Connect with us

RSS

Hamas Blames Israel for Gaza Protests Against Terror Group, Threatens Punishment for Demonstrators

Palestinians protest to demand an end to war, chanting anti-Hamas slogans, in Beit Lahiya in the northern Gaza Strip, March 26, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Stringer

As anti-Hamas protests continued in Gaza this week, the Palestinian terrorist group released its first reactions to them, blaming Israel for the demonstrations and threatening punishment for those participating in them.

“Demonstrations are expected from people facing extermination, against war and destruction,” senior Hamas official Basem Naim told the Qatari channel Al-Araby. “People are calling to stop the aggression, but the enemy and other parties with political agendas are diverting the spontaneous protests to serve the occupation’s [Israel’s] agenda and trying to portray it as if the demonstrators are against the resistance [Hamas].”

Naim, who is based out of Turkey, argued that the protests are not actually against Hamas, but rather the Israeli military campaign against the terrorist group in Gaza.

Meanwhile, the so-called “Palestinian Resistance Factions, an umbrella group of militant organizations including Hamas, released a statement from Gaza on Thursday.

In the statement, Hamas, which has fully governed Gaza since 2007, and allied groups in the Palestinian enclave accused the protesters of being “the occupation’s [Israel’s] lackeys.” It went on to accuse activists of “[refusing] to do anything but reveal their shame, their failure, their complicity and their cooperation with the occupation against our people and their cause, insisting on blaming the resistance and exonerating the occupation.”

Hamas also implicitly accused the protesters of being another arm in Israel’s war on the terrorist group.

“After the abject failure of all the plans and projects of the Zionist enemy against our Palestinian cause, whether by eliminating the Palestinian presence, displacement or starvation, and after 17 months of the war of genocide waged by the fascist occupation against our people in the Gaza Strip,” the statement read, “a group of the occupation’s lackeys refuses to do anything but reveal their shame, their failure, their complicity, and their cooperation with the occupation against our people and their cause, insisting on blaming the resistance and exonerating the occupation, ignoring the fact that the Zionist extermination machine is working without stopping even in the areas of security coordination, forgetting that the occupation considers the Palestinian existence itself to be the problem and not the resistance.”

The Palestinian groups then threatened punishment for those involved in the demonstrations.

“Those behind the suspicious movement caused the occupation to back down from its negotiating position in the last few hours because of its reliance on the success of these agents in stabbing the resistance in the back,” the statement read. “Therefore, these suspects are responsible, just like the occupation, for the bloodshed of our people, and they will be treated accordingly.”

Hamas has a history of violently attacking those it considers to be “collaborators” with Israel. Earlier this year, the terrorist group executed 11 people for this alleged crime in what its aligned media termed a “punishment of bullets.”

The difference in approach between Naim — who framed the protests as anti-Israel and anti-war rather than anti-Hamas — and the approach of Hamas and allied groups in Gaza — which suggested the protesters are collaborators or sympathizers with Israel — is rooted in an explicit rift between two factions inside Hamas.

“To clear Hamas’s view of the protests emerging from the Gaza Strip for the third day in a row, there’s a dispute between Hamas abroad and Hamas in Gaza in response,” wrote Palestinian anti-authoritarianism and pro-peace activist Hamza Howidy on X. “Hamas abroad issued a statement asking the militias in Gaza not to touch the protesters to avoid any international outrage and to work on shifting the narrative and the goals of the protests to make it sound as if it was only anti-war protests through their propaganda machines.”

“Hamas’s view in Gaza is a bit different,” Howidy continued, “as they are extremely concerned and even accused the protesters of being the reason behind Israel’s withdrawal from the negotiations and promised to punish everyone participating in the protests.”

Many of Hamas’s top political leaders live outside of Gaza in Qatar or Turkey, and at times they and the terrorist group’s military leadership in the Palestinian enclave can disagree tactically regarding their efforts to destroy Israel.

A document from Hamas abroad reportedly urged the terrorist group in Gaza not to take strong action against the protesters, and instead “to be patient in confronting these demonstrations and to direct them against the occupation.”

