RSS
Israel’s Allied Muslim States as a Centerpiece of Trump’s Policy of Peace
Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, then-US President Donald Trump, and United Arab Emirates (UAE) Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed display their copies of signed agreements as they participate in the signing ceremony of the Abraham Accords, normalizing relations between Israel and some of its Middle East neighbors, in a strategic realignment of Middle Eastern countries against Iran, on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, US, September 15, 2020. Photo: REUTERS/Tom Brenner/
Since Tehran will soon be able to launch an atomic bomb and will then become a real strategic danger to Israel and the Sunni Arab states, Israel has an existential need to prevent Iran from building nuclear weapons. That’s why Israel is trying to expand relations with all moderate or secular Muslim states that can support or join the Abraham Accords.
In this context, Israel’s and America’s grand strategy in the Middle East must consist of both rebuilding Gaza as soon as possible with a new Palestinian leadership; continuing to contain Iran’s proxies such as Hamas and Hezbollah; and extending the Abraham Accords to Central Asian and Caucasian Turkic-speaking countries such as Kazakhstan or Azerbaijan.
This is the new “big game.” For Donald Trump, the Accords are not just a simple tool for resolving the Middle East conflict by paying (financially or politically) the Arab or Muslim states to make peace with Israel, but should become an informal bloc of states, an intergovernmental club for joint economic development to support US economic policy in various fields. One of the first positive effects of the global Trump plan would be to fight terrorism, whose breeding ground is poverty and fanaticism, through economic development and a new moderate Palestinian government.
The 2020 agreements initiated by Trump led to the establishment of full diplomatic relations between Israel and the UAE and Bahrain, and were the first regional agreements to be signed since 1994 (between Israel and Jordan).
The agreements were named the “Abraham Accords” to emphasize the common belief of Islam and Judaism in the existence of the Prophet Abraham. In reality, the rapprochement between Israel and the Sunni Arab states began in the 2010s due to their common fear of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its nuclear program. Since 2012, the unofficial normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel has been largely based on intelligence sharing against this common threat, and the Omani and Israeli intelligence services have also begun to cooperate.
Now, five years later, how can the Abraham Accords be strengthened and extended to other Arab and non-Arab Muslim states?
According to US think tanks and Israeli media, the next direction of the “Abraham Process” could be the South Caucasus and other Turkic-speaking countries in Central Asia, with a possible alignment of Azerbaijan — a secular state with a moderate Shiite majority that already has a 30-year alliance with Israel. Recently, its state-owned energy giant bought 10% of one of Israel’s gas fields, and the deal was done with the blessing of the US company Chevron.
Azerbaijan’s unique conceptual and practical experience in Muslim-Jewish cooperation (after Turkey’s special experience in the 1990s was ended by President Erdogan’s pro-Hamas strategy) can be used to extend the Abraham Accords to other non-Arab Muslim countries in the Middle East, Central Asia, Southeast Asia and Africa.
Crucially, the UAE, one of the architects and key participants in the Abraham Accords, is also Azerbaijan’s top partner in the Arab world. Similarly, Israel is already promoting a trilateral partnership model for Morocco involving American companies, and plans to extend this approach to the Sunni Gulf monarchies and the US in the areas of defense, AI, and cybersecurity as part of the expansion of the Abraham Accords. Azerbaijan’s participation in such initiatives would strengthen the Muslim component of Israel’s regional partnerships.
If Trump’s plan to rebuild Gaza is adapted to the positions of Riyadh, Cairo, and Amman, the reconstruction — which is necessary in any case — will most likely involve the UAE, Egypt, and possibly other Arab states. Washington could approach Baku with a proposal to participate on a humanitarian basis, acting as a free supplier of energy resources needed for reconstruction efforts and for the needs of the Palestinian population during the active phase of the project.
