RSS
Hamas Was Preparing New Terror Attacks Before Israel Struck

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends a cabinet meeting at the Bible Lands Museum in Jerusalem on June 5, 2024. Photo: Gil Cohen-Magen/Pool via REUTERS
JNS.org – At 2.20 a.m. local time on Tuesday morning, the Israeli Air Force restarted large-scale action against Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Gaza. Included in the first batch of some 80 targets, struck in just minutes, were senior- and medium-ranking members of Hamas’s political regime and key military infrastructure sites.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu authorized the renewal of military action, while the Israeli government and security establishment coordinated the decision to resume operations against the terrorist regime in Gaza.
The decision followed Hamas’s repeated refusal to release hostages despite multiple mediation efforts, particularly those led by US envoy Steve Witkoff, according to Netanyahu. The renewed strikes mark a decisive shift in Israel’s approach, signaling both military escalation and political determination to achieve its war objectives.
However, JNS has learned, the renewal of Israeli military operations was driven not only by Hamas’s refusal to release hostages but also by clear intelligence indicating that the terrorist organization had used the ceasefire period to strengthen its military capabilities. During the two-month truce, which began on January 19, Hamas worked to rebuild its forces, stockpile weapons, and prepare for future attacks.
The Israeli response targeted mid-level Hamas commanders, senior figures in its political wing, and key terrorist infrastructure. The strikes were part of a sustained military effort designed to degrade Hamas’s operational capabilities while applying pressure to release hostages.
The timing of the operation was also influenced by intelligence assessments that Hamas was preparing new attacks. The group had been observed reinforcing its military positions and laying explosives along expected IDF entry routes.
These activities suggested a concerted effort to prepare for a new, cross-border attack targeting Israeli communities, prompting the IDF to act preemptively. The military operation is expected to continue as long as necessary, with the scope potentially expanding based on battlefield and diplomatic developments.
Hamas’s repeated declarations about its intention to conduct further attacks reinforced the perception that it was merely using the ceasefire as a tactical pause to prepare more murderous attacks against Israel. Israeli intelligence had been closely monitoring Hamas’s activities and concluded that its leadership remained committed to its goal of carrying out new large-scale operations on Israeli territory.
Given this assessment, waiting any longer would have allowed Hamas to further entrench itself. While the current phase of the operation remains focused on airstrikes, Israeli officials have indicated that a military escalation remains a possibility. The IDF’s extensive aerial campaign was executed with overwhelming force.
A joint announcement by the IDF and Shin Bet intelligence agency (ISA) on Tuesday stated that they were “continuing to strike terror targets belonging to the Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorist organizations across the Gaza Strip. The targets struck over the past few hours include terrorist cells, launch posts, weapons stockpiles, and additional military infrastructure used by these terror organizations to plan and execute attacks against Israeli civilians and IDF soldiers.”
The strikes took Hamas by surprise. The scale and speed of the attack were designed to inflict maximum damage while minimizing Hamas’s ability to respond effectively.
According to a subsequent IDF-Shin Bet statement, the operation resulted in the elimination of senior Hamas officials, including:
- Essam al-Da’alis, head of the Hamas government in Gaza, and the most senior figure of authority in Gaza.
- Mahmoud Marzouk Ahmed Abu-Watfa, Hamas’s minister of internal affairs and the head of its internal security forces, which the IDF said were also used for terrorist missions.
- Bahajat Hassan Mohammed Abu-Sultan, the head of Hamas’s internal security forces who engaged in terrorism.
- Ahmed Amar Abdullah Alhata, Hamas’s minister of justice, whose role included the use of Hamas-controlled legal institutions for terror-related purposes.
The targeted killings of these figures significantly weakened Hamas’s internal organizational structure and disrupted its ability to maintain governance and military coordination.
Col. (res) Yaron Buskila, a former operations officer in the IDF Gaza Division, told journalists in a call organized by the Jerusalem Press Club on Tuesday: “There were actually three objectives for this attack. The first one, and I think the most important one, is to removing the immediate threat of a Hamas raid on the Israeli positions or again on the Israeli villages. And we know about the threats. In the last two months since the ceasefire, the Hamas tried to arm itself again and to prepare for the next round.”
