Features
Further to the many Jewish psychiatrists from Manitoba
By BERNIE BELLAN Elsewhere on this website you can read an article by Gerry Posner about all the Jewish psychiatrists who have come from Manitoba (http://jewishpostandnews.ca/8-features/785-what-s-with-the-jews-of-winnipeg-and-psychiatry). In his column, however, Gerry explained that, for reasons of brevity, he did not include the names of Jewish women psychiatrists. Their names were actually given in Eva Wiseman’s book, “Healing Lives – A Century of Manitoba Jewish Physicians”.
Here are the names, as reported in Eva’s book:
Drs. Sheila Cantor, Marcia Fleisher, Adrian Kettner, Alla Kirshner, Cara Kroft, Gail Lavitt, Debra Lander, Mirtha Lopez-Fisher, Sara Rusen, Fran Steinberg, and Rivian Weinerman.
As well, other names that might have been included in Gerry’s article are: Gary Rodin, Allen Berkal, Leon Mowchun (brother of Neil), Marvin Shane (brother of Fred), Allan Rosenbluth, Lewis Pullmer, Grant Chernick, Neil Kraitberg, Dennis Kussin, and Peter Rosenthal. (Thanks to Dr. Adrian Kettner and Alan Levy for contributing those names.)
Of course, once you unleash an attempt to provide a categorical list of just about anything, others are quick to point out deficiencies in your list.
Gerry Posner himself has been on the receiving end of many emails and phone calls from individuals adding to his original list, including: David Gratzer and Tom Gratzer, Rex Kay, Ken Schwartz and Harold Spivak
We’ve also been receiving emails from individuals adding yet more names to the list. Here are two emails we received:
Hi Bernie,
I’ve been following your last two issues naming Jewish psychiatrists from Manitoba over the years. Unless I missed it, I haven’t seen Ed Chodirker’s name. He practised for the first few years of his career in Winnipeg but spent most of it in Vancouver. He is related to Dr. Nathan Wiseman who is married to Eva the author of the referenced book. I can’t imagine she missed him but its possible. He even came in for her book launch some years ago.
Fred Switzer
And this one:
Our son Joseph Bebchuk graduated in Medicine from U of M in 1988, took his training in Psychiatry in Toronto, and is now practicing in Minneapolis after a career in research in North Carolina and Detroit. So the influence of Manitoba continues. By the way the connection to Psychiatry even goes back to women cousins of mine in Russia who were a generation before mine. Also Rivian Weinerrman and Murray Schachter are my niece and nephew who also graduated from U of M. What a collection of Psychiatrists in one family with roots in Manitoba. I’m now retired and am very proud of having had the opportunity of playing a part in the teaching program in Psychiatry in Manitoba for 53 years.
Regards, Bill Bebchuk
So, to try to set the matter straight, we emailed Eva Wiseman herself to ask her how she apparently missed adding a fair number of psychiatrists to what was an extraordinarily comprehensive list of Jewish doctors from Manitoba.
Here is what Eva wrote back:
Re: Jewish psychiatrists
Hi Bernie,
Thank you for your email. I was able to write only about the physicians I knew about. I myself, and several research assistants combed the internet, professional organizations and journals, and interviewed colleagues for 3 years. If nobody told me about a doc or nothing was written about him/her,they weren’t mentioned in the book. I feel bad about it but it couldn’t be helped. I couldn’t write about them if I didn’t know about them. In any case, I made it clear at the beginning that the book is not an encyclopedia. I did my best but I knew from the beginning that some Jewish docs will be unfortunately missed.
One of the prerequisites to appear in the book, also mentioned in the beginning, was for a doc to practice in Manitoba for five years. If he practiced in the province less time than that, he wasn’t mentioned in the book. There were too many docs who spent a short time in Manitoba and then left. Nathan’s cousin Ed Chodirker, a psychiatrist in Vancouver fell into this category as did my brother-in-law DAVID, a radiologist in Calgary, and my own son Sam, a cancer surgeon in Vancouver. I don’t know which of the docs in your list on page 6 fell into this category as I didn’t keep track of the ones who stayed in Manitoba a short time only or not at all after graduating from medical school in Winnipeg.