It continued, “It is also strictly forbidden to confront these demonstrations in any way, no matter how many slogans are chanted against the movement and the resistance, no matter how intense the slogans are.”

However, there have been reports of death threats and even attempted executions and kidnappings by Hamas targeting those participating in the protests. Hamas officials have also reportedly called activists and threatened them not to join Friday’s protests, which were supposed to be a part of a “Day of Rage.”

Protests against Hamas in Gaza are now in their fourth day. While the specific number of people who have taken part in them is unclear, there have been demonstrations across the Strip, and it appears hundreds of people have attended each one.

The protests have featured anti-Hamas slogans such as “Down with Hamas, we’ve had enough,” “For God’s sake, Hamas out,” “we want an end to the war,” and “Hamas terrorists.”

One Gazan said, “Their rule has destroyed us, killed us, and ruined our lives — and all of us here in Beit Lahia stand firmly to end Hamas’s rule.”

Ahmad al-Masri, a 26-year-old resident of Beit Lahia, where the first protest took place on Tuesday, reportedly said, “Hamas needs to go away,” warning that “if it doesn’t, the bloodshed, the wars, and the destruction won’t stop.”

The protests have garnered the support of university professors in Gaza, who argue they should be able to express their opinions freely.

Gazan clans both in the north and south of the Strip have also come out in support of the demonstrations. The Assembly of Southern Gaza clans released a statement against Hamas, saying, “Enough is enough — a popular uprising against injustice. No more playing with our lives, our children’s future, or disregarding our suffering. Gaza is not anyone’s hostage; Gaza will be liberated by the will of its people.”

Another statement, released by the clans of Shuja’iyya in northern Gaza, read, “We call on you to take to the streets in a popular march of anger rejecting the continuation of the war, and demanding the lifting of Hamas’s control over the Gaza Strip, so that life can return to its people and our ongoing suffering can come to an end.”

The post Hamas Blames Israel for Gaza Protests Against Terror Group, Threatens Punishment for Demonstrators first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself. Really?

 

JNS.orgIf I asked you to name the most famous line in the Bible, what would you answer? While Shema Yisrael (“Hear O’Israel”) might get many votes, I imagine that the winning line would be “love thy neighbor as thyself” (Leviticus 19:18). Some religions refer to it as the Golden Rule, but all would agree that it is fundamental to any moral lifestyle. And it appears this week in our Torah reading, Kedoshim.

This is quite a tall order. Can we be expected to love other people as much as we love ourselves? Surely, this is an idealistic expectation. And yet, the Creator knows us better than we know ourselves. How can His Torah be so unrealistic?

The biblical commentaries offer a variety of explanations. Some, like Rambam (Maimonides), say that the focus should be on our behavior, rather than our feelings. We are expected to try our best or to treat others “as if” we genuinely love them.

Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi, in his classic text called the Tanya, argues that the actual feelings of love are, in fact, achievable provided that we focus on a person’s spirituality rather than how they present themselves physically. If we can put the soul over the body, we can do it.

Allow me to share the interpretation of the Ramban (Nachmanides), a 13th-century Torah scholar from Spain. His interpretation of the verses preceding love thy neighbor is classic and powerful, yet simple and straightforward.

“Do not hate your brother in your heart. You shall rebuke him, but do not bear a sin because of him” by embarrassing him in public. “Do not take revenge, and do not bear a grudge against your people. You shall love your fellow as yourself, I am God” (Leviticus 19:17-18).

What is the connection between these verses? Why is revenge and grudge-bearing in the same paragraph as love your fellow as yourself?

A careful reading shows that within these two verses are no less than six biblical commandments. But what is their sequence all about, and what is the connection between them?

The Ramban explains it beautifully, showing how the sequence of verses is deliberate and highlighting the Torah’s profound yet practical advice on how to maintain healthy relationships.

Someone wronged you? Don’t hate him in your heart. Speak to him. Don’t let it fester until it bursts, and makes you bitter and sick.