He added: “We had a lot of alerts that the Hamas is preparing to raid. It can be civilians who are working in the field next to the border, or against the Israeli villages.”
The second objective, said Buskila, “is to push Hamas again to the negotiation table under the terms of the first round.”
Hamas is currently attempting to engineer negotiations in a manner that would allow it to remain as Gaza’s ruler and armed force and prepare a new Oct.-7-style mass assault on Israel, according to Buskila.
“We can never know when [Hamas will try to attack again]. And that’s one of the things that we cannot allow. We have to stay, leave our forces in the Philadelphi Corridor and go inside Gaza again to fight against Hamas, to make sure Hamas will not stay in Gaza anymore. Otherwise, they will just arm themselves again and prepare for the next raid.”
The third objective, Buskila said, is to remove threats to Israel such as explosive devices, rockets and anti-tank missiles that were planted by Hamas in Gazan homes, along roads which the IDF is expected to enter in a future ground operation.
Buskila stressed that “Israel is trying to exhaust as many ways as possible to free the hostages,” adding, however, that “it is clear to us that the Hamas will not release everyone without achieving its goal because they [the hostages] are only assets that they have in their hands.”
“So if you want to change the terms of the next negotiation, we have to get inside Gaza and to fight again, and to go back to the table with terms that are better for Israel.”
In a statement to the nation on Tuesday, Netanyahu said: “Hamas refused offer after offer to release our hostages. In the past two weeks, Israel did not initiate any military action in the hope that Hamas would change course. Well, that didn’t happen. While Israel accepted the offer of President Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, Hamas flatly refused to do so. This is why I authorized yesterday the renewal of military action against Hamas.”
Defense Minister Israel Katz reinforced this message during a visit to the Tel Nof Airbase, southern Israel, declaring: “Hamas must understand that the rules of the game have changed. If it does not immediately release all the hostages, the gates of hell will open, and it will face the full force of the IDF—by air, sea, and land—until its total destruction.”
Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, the new IDF chief of staff, toured Rafah in the southern Gaza on Tuesday and reiterated the IDF’s commitment to securing southern Israel, telling troops: “Your mission is to protect the communities here. We are engaged in an ongoing operation against Hamas, alongside the IDF’s full obligation to bring back the hostages.”
At present, the operation remains an air campaign, but Israeli officials have made it clear that a ground incursion will follow if Hamas continues to refuse to change its position.
The post Hamas Was Preparing New Terror Attacks Before Israel Struck first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Pro-Israel Democrats Blast Washington Post Over ‘Antisemitic Tropes’ in Coverage of ‘Extremist’ Jewish Activists

Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish doctoral student at Tufts University in Somerville, Massachusetts, poses in an undated photograph provided by her family and obtained by Reuters on March 29, 2025. Photo: Courtesy of the Ozturk family/Handout via REUTERS
A US group advocating pro-Israel policies within the Democratic Party has lambasted the Washington Post for promoting what it described as “antisemitic tropes” in a front-page news story published on Saturday.
The article — headlined “A militant Zionist group threatens activists online with a ‘deport list’” — profiled the resurgence of Betar, an organization with roots going back a century which has chosen to embrace a hardball style in confronting — critics say threatening — anti-Israel protesters.
Betar, a right-wing Jewish group, says that it has assembled a list of foreign students who have engaged in pro-Hamas advocacy, calling on the Trump administration to deport them for supporting a US-designated terrorist organization. The Post noted that there is no evidence that Betar’s research has contributed to any deportations.
Another controversial tactic Betar employs is advocating for pro-Israel supporters to hand pagers to pro-Hamas activists, a move some regard as a threat of violence given its reference to a successful Israeli operation to explode the pagers used by members of the Hezbollah terrorist organization in Lebanon.
