RSS
The Mullahs Can Survive Bombs — They Can’t Survive Memes

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei waves during a meeting in Tehran, Iran, May 20, 2025. Photo: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS
For years, Western commentators have wondered aloud why the vast resources of Israel’s public diplomacy efforts — Hasbara, as it’s often called — have so consistently fallen flat — earnest explainer videos; carefully captioned infographics; appeals to reason and international law. All are tragically ineffective when faced with an enemy that thrives not on truth, but on narrative — and whose audiences see weakness not as a prompt for sympathy, but as an invitation to strike.
But something has shifted. Quietly, almost accidentally, a far more potent weapon has entered the battlefield: mockery. Not just commentary or explanation — but relentless, humiliating, viral ridicule. Suddenly, Iranian officials are being memed into irrelevance. Their threats turned into TikTok soundbites. Their propaganda met not with a counter-lecture, but a clown nose.
And it is working.
Because while the Islamic world has long postured around the notion of honor, there is one thing that has always cut deeper than military failure: public humiliation. Regimes can survive defeat. They can survive sanctions. But they do not survive becoming a joke.
Look back to 2009, when protestors in Iran chanted “Where is my vote?” after the stolen election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. What did the regime fear most? Not the demonstrations — those were violently suppressed. It was the Twitter hashtags, the jokes about their fake democracy, the collapse of the regime’s dignity in the eyes of their own people.
Dictatorships cling to power through fear. But fear only functions so long as people believe in the myth of strength. Once that illusion is broken — once a regime is laughed at — the spell is broken. The emperor has no clothes, and worse, he has been turned into a meme with auto-tuned music and poor subtitles.
Which brings us to today. Israel, long accused of losing the PR war, has begun to win it in a most unexpected fashion. Not by out-explaining. Not by out-arguing. But by out-mocking.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has just watched its crown jewel of nuclear secrecy, the Fordow facility, get flattened — and what’s circulating online? Not solemn analyses. Not Security Council resolutions. But a thousand perfectly timed TikToks with dancing soldiers, laugh tracks, and slow-zoom edits of confused ayatollahs. One could almost feel sorry for them — if they hadn’t brought this all upon themselves.
This isn’t just cultural pushback. It is psychological warfare at its finest. Because terrorism — and its state sponsors – rely on a performative narrative. They need to be feared. They need to be taken seriously. A suicide bomber is only powerful when framed as tragic, not idiotic. A supreme leader only commands loyalty when he’s seen as divine, not daft.
And so, for once, the West — and particularly Israel — has grasped a crucial truth: mockery is deterrence. Not instead of military action, but in tandem with it. A drone strike may eliminate a general. A meme may eliminate a myth. It is, in its own way, the most subversive act imaginable: to make the tyrant funny. To expose the man behind the beard. To show that the most feared actors in the Middle East can, with a few edits, become as ridiculous as a washed-up villain in a low-budget film.
The Hamas leadership in Gaza must face similar humiliation. Their battle cries turned into Instagram reels. Their martyrs repurposed as cautionary punchlines. It is not for naught that we have seen the rise of the comedic Jewish influencer, the one able to infantalize their moral superiority.
There is, of course, danger in this. Satire must not replace strategy. The West cannot meme its way out of hard decisions. But it would do well to remember that strength is not just about military power. It is also about psychological dominance — about never allowing the enemy to believe they have the upper hand in narrative, identity, or dignity.
Israel, for all its previous struggles in the digital battlefield, may have stumbled into something revolutionary. By embracing the power of mockery — by mocking the mullahs, the militias, the martyrdom cult — it has begun to rob them of their most precious asset: fear.
And as history has shown us, regimes can survive almost anything.
But ridicule? That’s fatal.
Meira Cowland Kolatch is a political commentator, international speaker, host of the podcast The Meira K Show, and founder of Young Voices for Israel. www.MeiraK.com
The post The Mullahs Can Survive Bombs — They Can’t Survive Memes first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
‘Fine Scholar’: UC Berkeley Chancellor Praises Professor Who Expressed Solidarity With Oct. 7 Attacks