This could open a window of opportunity for other post-Soviet Turkic countries, such as Kazakhstan, to join the club. Kazakhstan is the gateway to Central Asia, which is rich in coveted minerals such as uranium, lithium, and tantalum, and has some of the largest gas reserves in the world. Kazakhstan is also friendly to Israel. Washington could use the Baku-Jerusalem relationship to contain Iran’s geopolitical ambitions in Central Asia.
Iran is seeking to increase its influence in the region in pursuit of energy and, of course, uranium. Increasing alliances between Israel and other Muslim-majority countries important as the Trump administration works to pressure Iran and further integrate and consolidate Israel’s presence within the framework of a “Greater Middle East.”
Alessandro Bertoldi is the Executive Director of the Milton Friedman Institute.
The post Israel’s Allied Muslim States as a Centerpiece of Trump’s Policy of Peace first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
South Africa Distances Itself From Army Chief’s Pledges of Military, Political Support to Iran
Iranian Major General Amir Hatami and South African General Rudzani Maphwanya meet in Tehran to discuss strengthening military cooperation and strategic ties. Photo: Screenshot
South Africa’s army chief has faced domestic backlash after pledging military and political support to Iran during a recent visit, prompting government officials to distance themselves from his remarks over concerns they could harm Pretoria’s efforts to strengthen ties with the United States.
Members of South Africa’s governing coalition have denounced Gen. Rudzani Maphwanya, chief of the South African National Defense Force (SANDF), for his trip to Tehran earlier this week, describing his remarks as “reckless grandstanding.”
The Democratic Alliance (DA), South Africa’s second-largest party in the governing coalition, has called for Maphwanya to be court-martialed for breaking neutrality and violating military law, saying his comments had gone “beyond military-to-military discussions and entered the realm of foreign policy.”
“This reckless grandstanding comes at a time when South Africa’s relations with key democratic partners, especially the United States, are already under severe strain,” DA defense spokesperson Chris Hattingh said in a statement.
“The SANDF’s job is to lead and manage the defense forces, not to act as an unsanctioned political envoy. Allowing our most senior military officer to make partisan foreign policy pronouncements is strategically reckless, diplomatically irresponsible, and economically self-defeating,” he continued.
“South Africa cannot afford to have its international standing further sabotaged by political adventurism from the military’s top brass,” Hattingh said.
Iran and South Africa held high-level military talks earlier this week as both nations seek to deepen cooperation and strengthen their partnership against what officials called “global arrogance and aggressive colonial approaches.”
During a joint press conference with Iranian Maj. Gen. Amir Hatami, Maphwanya called for deeper ties between the two nations, especially in defense cooperation, affirming that “the Republic of South Africa and the Islamic Republic of Iran have common goals.”
“We always stand alongside the oppressed and defenseless people of the world,” the South African general said.
He also criticized Israel over the ongoing war in Gaza, expressed support for the Palestinian people, and told Iranian officials that his visit “conveys a political message” on behalf of President Cyril Ramaphosa’s administration.
However, shortly after Maphwanya’s remarks drew media attention, the South African government moved to distance itself from his comments, with the Foreign Affairs Ministry stating that his comments “do not represent the government’s official foreign policy stance.”
The Defense Department, which described Maphwanya’s comments as “unfortunate,” confirmed that he is now expected to meet with the Minister of Defense and Military Veterans, Angie Motshekga, upon his return to provide explanations.
Ramaphosa’s spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, clarified that the president was neither aware of the trip nor had he sanctioned it.
“The visit was ill-advised and more so, the expectation is that the general should have been a lot more circumspect with the comments he makes,” Magwenya told reporters during a press conference on Thursday.
“It is crucial to clarify that the implementation of South Africa’s foreign policy is a function of the presidency,” he continued. “Any statements made by an individual, or a department other than those responsible for foreign policy, should not be misinterpreted as the official position of the South African government.”
Maphwanya’s trip to Iran came after the Middle East Africa Research Institute (MEARI) released a recent report detailing how South Africa’s deepening ties with Tehran have led the country to compromise its democratic foundations and constitutional principles by aligning itself with a regime internationally condemned for terrorism, repression, and human rights abuses.