The group Democratic Majority for Israel (DMFI) took issue with the Post‘s coverage of Betar, saying it pushed “antisemitic tropes” by suggesting, without concrete evidence, that the small Jewish organization has had significant influence on the Trump administration pursuing its policy of deporting non-citizen students who allegedly support Hamas and other terrorist groups.
Beginning with clarification that “Betar does not speak for us,” DFMI President and CEO Mark Mellman then ran down a list of values DMFI supports including the US constitution, freedom of speech, the presumption of innocence, holding accountable those who harass Jewish students, and that “convicted criminals who are not citizens can be returned to their home countries and that our country is stronger when this process demonstrates adherence to the law.”
Mellman said that DMFI was “taken aback that, at a time of rising antisemitism, the Washington Post would echo antisemitic tropes by publishing a front-page story suggesting a small, extremist group is responsible for Donald Trump’s deportation policy. The decision is especially troubling when the Post admits, in the story’s fifth paragraph, that it ‘couldn’t determine whether the group played a role in the Trump administration’s decision to target deportees.’”
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) includes Betar in its “Glossary of Extremism and Hate.” The entry describes how the organization “adopts the far-right Kahanist slogan calling for Jewish armament, ‘Every Jew, a .22,’ openly embraces Islamophobia and harasses Muslims online and in person. The group has indicated that they would like to work with the Proud Boys, a far-right extremist group with a history of antisemitism and Islamophobia, to ‘counter Islamic jihadis.’”
The ADL also notes that Betar “posted a video of an individual shouting Islamophobic slurs outside of a mosque with the caption, ‘We protest mosques.’”
Betar rejects accusations of extremism.
“This claim that Betar, the youth movement associated with the Revisionist Zionist movement, is extremist is a mischaracterization that overlooks its historical context and ideological evolution,” the organization said in a Monday statement on X. “Founded in 1923 by Ze’ev Jabotinsky, Betar was originally conceived as a Zionist organization aimed at fostering Jewish nationalism and preparing Jews for the defense of the Jewish homeland. However, labeling Betar as ‘extremist’ in the modern context fails to recognize its integral role in shaping mainstream Zionism and its evolution into a broad-based ideological movement.”
Betar described how its “core ideology” had “always focused on Jewish self-defense, the establishment of a Jewish state in the historical land of Israel, and the revival of Hebrew culture. These principles align with the broader goals of Zionism, which advocated for the return of Jews to their ancestral homeland and the establishment of a sovereign Jewish state.”
Betar said that to call the group extremist “is to misunderstand the historical trajectory of Zionism itself. The movement has always been dedicated to the vision of a Jewish homeland, and its advocacy for this cause, far from being an extremist position, is one shared by the majority of Israeli society and is enshrined in the foundational principles of the modern State of Israel. To call Betar extremist is to call Zionism extremist.”
Following the arrest of Tufts graduate student Rumeysa Ozturk, Betar wrote Wednesday on X accompanied by an American flag emoji that “she was on our list. Many more jihadis are. We will be making a new submission Monday with approximately 1800 more jihadis. Submit to us candidates with proof for @ICEgov to consider!”
On Friday, US District Judge Denise Casper in Boston halted Ozturk’s deportation, requesting a response by Tuesday from the Trump administration to a complaint by the Turkish student. As of Monday, Ozturk remains in custody at the South Louisiana ICE Processing Center in Basile, Louisiana and she reportedly suffered an asthma attack while in transit to the facility.
The post Pro-Israel Democrats Blast Washington Post Over ‘Antisemitic Tropes’ in Coverage of ‘Extremist’ Jewish Activists first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Democratic Nominee for Florida Congressional Seat Has History of Anti-Israel Rhetoric

Josh Weil, a schoolteacher and Democratic candidate for Florida’s 6th Congressional District seat in the US House of Representatives, speaks at a town hall event in Ocala, Florida, US, March 26, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Octavio Jones
Josh Weil, the Democratic candidate in the special election to represent Florida’s 6th Congressional District in the US Congress, has a history of anti-Israel comments, potentially raising alarm bells among allies of the Jewish state in Florida.
