RSS
We Must Heed the Words of Warning About Threats to Israel
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei waves during a meeting in Tehran, Iran, May 20, 2025. Photo: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS
On August 3rd, 1914, as dusk was settling over St. James’s Park in Westminster, Central London, the British Foreign Secretary, Sir Edward Grey, stood at the window of his room at the Foreign Office with his friend John Alfred Spender, editor of the Westminster Gazette.
It had been a grueling week of diplomatic back-and-forth as Europe continued to flounder following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the presumptive heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, who was killed together with his wife in Sarajevo at the end of June. Earlier that day, it had become clear that all diplomatic efforts had been to no avail, and what would turn out to be the most devastating war in history was about to begin with the German invasion of Belgium.
Grey, whose own role as the British Empire’s top diplomat was intimately bound up with the failures leading up to the war, gazed out the window and murmured words to his friend that would haunt him, and remain etched in history: “The lamps are going out all over Europe; we shall not see them lit again in our lifetime.”
Outside, the scene was peaceful — the soft glow of the gas lamps, the calm of a London evening. But inside Grey’s office, and in the corridors of power across Europe, the gears of war were already turning. In that moment of eerie calm, Grey’s dark words captured the sense of a world that had sleepwalked into disaster, with leaders who did nothing to stop the calamity that was about to engulf them all.
The series of events historians call the July Crisis is a textbook example of catastrophic leadership failure: Self-important aristocrats and diplomats, smug politicians, and gung-ho military experts, all aloof in their ivory towers, refusing to hear the voices of those who warned of the abyss ahead. Illusions of dignity and prestige that would be lost were prioritized over both the realities of a world order that was changing, and any thought that war was the worst possible alternative.
It makes you wonder: What would have happened if Europe’s leaders had actually listened to the voices of the people who would be affected? If they’d heard from the soldiers who would soon die in the trenches, the mothers who would soon be left to mourn, and the ordinary citizens and their descendants whose lives would be shattered for a century to come?
One of the great foundations of modern democracy is the ‘voice of the people’ — the idea that leaders are accountable to those they govern, and that power and justice are strongest when they emerge from the bottom up, not imposed from the top down. In his foundational work, Two Treatises of Government, the seventeenth-century English political philosopher John Locke argued that governments only derive legitimacy from what he called “the consent of the governed.”
Thomas Jefferson was a big fan of this idea, and together with America’s founding fathers, he ensured that it was enshrined in the US Constitution. Jefferson was also a devoted admirer of the Hebrew Scriptures, and it is therefore not surprising that this idea is embedded in the Torah. In an 1813 letter to the prominent Quaker William Canby, Jefferson expressed admiration for the “sublime philosophy of the Hebrew prophets,” calling it “the most precious” source of religious and moral guidance.
And indeed, in the Torah, we find a remarkable example of this very principle — a moment when leadership didn’t come from the top down, but rather emerged from the Israelites’ desert camp itself. Despite resistance toward it from an influential voice, Moshe, the paradigm of Jewish leadership, embraces the ‘voice of the people’ wholeheartedly.
The story can be found in Parshat Beha’alotecha after Moshe appoints seventy elders to share the burden of prophecy and leadership. Suddenly, two men — Eldad and Medad — begin to prophesy in the camp outside the carefully orchestrated gathering.
Their unexpected prophecy shakes the status quo, and Moshe’s devoted deputy Joshua suggests they be arrested and jailed for this shocking break with protocol. But Moshe’s reaction to Joshua’s suggestion is nothing short of remarkable: “Would that all of God’s people were prophets, that God would put His spirit upon them!” (Num. 11:29).
Moshe’s response stands as a timeless rebuke to those who cling to control and hierarchy at all costs. It recognizes that the strength of any group depends on nurturing the spirit of prophecy in every voice, not suppressing it in the name of protocol or power.
More importantly, it is a moment that reveals the essential Jewish approach to leadership: being a leader is not about imposing authority from above, but rather, it is about creating space for everyone’s potential to shine.
In contrast to the European leaders of 1914, who turned away from the people they served, Moshe understood that authentic leadership is about empowering the people’s voice. But there was no one like Moshe in the summer of 1914. Amid the swirling chaos of that fateful July, one voice of caution stood out: Jean Jaurès, who represented the French working class.
