Uncategorized
Trump’s dinner with a Holocaust denier draws rare criticism from some of his Jewish allies
(JTA) — Two weeks after feting Donald Trump as America’s most pro-Israel president ever, the Zionist Organization of America had harsh words for the man who aspires to return to the White House.
“ZOA deplores the fact that President Trump had a friendly dinner with such vile antisemites,” ZOA said Sunday in a news release. “His dining with Jew-haters helps legitimize and mainstream antisemitism and must be condemned by everyone.”
The group was referring to Trump’s dinner last week with Ye, the rapper formerly known as Kanye West who came out as an antisemite in recent weeks, and Nick Fuentes, the right-wing provocateur and Holocaust denier. Trump hosted the pair at Mar-a-Lago, his Florida estate, on Tuesday.
Reaction to the dinner was initially muted in the days before Thanksgiving, but over the long weekend, a host of figures denounced Trump for meeting with the two men, though some did so more strongly or explicitly than others. Among Jews, the criticism has come not only from Trump’s longtime detractors but from some of his biggest fans.
“To my friend Donald Trump, you are better than this,” David Friedman, Trump’s ambassador to Israel, said Friday on Twitter. “Even a social visit from an antisemite like Kanye West and human scum like Nick Fuentes is unacceptable.”
Friedman is rarely anything but effusive in praising Trump, whom he once said would join the “small cadre of Israeli heroes” for moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, recognizing Israeli sovereignty on the Golan Heights and exiting the Iran nuclear deal, among other measures. But on Friday, his tone was more pleading as he tweeted to Trump: “I urge you to throw those bums out, disavow them and relegate them to the dustbin of history where they belong.”
Trump for his part said in statements on his Truth Social social media site that he hoped to assist Ye, whom he described as “troubled,” and that he did not know who Fuentes was. (Ye said he had come to Mar-a-Lago to ask Trump to be his running mate in his own nascent campaign.)
“We got along great, he expressed no antisemitism and I appreciated all of the nice things he said about me on ‘Tucker Carlson,’” Trump said of Ye, referring to a Fox News opinion show hosted by Carlson, whose embrace of an antisemitic conspiracy theory has led the Anti-Defamation League to call for his removal. “Why wouldn’t I agree to meet? Also, I didn’t know Nick Fuentes.”
The response was reminiscent of Trump’s swatting-away of criticism after he told the Proud Boys, a far-right group whose founder had made antisemitic comments, to “stand back and stand by” during a presidential debate in 2020, in response to being asked to condemn white supremacists from the debate stage. He subsequently said he did not know who the Proud Boys were. (The group later rebranded as explicitly antisemitic.)
Trump’s contention that he did not know Fuentes raised eyebrows for some. Like the Proud Boys, Fuentes is part of the extremist fringe of the Republican Party that has made up part of Trump’s base. The founder of a white nationalist group called America First, he was a leading organizer of the “Stop the Steal” rallies organized by Trump supporters to try to overturn the election results showing that he lost in 2020; he was also present at the rally that Trump addressed preceding the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol that aimed to derail the transition of power.
Fuentes, who routinely rails against Jews on his livestream, also attended the 2017 far-right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where Trump famously said there were “very fine people on both sides” and more recently has grown close to far-right lawmakers in Trump’s party, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene in Georgia and Rep. Paul Gosar in Arizona.
Nick Fuentes answers question during an interview with Agence France-Presse in Boston, May 9, 2016. (William Edwards/AFP via Getty Images)
But even those who took Trump at his word that he did not previously know Fuentes said that was little excuse for dining with him.
“A good way not to accidentally dine with a vile racist and anti-Semite you don’t know is not to dine with a vile racist and anti-Semite you do know,” the Jewish right-wing pundit Ben Shapiro tweeted on Sunday. (Shapiro’s tweet kicked off a heated exchange with Ye, who recently returned to Twitter as the social media platform’s new owner, Elon Musk, restores many accounts that were suspended for violating the site’s old rules, including Trump’s.)
