע הענטלעך,“ װוּ בלױז אַ בילד פֿון אַזעלכע האַנטדרוקן זײַנען מרמז אױף דער גאַנצער סצענע.
אין „לופּוס,“ אַ דיאַלאָג צװישן אַן איזאָלירטן אַלכעמיסטישן פּאַרשױן (אין סוצקעװערס לשון, אַן „איבערכעמיקער“), און אַ באַשעפֿעניש װאָס לעבט אױף פֿונעם שאָטן פֿון אַ מת, איז יאַסורס צוגאַנג אַ געראָטענער: דאָס ליכט װאָס באַלײַכט דעם העלדס עקספּערימענטאַלער אַרבעט װאַרפֿט אַ שאָטן אױף אַ װאַנט, װאָס װערט אַלײן, דורך בייקערס קונציקע תּנועות און באַװעגונגען, דער פּאַרטנער אין דעם שמועס. בכלל לאָזט זיך אױס, דורך יאַסורס רעזשי, אַז לופּוס איז מחיה־המתים — זיך אַלײן. זיכער איז דאָס נישט דער אײנציקער אופֿן צו פֿאַרשטײן די דאָזיקע מעשׂה, נאָר מע װערט דערפֿון איבערצײַגט, און נתפּעל.
דער צװײטער צוגאַנג װאָס וואַרפֿט זיך אין די אױגן, װידער אױף אַ הצלחהדיקן אופֿן, האָט געהאַט צו טאָן מיט דער פּראָבלעם פֿון נאַראַטאָר אין סוצקעװערס מעשׂיות. אָפֿט מאָל רעדט דער נאַראַטאָר אין ערשטן פּערזאָן, און, װי געזאָגט, איז נישט אַלע מאָל קלאָר בײַם לײענער װער דאָס איז – אַ מאַן, אַ פֿרױ, אַ מת, אַ שד…? דערצו שטעלט זיך אַ פּראַקטישע פֿראַגע פֿון אינסצענירונג: נישט אַלע מאָל איז אינטערעסאַנט פֿאַרן עולם, אַז אײן קול, אָדער אײן אַקטיאָר, זאָל אױסשפּילן אַ גאַנצע דערציילונג װי אַן אײנצלנע דאָמינאַנטע פֿיגור.
איז אַ גליק אַז יאַסור, און די דאָזיקע אַקטיאָרן, שאַפֿן צוזאַמען אַ קלײנע געזעלשאַפֿט מיט בלױז צװײ פֿיגורן אױף דער בינע. אין „דאָרט, װוּ עס נעכטיקן די שטערן“, װערן די צװײ אַ פּאָרל װאָס שטעלט זיך אַרױס פֿונעם קעצישן, אָדער גאָר פֿאַרפֿירערישן זכּרון, פֿון אַ פֿרױ װעמענס אידענטיטעט איז אַלײן נישט קלאָר. די גוטמוטיקע גרײטקײט פֿון בייקער איז דערגאַנצט געוואָרן פֿון דער יענװעלטיקער צעדרײטקײט פֿון סגלס שדיכע־געשטאַלט.
אין דער לעצטער מעשׂה, „פּאָרטרעט אין בלױען סװעטער,“ בײַטן זיך אױס די רעפּליקעס פֿון די צװײ אַקטיאָרן, עלעהײ זײ לײענען בײדע פֿונעם נאַראַטאָרס זכרונות. אַזױ באַקומט זיך אַ פּיעסע בתּוך אַ פּיעסע, בשעת די צװײ אַקטיאָרן שפּילן אױס מעשׂיות איבערגעגעבן פֿון דער מעשׂהס נאַראַטאָר. ס׳איז כּדאַי צו באַמערקן, אַז יאַסור, און די אַקטיאָרן, שפּילן זיך פֿרײַ מיט פֿאַרשײדענע השׂגות פֿון מין (דזשענדער), אױף אַן אופֿן װאָס איז גאַנץ פֿאַרשפּרײט אין טעאַטער בכלל און אינעם ייִדישן טעאַטער בפֿרט. אױך אין דער דאָזיקער מעשׂה האָט מען אַרױסגעהױבן די אַנדערשקײטן פֿונעם װילנער נאַראַטאָר, אין פֿאַרגלײַך מיטן לשון פֿון װאַרשע װוּ דער אײגנטימער פֿון „סװעטער“ זוכט זײַן (צי איר) מזל. אַ „לוטװאַק“, ווי באַקאַנט, װערט נישט אַלע מאָל רעספּעקטירט פֿון די װאַרשעװער….