In the final days of peace, Jaurès warned passionately of the ruin that lay ahead, urging European leaders to be conscious of the looming catastrophe. On July 25th, he declared that France must not be drawn into this reckless conflict with unknown consequences — a calm, prophetic voice bravely highlighting the human cost of world war.
Just six days later, he was assassinated in a Paris café — silenced by a pro-war fanatic at the very moment he was trying to prevent cataclysmic devastation. The elevated elites eagerly marching into conflict hardly acknowledged his death, but when they did, they dismissed him as a traitor to the French nation.
His passing marking the disappearance of one of the few voices still calling for caution. He was a lone prophetic voice — an “Eldad and Medad” for his time — whose warnings were drowned out by those urging war.
We are seeing the same dynamic play out in our days — prophetic voices being ignored by the elites. Broadcaster and news blogger Mark Levin has long warned of the dangers of Iran’s nuclear ambitions, a threat that many in the halls of power seem content to downplay or ignore.
Former US military intelligence officer and Middle East analyst Michael Pregent consistently highlights the risks of the West’s misguided alliance with Qatar, which bankrolls extremism even as it claims to be an ally.
And former IDF intelligence officer Yigal Carmon of MEMRI translates the words of jihadists who call for violence against the West, exposing the danger from those who harbor hatred toward the very countries they live in — yet his warnings fall on deaf ears.
These are today’s “Eldad and Medad,” raising their voices in the camp, warning of the abyss that lies ahead. And we ignore them at our peril. The lesson of Moshe in Beha’alotecha is that true leadership does not fear the grassroots voice — and that one must never suppress the prophet in the midst of the people. Those voices are always the ones that can save a nation from sleepwalking into disaster. “Would that all of God’s people were prophets, that God would put His spirit upon them!”
The author is a rabbi in Beverly Hills, California.
The post We Must Heed the Words of Warning About Threats to Israel first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
‘Hamas Must End Its Rule in Gaza’: Qatar Joins Other Arab Countries in Demanding Terror Group Disarm, Step Down
Qatar’s Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani makes statements to the media with then-US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, in Doha, Qatar, Oct. 13, 2023. Photo: Jacquelyn Martin/Pool via REUTERS
Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the Arab League, signed onto an unprecedented declaration on Tuesday calling on the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas to disarm, relinquish control over the war-torn Gaza Strip, and release the Israeli hostages it is still holding.
At a French and Saudi-led United Nations conference on reviving conversation and advocacy for a two-state solution to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, 17 countries, the 22-member Arab League, and the European Union signed onto the declaration.
“Hamas must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority, with international engagement and support, in line with the objective of a sovereign and independent Palestinian State,” it read.
“Governance, law enforcement, and security across all Palestinian territory must lie solely with the Palestinian Authority, with appropriate international support.”
While European and other Western countries have consistently made their condemnation of Hamas and its attacks clear, as well as their commitment to a two-state solution, it is notable that many Arab countries — including Qatar, which has historically supported Hamas diplomatically and financially — signed onto the declaration.
Some foreign policy experts noted the striking inclusion of Qatar, which continues to host senior Hamas leaders.
The declaration also condemned Hamas’s deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attack on southern Israel, which left 1,200 dead and another 251 taken hostage, and called for an end to the subsequent war which has devastated Gaza.
This is the first time since the Israel-Hamas war began that a united front of Arab countries condemned the Oct. 7 massacre and called on Hamas to disarm and step down from power.
When it comes to a post-war Gaza, the declaration proposes “a temporary international stabilization mission” under the auspices of the United Nations and upon invitation by the Palestinian Authority. It also notes that some countries have expressed readiness to contribute troops to the cause.
“By bringing the Arab countries for the first time to condemn Hamas and call for its disarmament, we are creating, or recreating, the conditions for this political solution that, again, is the only path forward, and we are paving the way,” French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said in an interview with CBS News.
“We’re paving the way for the future Abraham Accords that the US administration might lead,” he argued, referring to a series of US-brokered deals normalizing ties between Israel and several Arab countries.
Michael Koplow, the chief policy officer of the Israel Policy Forum, a pro-two-state solution think tank, called the declaration “remarkable” and wrote that the Israeli government “should treat this as an unprecedented accomplishment.”