Reaction to the dinner kept Trump in the spotlight over the course of a holiday weekend, a double-edged sword for the first Republican to declare a 2024 presidential campaign. Trump’s rise was fueled by nonstop media coverage, including of seeming misdeeds that did not doom him with his supporters. Still, one Trump advisor told NBC News that the event was a “f—ing nightmare” for the campaign, which has gotten off to a rocky start.
Also condemning the meeting were Jewish organizations that have not hesitated to criticize Trump’s flirtation with extremists in the past, including the American Jewish Committee, the Reform movement of Judaism and the Anti-Defamation League.
The Biden White House also condemned the incident. “Bigotry, hate, and anti-Semitism have absolutely no place in America, including at Mar-a-Lago,” its statement said. ”Holocaust denial is repugnant and dangerous, and it must be forcefully condemned.” (Asked to comment on Trump saying he didn’t know Fuentes, Biden himself told a reporter, “You don’t want to hear what I think.”)
The White House’s statement did not name Trump, nor did statements from many Republicans, including the Republican Jewish Coalition, at whose annual conference Trump spoke last week. The group did not initiate a statement, but, in response to reporters’ queries, released one.
“We strongly condemn the virulent antisemitism of Kanye West and Nick Fuentes and call on all political leaders to reject their messages of hate and refuse to meet with them,” said the statement, first solicited by The New York Times’ Maggie Haberman. The RJC and its CEO, Matt Brooks, retweeted Haberman.
Why the RJC would not name Trump drew follow-up questions from reporters, including Haberman, as well as a barrage of criticism on social media.
Brooks, evidently stung, called such queries “dumb and short-sighted” on Sunday morning and said on Twitter by way of explanation, “We didn’t mention Trump in our RJC statement even though it’s obviously in response to his meeting because we wanted it to be a warning to ALL Republicans. Duh!”
White nationalist leader Nick Fuentes addresses his livestream audience on the day Roe v. Wade is struck down to attack Jews on the Supreme Court, June 24, 2022. (Screenshot)
Max Miller, a Jewish Republican just elected to Congress from Ohio, and a former wingman for Trump, also did not name Trump and instead appealed to Ye, who at least until recently had become cherished on the right as a Black Christian conservative, to make a course correction.
“Nick Fuentes is unquestionably an anti-Semite and a Holocaust denier. His brand of hate has no place in our public discourse,” Miller said on Twitter. Ye “doesn’t need to keep walking this path. Letting people like Nick Fuentes into his life is a mistake.”
Prominent Jewish Republicans not making statements included David Kustoff, a Tennessee Jewish Republican congressman; Jason Greenblatt, once a top Middle East adviser to Trump; and Trump’s daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared Kushner, who were both top advisers to Trump when he was president. A spokesman for Kushner did not reply to a request for comment.
Lee Zeldin, the Jewish Republican New York congressman seen as having a future in the GOP leadership after performing more strongly than expected in a failed bid to be elected governor of a Democratic state, also did not issue a statement, and his spokesman did not reply to a request for comment. Zeldin has otherwise been outspoken on Jewish issues in Congress and co-chairs the U.S. House of Representatives Black-Jewish caucus.
South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, who is the only Black Republican in the Senate and who co-chairs its Black-Jewish caucus, also had not commented as of Sunday night. Scott is believed to be a 2024 presidential hopeful and
Other Republican leaders denounced extremism but did not call out Trump by name. Ronna McDaniel, the Republican National Committee chairwoman known for her closeness to the former president, like the RJC, replied only when asked by a reporter — in her case, from Bloomberg — and did not name Trump.
“As I had repeatedly said, white supremacy, neo-Nazism, hate speech, and bigotry are disgusting and do not have a home in the Republican Party,” McDaniel said.