Instead, talk it out. Confront the person. Of course, do it respectfully. Don’t embarrass anyone in public, so that you don’t bear a sin because of them. But don’t let your hurt eat you up. Communicate!

If you approach the person who wronged you—not with hate in your heart but with respectful reproof—one of two things will happen. Either he or she will apologize and explain their perspective on the matter. Or that it was a misunderstanding and will get sorted out between you. Either way, you will feel happier and healthier.

Then you will not feel the need to take revenge or even to bear a grudge.

Here, says the Ramban, is the connection between these two verses. And if you follow this advice, only then will you be able to observe the commandment to Love Thy Neighbor. If you never tell him why you are upset, another may be completely unaware of his or her wrongdoing, and it will remain as a wound inside you and may never go away.

To sum up: Honest communication is the key to loving people.

Now, tell me the truth. Did you know that not taking revenge is a biblical commandment? In some cultures in Africa, revenge is a mitzvah! I’ve heard radio talk-show hosts invite listeners to share how they took “sweet revenge” on someone, as if it’s some kind of accomplishment.

Furthermore, did you know that bearing a grudge is forbidden by biblical law?

Here in South Africa, people refer to a grudge by its Yiddish name, a faribel. In other countries, people call it a broiges. Whatever the terminology, the Torah states explicitly: “Thou shalt not bear a grudge!” Do not keep a faribel, a broiges or resentment of any kind toward someone you believe wronged you. Talk to that person. Share your feelings honestly. If you do it respectfully and do not demean the other’s dignity, then it can be resolved. Only then will you be able to love your fellow as yourself.

May all our grudges and feelings of resentment toward others be dealt with honestly and respectfully. May all our grudges be resolved as soon as possible. Then we will all be in a much better position to love our neighbors as ourselves.

The post Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself. Really? first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

‘Nonsense’: Huckabee Shoots Down Report Trump to Endorse Palestinian Statehood

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee looks on during the day he visits the Western Wall, Judaism’s holiest prayer site, in Jerusalem’s Old City, April 18, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun

i24 NewsUS Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee on Saturday dismissed as nonsensical the report that President Donald Trump would endorse Palestinian statehood during his tour to the Persian Gulf this week.

“This report is nonsense,” Huckabee harrumphed on his X account, blasting the Jerusalem Post as needing better sourced reporting. “Israel doesn’t have a better friend than the president of the United States.”

Trump is set to visit Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. The leader’s first trip overseas since he took office comes as Trump seeks the Gulf countries’ support in regional conflicts, including the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza and curbing Iran’s advancing nuclear program.

However, reports citing administration insiders claimed that Trump has also set his sights on the ambitious goal of expanding the Abraham Accords. These agreements, initially signed in 2020, normalized relations between Israel and the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan. The accords are widely held to be among the most important achievements of the first Trump administration.

The post ‘Nonsense’: Huckabee Shoots Down Report Trump to Endorse Palestinian Statehood first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

US to Put Military Option Back on Table If No Immediate Progress in Iran Talks

US President Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy-designate Steve Witkoff gives a speech at the inaugural parade inside Capital One Arena on the inauguration day of Trump’s second presidential term, in Washington, DC, Jan. 20, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Carlos Barria

i24 NewsUnless significant progress is registered in Sunday’s round of nuclear talks with Iran, the US will consider putting the military option back on the table, sources close to US envoy Steve Witkoff told i24NEWS.

American and Iranian representatives voiced optimism after the previous talks that took place in Oman and Rome, saying there was a friendly atmosphere despite the two countries’ decades of enmity.

However the two sides are not believed to have thrashed out the all-important technical details, and basic questions remain.

The source has also underscored the significance of the administration’s choice of Michael Anton, the State Department’s policy planning director, as the lead representative in the nuclear talks’ technical phases.

Anton is “an Iran expert and someone who knows how to cut a deal with Iran,” the source said, saying that the choice reflected Trump’s desire to secure the deal.

The post US to Put Military Option Back on Table If No Immediate Progress in Iran Talks first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News