“It explicitly called for a Palestinian state to be demilitarized, marked PA incitement in school curricula as something that must be addressed, and promised Israel full regional integration. It’s basically attaching the full Israeli wishlist to two states,” he argued. At the same time, “there’s plenty in here that Israel reasonably finds objectionable. Full right of return is a non-starter, and the real carrot of a pledge for full normalized diplomatic relations across the board is missing.”
He concluded, “When Israel talks about peace through strength and a transformed regional and [international] environment re: accepting Israel, this is what it actually looks like. If this [government] had an ounce of sense, it would crow about this as the world accepting what it has long demanded and build on it.”
The United States and Israel did not participate in the conference.
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said in a statement that the conference is “unproductive and ill-timed,” and that it is “a slap in the face to the victims of Oct. 7 and a reward for terrorism.”
“This is a publicity stunt that comes in the middle of delicate diplomatic efforts to end the conflict,” she continued. “Far from promoting peace, the conference will prolong the war, embolden Hamas, and reward its obstruction and undermine real-world efforts to achieve peace.”
Israeli officials have similarly argued that recognizing a Palestinian state at this time would “reward” Hamas’s terrorism, embolden the Islamist group to continue fighting, and only lead to a failed state.
RSS
NYT Adds Editors’ Note to Story That Didn’t Mention Malnourished Gazan Child’s Pre-Existing Health Problems
The headquarters of The New York Times. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.
The New York Times has added an editors’ note to a widely shared news article that spotlighted a severely malnourished child in Gaza, revealing that the 18-month-old boy maintained pre-existing health issues that contributed to his current condition.
The addition followed mounting scrutiny over the accuracy of the story and the credibility of its sources.
“This article has been updated to include information about Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq, a child in Gaza suffering from severe malnutrition,” read the note posted at the bottom of the story. “After publication of the article, The Times learned from his doctor that Mohammed also had pre-existing health problems.”
The original article focused in part on al-Mutawaq, who has been reportedly suffering from acute malnutrition amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza. The story, accompanied by a harrowing image of the emaciated child, was quickly amplified across social media and used by advocacy groups and some politicians to demand further pressure on Israel to halt its military campaign in the enclave against the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas.
However, within days, Israeli officials and independent analysts raised concerns about the report. Medical experts noted inconsistencies in the image and questioned whether the child’s condition truly reflected famine rather than preexisting illness. Critics pointed out the lack of corroboration from independent humanitarian organizations or UN agencies, many of which have not confirmed famine in northern Gaza despite repeated claims from Hamas-linked sources.
Furthermore, online researchers identified pro-Hamas affiliations among some individuals featured in the story or cited as sources, prompting questions about whether the Times had adequately vetted the material.
Amid growing backlash, the New York Times appended the editors’ note to the article, and the newspaper also issued a statement elaborating on the situation.
“We recently ran a story about Gaza’s most vulnerable civilians, including Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq, who is about 18 months old and suffers from severe malnutrition,” a spokesperson said. “We have since learned new information, including from the hospital that treated him and his medical records, and have updated our story to add context about his pre-existing health problems. This additional detail gives readers a greater understanding of his situation.”
“A lie went viral. A child’s illness was twisted into propaganda. This isn’t journalism. It’s a blood libel,” the Israel Foreign Ministry posted on X/Twitter.
A lie went viral. A child’s illness was twisted into propaganda.
This isn’t journalism.
It’s a blood libel. pic.twitter.com/yc0PV0f8TJ— Israel Foreign Ministry (@IsraelMFA) July 30, 2025
They quietly added an editor’s note, but the lie already went global. https://t.co/eJmCfoY2jv
— Israel Foreign Ministry (@IsraelMFA) July 30, 2025
Israeli officials have repeatedly stated that they coordinate with international agencies to facilitate the entry of food and aid into Gaza, and that it is Hamas, not Israel, that diverts or seizes supplies for its fighters. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) recently released footage which showed stockpiles of food, fuel, and medical supplies in areas controlled by Hamas.
The Israeli government has facilitated the entry of thousands of aid trucks into Gaza, with officials condemning international aid agencies for their alleged failure to distribute supplies, which have largely been stalled at border crossings.
