RSS
How a repeatedly vandalized Toronto synagogue is navigating a new era of security
Michael Gilmore, who runs the synagogue that may hold the ignominious title of being Canada’s most vandalized, has become accustomed to 3 a.m. phone calls.
After hearing from the security company, he’s braced for coordinating a daytime visit from Toronto Police Services—a recurring experience in the aftermath of vandalism and other attacks targeting the building.
The executive director of Kehillat Shaarei Torah (KST), a 45-year-old modern Orthodox congregation with about 200 member families, which has been led by Rabbi Joe Kanofsky since 2009—located in the Bayview Village area of North York—has learned to respond nimbly to overnight attacks: the shul was vandalized, attacked, sustained property damage, at least eight times between April and December.
One person was arrested Jan. 13 in connection with a July 31 incident at the synagogue, when two sturdy lawn signs expressing the synagogue’s support for Israel were set on fire. It’s the first arrest in the series of incidents determined to be hate-motivated. Police have not released further details about the charges or the identity of the person arrested.
Gilmore said he’s pleased that at least one suspect has been found.
“I have always had full confidence in their ability to do it… it takes longer in reality than we’d like, but that’s just the system that we live in…. and hopefully the rest of our vandalism [incidents]… the person, the people that [did those] does get arrested as well.”
Since last April, the synagogue at the corner of Bayview Avenue and Fifeshire Road has had its windows and glass doors smashed by hammers and attacked with exploding mini-projectiles Gilmore says were designed to crack the glass on impact—along with several incidents of lawn signs for hostages set ablaze and defaced with spray-painted messages.
The first time the synagogue was attacked, it hit Gilmore hard.
“We all have that deep-seated fear as a Jewish people that one day something’s going to happen, to our synagogue,” school, home or childcare centre, he reflects.
“Waking up to those vandalism [incidents] [represents] that fear being actualized.”
KST’s executive director has learned to adapt and anticipate, figuring out next steps after an incident: “Who needs to talk to the police?”
“Now in my head I’ve unfortunately worked that into my routine,” he said, coming to anticipate that “we’re probably going to get vandalized again.”
“How do we navigate everyday shul life while always getting vandalized? How do I make sure I organize my day well enough … [so that] I could deal with the police… with getting things fixed [if] they need to be,” mused Gilmore.
The first incident, in April, involved a suspect smashing five windows with a hammer and was followed by a dead raccoon being left in the shul parking lot, which was not deemed to be a suspected hate-motivated occurrence. Another hammer attack followed May 17.
Next came a June 30 incident involving projectiles someone threw at the building that Gilmore says were designed to damage the windows.
“It wasn’t rocks, because they made these little explosions when it hit our window,” he said. “Luckily we already had the polycarbonate [window coverings] on, it prevented projectiles from getting through the windows, but they still shattered the glass behind it, and it created… a small, not explosion, but it kind of broke apart, exploded a bit when it hit the polycarbonate covering. [Those] weren’t rocks for sure… [the person] brought those with [them].”
Gilmore characterizes the people vandalizing the synagogue as cowards.
“Never in my life have I thought, ‘oh, it’s 3 in the morning. I’m going to go vandalize a place of worship, try and scare some people.’ I mean, I’m asleep… a person who has a life that’s filled with commitments, they can’t do [that]. The person whose life is filled with hate and just wants to destroy, they find the time.”
Gilmore has developed a working rapport with police and has maintained contact with the police Hate Crimes Unit during its investigations.
The eight separate incidents don’t follow any predictable sequence of events. However, Gilmore has noticed distinguishing details about the individual suspects when reviewing security videos.
“The person who smashed the windows was left-handed when they use the hammer. The person who threw the projectiles through our windows was right-handed. They came on a motorcycle. The person that [set the sign on fire, on July 31] was right-handed. They came in and they lit the sign on fire and then went south on a motorcycle again.”
The suspect in the two December incidents, whose images police released earlier in January, “came without a mask” and had “different hats” according to Gilmore—and they seemed to be a different suspect than other vandalism incidents.
As to why his synagogue has been singled out, he believes it’s KST’s location.
The synagogue is not on the heavily-travelled Bathurst Street corridor, home to many of the city’s Jewish institutions. The building is easily visible along a road with no close residential neighbours in sight, and is just a few blocks from Highway 401, where vandals can make a quick escape.
“I think it’s… some [part] opportunities, some [part] where we are located, and … in the area, that they know the synagogue and it’s the easiest place for them to vandalize.”
