Shamsud-Din Jabbar, a suspect in the New Orleans attack, is seen in this picture obtained from social media, released in November 2013, in Fort Johnson (formerly Fort Polk), Louisiana, US, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division via Facebook via REUTERS

The tragic terror attack in New Orleans on New Year’s Day is yet another reminder of the persistent threat of extremist ideologies in the West. While the immediate focus is on this horrific event, it’s crucial that we don’t allow such incidents, often labeled as “lone wolf” attacks, to overshadow the broader issue of radical Islamism, which continues to challenge Western societies.

The terrorist’s actions, carried out hours after posting videos expressing a desire to kill people and featuring ISIS symbols, highlight the ideological motivations behind these attacks. While the FBI has not confirmed a direct ISIS affiliation, the presence of ISIS-related imagery and the killer’s premeditated plan signal a deeper ideological commitment to terror. The attack also involved firearms and improvised explosive devices (IEDs), showcasing the deadly, calculated nature of these assaults.

However, the “lone wolf” label can be misleading. While these individuals may act alone in execution, they are often driven by powerful ideologies. Islamism, a radical political ideology advocating for the establishment of an Islamic state under Sharia law, continues to thrive in certain segments of Western societies. This ideology, which justifies violence as a means of achieving political goals, is not confined to isolated groups or individuals — it is a growing threat.

This issue was starkly brought into focus in October 2023, with the Hamas-led massacre in Israel. On October 7, Hamas militants launched an unprecedented assault, killing approximately 1,200 people and taking hundreds of hostages. This attack, one of the deadliest in recent memory and the worst in Israel’s histoy, was not an isolated incident, but part of Hamas’ long-standing agenda to destroy Israel and establish an Islamic state. The brutality of October 7 is just one example of the kind of radicalism promoted by Islamist groups like Hamas, whose violent methods echo those of ISIS and other extremist organizations.

The ideology driving groups like Hamas and ISIS shares a goal: the imposition of their version of Islam through violent means. These ideologies promote terror as a political tool. Whether through organized groups like Hamas or individuals radicalized in the West, the core motivation remains the same: a radical, uncompromising vision of Islam that justifies violence to achieve its goals.

This form of radical Islamism, while often dismissed as an issue confined to the Middle East, has spread globally. In Western countries, it is particularly alarming to see these ideologies gaining traction in local communities, leading to violent acts carried out by individuals like the New Orleans killer.

The problem with this kind of Islamism is that it does not merely present an ideological challenge — it is inherently violent. The radicalization process, whether it occurs in a war zone or in Western cities, is fueled by extremist interpretations of Islam. While the majority of Muslims do not subscribe to these beliefs, the existence of such ideologies within the Muslim community creates a dangerous undercurrent that must be addressed.

In the aftermath of the New Year’s attack, President Joe Biden and local authorities prioritized swift action and investigation. However, addressing the underlying problem of radical Islamism requires more than just focusing on individual attacks. Governments must confront the broader networks of influence that enable these ideologies to thrive. Whether it’s ISIS, Hamas, or lone-wolf attackers, they are all products of the same ideological machinery that promotes radicalism.

The rise of radical Islamism requires a coordinated global response. This includes intelligence-sharing among nations and improved efforts to monitor and prevent radicalization within communities. The use of social media by extremists highlights the importance of monitoring online platforms for signs of radicalization. However, questions remain about whether Western societies are doing enough to act on such signals in real-time.

Moreover, Western countries must ensure that Muslim communities are not isolated or preyed upon by extremist groups. Integration — socially, economically, and politically — helps prevent disenfranchised individuals from turning to violent ideologies. Community engagement, education, and open dialogue between Muslim leaders and broader society can foster an environment that isolates radical elements and promotes a peaceful, inclusive vision of Islam.

The role of the media also cannot be overstated. While it is natural to focus on the details of an attack, it is equally important to address the broader ideological threat posed by Islamism. The media often highlights the individual perpetrator, but the real issue lies in the ideas that drive these attacks.

While the attack in New Orleans is tragic and demands full attention, we must not let it distract from the broader issue of radical Islamism in the West. Only by addressing the root causes of this violence can we hope to prevent future tragedies, and ensure a safer, more inclusive world for everyone.