Meanwhile, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo condemned antisemitism — but without mentioning Trump, Fuentes, Ye or any of the forms of antisemitism they have expressed. Instead, Pompeo spoke of his own role in undermining the boycott Israel movement — a cause that none of the men who dined together has embraced.
“Anti-Semitism is a cancer. As Secretary, I fought to ban funding for anti-Semitic groups that pushed BDS,” Pompeo said on Twitter. “We stand with the Jewish people in the fight against the world’s oldest bigotry.”
Trump was the ghost in the Republican machine last weekend at the Republican Jewish Coalition’s annual conference in Las Vegas: the declared candidate who party leaders believe still commands the unswerving loyalty of at least a third of the base. With his capacity for lashing out at critics, taking on Trump directly is seen as a fool’s game by many in the party.
A handful of Republicans already known for their open criticism of Trump, including Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, did denounce him by name.
“This is just awful, unacceptable conduct from anyone, but most particularly from a former President and current candidate,” Christie tweeted on Friday.
—
The post Trump’s dinner with a Holocaust denier draws rare criticism from some of his Jewish allies appeared first on Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
Uncategorized
A shocking Purim experience (from the memoirs of I. J. Singer)
אינעם בוך זכרונות פֿונעם פּראָזע־מײַסטער, י. י. זינגער, „פֿון אַ וועלט וואָס איז נישטאָ מער‟, געפֿינט זיך אַ רירנדיקע פּורים־מעשׂה.
דאָס בוך איז אַרויס אין יאָר 1946, צוויי יאָר נאָך זינגערס פּלוצלינגדיקן, פֿריצײַטיקן טויט. דאָס ווערק האָט זיך צוערשט געדרוקט אין פֿאָרווערטס נאָך זײַן פּטירה, אונטערן נאָמען „אמתע פּאַסירונגען‟, אָבער זינגער אַליין האָט זײַן ווערק אַ נאָמען געגעבן „פֿון אַ וועלט וואָס איז נישטאָ מער‟. לויט זײַן פּלאַן, האָט דאָס ווערק געזאָלט אונדז געבן אַ ברייט קינסטלעריש בילד פֿון זײַן לעבן, און איבערהויפּט פֿונעם לעבן פֿון זײַן סבֿיבֿה, פֿון די קינדעריאָרן ביז זײַן קומען קיין אַמעריקע. עס האָט געזאָלט זײַן אַ ווערק פֿון דרײַ בענד, אַרום פֿופֿצן הונדערט זײַטן.
אין זײַן רײַכער ליטעראַרישער ירושה, האָט זינגער אונדז אָבער איבערגעלאָזט די ווײַטערדיקע לוסטיקע פּורים־מעשׂה (געדרוקט דאָ אין אַ פֿאַרקירצטן נוסח), וואָס איז פֿאָרגעקומען אין זײַן שטוב ווען ער איז געווען אַ קינד.
שיִעלע — אַזוי הייסט דער יונגער י. י. זינגער — דערציילט וועגן אַ מלמד, ר’ מיכל דוד, אַ פֿריילעך ייִדל, וואָס ס׳האָט זיך בײַ אים, נעבעך, פֿאַרענדיקט שוין גאָרנישט פֿריילעך. אַהרן צייטלין האָט אַ מאָל געשריבן וועגן י. י. זינגער, אַז ער איז געווען „אַ גײַסטיקער רעוואָלוציאָנער, וואָס האָט נישט אָנגענומען — נישט געוואָלט און נישט געקאָנט אָננעמען — דעם סדר פֿון דער וועלט‟. אין אָט דעם מעשׂהלע קען מען דאָס שוין גוט דערפֿילן.