However , LEON MOWCHUN and MARVIN SHANE ARE ON PAGE 436 of Healing Lives. Bill BEBchuk’s son JOSEPH AND RUSSIAN COUSINS, mentioned in the letter below, are on p. 429 and RIVIAN WEinermann And MURRAY SCHACTER ON P.436.
Could you please put these corrections and my explanation for selection criteria into the next issue? I don’t want these people to feel overlooked or believe that I was negligent.
I hope this explains the content to you.
Thank you for your interest.
All the best,
Eva
Uncategorized
Volatility, Hit Frequency, and RTP: Why the Number Casinos Advertise Is the Least Useful One
The return to player percentage looks clean as a casino data point. It gives players a neat number, usually around 94% to 97% for many online slots, and that number feels easy to compare. A 96.5% game appears better than a 95.2% game. The problem starts when players treat RTP as a forecast for their next 50 spins or one evening.
You may find the RTP listed on slot pages on a leading online casino in Ontario, but the number only tells part of the story. Two games can share the same RTP and create different sessions: one may return small wins often, while the other may drain a balance before one bonus round changes everything.
The RTP Trap
Return to player (RTP) measures the theoretical share of total wagers a game returns across a very large number of rounds. In plain terms, a 96% RTP slot returns about $96 for every $100 wagered in the long run. That does not mean one player who deposits $100 should expect $96 back.
The trap sits in the word “theoretical.” RTP comes from the game’s math model. It works across huge samples, not personal sessions. A player can finish far above that percentage, far below it, or with nothing left after a short run of poor results.
Is it useless then? No, RTP can still help. It gives a baseline cost of play. Lower-RTP games cost more on average than higher-RTP games. Still, once a game passes a reasonable threshold, the next question matters more: how does it distribute that return?
Hit Frequency: The Number That Shapes Session Feel
Hit frequency tells you how often a game produces a winning outcome. This often misleads players because any win can count. A spin that returns $0.10 on a $1 bet may still count as a hit, even though the player lost $0.90 in real terms.
A game can feel active because symbols connect often, sounds play, and the screen keeps celebrating small returns. The balance may still fall. In many modern slots, “win” does not always mean profit on the spin.
Hit frequency answers one practical question: how much silence can you tolerate? Some players dislike long dry spells. Others accept quieter sessions because they chase bonus rounds or larger payouts.
The educational site Get Gambling Facts gives a useful distinction: RTP concerns the percentage of money returned over time, while hit frequency concerns how often a machine stops on a winning combination.
Volatility: The Risk Label Players Need More Often
Volatility, also called variance, describes how unevenly a game pays. Low-volatility games tend to return smaller amounts more often. High-volatility games hold more value in rare events: bonus rounds, premium symbols, multipliers, or jackpots.
Here is where RTP becomes less useful on its own:
- A 96% low-volatility slot may give modest returns and longer play from the same balance.
- A 96% high-volatility slot may burn through funds quickly unless the player hits a strong feature.
- A progressive jackpot game may look exciting, but it often places more value on rare top prizes.
The same RTP can hide very different risk profiles. Players who ignore volatility often blame the casino or the game when the session follows its math design.

Why the Same RTP Can Feel So Different
Picture two slots with 96% RTP. Slot A pays small wins on many spins, has a modest top prize, and rarely creates dramatic balance swings. Slot B pays less often but offers a large max win and volatile bonus rounds. The advertised return matches, but the experience does not.
Slot A may suit a player who wants a slower bankroll drop and more regular feedback. Slot B suits someone who accepts sharper losses in exchange for a shot at a heavier payout.
A Better Way to Read a Slot Page
Most slot pages give players more clues than they notice. The trick is to read the details together rather than chase the highest percentage.