Gilmore has overseen a range of security upgrades and additional expenses since spring 2024, including adding additional security video cameras, and in some cases replacing them with better cameras. A new access control system enables him to see “who enters the building, when they enter, when they leave” and a security fence was recently installed around the entire premises.
Windows that were broken have been replaced, and polycarbonate security coverings were layered atop those windows in addition to a security film to prevent anyone from actually entering the synagogue if they managed to get through the polycarbonate covering. Security film was also added to glass door replacements.
Night time security guards were also hired depending on the news from Israel, for instance when Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah was killed, and during Jewish holidays.
Gilmore says the security company has been responsive to KST’s needs. However, the synagogue can’t afford to have security guards on-site permanently.
The federal programs to assist communities experiencing hate crime attacks will, eventually, reimburse half the cost of upgrades, says Gilmore, but he finds the process of applying for the Public Safety Canada grants unduly slow and onerous.
Worse for this particular congregation—whose clever wordplay slogans on its roadside sign have earned global attention online—is that Gilmore finds they are caught in a bureaucratic catch-22. The shul’s security grant application was made under the previous Security Infrastructure Program (SIP) and reimburses up to 50 percent of total costs.
That application and reimbursement process was already underway when the new version of the program, Canada Community Security Program (CCSP), which reimburses up to 70 percent, was rolled out—but work begun or undertaken under the previous program’s funding can’t be funded by the new program.
Gilmore can’t apply for the increased reimbursement for any work that’s already been done, and would lose the current 50 percent reimbursement grant if he pulled out of SIP to instead apply under CCSP.
‘This whole thing has been a headache basically for every other synagogue director I’ve spoken to,” he said. He explains that after KST was vandalized, it qualified for the federal program’s fast-tracked funding stream, called Severe Hate-Motivated Incident Support.
“When I initially submitted the application, we’d only been vandalized once, when the process had started… by the time it was all finished, we’ve been vandalized four times. It took a few months to get everything approved. We had to go through and calculate all the costs that we would be applying for.”
He says it’s a fault in the system that’s set up to appear to be doing more than it really is, and in the process creates onerous tasks for security grant applicants who are in the middle of responding to unsettling incidents.
“I’m not sure how they came up with [these programs]… it feels like no members of the groups this is supposed to help have had input,” said Gilmore.
He says he understands the government’s attempt to support communities who’ve been targeted, “however, if they’d spoken to member of Jewish community… synagogues, schools … they’d see how effective the program actually is.
“It feels like the government talking to the people [they’re supposed to help], rather than a partnership,” which Gilmore finds “unfortunate, but common.”
Fortunately, a “KS Strong” fund raising drive in 2024 helped the shul pay for the upgrades, which he says came out to $151,286, with a federal grant reimbursing half, or $75,643. He notes that donations came not only from members but also from the wider community around the synagogue.
In addition, Jewish Security Network (JSN), the new independent agency that absorbed the security operation previously housed under the UJA Federation of Greater Toronto, has been supporting KST with security consulting, assessments, advice on upgrades and procedures, and providing some of the funding for the synagogue’s security costs.
According to Gilmore, the security recommendations from the JSN team, then with UJA, matched those of TPS nearly identically.
JSN’s director, Jevon Greenblatt, confirmed that JSN has committed to paying a portion of KST’s security upgrade cost, but declined to say how much.
The area’s new Toronto city councillor, Rachel Chernos-Lin, cited the vandalized synagogue at a city hall meeting in December, during discussion on a bylaw proposal to prevent demonstrations from encroaching on community spaces as well as grants to protect vulnerable buildings from car attacks. After about 90 minutes of debate, a vote secured the funding and a request to staff to develop the bylaw proposal.
“At City Hall, we often speak about the beauty of Toronto being our diversity. But increasingly Jewish families in Toronto are being targeted with hate and real antisemitism, and we as a council… cannot let this continue,” Chernos-Lin said at the council meeting Dec. 18.
“No community in Toronto should have to live in fear. No community in Toronto should be held responsible for the actions of governments in other parts of the world because of their religious affiliation. For many in my community, it doesn’t feel like meaningful action has been taken to combat antisemitism, not just at the city level but by all levels of government, and so I believe it is up to us as a council to say ‘enough is enough’ and ‘what can we do?’”
In an interview with The CJN, Chernos-Lin, formerly a school trustee for the ward, said she’s heard criticisms that there’s been a lack of government taking action.
