RSS
Reuters Carpet Bombs the Truth with Biased Reporting Against Israel
An Israeli flag flies in Lebanon, near the Israel-Lebanon border, following the ceasefire between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah, as seen from Metula, northern Israel, Dec. 3, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Stoyan Nenov
Is Reuters carpet bombing its vaunted Trust Principles that promise news consumers “integrity, independence and freedom from bias”?
Indeed, in recent coverage of Israel’s war against both Hamas and Hezbollah, Reuters journalists launched multiple strikes against the media outlet’s stated commitment to “unbiased and reliable news.”
For example, in their Nov. 28 article, Reuters’ Laila Basam, Tom Perry, and Maya Gebeily falsely referenced Israel’s “carpet bombing of Beirut’s southern suburbs” (“Still counting its dead, Hezbollah faces long road to recover from war“).
Carpet bombing refers to a campaign which “seeks to destroy every part of a wide area.” If Israel had carpet-bombed Beirut’s southern suburbs, the entire area would be destroyed and fatalities would have reached the tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands.
But as previous Reuters coverage indicates, Israeli attacks on Beirut’s southern suburbs were highly focused, targeting specific buildings, and not the entire area.
Reuters reported on Oct. 1, for instance, that a single high-rise building was hit in one such attack:
Israel carried out two attacks on Beirut on Tuesday afternoon, striking the southern suburbs of the Lebanese capital and the city’s southern entrance, two security sources said.
A high-rise building was hit in the city’s Jnah area, the sources said.
The Israeli military said it was targeting the Lebanese capital and had carried out a “precise strike.”
Likewise, on Nov. 23, Reuters reported on Israeli attacks against Hezbollah targets, as opposed to total annihilation of the suburbs: “The Israeli air force also struck Hezbollah targets in the southern suburbs of Beirut, the group’s stronghold, the Israeli military said.”
Similarly, Reuters reporting on Nov. 13 referred to Israel warning civilians to evacuate and then striking specific Hezbollah targets in the area, a focused attack not even remotely resembling the flattening of the entire area:
The Israeli military pounded Beirut’s southern suburbs with airstrikes on Tuesday, mounting one of its heaviest daytime attacks yet on the Hezbollah-controlled area, and struck the middle of the country where more than 20 people were killed.
Smoke billowed over Beirut as around a dozen strikes hit the southern suburbs starting in midmorning. After posting warnings to civilians on social media, the Israeli military said it struck Hezbollah targets in Beirut’s Dahiyeh area and later said it dismantled most of the group’s weapons and missile facilities.
If Israel had carpet-bombed the southern suburbs of Beirut, there would be nothing left there aside from rubble.
But Reuters’ own photographic coverage demonstrates that this is clearly not the case.
The Nov. 24 Reuters image below shows that the vast majority of buildings are completely intact.
Five hours of CGTN Europe Nov. 26 footage of the view overlooking Beirut’s southern suburbs before the ceasefire went into effect also shows attacks against specific buildings, and not wholesale destruction of the entire residential area.
While CAMERA informed Reuters editors about the egregiously fallacious claim days ago, the media outlet has yet to correct. With one billion global news consumers exposed to Reuters daily, the media outlet’s civilian casualties — those on the receiving end of its false “carpet bombing” libel — are widespread.
Reuters also subjects its readers to unfounded mayhem and confusion, obscuring the actual outlines of the Hezbollah-Israel ceasefire agreement.
The ceasefire agreement is perfectly clear that Hezbollah is to be disarmed and is forbidden to deploy south of the Litani River. It also states explicitly that Israel has up to 60 days to withdraw its forces from Lebanon. Nevertheless, in a recent article, “With Israeli tanks on the ground, Lebanese unable to bury dead,” Hamuda Hassan and Ahmed Fahmy concealed these keys points of the deal.
Instead, in their abbreviated characterization of the ceasefire, they say only that the agreement “stipulated an end to fighting so residents on both sides of the border could return home.” Further, in describing the alleged hardships Lebanese say they face upon return to their villages in the south, the reporters falsely imply that Israel’s current presence in southern Lebanon is a violation of the deal:
The ordeal highlights the bitterness and confusion for residents of southern Lebanon who have been unable to return home because Israeli troops are still present on Lebanese territory.
