RSS
Hamas Lies; It’s Time We Start Acknowledging It
Yahya Sinwar, head of the Palestinian terror group Hamas in Gaza, in Gaza City on April 14, 2023. Photo: Yousef Masoud / SOPA Images/Sipa USA via Reuters Connect
As the Israel-Gaza war continues, many reporters are trying to present both sides of the conflict, in order to deliver the objectivity required of journalists. However, when it comes to Hamas, simply treating the terror organization’s statements with the same credibility as those of Israel is an act of journalistic negligence.
Hamas and other Palestinian organizations have a history of deceiving the public in times of war. In late December, Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza, lied about Hamas’ progress in the war, claiming their forces had killed more than 1,500 Israeli soldiers. In reality, the number of confirmed military casualties as of that day, including those killed in Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on southern Israel, was only 456. Similarly, Mousa Abu Marzouk, a senior member of Hamas, told the BBC that the October 7 terrorists did not murder any innocent civilians; this came after the terrorists filmed themselves killing women, children, and elderly civilians.
The lying phenomenon is not unique to Hamas or this conflict; it is pervasive in the Middle East. In 1967, after Israeli troops had taken control of the Sinai peninsula, Ahmed Said, a broadcaster for an Egyptian state-run radio, famously reported an Egyptian victory, falsely claiming that Egyptian forces had shot down 70 Israeli planes.
To better understand why outright deception is so frequently deployed, it is essential to realize that although lying is forbidden in Islam, all of the above examples are permissible according to Sunni law (the Islamic sect that Hamas is affiliated with).
Many Sunni sources define lying in war as a “non-lie.” Hadith 4921 in Sunan Abu Dawood says, “I do not count as a liar a man who puts things right between people, saying a word by which he intends only putting things right, and a man who says something in war.”
Similarly, the Jami at Tirmidhi Hadith 1939 says, “It is not lawful to lie except in three cases: Something the man tells his wife to please her, to lie during the war, and to lie to bring peace between the people.”
Although lying during war can arguably be justified, especially when it may save lives, Hamas has used this tactic to repeatedly mislead the public for years. And still, despite the repeated lies and their clear, proven, and frequent refutals, often by objective outsiders, the international media keeps treating Hamas with similar credibility as they would any Western government. They quote its casualty figures, and give its representatives a platform to voice their statements and positions.
Accepting Hamas as a credible source has a lasting and damaging impact on readers and viewers, even if the claims are later proven false, because many people hear the lie, but never the correction.
In contrast, Israel continues to prove its commitment to truth and transparency, often putting its reputation and military progress at risk in order to tell the truth. The IDF has reported military errors that led to the death of its soldiers, and has taken responsibility for a botched operation that resulted in the killing of three Israeli hostages. When Israel faced allegations of bombing the Al-Ahli hospital, the IDF spokesperson waited hours before commenting in order to allow for an investigation, which proved Israel had no involvement and was not operating in that area at the time. Still, Israel and Hamas are often treated as equally credible despite the drastic distinctions between the two sides’ approaches to honesty at war.
We must begin to acknowledge Hamas’ lies, and reporters must exercise more scrutiny when repeating them. Simply taking Hamas’ statements at face value without questioning their accuracy and validity is a disservice to readers and viewers.
In order to present an accurate account of the war, it is crucial that commentators recognize Hamas’ history of misinformation, and approach the group’s allegations with a greater degree of skepticism. Although Gaza is a dangerous place that is not accessible to most journalists, deeper scrutiny of Hamas’ statements is the only way to begin telling the truth about the war.
Elya Cowland is a British-Israeli public relations professional living in Jerusalem. Following the October 7 massacre, he has been facilitating media opportunities and press conferences for hostage families and coordinating media campaigns for war-related initiatives and organizations.
The post Hamas Lies; It’s Time We Start Acknowledging It first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
UN Sanctions on Iran to Be Reimposed, France’s Macron Says
French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, Sept. 15, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/Pool
European powers will likely reimpose international sanctions on Iran by the end of the month after their latest round of talks with Tehran aimed at preventing them were deemed not serious, France’s President Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday.
Britain, France, and Germany, the so-called E3, launched a 30-day process at the end of August to reimpose UN sanctions. They set conditions for Tehran to meet during September to convince them to delay the “snapback mechanism.”
The offer by the E3 to put off the snapback for up to six months to enable serious negotiations is conditional on Iran restoring access for UN nuclear inspectors – who would also seek to account for Iran‘s large stock of enriched uranium – and engaging in talks with the US.
When asked in an interview on Israel’s Channel 12 whether the snapback was a done deal, Macron said:
“Yes. I think so because the latest news from the Iranians is not serious.”
E3 foreign ministers, the European Union foreign policy chief, and their Iranian counterpart held a phone call on Wednesday, in which diplomats on both sides said there had been no substantial progress, though the door was still open to try and reach a deal before the deadline expired.
The 15-member UN Security Council will vote on Friday on a resolution that would permanently lift UN sanctions on Iran – a move it is required to take after the E3 launched the process.
The resolution is likely to fail to get the minimum nine votes needed to pass, say diplomats, and if it did it would be vetoed by the United States, Britain, or France.
RSS
UAE Could Downgrade but Won’t Cut Diplomatic Ties if Israel Annexes West Bank, Sources Say
Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, then-US President Donald Trump, and United Arab Emirates (UAE) Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed display their copies of signed agreements as they participate in the signing ceremony of the Abraham Accords, normalizing relations between Israel and some of its Middle East neighbors, in a strategic realignment of Middle Eastern countries against Iran, on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, US, Sept. 15, 2020. Photo: REUTERS/Tom Brenner
The United Arab Emirates could downgrade diplomatic ties with Israel if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government annexes part or all of the West Bank, but it is not considering the option of severing them completely, according to three sources briefed on the Gulf Arab state’s deliberations.