— דניאלה מאַוער
אַ ייִד אַ מלמד פֿאַרגלוסט זיך צו ווערן אַ מלאך
ר׳ מיכל דוד איז געווען אַ קליין, לעבעדיק פּאַרשוינדל, מיט אַ שיטער, בלאָנד בערדל, אַ ייִדל אַ שטיק קוועקזילבער. בײַם לערנען האָט ער ליב געהאַט צו שניצן מיט אַ מעסערל. ער האָט אויסגעשניצט טאַבאַק־שטעקעלעך פֿון קאָרע, וואָס ער האָט אַוועקגעשאָנקען מתּנות צו אַלטע ייִדן, גרויסע טאַבאַק־שמעקער; אָדער ער האָט אויסגעשניצט פֿון האָלץ אַן אתרוג־פּושקע. ער האָט אויך פֿאַר אונדז אויסגעאַרבעט פֿאַרביקע לאַמטערנדלעך, מיט וועלכע מיר פֿלעגן אַהיימגיין אין די ווינטערנעכט פֿון חדר. געלערנט האָט ער מיר אַ פֿריילעכן ניגון, אָפֿט מאָל צוקנאַקנדיק מיט די פֿינגער פֿאַר שׂמחה.
די באַלעבאָסטעס, בײַ וועלכע ער האָט געגעסן טעג, האָבן אָנגעקוואָלן פֿון אים, ווײַל אַלץ האָט ער ליב געהאַט, פֿון יעדן מאכל הנאה געהאַט. די חסידים האָבן געלעקט די פֿינגער פֿון אים, ווײַל ער האָט געקענט דערציילן די וווּנדערלעכסטע מעשׂיות פֿון צדיקים און גוטע־ייִדן. אויך פֿאַר אונדז, ייִנגלעך, פֿלעגט ער דערציילן אַ וועלט מיט מעשׂיות, די פֿאַנטאַסטישסטע מעשׂיות פֿון צדיקים און בעל־שמס, וואָס האָבן געהאַט קפֿיצת־הדרך, געווען רואה־ואינו־נראהס און באַוויזן נאָך אַזעלכע קונצן.
אויף חסידישע סעודהלעך און ימים־טובֿים האָט ר׳ מיכל דוד געקערט וועלטן. ער האָט געזונגען מיט אַ הויך קוויטשיק קולכל, געקאָנט מאַכן אַ סך „לחיימס”, ווי פֿאַר אַ חסיד פּאַסט, און ער האָט געטאַנצט גאָרנישט מיד צו ווערן. דער עיקר האָט ער ליב געהאַט צו טאַנצן אויפֿן טיש…
פֿאַר פּורים האָט ר׳ מיכל דוד אינגאַנצן אָפּגעלאָזט די גמרא און געגרייט זיך צום פֿריילעכן יום־טובֿ. ערשטנס, האָט ער אויף דער מזרח־וואַנט פֿון בית־המדרש אָנגעצייכנט מיט אַ חלבֿן ליכט גרויסע אותיות און געמעלעכסטן. דער מלמד האָט אײַנגעטונקען אַ שמאַטע אין אַש פֿון בית־המדרש־אויוון און דערמיט איבערגעגאַנגען איבער דעם חלבֿ, און גלײַך זײַנען די אותיות און צייכענונגען געוואָרן שוואַרץ און אָנזעוודיק. מיר האָבן דערזען אַ גרויסע אויפֿשריפֿט: „משנכנס אדר מרבין בשמחה‟, וואָס מיינט, אַז ווי נאָר עס הייבט זיך אָן דער חודש אָדר, דאַרף מען אָנהייבן זיך משׂמח זײַן. אונטער דעם שיינעם אויפֿשריפֿט פֿון געכּתיבֿהטע אותיות איז געווען אויסגעמאָלט אַ פֿלעשל בראָנפֿן און צוויי הענט גיבן זיך לחיים. אין חדר האָט ער מיט אונדז געלערנט די מגילה, שניצנדיק דערבײַ די שענסטע גראַגערס פֿאַר אַלע תּלמידים.