Jewish Torontonians, including in her ward, she says, want to know “‘why are we a year in and not seeing anything being done?”
“The longer we go, and allow hate to manifest, the worse it’s going to get and the harder it’s going to be to stop it down the road,” she said.
“If we really care about everybody in our city, we have to be standing up for Jews.”
Ruth Urbach, a longtime member of KST—whose services roamed from area homes to rental facilities for nearly a decade, as it gradually settled into a permanent building on the site of a house that was later demolished—says the close-knit congregation has been brought even closer of late, but there’s much more to community life than these incidents.
“I would hope people know when they think of the synagogue not to think that we’re all only dwelling on this, and frightened. You can come to the shul and it might not even come up. It doesn’t inform every interaction that we have,” she told The CJN.
“It’s something that’s going on. We wish it hadn’t happened and we really hope that there will be arrests. No synagogue should have to deal with anything like this,” said Urbach, who is also a current board member—though she added “the shul’s dealing with it very well.”
The congregation has always included a significant portion of members from the South African Jewish community, reflecting the majority of the founding families. Celebrations and events for its 45th anniversary are in the works for later in the year; several members who signed the original article of incorporation are still around.
When the celebration is being planned, the “hateful incidents” of 2024 don’t come to mind, according to Urbach.
Michael Gilmore says the synagogue refuses to back down in the face of vandalism, which may be why it has been targeted so frequently.
“They [vandals] could do whatever they want to do, and it’s not going to stop us from being proud Jews… from being proud members… I think that is the overall feeling… of strength and unity, and carry on with life,” he said.
After the first vandalism the community united in a message of defiance to vandals and attackers.
“You’re going to try and break us… we’re not going to be broken,” he said, remembering a response from the synagogue’s rabbi, assembled in block letters on the permanent sign outside the building.
“Windows shatter easily. Communities don’t,” said Gilmore, quoting Rabbi Kanofsky’s now most-circulated outdoor sign message. “That’s what has really been our mantra.”
The post How a repeatedly vandalized Toronto synagogue is navigating a new era of security appeared first on The Canadian Jewish News.
RSS
Trump Administration Says George Washington University Ignored Campus Antisemitism
US President Donald Trump holds a press briefing on Aug. 11, 2025. Photo: Andrew Thomas via Reuters Connect
The Civil Rights Division of the US Department of Justice (DOJ) said on Tuesday that it has amassed sufficient evidence to prove that George Washington University violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, alleging that the institution responded to campus antisemitism “by acting deliberately indifferent” to the harm it posed to Jewish students and faculty.
“The division finds that GWU took no meaningful action and was instead deliberately indifferent to the complaints it received, the misconduct that occurred, and the harms that were suffered by its Jewish and Israeli students and faculty,” the agency said while sharing a document containing its findings. “The Justice Department will seek immediate remediation with GWU for its civil rights violations.”
George Washington University, speaking through spokesperson Shannon McClendon, responded to the Justice Department in a statement which summarized the institution’s actions and policies while stopping short of offering a contentious refutation of the government’s case.
“We have taken appropriate action under university policy and the law to hold individuals or organizations accountable, including during the encampment, and we do not tolerate behavior that threatens our community or undermines meaningful dialogue,” McClendon said. “We have worked diligently with members of GW’s Jewish community, as well as Jewish community organizations, city, and federal authorities to protect the GW community from antisemitism and we remain committed to working with them to ensure every student has the right to equal educational opportunities without fear of harassment and abuse.”
As previously reported, George Washington University in Washington, DC has been a hub of extreme anti-Zionist activity that school officials have struggled to quell. A major source of such conduct has been the campus group Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), which, among other things, has threatened a Jewish professor and intimidated Jews on campus.
Recently, a student used her commencement speech to lodge accusations of apartheid and genocide against Israel, a notion trafficked by neo-Nazi groups and jihadist terror organizations.
The student, Cecilia Culver, accused Israel of targeting Palestinians “simply for [their] remaining in the country of their ancestors” and said that GW students are passive contributors to the “imperialist system.” An economics and statistics major, Culver deceived administrators who selected her to address the Columbian College of the Arts and Sciences ceremony, the university said in a statement, claiming she strayed from her prepared remarks.
GW faculty have also allegedly contributed to the promotion of antisemitism on campus. In 2023, former psychology professor Lara Sheehi was accused of verbally abusing and discriminating against her Jewish graduate students.