Israel’s military has issued orders to residents of 60 southern towns not to return home, saying they are prohibited from accessing their hometowns until further notice.
The U.S.-brokered ceasefire deal grants both Lebanon and Israel the right to self-defence, but does not include provisions on a buffer zone or restrictions for residents.
Given that Israel’s military presence in southern Lebanon is permitted for nearly two more months, the smoke and mirrors reference to a lack of provisions on buffer zone and restrictions falsely implies that Israel is in violation of the agreement. That fabrication is the underlying narrative of the entire article.
Reuters’ sustained assault on unbiased and reliable news extends southwards from Lebanon to the Gaza Strip. In his article this week, Nidal al-Mughrabi reports dubious and notoriously unreliable Hamas-supplied fatality statistics as fact, without any attribution: “Israel’s military campaign has killed more than 44,400 Palestinians, injured many others, and reduced much of the enclave to rubble” (“Israel kills 14 people in northern Gaza, orders evacuation in south“).
When it comes to Israel’s verified Oct. 7 victims, in contrast, al-Mughrabi fastidiously attributes the information, as if the data cannot be independently confirmed:
Israel launched its campaign in the densely populated Palestinian enclave after Hamas-led fighters attacked Israeli communities on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and capturing more than 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies.
Reuters took another shot at its unbiased news promise when it dropped key information from its Nov. 30 headline: “Israel says it killed Oct. 7 attack suspect who worked for US-based charity.”
By the next day, the updated version of the same story, carrying the same url as the original article, contained less — not more — information, stating: “Israeli airstrikes on Gaza killed two aid workers.” How does the headline’s omission of the aid workers’ alleged participation in Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks against Israel serve Reuters’ Trust Principles?
In contrast, the Associated Press’ headline clearly notes Israel’s information that the targeted Gazan participated in the Oct. 7 massacre: “Israeli strike in Gaza kills World Central Kitchen workers. Israel says 1 was an Oct. 7 attacker.”
News providers face a challenge, wrote chairman of Thomson Reuters Founders Share Company Kim Williams in 2018. “[T]hey must earn the confidence of their clients through convincing efforts to strengthen credibility.” A convincing initial effort towards strengthening credibility would be to forthrightly correct the absurd carpet bombing libel.
As for recovery of trust, integrity and freedom from bias, cessation of scorched-earth journalistic skewing in favor of Hamas and Hezbollah is a good place to start.
Tamar Sternthal is the director of CAMERA’s Israel Office. A version of this article previously appeared on the CAMERA website.
The post Reuters Carpet Bombs the Truth with Biased Reporting Against Israel first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Syria’s Sharaa Says Talks With Israel Could Yield Results ‘In Coming Days’
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa speaks at the opening ceremony of the 62nd Damascus International Fair, the first edition held since the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, in Damascus, Syria, Aug. 27, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi
Syria’s President Ahmed al-Sharaa said on Wednesday that ongoing negotiations with Israel to reach a security pact could lead to results “in the coming days.”
He told reporters in Damascus the security pact was a “necessity” and that it would need to respect Syria’s airspace and territorial unity and be monitored by the United Nations.
Syria and Israel are in talks to reach an agreement that Damascus hopes will secure a halt to Israeli airstrikes and the withdrawal of Israeli troops who have pushed into southern Syria.
Reuters reported this week that Washington was pressuring Syria to reach a deal before world leaders gather next week for the UN General Assembly in New York.
But Sharaa, in a briefing with journalists including Reuters ahead of his expected trip to New York to attend the meeting, denied the US was putting any pressure on Syria and said instead that it was playing a mediating role.
He said Israel had carried out more than 1,000 strikes on Syria and conducted more than 400 ground incursions since Dec. 8, when the rebel offensive he led toppled former Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad.
Sharaa said Israel’s actions were contradicting the stated American policy of a stable and unified Syria, which he said was “very dangerous.”