אין ביידע טעג פֿון פּורים און שושן־פּורים האָט ר׳ מיכל דוד ממש איבערגעקערט דאָס שטעטעלע. ווען מען האָט געלייענט אין בית־המדרש די מגילה, האָט ער צונויפֿגענומען אַלע ייִנגלעך, נישט נאָר די תּלמידים זײַנע, נאָר אַפֿילו פֿרעמדע, און קאָמאַנדעוועט מיט אונדז בײַם גראַגערן יעדעס מאָל, ווען מען האָט דערמאָנט המנען. ער אַליין האָט געמאַכט פֿאַר זיך אַליין דעם גרעסטן גראַגער. ער האָט אויך געטופּעט מיט די פֿיס, און נישט נאָר בײַ המנס נאָמען, נאָר אויך ווען מען האָט דערמאָנט המנס ווײַב זרש און זייערער צען זין. דאָס וואָס אַ ייִד מיט אַ באָרד גראַגערט אין בית־המדרש האָט אַרויסגערופֿן גרויס שׂמחה בײַ אונדז ייִנגלעך. מיר האָבן שיִער נישט דאָס בית־המדרש צעלייגט. מײַן פֿאָטער איז אַפֿילו געווען אומצופֿרידן, ווײַל מיר האָבן געשטערט דעם בעל־קורא אין לייענען די מגילה, אָבער ער האָט זיך נישט געבייזערט. מען האָט אויף דעם פֿריילעכן מיכל דוד זיך נישט געקאָנט בייזערן. חוץ דעם, איז עס דאָך געווען פּורים, ווען מען דאַרף משׂמח זײַן.
נאָך דער מגילה האָט מיכל דוד גענומען גיין איבער די הײַזער, פֿון איין באַלעבאַטישער שטוב צו דער אַנדערער, און מאַכן „לחיימס”. אין שושן־פּורים האָט ער צונויפֿגענומען די חסידים און געמאַכט הוליאַנקעס. די חסידים האָט מען אַזעלכע זאַכן נישט געדאַרפֿט בעטן. זיי זײַנען אַלע מאָל גרייט געווען צו אַ סעודהלע, צו אַ שׂמחה. זיי האָבן געקויפֿט אַ פֿאַס ביר און געטרונקען אויף וואָס די וועלט שטייט. זיי זײַנען געגאַנגען פֿון הויז צו הויז, וווּ זיי האָבן געגעסן און געטרונקען און געטאַנצט. די ייִנגלעך זײַנען נאָכגעלאָפֿן. די פּראָסטע לײַט, די מתנגדים, האָבן געקוקט קרום אויף די חסידישע הוליאַנקעס, אָבער די חסידים האָבן זיי געהערט ווי המן דעם גראַגער און זיי אויף צו־להכעיס נאָך העכער געזונגען און געטאַנצט. מיכל דוד האָט געטאַנצט אויף דער גאַס. ער איז גאָרנישט מיד געוואָרן פֿון טרינקען און האָפּסען און זינגען און פֿרייען זיך. צום־לעצט זיינען די חסידים אַרײַנגעקומען צו מײַן פֿאָטער אין שטוב.
„רביצין, פּורים מעג מען טאַנצן אויפֿן טישטעך. עס זאָל אַ רוח המנען אין זײַן טאַטנס טאַטן אַרײַן ביז עמלקן!‟ האָט מיכל דוד געשריגן און געטופּעט מיט די פֿיס.
דערנאָך איז ער אַראָפּגעשפּרונגען פֿון טיש, אײַנגעהילט זיך אין טישטעך ווי אין אַ טלית און זיך פֿאַרשטעלט פֿאַר אַ מלאך.