Start with RTP. If two games look similar, the higher number has better long-term value. Then check volatility. If the game uses terms such as high, very high, or extreme variance, lower your bet size or expect shorter sessions. Next, look at the paytable. A huge max win usually means the game saves a lot of its value for rare outcomes.
A sensible pre-play check looks like this:
- RTP: What is the average long-term return?
- Volatility: How rough can the session become?
- Hit frequency: How often will the game show any wins?
- Paytable: Where does most value sit?
To Conclude
Casinos advertise RTP because it looks objective, tidy, and easy to rank. Players should read it, but they should not give it more authority than it deserves. For long sessions, volatility may matter more than a small RTP difference. For comfort, hit frequency may explain the feel better than the payback rate.
Features
They Deserve the Very Best”: The Doctors Bringing Specialist Care to Holocaust Survivors at Home
Features
The Popularity of Simpler Slot Games in 2026: Review From Casino Online CrazyTower Experts
Online casinos now fill their libraries with numerous video slots that have dozens of functions, long bonus rounds, complex mechanics, and so on. Interestingly, despite this huge range of modern options, many Canadian visitors at sites like Casino Online CrazyTower here https://crazytower.com/ca/ no longer want complicated gameplay that requires constant attention and long explanations.
Simpler slots now attract a wider audience because they save time and create faster sessions. So, let’s figure out why this change happened and reasons for the popularity of simpler machines.
Why Many Players Are Returning to Basic Gameplay
Modern websites like Casino Online CrazyTower pushed complex video slots for years, but many people now prefer classic formats again. Simple gameplay has fewer interruptions and is simpler in terms of budgeting, which is important when you gamble for fun.
These are a few potential reasons explain why simpler slots became popular again in 2026:
- Faster rounds. Symbols appear quickly, and rounds continue without long animations or extended bonus sequences.
- Easier controls. Most classic slots have simple menus and familiar layouts that don’t confuse new visitors.
- Smaller feature lists. Simple slots usually have standard wilds, scatters, and multipliers instead of dozens of random mechanics.
- Better session flow. People spend more time on gameplay instead of reading explanations about symbols and special functions.
- Lower visual pressure. Simpler slots use calmer designs and shorter effects that don’t overload attention.
Classic gameplay also suits mobile devices better because shorter rounds work well on smaller screens. Plus, many visitors now prefer games that start instantly and explain their mechanics within seconds.
Features That Make Simpler Slots Appealing
Simple machines at Casino Online CrazyTower and similar websites continue to attract attention because they have a high gameplay speed. Many classic titles also replicate older casino machines that people already know from physical casinos.
However, these aren’t the only factors that attract gamblers. So, check out this list:
- Short bonus rounds. Free spins and multipliers finish quickly instead of interrupting gameplay for several minutes.
- Common and standard paylines. Traditional layouts help people understand payouts without long explanations.
- Faster loading times. Simpler graphics reduce waiting time on phones, tablets, and older computers.
- Stable gameplay pace. Long cutscenes and constant pop-up notifications don’t interrupt the session.
- Traditional themes. Fruit symbols, bars, sevens, and classic casino designs still attract large audiences.
- Smaller menus. Important information appears immediately without complicated tabs or hidden sections.
Modern video slots often contain too many mechanics in a single game. Developers now combine expanding reels, random modifiers, mission systems, tournaments, and multiple bonus levels in one title. Many visitors lose interest because gameplay turns repetitive and overloaded with constant interruptions.
Compare this to a session when you get results immediately and aren’t interrupted. These still have free spins and even mini risk games, but not as loaded as innovative titles.
Conclusion
Simple slots usually create better replay value because people understand the mechanics immediately. Common and standard gameplay doesn’t cause frustration and allows faster decisions during casino sessions.
Many classic slots also function better during short breaks because rounds finish quickly without long bonus interruptions. That’s why simpler slots became popular again at many casinos, including Casino Online CrazyTower and such.

