Australian police have arrested and charged 14 members of an organized crime network in connection with a wave of antisemitic hate crimes across the country.

According to a statement from New South Wales (NSW) Police and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) on Tuesday, the suspects have been charged with 65 offenses, including participation in a criminal group, arson, and destruction of property.

This latest legal step comes as law enforcement works to combat a surge in antisemitic incidents across Australia which the country’s spy chief has called his agency’s top priority.

After the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, invasion of and massacre across southern Israel, several Jewish sites in Australia have been relentlessly targeted with vandalism and even arson, especially in the past few months. In response, an NSW police task force, Strike Force Pearl, was established to address the wave of hate crimes and rising antisemitism.

Law enforcement in Sydney and Melbourne, home to the majority of Australia’s Jewish population, is actively investigating these hate crimes, including the recent discovery of a trailer containing explosives and a list of potential Jewish targets.

Based on their investigation, local police said the group’s actions did not appear to be driven by ideology, despite the attacks directly targeting the Jewish community.

“None of the individuals we have arrested … have displayed any form of antisemitic ideology,” NSW Police deputy commissioner David Hudson said following a series of raids on Tuesday night.

“I think these organized crime figures have taken an opportunity to play off the vulnerability of the Jewish community,” he continued.

Some of these individuals have been granted bail, while others remain in custody until their court appearances, either on Tuesday or at a later date.

Strike Force Pearl was established last year to address the rise in antisemitism and the recent wave of hate crimes across Australia. Since then, law enforcement has arrested 29 people and filed a total of 143 charges, with investigations still ongoing.

These latest arrests came after the AFP revealed that the caravan filled with explosives and material containing details about Jewish targets, discovered in January in a suburb of Sydney, was a “fake terrorism plot” linked to organized crime.

According to AFP Deputy Commissioner of National Security Krissy Barrett, the information authorities received about the caravan was fabricated, and the plot itself was an “elaborate scheme contrived by organized criminals domestically and offshore.”

On Tuesday, NSW Premier Chris Minns defended law enforcement’s response to the discovery, saying it was a serious threat at the time and that it “would have been negligent” not to have taken it seriously in the context of rising antisemitism.

“I think reasonable people would assume that NSW Police and the NSW government would say we want you to investigate this as if it was the worst possible potential exposure to the public,” he said.

“As a result of a very complex, detailed investigation, they were able to get to the bottom of this plot and present that evidence in the courts in the coming days.”

In response to the ongoing spike in antisemitism, Australia passed a new slate of hate crime laws last month which would, among other measures, imprison those who make terror threats or perform Nazi salutes.

According to a report from the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ), the country’s Jewish community experienced over 2,000 antisemitic incidents between October 2023 and September 2024, a significant increase from 495 in the prior 12 months.

The post Australian Police Arrest 14 Members of Organized Criminal Network Over Antisemitic Hate Crimes first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

The US Department of Education has added dozens of colleges and universities to the list of institutions it will investigate for civil rights violations stemming from their alleged failure to address campus antisemitism.

“The department is deeply disappointed that Jewish students studying on elite US campuses continue to fear for their safety amid the relentless antisemitic eruptions that have severely disrupted campus life for more than a year,” Education Secretary Linda McMahon said on Monday in a statement. “US colleges and universities benefit from enormous public investments funded by US taxpayers. That support is a privilege, and it is contingent on scrupulous adherence to federal antidiscrimination laws.”

McMahon named 55 institutions, public and private, in total that were not included in the administration’s February announcement of five investigations of antisemitism at Columbia University, Northwestern University, Portland State University, the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.

The new schools include: Harvard University, Swarthmore College, Drexel University, and Princeton University — all of which have struggled with antisemitic anti-Israel activity and pro-Hamas agitation, as The Algemeiner has previously reported.

Since Hamas’s invasion of Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Harvard has seen its law school student government issue a resolution which falsely accused Israel of genocide; its students quote terrorists during an “Apartheid Week” event held in April; and dozens of its students and faculty participate in an illegal pro-Hamas encampment attended by members of a group that shared an antisemitic cartoon.