„רביצין, איך בין דער מלאך מיכאל — האָט ער געשריגן — גיט מיר צוויי פֿלעדערווישן, וועל איך מאַכן פֿליגל.‟
מײַן מוטער, אַ מתנגדישע טאָכטער, האָט דעם צעקאָכטן חסיד קיין פֿלעדערווישן נישט געוואָלט געבן. אָבער ער איז נישט געווען פֿויל און אַליין אַרײַן אין קיך. ער האָט אויסגעזוכט צוויי גענדזענע פֿליגל, וועלכע ער האָט מיט שטריקלעך צוגעבונדן צום טישטעך, אַזוי אַז ער זאָל אויסזען ווי אַן אמתער מלאך. דערנאָך האָט ער גענומען אַ הויפֿן מעל און זיך אויסגעמעלט דאָס פּנים. פֿאַרוואָס אַ מלאך דאַרף האָבן אַן אויסגעמעלט פּנים ווייס איך נישט, אָבער אַזוי האָט ר׳ מיכל דוד געטאָן. אין אָט דעם הילוך איז ער אַרײַן אין מײַן פֿאָטערס שטוב אין גענומען טאַנצן אַ מלאכים־טאַנץ. דער ייִד האָט געשוועבט ווי אַ רוח. ייִדן האָבן צוגעפּאַטשט מיט די הענט און גערופֿן פֿריילעך:
„לעבעדיק, מלאך מיכאל!‟
מיט אַ מאָל, האָט דער מלאך מיכאל צעשפּרייט זײַנע הענט ווי פֿליגל און אַ פֿלי געטאָן גלײַך דורכן פֿענצטער אין דרויסן אַרויס.
אַרײַן אין שטוב צוריק איז ער שוין נישט אויף די אייגענע פֿיס. מען האָט אים געטראָגן. זײַנע לעבעדיקע אויגן זײַנען געווען געשלאָסן. פֿון איין אויג האָט גערונען בלוט. אַ צעקנאָדערטן, ווי אַ בינטל טויטע אבֿרים, האָט מען אים געטראָגן אין זײַן טישטעך מיט די פֿלעדערווישן מיטן אויסגעמעלטן פּנים. מען האָט גלײַך אַרײַנגערופֿן דעם גוייִשן פֿעלדשער פּאַוואָלסקי, וואָס האָט געוווינט אין שכנות.
„איך קאָן גאָרנישט טאָן, דאָס אויג רינט אים אויס,‟ האָט ער געזאָגט.
אַלע ייִדן אַרום, אויסגעניכטערטע אין איין רגע, זײַנען געשטאַנען מיט אַראָפּגעלאָזענע קעפּ. מײַן פֿאָטער האָט זיך געבעטן בײַם אויסגעצויגענעם מלמד:
„ר׳ מיכל דוד, איר זעט מיך, ר׳ מיכל דוד? … ענטפֿערט, ר׳ מיכל דוד….‟
ר׳ מיכל דוד האָט נישט געענטפֿערט. זײַן פּנים, אויסגעשמירט אין מעל, האָט אויסגעזען ווי אַ מת. די פּראָסטע ייִדן, וואָס זײַנען אָנגעלאָפֿן, האָבן געמוסרט די חסידים:
„חסידקעס, שיכּרים זענט איר, נישט קיין ייִדן — האָבן זיי געמורמלט — אַזאַ אומגליק…‟
מײַן פֿאָטער איז געווען חושך. מײַן מוטער האָט געוויינט. אין מיטן וויינען האָט זי זיך דערמאָנט אַז מען דאַרף צינדן ליכט, ווײַל שושן־פּורים איז דעמאָלט אויסגעפֿאַלן אין פֿרײַטיק.
איך האָב געקוקט אויף דעם מלמד מײַנעם, וואָס איז געלעגן אויסגעצויגן אויף דער גרינער קאָלדרע, געלעגן אַ שווײַגנדיקער, מיט אַן אויסגעמעלט פּנים, איבער וועלכן אַ דין שנירעלע בלוט האָט זיך געשלענגלט, און איך האָב געהאַט תּרעומות צו גאָט, וואָס האָט געקאָנט אָפּטאָן אַזאַ אומגערעכטיקייט, און אין אַ יום־טובֿ דערצו. דאָס איז געווען שוואַרץ־שבת.