RSS
Democrat Pete Buttigieg Toughens Stance on Israel, Says He Backs Arms Embargo Following Left-Wing Pressure
Former US Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg speaks during an appearance on the “Pod Save America” podcast on Aug. 10, 2025. Photo: Screenshot
Former US Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, a Democrat considered by many observers to be a potential 2028 presidential candidate, has recalibrated his stance on Israel, moving from cautious language to a far more critical position after facing backlash over recent comments on the popular “Pod Save America” podcast.
In his podcast interview on Sunday, Buttigieg called Israel “a friend” and said the United States should “put your arm around” the country during difficult times. He also sidestepped a direct answer on whether the US should recognize a Palestinian state, describing the question as “profound” but offering little elaboration beyond calls for peace.
That measured approach drew sharp criticism from progressives and foreign policy voices who argued that his words were too vague amid the ongoing war in Gaza and a shifting sentiment within the Democratic party base regarding Israel. Evolving fault lines within the Democratic Party over US policy toward its staunch Middle Eastern ally signal that the issue could loom large in the 2028 presidential primary.
Following Sunday’s interview, US Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) urged Buttigieg to show “moral clarity,” while Ben Rhodes, former White House aide to President Barack Obama, said he was left uncertain where the Cabinet official stood. Social media critics accused Buttigieg of offering platitudes that dodged hard policy commitments.
In a follow-up interview with Politico published on Thursday, Buttigieg took a decidedly tougher line. He said he supports recognizing a Palestinian state as part of a two-state solution and ending the decades-long practice of providing military aid to the Jewish state through sweeping, multi-year packages. Instead, he called for a case-by-case review of assistance, while emphasizing the need to stop civilian deaths, release hostages, and ensure unimpeded humanitarian aid to Gaza.
Perhaps most significantly, Buttigieg indicated support for a US arms embargo on Israel, saying he would have signed on to Sen. Bernie Sanders’s recently proposed resolution to prohibit arms sales to the Jewish state.
The shift places Buttigieg closer to the party’s progressive flank on foreign policy, a notable change for a figure often viewed as a bridge between the Democratic establishment and younger, more liberal voters. For a likely 2028 contender, the move reflects both the political risks of appearing out of step with an increasingly skeptical base and the growing influence of voices calling for sharper limits on US support for Israel.
Recent polling shows a generational divide on the issue, with younger Democrats far more likely to back conditioning aid to Israel and recognizing Palestinian statehood.
RSS
Former Algemeiner Correspondent Gidon Ben-Zvi Dies at 51
Gidon Ben-Zvi. Photo: Screenshot
Gidon Ben-Zvi, former Jerusalem Correspondent for The Algemeiner, has died at the age of 51 after a fight with cancer.
Ben-Zvi continued to write op-eds for The Algemeiner even after he left as a correspondent, including in the aftermath of Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel.
An accomplished writer, Ben-Zvi left Hollywood for Jerusalem in 2009, moving back to Israel after spending 12 years in the United States. From 1994-1997, Gidon served in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), in an infantry unit.
In addition to writing for The Algemeiner, Ben-Zvi contributed to the Times of Israel, Jerusalem Post, CiF Watch, and blogged at Jerusalem State of Mind.
Ben-Zvi joined HonestReporting as a senior editor in June 2020, becoming an integral part of the editorial department and writing dozens of articles and media critiques for the watchdog group exposing anti-Israel bias. He moved with his family to Haifa at the end of 2022.
Ben-Zvi’s final article for HonestReporting was published in January 2025, before he took a leave of absence for health reasons. HonestReporting said in a newly published obituary that staff believed he would eventually return, noting the positivity and perseverance he exuded. The advocacy group said it learned of Ben-Zvi’s passing late last month.
Ben-Zvi leaves behind his wife, Debbie, and four young children.
All Ben-Zvi’s articles for The Algemeiner can be found here.
May his memory be a blessing.