Additionally, many Harvard students openly cheered Hamas’s Oct. 7 atrocities, which included sexual assault and child abduction, and a mob led by the president of the prestigious Harvard Law Review followed, surrounded, and intimidated a Jewish student, screaming “Shame! Shame! Shame!” into his ears.

After these incidents and more, Harvard fought tooth and nail to discredit lawsuits which alleged that its response to campus antisemitism amounted to the enabling of discriminatory behavior in violation of federal civil rights law. Harvard eventually settled multiple complaints out of court, but at least one plaintiff, Harvard alumnus Shabbos Kestenbaum, refused to be a party to the agreements, arguing that they allowed the university to evade accountability for its alleged indifference to antisemitism.

At Swarthmore College, Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) recently raided and occupied the college’s Parrish Hall dressed like Hamas fighters, their faces wrapped with and concealed by keffiyehs. By the time the college formally warned the students that their behavior would trigger disciplinary measures, they had shouted slogans through bullhorns, attempted to break into offices that had been locked to keep them out, and pounded the doors of others that refused to admit them access. Meanwhile, SJP collaborators reportedly circumvented security’s lockdown of the building to smuggle food inside. Several students then grew impatient and attempted to end the lockdown themselves by raiding the building, and in doing so caused a physical altercation with security, whom they proceeded to pelt with expletives and other imprecations.

The Swarthmore administration responded to the incident by barring SJ  from operating on its campus while school officials investigate the incident.

In May, a “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” installed at Drexel University in Philadelphia forced school officials to lock down the campus to protect it from a flood of non-students who joined the demonstration. The previous month, the Raymond G. Perelman Center for Jewish Life was vandalized, with agitators removing large channel letters spelling out Perelman’s name from a brick structure near the entrance to the building. The disturbing act, perpetrated by masked individuals, occurred amid an explosion of antisemitic hate crimes across the US.

Princeton University has drawn scrutiny for, among other reasons, what it teaches students about Israel. In 2023, the International Legal Forum (ILF), a nonprofit organization based in Tel Aviv which advocates for equality in Israel and the Middle East, noted that a syllabus for a course taught at Princeton’s Department of Near Eastern Studies included a book that accuses the Israel Defense Forces of “maiming” Palestinians and harvesting their organs — a claim that critics described as a disturbing blood libel which serves no other purpose than to promote antisemitic conspiracies and tropes.

The Trump administration has moved rapidly to address campus antisemitism since taking office in January.

On Friday, it canceled $400 million in funding to Columbia University as punishment for the school’s alleged harboring of antisemitic faculty, students, and staff and shielding them from disciplinary sanctions. Prior to that, US President Donald Trump issued a highly anticipated executive order which calls for “using all appropriate legal tools to prosecute, remove, or otherwise … hold to account perpetrators of unlawful antisemitic harassment and violence.”

A major provision of the order authorizes the deportation of extremist “alien” student activists, whose support for terrorist organizations, intellectual and material, such as Hamas contributed to fostering antisemitism, violence, and property destruction on college campuses. That policy is currently being challenged in the courts, as a federal judge in Manhattan has halted its application to the case of a male alumnus of Columbia University who was arrested by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) after being identified as an architect of the Hamilton Hall building takeover, which took place during the closing weeks of the 2023-2024 academic year.

Trump has defended the attempted deportation and argued that more are forthcoming.

“This is the first of many to come. We know there are more students at Columbia and other universities across the country who have engaged in pro-terrorist, antisemitism, anti-American activity, and the Trump Administration will not tolerate it,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. “Many are not students, they are paid agitators. We will find, apprehend, and deport these terrorist sympathizers from our country — never to return again.”

Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.

The post Trump Administration Announces New Antisemitism Investigations Into 55 Universities first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

A ruling by the US Supreme Court on Monday has restarted a fight over the ownership of artist Camille Pissarro’s 1897 oil painting “Rue Saint-Honoré, in the afternoon. Effect of rain,” a work stolen by the Nazi regime and now hanging in Madrid’s Thyssen-Bornemisza museum.

Citing a new California law, the justices reversed the decision of lower courts which sided with the Spanish museum against the descendants of German Jewish art collector Julius Cassirer, who purchased the painting from Pissarro in 1900 and whose daughter-in-law Lilly Cassirer Neubauer was coerced into selling the work in order to obtain exit visas for herself and her husband to flee Germany.