בײַם אױפֿנעמען די אַפּלאָדיסמענטן פֿונעם דאַנקבאַרן עולם, האָט בייקער באַמערקט מיט אַנטױשונג אַז נישט אַלע זיצפּלעצער זײַנען פֿאַרנומען געװאָרן, כאָטש ס׳איז דער אָװנט פֿון ערבֿ־ניטל, װען מע װאָלט געדאַרפֿט זײַן פֿרײַ פֿון דער אַרבעט און גערן שטיצן אַ ייִדישע פֿאָרשטעלונג. לאָמיר נעמען די געלעגנהײט אַרױסצוהײבן די הויכע קװאַליטעט און אַמביציעס פֿון דער דאָזיקער אױפֿפֿירונג, אױסגעצײכנט געשפּילט און שאַפֿעריש רעזשיסירט, און מוטיקן אונדזערע לײענערס אָנצופֿילן די ערטער.
The post Poetry in drama: Sutzkever’s stories come alive on the stage appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
Explosion at Alawite Mosque in Syria’s Homs Kills Eight
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa speaks during a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron after a meeting at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, May 7, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Stephanie Lecocq/Pool
Eight people were killed in an explosion at a mosque of the Alawite minority sect in the Syrian city of Homs on Friday, Syrian state news agency SANA said.
SANA cited Syrian Health Ministry official Najib al-Naasan as saying 18 others were wounded and that the figures were not final, indicating they could rise.
The city’s press office said an explosive device had detonated inside the Imam Ali bin Abi Talib mosque and that security forces had cordoned off the area. A local security official told SANA that the identity of the perpetrator and any affiliation to violent groups were still unknown.
Local official Issam Naameh told Reuters the blast occurred during Friday noon prayers.
Syria‘s foreign ministry condemned the blast as a “terrorist crime.” Regional countries including Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, and Qatar also condemned the attack.
Syrian state media SANA published footage of rescuers and security forces examining debris splayed across the mosque’s green carpet.
Syria has been rocked by several episodes of sectarian violence since longtime leader Bashar al-Assad, an Alawite, was ousted by a rebel offensive last year and replaced by a government led by members of the Sunni Muslim majority.
Earlier this month, two American soldiers and a civilian interpreter were killed in central Syria by an attacker described by the authorities as a suspected member of the Islamic State, a violent Sunni Muslim group.
Uncategorized
Southern Yemeni Separatists Dismiss Saudi Call to Withdraw From Eastern Provinces
A drone view shows people attending a rally organized by Yemen’s main separatist group, the Southern Transitional Council (STC), in Aden, Yemen, Dec. 21, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Fawaz Salman
Yemen’s main southern separatist group rejected on Friday a Saudi call for its forces to withdraw from areas it seized earlier in December, saying it will continue securing the eastern provinces of Hadramout and Mahra.
Saudi Arabia said on Thursday it remains hopeful the Southern Transitional Council (STC) will end an escalation and withdraw its forces from the provinces, after the group claimed broad control of the south and pushed the Saudi-backed, internationally recognized government from its headquarters in Aden.
The group said in a statement posted on its account on X that its military operations in the two provinces were to combat security threats, including cutting supplies to the Iran-backed Houthi terrorists who control the north of the country.
Situated between Saudi Arabia and an important shipping route on the Red Sea, Yemen was split into northern and southern states until 1990.
AIRSTRIKES IN HADRAMOUT
In Hadramout, an escalation of fighting on Thursday killed two people from the STC’s Hadhrami Elite Forces, the group said in its statement.
Armed groups had ambushed STC forces in the Ghail bin Yamin area in the east of the province, but the forces managed to regain control of the area, a source from the group – speaking on condition of anonymity – told Reuters.
Saudi airstrikes followed early on Friday, targeting the STC forces in the area, the source added.
The STC said the “surprising” airstrikes will not “serve any path to an understanding, nor will they deter the people of southern Yemen from continuing their struggle to restore their full rights.”
Saudi Arabia did not confirm the strikes.
The kingdom said in its Thursday statement that a joint Saudi-Emirati military delegation was sent to Aden on Dec. 12 to make “the necessary arrangements” to ensure the return of STC forces to their previous positions outside the two provinces, adding that the efforts were still in progress.
The STC said on Friday that the group was open to any “coordination or arrangements based on guaranteeing the security, unity, and integrity of the south, and ensuring that security threats do not recur.”
The group added that any arrangements should “fulfil the aspirations and will of the people of south of Yemen,” as well as “the shared interests” with Saudi Arabia.
UAE WELCOMES SAUDI EFFORTS
The United Arab Emirates, which supports the STC, welcomed on Friday Saudi Arabian efforts to support security and stability in Yemen, and said it remains committed to backing stability in the country.
“The UAE reaffirmed its steadfast commitment to supporting all endeavours aimed at strengthening stability and development in Yemen,” the foreign ministry said in a statement.
The STC was initially part of the Sunni Muslim Saudi-led alliance that intervened in Yemen in 2015 against the Houthis. But the group has turned on the government and sought self-rule in the south.
Yemen has already been marred by a civil war since 2014, with the Houthis controlling the northern part of the country, including the capital Sanaa, after forcing the Saudi-backed government to flee south.