The post A shocking Purim experience (from the memoirs of I. J. Singer) appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
Iranian Regime Uses HispanTV to Spread Antisemitic Propaganda Across Latin America, ADL Warns
Iranians attend an anti-Israel rally in Tehran, Iran, April 19, 2024. Photo: Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
As the Iranian regime escalates its campaign of disinformation against Israel, Tehran is now flooding Latin America with antisemitic propaganda and pro-terrorist messaging, using outlets such as HispanTV to reach millions of Spanish-speaking audiences and reshape public perceptions in the region.
On Tuesday, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) released a new report detailing a dramatic rise over the past two years in antisemitic and anti-Israel content on HispanTV, the Spanish-language network run by the Iranian regime as part of its coordinated disinformation campaign across Latin America.
With the capacity to reach nearly 600 million Spanish speakers through satellite, cable, livestreaming, and social media, ADL characterizes HispanTV, which launched in 2012, as “the world’s leading platform for peddling antisemitic hate and disseminating anti-Israel prejudice and incitement across Latin America and the wider Spanish-speaking world.”
According to the report, HispanTV consistently disseminates content that reinforces long-standing antisemitic stereotypes about Jewish influence, spreads conspiracy theories, fuels the demonization of Israel, and glorifies Iranian-backed terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.
The study notes that the network’s hateful content has escalated sharply over the past two years, especially in the wake of the Hamas-led invasion of and massacre across southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.
“HispanTV consistently frames Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, attacks as legitimate and praiseworthy acts of resistance worthy of celebration,” the report says. “This reframing is essential to the channel’s ideological project, converting mass violence into a foundational myth of liberation.”
Across its broadcasts, HispanTV portrays Jews and Zionism as “an omnipresent, evil force” manipulating governments through a coordinated malicious scheme, reinforcing deeply entrenched antisemitic stereotypes about Jewish influence and power.
The report also finds that another central theme in the network’s coverage is the glorification of terrorist groups, depicting them as “extraordinary examples of heroism and bravery,” celebrating attacks that killed civilians, and vowing continued violence until the “complete annihilation of the occupants” — an apparent reference to Israel.
“The Iranian regime’s media outlet is spreading classic antisemitic conspiracy theories and anti-Israel propaganda to potentially millions of people across Latin America and beyond, making the Islamic Republic a destabilizing force not only in the Middle East, but across the Spanish-speaking world,” ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said in a statement.
“With antisemitism already at historic levels globally, Tehran is funding a massive media propaganda operation that is priming the pump for spreading antisemitism and hate against Israel and Jews the world over,” he continued.
While systematically undermining Israel’s right to exist — depicting the Jewish state as a “colonial,” “genocidal,” and “terrorist” project — HispanTV presents the Iranian regime as a principled alternative to Western democracies and positions Tehran as the leader of the “Axis of Resistance,” according to the ADL’s newly released report.
The Iranian network also depicts Jews and Israelis as “operating a highly organized global disinformation apparatus designed to deceive the world and justify genocide,” minimizing or outright denying the reality of antisemitism.
The ADL argues that the lack of decisive action by governments, international bodies, and corporations has allowed the Islamic regime to leverage HispanTV to disseminate its hateful conspiracies around the globe.
“If this threat is not seriously addressed, the result will likely be the radicalization of Spanish-speaking audiences across Latin America and beyond,” the report says.
Uncategorized
US Justice Department Launches Investigation Into Antisemitism at Lincoln Memorial University Medical School
US Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon at the Justice Department in Washington, DC, US, Aug. 7, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Kent Nishimura
The US Department of Justice has opened an investigation into Lincoln Memorial University (LMU) in Tennessee for allegedly having “engaged in discrimination against its Jewish students” over several years, the agency announced last week.