As recounted in a 2023 civil rights complaint filed by StandWithUs, Sheehi was accused of expressing contempt for Jews when, on the first day of term in August 2022, she asked every student to share information about their backgrounds and cultures. Replying to a student who revealed that she was Israeli, Sheehi allegedly said, “It’s not your fault you were born in Israel.” Jewish students said they made several attempts to persuade the university to correct Sheehi’s behavior or arrange an alternative option for fulfilling the requirements of her course. Each time, StandWithUs alleged, administrators said nothing could be done.
Later, the complaint added, Sheehi spread rumors that her Jewish students were “combative” racists and filed misconduct charges against them. One student told The Algemeiner at the time that she never learned what university policies Sheehi accused her and her classmates of violating.
In May, a civil lawsuit recounted dozens of antisemitic incidents which occurred at the university following the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel. It alleged that school officials failed to respond to adequately to them because of anti-Jewish, as well as anti-Zionist, bias. Among the incidents detailed, the campus Hillel Center was vandalized; someone threw a rock through the window of a truck owned by a Jewish advocacy group; and a Jewish student was told to “kill yourself” and “watch your back” in a hate message which also called her a “filthy k—ke.”
That and more transpired, court documents charge.
“Protesters at GWU raised repulsive, antisemitic signs and shouted slogans like ‘final solution,’ ‘the irony of being what you once hatred,’ a message that equated the swastika to the Star of David; and ‘Globalize the Intifada,’ an express call for violence against Jews,” the complaint adds. “Protesters vandalized university property in what amounted to rioting and blocked Jewish students from traversing campus freely, attending class, and otherwise engaging in educational opportunities.”
The plaintiffs, Sabrina Soffer and Ari Shapiro, said in court documents that the university’s anemic response to campus antisemitism constituted a violation of Title VI. They are seeking damages and injunctive relief.
On Tuesday, assistant attorney general Harmeet Dhillon of the Justice Department’s civil rights division said the Trump administration will continue identifying universities which allegedly miscarried justice, saying, “Every student has the right to educational opportunities without fear of harassment or abuse. No one is above the law, and universities that promulgate antisemitic discrimination will face legal consequences.”
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
RSS
Iran, South Africa Deepen Military, Strategic Partnership to Counter ‘Global Arrogance’
Iranian Maj. Gen. Amir Hatami and South African Gen. Rudzani Maphwanya meet in Tehran on Aug. 12, 2025, to discuss strengthening military cooperation and strategic ties. Photo: Screenshot
Iran and South Africa held high-level military talks this week as both nations seek to deepen cooperation and strengthen their partnership against what they called “global arrogance and aggressive colonial approaches.”
On Tuesday, Iranian Maj. Gen. Amir Hatami, chief of staff of Iran’s army, met with Gen. Rudzani Maphwanya, the visiting chief of the South African National Defense Force, in Tehran.
During a joint press conference, Hatami said that both countries share a strong commitment to opposing “colonialism and global arrogance,” with South Africa playing a significant role in Iran’s foreign policy priorities.
“The Islamic Republic and South Africa have always supported each other and oppressed nations,” the Iranian commander said, according to Iran’s state-run media, emphasizing that their shared mission must continue “until restoration of an international order based on justice and human dignity.”
Hatami also emphasized the strong political alignment between Tehran and Pretoria, saying it has granted South Africa “a special position” in Iran’s broader strategy toward Africa.
He expressed hope that this partnership, particularly their shared military capabilities, would soon lead to tangible joint projects.
For his part, Maphwanya called for deeper ties between the two nations, especially in defense cooperation, affirming that “the Republic of South Africa and the Islamic Republic of Iran have common goals.”
“We always stand alongside the oppressed and defenseless people of the world,” the South African general said.
The meeting came after the Middle East Africa Research Institute (MEARI) released a recent report detailing how South Africa’s deepening ties with Tehran have led the country to compromise its democratic foundations and constitutional principles by aligning itself with a regime internationally condemned for terrorism, repression, and human rights abuses.
For example, the report noted that while Iran supports South Africa’s coalition government partly because of their shared revolutionary and liberation ideologies, Pretoria has often defended Tehran at the United Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) by voting against sanctions or abstaining.
In doing so, the study claimed that the South African government has both undermined its democratic values and bolstered Iran’s regional ambitions by defending its nuclear program and downplaying its human rights abuses.
During the press conference in Tehran, Hatami praised South Africa’s “firm stance” in condemning what he called “the joint atrocities committed by the Israeli regime and the United States against Palestinians,” describing it as both “courageous and commendable.”