The painting is estimated to be worth tens of millions of dollars. It features a gray image of a street scene with impressionistic renderings of carriages. The Thyssen-Bornemisza museum describes the painting as part of “a series of fifteen works that Camille Pissarro painted in Paris from the window of his hotel in the place du Théâtre Français during the winter of 1897 and 1898.”

The Nazis auctioned the painting in 1943, and it ultimately ended up in the possession of the Spanish government in the 1990s following a purchase from Baron Hans Heinrich Thyssen-Bornemisza. The museum says it did not know of the painting’s provenance when buying the work. Heirs of the Cassirer Neubauer family first sued in 2005 upon learning of the art’s survival in 2000 and failing to come to an agreement with the museum.

David Cassirer, great-grandson of Cassirer Neubauer, praised the Supreme Court “for insisting on applying principles of right and wrong.” He said in a statement that “as a Holocaust survivor, my late father, Claude Cassirer, was very proud to become an American citizen in 1947, and he cherished the values of this country.”

When California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the law now cited by the Supreme Court, he said that “for survivors of the Holocaust and their families, the fight to take back ownership of art and other personal items stolen by the Nazis continues to traumatize those who have already gone through the unimaginable.” Newsom called it “both a moral and legal imperative that these valuable and sentimental pieces be returned to their rightful owners, and I am proud to strengthen California’s laws to help secure justice for families.”

The legislation mandates that California law must apply in lawsuits involving artwork or other personal property that was stolen or looted during the Holocaust due to political persecution, like in the case involving the Cassirer family. The legislation builds on existing California law that aids the state’s residents in recovering stolen property, including property stolen during the Holocaust.

Previously, the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled that the Thyssen-Bornemisza museum was not obligated to return the artwork to Cassirer’s heirs in California, applying Spanish law to the case as opposed to California law.

Cassirer’s lawyers, David Boies and Sam Dubbin, said in response to the Supreme Court’s overriding decision that “we hope Spain and its museum will now do the right thing and return the Nazi-looted art they are holding without further delay.”

The museum’s lawyer, Thaddeus Stauber, countered that “today’s brief order gives the Ninth Circuit the first opportunity to examine if the new California Assembly Bill is valid and what, if any, impact it may have on the Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation’s repeatedly affirmed rightful ownership.” He said that the foundation, “as it has for the past 20 years, looks forward to working with all concerned to once again ensure that its ownership is confirmed with the painting remaining on public display in Madrid.”

Other descendants of Jews forced under duress during World War II to part with their artworks have continued efforts to recover paintings to differing degrees of success.

Heirs of Paul Leffmann have sought to acquire Pablo Picasso’s “The Actor” from New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art. Two American courts have disagreed with the family.

In Amsterdam in June 2024, a museum returned “Odalisque” by Henri Matisse to heirs of Albert and Marie Stern.

In October 2024, the family of Adalbert Parlagi received Claude Monet’s “Bord de Mer” from a Louisiana family who attempted to sell the painting to an art gallery, triggering an alert to the FBI.

Months earlier, in July 2024, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, Jr. announced the return of the Austrian artist Egon Schiele’s “Seated Nude Woman, front view” to the family of Fritz Grünbaum. The descendants of Gustav “Gus” Papanek repatriated the work, unaware of its theft when the family purchased it in 1938.

“The history behind Nazi-looted art is horrific and tragic, and the consequences are still impacting victims and their families to this day. It is inspiring to see both the Grünbaum and Papanek families join together to reflect on their shared history and preserve the legacy of Fritz Grünbaum,” Bragg said at the time. “I want to commend the Reif family for harnessing Fritz Grünbaum’s legacy to create a better world by using the funds from their auctions to support underprivileged artists.”

Grünbaum relative Timothy Reif said at the time that “the recovery of this important artwork — stolen from a prominent Jewish critic of Adolf Hitler — sends a message to the world that crime does not pay and that the law enforcement community in New York has not forgotten the dark lessons of World War II.”

The post US Supreme Court Decision Reopens Family’s Efforts to Recover Nazi-Stolen Painting Worth Millions first appeared on Algemeiner.com.