The investigation, which will receive support from the US Department of Health and Human Services, was prompted by complaints that high-level officials at the LMU DeBusk College of Osteopathic Medicine “intentionally” prevented Jewish students from finishing final exams — an action that could lead to academic failure as well as squandering tens of thousands of dollars in tuition fees.
According to WBIR-TV, a local news outlet based in the city of Knoxville, LMU enacted a new policy which proscribed granting students exam exemptions based on their observing religious holidays. Two Orthodox Jewish students studying medicine are known to have been disproportionately impacted by the dictate, and, according to Rabbi Yossi Wilhelm of Chabad of Knoxville, their qualifications for becoming doctors were allegedly called into doubt by a college official who implied that religious observance is disqualifying.
“This Department of Justice is fiercely committed to shutting down the concerning outbreak of antisemitism that has been spreading on college campuses since the Hamas attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023,” Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general of the civil rights division of the Justice Department, said on Friday when the investigation was announced. “When colleges and universities single Jewish students out for adverse treatment, they are in clear violation of our civil rights laws and of this nation’s promise of equal opportunity for all Americans.”
Paula Stannard, director of the civil rights office of the Department of Health and Human Services, added, “All students should be free to learn and train in environments free from discrimination. Antisemitism has no place in our nation’s educational or medical training institutions, and OCR [the Office of Civil Rights] will work to ensure that federal civil rights laws are fully enforced.”
In a statement to The Algemeiner, Lincoln Memorial University denied discriminating against anyone, citing its “belief that every single person, regardless of race, situation, or background, deserves the right to a quality educational experience.”
It continued, “We would never intentionally discriminate against any member of our community, and we do not believe we did so as has been alleged in the concerns under investigation by the Department of Justice. Educating our future leaders is why we exist. Any decision that is made is always with the goal of providing the best education for each and every student.”
Antisemitism in academic medical centers located on college campuses is fostering noxious environments which deprive Jewish health-care professionals of their civil right to work in spaces free from discrimination and hate, according to a study by the StandWithUs Data & Analytics Department in May.
“Academia today is increasingly cultivating an environment which is hostile to Jews, as well as members of other religious and ethnic groups,” StandWithUs director of data and analytics and study co-author, Alexandra Fishman, said in a statement at the time. “Academic institutions should be upholding the integrity of scholarship, prioritizing civil discourse, rather than allowing bias or personal agendas to guide academic culture.”
Titled “Antisemitism in American Healthcare: The Role of Workplace Environment,” the study includes survey data showing that 62.8 percent of Jewish health-care professionals employed by campus-based medical centers reported experiencing antisemitism, a far higher rate than those working in private practice and community hospitals. Fueling the rise in hate, it added, were repeated failures of DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) initiatives to educate workers about antisemitism, increasing, the report said, the likelihood of antisemitic activity.
The study is not StandWithUs’s first contribution to the study of antisemitism in medicine. In December 2024, the Data & Analytics Department published a study which found that nearly 40 percent of Jewish American health-care professionals have encountered antisemitism in the workplace, either as witnesses or victims.
The study included a survey of 645 Jewish health workers, a substantial number of whom said they were subject to “social and professional isolation.” The problem left over one quarter of the survey cohort, 26.4 percent, “feeling unsafe or threatened.”
The issue is currently being investigated by the US House Committee on Education and the Workforce, with a focus on the University of California, Los Angeles’ (UCLA) David Geffen School of Medicine, the University of Illinois’ College of Medicine, and the University of California, San Francisco’s School of Medicine.
“This investigation will aid the committee in considering whether potential legislative changes, including legislation to specifically address antisemitism discrimination, are needed,” education committee chairman Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI) wrote in a letter to Steven Dubinett, dean of UCLA’s Geffen School. “The committee has become aware that Jewish students and faculty have experienced hostility and fear at the hands of peers, colleagues, and administrators at UCLA Med, and it has not been demonstrated that the university has meaningfully responded to address and mitigate this problem.”
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.