He also commended Pretoria’s decision to “challenge the Zionist regime at the International Court of Justice [ICJ] over its ongoing genocide in the Gaza Strip,” calling the move one that “would go down in history.”
Since December 2023, South Africa has been pursuing its case at the ICJ, the UN’s top court, accusing Israel of committing “state-led genocide” in its defensive war against the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas in Gaza.
Israeli leaders have lambasted the case as an “obscene exploitation” of the Genocide Convention, noting that the Jewish state is targeting terrorists who use civilians as human shields in its military campaign.
MEARI’s report questioned whether South Africa’s case against Israel was genuinely rooted in constitutional principles — or driven by outside political pressure.
According to the study, South Africa’s open hostility toward Israel and its biased approach in filing the case — failing to acknowledge Hamas’s role in launching the war with its Oct. 7, 2023, invasion of and massacre across southern Israel — undermines the government’s credibility.
The study also explained that, shortly after filing the ICJ case, South Africa’s ruling African National Congress (ANC), struggling with financial difficulties, unexpectedly paid off a multi-million-rand debt, fueling speculation about possible covert support from Iran.
During Tuesday’s press conference, Hatami also emphasized that Gaza’s population requires immediate and concrete support from governments and international organizations, rather than mere symbolic gestures.
“Unfortunately, due to the influence of the United States and some Western powers, such support is more verbal than practical. As a result, the crimes of this regime continue with intensity,” he said.
Since the start of the war in Gaza, the South African government has been one of the fiercest critics of Israel’s military campaign, which seeks to free the hostages kidnapped by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023, and dismantle the terrorist group’s military and administrative control in the enclave.
Beyond its open hostility toward Israel, South Africa has actively supported Iran’s terrorist proxy by hosting two Hamas officials at a state-backed conference expressing solidarity with the Palestinians in December 2023.
Iranian leaders routinely declare their intention to destroy the state of Israel.
RSS
Zohran Mamdani Overwhelmingly Unpopular With New York City Jews, New Poll Finds
Zohran Mamdani. Photo: Ron Adar / SOPA Images via Reuters Connect
A new Siena College poll shows Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani facing an overwhelming backlash from Jewish voters in New York City, with a staggering 75 percent holding an unfavorable opinion of the Queens Democrat and just 15 percent viewing him favorably.
The numbers mark Mamdani as one of the least popular figures among Jewish New Yorkers, undermining narratives that the progressive lawmaker enjoys substantial support from the Jewish community. His unfavorable rating among Jewish voters is more than 38 points higher than his standing with the general electorate, where 37 percent view him negatively compared to 28 percent favorably. (The remainder responded they either don’t know or have no opinion.)
The steep disapproval comes as Mamdani continues to face criticism for adopting explicitly anti-Israel rhetoric during his campaign. He has repeatedly accused Israel of “apartheid,” called for a US arms embargo on the country, and championed pro-Palestinian causes. He has also accused Israel of committing a so-called “genocide” in Gaza and refused to affirm its right to exist as a Jewish state.
Many local Jewish leaders have condemned these positions as dangerously one-sided amid rising global antisemitism. Critics within the Jewish community have said Mamdani’s rhetoric ignores Israel’s right to defend itself and alienates Jewish New Yorkers who see anti-Israel animus leading to increased antisemitism in the US.
Only 20 percent of Jews stated in the new poll that they plan on voting for Mamdani, undercutting previous polling which indicated the firebrand progressive winning a plurality of New York City Jewish support. According to the poll, 44 percent and 23 percent of Jews in the city plan on voting for former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and conservative activist Curtis Sliwa, respectively. Only 4 percent plan on voting for incumbent Mayor Eric Adams.
Mamdani, the 33‑year‑old state assemblymember and self-proclaimed democratic socialist, defeated Cuomo and other candidates in a lopsided first‑round win in the city’s Democratic primary for mayor, notching approximately 43.5 percent of first‑choice votes compared to Cuomo’s 36.4 percent.
A little-known politician before this year’s primary campaign, Mamdani is an outspoken supporter of the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to isolate Israel from the international community as a step toward its eventual elimination. Mamdani also defended the phrase “globalize the intifada”— which references previous periods of sustained Palestinian terrorism against Jews and Israels and has been widely interpreted as a call to expand political violence — by invoking the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising during World War II. In response, the US Holocaust Memorial Museum repudiated the mayoral candidate, calling his comments “outrageous and especially offensive to [Holocaust] survivors.”