He said Damascus was seeking a deal similar to a 1974 disengagement agreement between Israel and Syria that created a demilitarized zone between the two countries.
He said Syria sought the withdrawal of Israeli troops but that Israel wanted to remain at strategic locations it seized after Dec. 8, including Mount Hermon. Israeli ministers have publicly said Israel intends to keep control of the sites.
He said if the security pact succeeds, other agreements could be reached. He did not provide details, but said a peace agreement or normalization deal like the US-mediated Abraham Accords, under which several Muslim-majority countries agreed to normalize diplomatic ties with Israel, was not currently on the table.
He also said it was too early to discuss the fate of the Golan Heights because it was “a big deal.”
Reuters reported this week that Israel had ruled out handing back the zone, which Donald Trump unilaterally recognized as Israeli during his first term as US president.
“It’s a difficult case – you have negotiations between a Damascene and a Jew,” Sharaa told reporters, smiling.
SECURITY PACT DERAILED IN JULY
Sharaa also said Syria and Israel had been just “four to five days” away from reaching the basis of a security pact in July, but that developments in the southern province of Sweida had derailed those discussions.
Syrian troops were deployed to Sweida in July to quell fighting between Druze armed factions and Bedouin fighters. But the violence worsened, with Syrian forces accused of execution-style killings and Israel striking southern Syria, the defense ministry in Damascus and near the presidential palace.
Sharaa on Wednesday described the strikes near the presidential palace as “not a message, but a declaration of war,” and said Syria had still refrained from responding militarily to preserve the negotiations.
RSS
Anti-Israel Activists Gear Up to ‘Flood’ UN General Assembly
US Capitol Police and NYPD officers clash with anti-Israel demonstrators, on the day Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses a joint meeting of Congress, on Capitol Hill, in Washington, DC, July 24, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Umit Bektas
Anti-Israel groups are planning a wave of raucous protests in New York City during the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) over the next several days, prompting concerns that the demonstrations could descend into antisemitic rhetoric and intimidation.
A coalition of anti-Israel activists is organizing the protests in and around UN headquarters to coincide with speeches from Middle Eastern leaders and appearances by US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The demonstrations are expected to draw large crowds and feature prominent pro-Palestinian voices, some of whom have been criticized for trafficking in antisemitic tropes, in addition to calling for the destruction of Israe.
Organizers of the demonstrations have promoted the coordinated events on social media as an opportunity to pressure world leaders to hold Israel accountable for its military campaign against Hamas in Gaza, with some messaging framed in sharply hostile terms.
On Sunday, for example, activists shouted at Israel’s Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon.
“Zionism is terrorism. All you guys are terrorists committing ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza and Palestine. Shame on you, Zionist animals,” they shouted.
BREAKING: PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTORS CONFRONT “ISRAELI” AMBASSADOR DANNY DANON AT THE UNITED NATIONS
1/5 pic.twitter.com/4G1VYEMGzV
— Within Our Lifetime (@WOLPalestine) September 14, 2025
The Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM), warned on its website that the scale and tone of the planned demonstrations risk crossing the line from political protest into hate speech, arguing that anti-Israel activists are attempting to hijack the UN gathering to spread antisemitism and delegitimize the Jewish state’s right to exist.
Outside the UN last week, masked protesters belonging to the activist group INDECLINE kicked a realistic replica of Netanyahu’s decapitated head as though it were a soccer ball.
US activist group plays soccer with Bibi’s mock decapitated HEAD right outside NYC UN HQ
Peep shot at 00:40
Footage posted by INDECLINE collective just as UN General Assembly about to kick off
‘Following the game, ball was donated to Palestinian Genocide Museum’ pic.twitter.com/TQ84sgZhKr
— RT (@RT_com) September 9, 2025
Within Our Lifetime (WOL), a radical anti-Israel activist group, has vowed to “flood” the UNGA on behalf of the pro-Palestine movement.
WOL, one of the most prolific anti-Israel activist groups, came under immense fire after it organized a protest against an exhibition to honor the victims of the Oct. 7 massacre at the Nova Music Festival in southern Israel. During the event, the group chanted “resistance is justified when people are occupied!” and “Israel, go to hell!”