University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. Photo: Allison Bailey via Reuters Connect.
The chancellor of University of California, Berkeley described a professor who cheered the Oct. 7 Hamas massacre across southern Israel a “fine scholar” during a congressional hearing held at Capitol Hill on Tuesday.
Richard K. Lyons, who assumed the chancellorship in July 2024 issued the unmitigated praise while being questioned by members of the House of Representatives Committee on Education and the Workforce, which summoned him and the chief administrators of two other major universities to interrogate their handling of the campus antisemitism crisis.
Lyons stumbled into the statement while being questioned by Rep. Lisa McClain (R-MI), who asked Lyons to describe the extent of his relationship and correspondence with Professor Ussama Makdisi, who tweeted in Feb. 2024 that he “could have been one of those who broke through the siege on October 7.”
“What do you think the professor meant,” McClain asked Lyons, to which the chancellor responded, “I believe it was a celebration of the terrorist attack on October 7.” McClain proceeded to ask if Lyons discussed the tweet with Makdisi or personally reprimanded him, prompting an exchange of remarks which concluded with Lyons’s saying, “He is a fine scholar.”
Lyon’s comment came after nearly three hours in which the group of university leaders — which included Dr. Robert Groves, president of Georgetown University, and Dr. Felix V. Matos Rodriguez, chancellor of the City University of New York (CUNY) — offered gaffe-free, deliberately worded answers to the members’ questions to avoid eliciting the kind of public relations ordeal which prematurely ended the tenures of two Ivy League presidents in 2024 following an education committee held in Dec. 2023.
Rep. McClain later criticized Lyons on social media, calling his comment “totally disgraceful.” She added, “Faculty must be held accountable and Jewish students deserve better.”
CUNY chancellor Rodriguez also triggered a rebuke from the committee members in which he was also described as a “disgrace.”
As previously reported by The Algemeiner, CUNY campuses have been lambasted by critics as some of the most antisemitic institutions of higher education in the United States. Last year, the US Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) resolved half a dozen investigations of antisemitism on CUNY campuses, one of which involved Jewish students who were pressured into saying that Jews are White people who should be excluded from discussions about social justice.
During Tuesday’s hearing Rodriguez acknowledged that antisemitic incidents continue to disrupt Jewish academic life, disclosing that 84 complaints of antisemitism have been formally reported to CUNY administrators since 2024. 15 were filed in 2025 alone, but CUNY, he said, has published only 18 students for antisemitic conduct. Rodriguez went on to denounce efforts to pressure CUNY into adopting the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel, saying, “I have repudiated BDS and I have said there’s no place for BDS at the City University of New York.”
Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) remarked, however, that Rodriguez has allegedly done little to address antisemitism in the CUNY faculty union, the Professional Staff Congress (PSC), which has passed several resolutions endorsing BDS and whose members, according to 2021 ruling rendered by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), discriminated against Professor Jeffrey Lax by holding meetings on Shabbat to prevent him and other Jews from attending them.
“The PSC does not speak for the City University of New York,” Rodriquez protested. “We’ve been clear on our commitment against antisemitism and against BDS.”
Later, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), whose grilling of higher education officials who appear before the committee has created several viral moments, rejected Rodriguez’s responses as disingenuous.
“It’s all words, no action. You have failed the people of New York,” she told the chancellor. “You have failed Jewish students in New York State, and it is a disgrace.”
Following the hearing, The Lawfare Project, legal nonprofit which provides legal services free of charge to Jewish victims of civil rights violations, applauded the education committee for publicizing antisemitism at CUNY.
“I am thankful for the many members of Congress who worked with us to ensure that the deeply disturbing facts about antisemitism at CUNY were brought forward in this hearing,” Lawfare Project litigation director Zipora Reich said in a press release. “While it is deeply frustrating to hear more platitudes and vague promises from CUNY’s leadership, we are encouraged to see federal lawmakers demanding accountability.”
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
The post ‘Fine Scholar’: UC Berkeley Chancellor Praises Professor Who Expressed Solidarity With Oct. 7 Attacks first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Huckabee Calls for Israeli Investigation Into ‘Criminal and Terrorist’ Killing of Palestinian-American in West Bank
RSS
Scandal-Plagued UN Commission Disbands Amid Increasing US Pressure Against Anti-Israel International Organizations

Miloon Kothari, member of the United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel, briefs reporters on the first report of the Commission. UN Photo/Jean Marc Ferré
The Commission of Inquiry (COI), a controversial United Nations commission investigating Israel for nearly five years, has collapsed after all three of its members abruptly resigned days after the United States sanctioned a senior UN official over antisemitism.
Commission chair Navi Pillay resigned on July 8, citing health concerns and scheduling conflicts. Her fellow commissioners, Chris Sidoti and Miloon Kothari, followed suit days later. While none of the commissioners directly linked their resignations to the U.S. sanctions, the timing suggests mounting American pressure played a decisive role.
The resignations came just one day before the Trump administration announced sanctions on Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Palestinian territories. Albanese was sanctioned over what the State Department called a “pattern of antisemitic and inflammatory rhetoric.” She had previously claimed that the U.S. was controlled by a “Jewish lobby” and questioned Israel’s right to self-defense. The sanctions bar her from entering the U.S. and freeze any assets under American jurisdiction.
The resignations mark a major victory for critics who have long viewed the inquiry as biased and politically motivated.
Watchdog groups, including Geneva-based UN Watch, celebrated the swift collapse of the Commission of Inquiry (COI), which they say had long operated with an open mandate to target Israel. “This is a watershed moment of accountability,” said UN Watch Executive Director Hillel Neuer. “The COI was built on bias and sustained by hatred. Its fall is a victory for human rights, not a defeat.”
The COI had faced heavy criticism since its formation in 2021. In July 2022, Commissioner Miloon Kothari, made comments about the undue influence of a so-called “Jewish lobby” on the media, said the COI would “have to look at issues of settler colonialism.”
“Apartheid itself is a very useful paradigm, so we have a slightly different approach, but we will definitely get to it,” he added.
The Commission was established in 2021 year following the 11-day war between Israel and Gaza’s ruling Hamas group in May. COI is the first UN commission to ever be granted an indefinite period of investigation, which has drawn criticism from the US State Department, members of US Congress, and Jewish leaders across the world.
Following the resignations, Council President Jürg Lauber invited member states to nominate replacements by August 31. However, it is unclear whether the commission will be reconstituted or quietly shelved. UN Watch and other groups have urged the council to disband the COI entirely, calling it irreparably biased.
The post Scandal-Plagued UN Commission Disbands Amid Increasing US Pressure Against Anti-Israel International Organizations first appeared on Algemeiner.com.