RSS
Australian Police Arrest Suspect in Arson Attack on Melbourne Synagogue
The Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team (JCTT) in Australia announced the apprehension of an unnamed 21-year-old man for his alleged role in a Dec. 6, 2024, arson attack. Photo: Victoria Police
The Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team (JCTT) in Australia announced the apprehension of an unnamed 21-year-old man who could face charges which carry potential 15- and 10-year jail sentences for his alleged role in a Dec. 6, 2024, arson attack on the Adass Israel Synagogue — an Orthodox congregation in the Melbourne suburb of Ripponlea — that left one person with minor burns and the building with extensive damage.
On Wednesday, a joint statement from the Australian Federal Police (AFP), Victoria Police, and the Australian Security Intelligence Organization said that in addition to torching the Jewish house of worship, the suspected assailant also allegedly stole a car, an offense with a maximum 10-year sentence, the same as a third charge for “endangering life.” Authorities say the man collaborated with two other individuals in commission of his crimes. They arrested another individual on July 16 for allegedly stealing the car used in the arson.
“Since the fire occurred on Dec. 6 last year, the investigation has been one of the highest priorities for Victoria Police and the JCTT,” Victoria Police Deputy Commissioner Wendy Steendam said. “Today’s arrest is a demonstration of our ongoing efforts to hold those involved to account. We now have charged two people as part of this investigation, and I expect there will be more to come.”
Steendam added, “What has also been clear to us throughout this investigation is that assistance from the public is absolutely crucial and without that assistance, the investigation would not be where it is today. We know there are people out there with information that will progress this investigation – whether that is people we have already spoken to or others who are yet to come forward. Again, I appeal for those people to contact police. If you have any details at all about those involved and their motivation, then we want to hear from you. Even the smallest detail or piece of information could prove crucial.”
Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said that “people deserve to be safe and feel safe, particularly when it comes to their places of worship. This is not negotiable in any way. We remain committed to identifying all those who seek to cause this kind of fear and harm, and ensuring they are brought to justice.”
The Australian government has committed 30 million Australian dollars ($20 million) for reconstructing the synagogue. “This attack was not simply an attack on Jewish Australians; an attack on a synagogue is an attack on Australia and is treated as such,” Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said.
AFP Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett confirmed that the JCTT investigated the synagogue attack as politically motivated.
“We will not let this go unpunished in Australia. And that’s why we have responded with relentless determination to pursue those responsible and hold them to account,” Barrett told reporters. “This crime was despicable as it was dangerous, and it is important to acknowledge that this was not just an arson on a synagogue.”
Explaining the broader impact of the arson, Barrett said that “the effect of this crime has rippled through a community that continues to be targeted by criminals. We will not stand for this, and I want to reassure the public that this is not just a priority investigation for the JCTT, but also for the AFP. I want to thank the Jewish community across Australia, and in particular, the Adass Israel Synagogue congregation, for their stoicism, patience, and the support they have shown the JCTT.”
Barrett said that investigators suspect overseas actors may have coordinated the attack. “The motivation is still being assessed,” she said, explaining the AFP was “working closely with our Five Eyes partners and international partners to ensure our collective powers and capabilities are drawn upon to help bring those responsible to justice.”
“Five Eyes” refers to the collaborative relationship between the espionage agencies of anglosphere allies Australia, the United States, Britain, Canada, and New Zealand.
Australian law enforcement had previously announced in January they believed that foreign criminal groups may have orchestrated violence in the wave of antisemitic incidents that Australia has experienced over the last year.
However, recent polling shows a homegrown antisemitism problem in Australia.
From June 27 through July 1, the Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM) watchdog organization polled 1,000 Australians, finding that only 24 percent of respondents regarded the country’s attitudes toward Jews as “very positive” (9 percent) or “slightly positive” (15 percent). These numbers contrasted with the higher levels (28 percent) who answered “very negative” (8 percent) or “slightly negative” (20 percent).
“Australia used to be thought of as a safe haven for Jews, but that image has unfortunately been shattered over the last two years,” CAM’s CEO Sacha Roytman said in a statement. “Many national and local authorities were left shocked and surprised by this wave of hate and we are working with our partners in Australia to provide strategies and the necessary tools to fight hate and antisemitism.”