Weil, a schoolteacher based in Orlando, was tapped by the Florida Democratic Party to compete in the special election to represent the district, whose congressional seat was vacated by Republican Mike Waltz after US President Donald Trump selected him to serve as White House national security adviser. Weil’s ascendance to the Democratic ticket has drawn fresh scrutiny toward his views on Israel.
Weil has publicly condemned Israel and vowed to oppose efforts to provide the Jewish state with US aid if elected to Congress. In 2021, during a failed run for US Senate, Weil slammed “Israel’s state sanctioned violence against Palestinians.” He also called for then-US Secretary of State Antony Blinken to” immediately intervene to stop Jerusalem expulsions” and to “end US military aid to Israel.”
That same year, Weil accused Israel of committing a “war crime” for forcing “Palestinians from their homes to make room for Israeli settlers” in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah.
“There is no justification for this abhorrent assault on human rights,” he wrote.
In 2021, the Sheikh Jarrah area of Jerusalem was embroiled in a battle between landlords, squatters, and delinquent renters from a number of houses with tenants whose leases had expired. The landlords engaged in a drawn-out legal battle to successfully evict the squatters and delinquent renters. Critics argued that the evictions were an example of anti-Arab discrimination and that Israel should force the landlords to keep the squatters and delinquent renters in place.
In 2022, Weil posted on X/Twitter that Israelis “murder children in their homes.”
In February, Weil appeared on a YouTube show hosted by Jen Perelman, a staunch anti-Zionist. Perelman, a Florida native, has challenged Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL) for her congressional seat, condemning the congresswoman for supporting the Jewish state and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Perelman has accused Israel of “genocide,” “ethnic cleansing,” and called for an end to all US aid to the Jewish state.
Conversely, Weil’s Republican opponent, Florida state Sen. Randy Fine, who is Jewish, has positioned himself as a stalwart ally of Israel. Following the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, invasion of and massacre across southern Israel, Fine, has spearheaded efforts to uproot antisemitism within the state of Florida.
In August 2024, he chided Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) for taking a trip to Ireland, repudiating the country as “antisemitic.”
That same month, Fine launched an investigation into alleged antisemitic and pro-terrorist ideology within instructional materials at Florida public universities. Fine suggested that activist professors were using textbooks that were indoctrinating students with anti-Israel sentiment.
“When we learned that Florida universities were using a factually inaccurate, openly antisemitic textbook, we realized there was a problem that had to be addressed,” Fine said.
The lawmaker has not shied away from controversy. Following the New Year’s Day ISIS-inspired terrorist attack in New Orleans, Fine raised eyebrows by repudiating Islam as a “fundamentally broken and dangerous culture.”
“Muslim terror has attacked the United States — again. The blood is on the hands of those who refuse to acknowledge the worldwide #MuslimProblem. It is high time to deal with this fundamentally broken and dangerous culture,” Fine posted on X/Twitter.
The race between Fine and Weil has drawn national interest, in part due to the Republicans only having a narrow majority in the US House of Representatives. According to reports, polls and early voting totals have shown that what was expected to be an easy victory for Fine is now a tight race.
Still, US President Donald Trump expressed support for Fine in a social media post over the weekend.
“America First Patriot Randy Fine is running to represent the Wonderful People of Florida’s 6th Congressional District!” he wrote. “A highly successful, Harvard educated businessman, and greatly respected State Legislator, Randy has been a tremendous Voice for MAGA.”
“In Congress, Randy will be an incredible fighter, who will work tirelessly with me to Strengthen our Economy, Lower Taxes, Secure the Border, Champion our Military/Vets, Ensure American Energy DOMINANCE, Protect our always under siege Second Amendment, and Advance PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH,” Trump added.
The post Democratic Nominee for Florida Congressional Seat Has History of Anti-Israel Rhetoric first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Organizers of Local Music Awards in Australia Vow to Back Anti-Israel Musician Despite City Funding Being Pulled

A protester holds a sign that reads, ”From the river to the sea Palestine will be free” during a pro-Palestinian emergency demonstration outside the Consulate General of Israel in Houston, Texas, on March 19, 2025. Photo: Reginald Mathalone via Reuters Connect
Organizers of a music awards ceremony that celebrates artists in northeastern Australia said it is their “priority” to support an avid anti-Israel jazz musician, who won a top honor at the recent show for her anti-Israel composition and then repeatedly criticized the Jewish state in her acceptance speech.