The UAE is one of just a few Arab states with diplomatic relations with Israel and downgrading ties would be a major setback for the Abraham Accords – a signature foreign policy achievement of US President Donald Trump and Netanyahu.
Israel‘s government has recently taken steps that could presage annexation of the West Bank, which was captured from Jordan along with East Jerusalem in a war in 1967. The United Nations and most countries oppose such a move.
For Netanyahu, whose coalition relies in part on right-wing nationalist parties, annexation could be seen as a valuable vote winner before an election expected next year.
NOT ALL TIES LIKELY TO BE CUT, SOURCE SAYS
Abu Dhabi warned Netanyahu’s coalition this month that any annexation of the West Bank would be a “red line” for the Gulf state but did not say what measures could follow.
The UAE, which established ties with Israel in 2020 under the Abraham Accords, was considering withdrawing its ambassador in any response, the sources told Reuters.
The sources, who all spoke on condition of anonymity, said Abu Dhabi was not considering completely severing ties, although tensions have mounted during the almost two-year-old Gaza War.
A source in Israel said the government believed it could repair its strained ties with the UAE, a major commercial center seen as the most significant of the Arab states to establish ties with Israel in 2020. The others were Bahrain and Morocco.
No other Arab state has since established formal ties with Israel, which also has diplomatic relations with Egypt and Jordan, and direct contacts with Qatar, though without full diplomatic recognition. Once-thriving business ties between the UAE and Israel have cooled due to the Gaza war and Netanyahu has yet to visit the Gulf state five years after establishing ties.
ISRAELI COMPANIES BARRED FROM UAE AIRSHOW
In a sign of growing tension with Israel, the Gulf state last week decided to bar Israeli defense companies from exhibiting at the Dubai Airshow in November, three of the sources said. Two other sources, an Israeli official and an Israeli defense industry executive, confirmed the decision.
Israel‘s defense ministry said it had been made aware of the decision but did not elaborate. A spokesperson for the Israeli embassy in Abu Dhabi said discussions over Israel‘s participation in the week-long trade show were continuing.
Israel‘s media were the first to report the move to block the firms from the UAE‘s flagship aerospace and defense event.
The UAE foreign ministry did not respond to questions on whether it was weighing downgrading diplomatic ties with Israel.
The spokesperson at the Israeli embassy in Abu Dhabi said that Israel was committed to the Abraham Accords and that it would continue to work towards strengthening ties with the UAE.
Emirati foreign ministry official Lana Nusseibeh had told Reuters and Israeli media on Sept. 3 that any annexation of the West Bank would jeopardize the Abraham Accords and end the pursuit of regional integration.
That warning preceded Israel‘s air strike on Qatar last week, which targeted Hamas leaders, an attack that Anwar Gargash, diplomatic adviser to UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, condemned.
At an emergency meeting of Muslim nations in Qatar, convened in response to the strike, a communique was issued urging countries to review diplomatic and economic ties with Israel.
As part of the Abraham Accords, Netanyahu promised to hold off annexing the West Bank for four years. But that deadline has passed and some Israeli ministers are now pressing for action.
Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich this month said that maps were being drawn up to annex most of the West Bank, urging Netanyahu to accept the plan. Itamar Ben-Gvir, the national security minister, also backs annexing the territory.
TIES WITH ISRAEL DETERIORATED AFTER 2023
After establishing ties, the UAE and Israel built a close relationship, focusing on economic, security, and intelligence cooperation. This followed years of discreet contacts.
But differences began emerging after Netanyahu returned to power in 2023, leading the most right-wing government in Israel‘s history. Abu Dhabi has condemned repeated efforts by Ben-Gvir to alter the status quo of Jerusalem’s Al Aqsa compound to allow Jews to be able to pray there. The site is sacred to Muslims and Jews and at present non-Muslims can visit but cannot pray.
The UAE has also criticized Israel‘s policies in the West Bank, including the expansion of settlements, and its military campaign in Gaza, and said an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel was necessary for regional stability. Netanyahu this month declared there would never be a Palestinian state in the wake of Hamas’s invasion of and massacre across southern Israel.
RSS
Gaza Aid Driver Kills Two Israeli Military Personnel at Jordan Border Crossing
Israeli police officers stand next to their cars at the scene of a fatal shooting at the Allenby Crossing between the West Bank and Jordan, Sept. 18, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Oren Ben Hakoon
A driver bringing humanitarian aid from Jordan for Gaza opened fire and killed two Israeli military personnel at the Allenby Crossing into the West Bank on Thursday before being killed by security forces, authorities from both nations said.
No group immediately claimed responsibility for what Israel denounced as a “terror attack” at the only gateway for Palestinians from the West Bank to Jordan.
“The driver accused of the operation is Abdul Mutalib al-Qaisi, born in 1968. He is a civilian who began working as a driver delivering aid to Gaza three months ago,” Jordan’s foreign ministry said.
Israel‘s ambulance service said the two Israelis succumbed to their wounds while the attacker was shot dead by security personnel.
Jordan said an investigation would be opened, calling the shootings a threat to its humanitarian role in Gaza.
Israeli chief of staff Eyal Zamir advised the government to halt the entry of humanitarian aid from Jordan until the completion of an inquiry into the incident, and the implementation of revised screening procedures for Jordanian drivers, the military said.
Earlier this month, Palestinian terrorist group Hamas claimed responsibility for a shooting on the outskirts of Jerusalem that killed six people.
In September 2024, a gunman from Jordan also killed three Israelis at the Allenby Crossing before being shot dead by security forces.