“We will be there to confront them with the truth: Their silence and inaction enable genocide. The world cannot continue as if Gaza does not exist,” WOL said of its planned demonstrations in New York. “This is the time to make our voices impossible to ignore. Come to New York by any means necessary, to stand, to march, to demand the UN act and end the siege.”
Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM), two other anti-Israel organizations that have helped organize widespread demonstrations against the Jewish state during the war in Gaza, also announced they are planning a march from Times Square to the UN headquarters on Friday.
“The time is now for each and every UN member state to uphold their duty under international law: sanction Israel and end the genocide,” the groups said in a statement.
JVP, an organization that purports to fight for “Palestinian liberation,” has positioned itself as a staunch adversary of the Jewish state. The group argued in a 2021 booklet that Jews should not write Hebrew liturgy because hearing the language would be “deeply traumatizing” to Palestinians. JVP has repeatedly defended the Oct. 7 massacre of roughly 1,200 people in southern Israel by Hamas as a justified “resistance.” Chapters of the organization have urged other self-described “progressives” to throw their support behind Hamas and other terrorist groups against Israel
Similarly, PYM, another radical anti-Israel group, has repeatedly defended terrorism and violence against the Jewish state. PYM has organized many anti-Israel protests in the two years following the Oct. 7 attacks in the Jewish state. Recently, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) called for a federal investigation into the organization after Aisha Nizar, one of the group’s leaders, urged supporters to sabotage the US supply chain for the F-35 fighter jet, one of the most advanced US military assets and a critical component of Israel’s defense.
The UN General Assembly has historically been a flashpoint for heated debate over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Previous gatherings have seen dueling demonstrations outside the Manhattan venue, with pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian groups both seeking to influence the international spotlight.
While warning about the demonstrations, CAM noted it recently launched a new mobile app, Report It, that allows users worldwide to quickly and securely report antisemitic incidents in real time.
RSS
Nina Davidson Presses Universities to Back Words With Action as Jewish Students Return to Campus Amid Antisemitism Crisis
Nina Davidson on The Algemeiner’s ‘J100’ podcast. Photo: Screenshot
Philanthropist Nina Davidson, who served on the board of Barnard College, has called on universities to pair tough rhetoric on combatting antisemitism with enforcement as Jewish students returned to campuses for the new academic year.
“Years ago, The Algemeiner had published a list ranking the most antisemitic colleges in the country. And number one was Columbia,” Davidson recalled on a recent episode of The Algemeiner‘s “J100” podcast. “As a board member and as someone who was representing the institution, it really upset me … At the board meeting, I brought it up and I said, ‘What are we going to do about this?’”
Host David Cohen, chief executive officer of The Algemeiner, explained he had revisited Davidson’s remarks while she was being honored for her work at The Algemeiner‘s 8th annual J100 gala, held in October 2021, noting their continued relevance.
“It could have been the same speech in 2025,” he said, underscoring how longstanding concerns about campus antisemitism, while having intensified in the aftermath of Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel, are not new.
Davidson argued that universities already possess the tools to protect students – codes of conduct, time-place-manner rules, and consequences for threats or targeted harassment – but too often fail to apply them evenly. “Statements are not enough,” she said, arguing that institutions need to enforce their rules and set a precedent that there will be consequences for individuals who refuse to follow them.
She also said that stakeholders – alumni, parents, and donors – are reassessing their relationships with schools that, in their view, have not safeguarded Jewish students. While supportive of open debate, Davidson distinguished between protest and intimidation, calling for leadership that protects expression while ensuring campus safety.
The episode surveyed specific pressure points that administrators will face this fall: repeat anti-Israel encampments, disruptions of Jewish programming, and the challenge of distinguishing political speech from conduct that violates university rules. “Unless schools draw those lines now,” Davidson warned, “they’ll be scrambling once the next crisis hits.”
Cohen closed by framing the discussion as a test of institutional credibility, asking whether universities will “turn policy into protection” in real time. Davidson agreed, pointing to students who “need to know the rules aren’t just on paper.”
The full conversation is available on The Algemeiner’s “J100” podcast.