QMusic, which is the Australian state of Queensland’s music industry development association and the organizer of the Queensland Music Awards (QMAs), sent a letter to its members on Sunday in support of “River to Sea” composer and pianist Kellee Green. The letter was sent after the Brisbane City Council (BCC) in Australia revoked funding worth $25,000 (US $15,755) for the QMAs effective immediately because Green’s seven-minute instrumental compassion won the jazz award at the annual ceremony on March 25.
A further $450,000 (USD $283,590) in annual funding to QMusic is also under review, according to The Guardian. Queensland’s Arts Minister John-Paul Langbroek said in a recent statement that the awards show “should have never been the place for this divisive commentary to occur.”
“There are consequences for words and actions,” he added. “I have sought an explanation from QMusic. I will be questioning the awards process, current eligibility criteria, and comments made at the awards ceremony.”
In the letter to QMusic members, CEO Kris Stewart wrote: “One of our QMAs winners and members, Kellee Green, who, along with the QMAs, has received a lot of media attention in the days since the awards. Supporting Kellee is a priority, and I apologize for the delay in sharing this update with our members.”
“We have remained in regular contact with Kellee following the QMAs to ensure she is supported and has access to professional support services,” Stewart added in part. “The safety and wellbeing of our members and the wider music community is our shared responsibility … This moment serves as a reminder of the importance of a strong, united music community.”
Green, who is also a teacher at a private Catholic girls’ school, attended the QMAs on March 25 wearing an ensemble that prominently featured the colors of the Palestinian flag. The title of her composition “River to Sea” is a nod to the anti-Israel slogan “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” The phrase is largely recognized as a call for the destruction of the Jewish state — located between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea — and for it to be replaced with “Palestine.”
In her acceptance speech after “River to Sea” won the jazz award, the Brisbane-based artist accused Israel of “76 years of genocide against the people of Palestine.” She claimed Israel “kill[s] innocent Palestinian men, women, and children,” and called for a boycott of the Jewish state. She also criticized the Australian government for supporting Israel. She alleged that Australia is “complicit in war crimes,” and “supports the mass slaughter and ethnic cleansing of an entire race of people.” Green ended the speech by proclaiming, “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.”
Her comments were condemned by Jewish groups as well as Brisbane’s Lord Mayor Adrian Schrinner, who called Green’s “promotion of antisemitism” at the QMAs “utterly shameful and divisive.” He criticized QMusic for giving an award “to an offensively titled anti-Jewish song” and allowing “vile hate speech” at the QMAs. Stewart responded to the backlash about Green’s song winning an award by saying that while QMA judges “recognize that this phrase [‘River to Sea’] carries political connotations, the title did not stand out as divisive within the volume of songs received.”
Brendan Cahill, the principal of the school Brigidine College in Indooroopilly where Green teaches, issued a statement to parents of students last week announcing that Green had agreed to take a leave of absence from the school, The Guardian reported. Green assured him that she had not made any political statements to students, and the school is further investigating Green’s “personal musical recordings,” Cahill added. The school has also been in contact with the Queensland Jewish Board of Deputies, which has called for QMusic to revoke Green’s award. Green’s website has since gone private, and she deactivated her social media accounts.
More than 2,000 members of the music industry have signed a statement in solidarity with Green that was launched by Taiwanese-Australian composer Matt Hsu, the founder of Brisbane’s Obscure Orchestra. A number of pro-Palestinian groups — such as the Facebook group called Teachers and School Staff for Palestine NSW — have also come out in support of Green and her song amid the controversy.
The post Organizers of Local Music Awards in Australia Vow to Back Anti-Israel Musician Despite City Funding Being Pulled first appeared on Algemeiner.com.