RSS
‘Absolute Lies’: Israeli Minister Denounces New York Times Article
Israel’s minister of diaspora affairs and combating antisemitism, Amichai Chikli, in Krakow, Poland, Jan. 22, 2024. Photo: Beata Zawrzel via Reuters Connect
Israel’s minister of diaspora affairs and combating antisemitism, Amichai Chikli, has denounced a New York Times article that falsely accused the Israeli government of a “secretive” and “covert” campaign “to influence the US government.”
In a Hebrew-language post on X/Twitter, Chikli called the Times reporter “fake” and said that the story consisted of “absolute lies whose purpose is harming Israel.”
The Times article, published online, was headlined, “Israel Secretly Targets US Lawmakers With Influence Campaign on Gaza War.” A subheadline said, “Israel’s Ministry of Diaspora Affairs ordered the operation, which used fake social media accounts urging US lawmakers to fund Israel’s military.”
Notwithstanding the Times hype about the effort being “secretive” or “covert,” the Israeli ministry actually published a public request for proposals to advance digital initiatives.
In typical Times fashion, the article focused exclusively on Israel’s social media efforts, without mentioning at all that there are Iranian, Russian, and Chinese social media campaigns aimed at influencing American public opinion related to the war in the Middle East.
Even the context in the Times article was contentious. It said, “The United States has long been one of Israel’s staunchest allies, with President Biden recently signing a $15 billion military aid package for the country. But the conflict has been unpopular with many Americans, who have called for Mr. Biden to withdraw support for Israel in the face of mounting civilian deaths in Gaza.”
Actually the aid to Israel was part of a larger $95 billion package that also included $60 billion for Ukraine and $1 billion in humanitarian aid for Gaza, as well as money to protect Taiwan. And the Times claim that “many Americans” want Biden “to withdraw support for Israel,” ignores polling that shows even more Americans — the overwhelming majority — support Israel, supported the aid to Israel, and think Israel is trying to avoid civilian casualties.
At least one former Israeli government official, Michael Oren, appeared to take the Times report seriously. “If the report is true, the campaign represents a flagrant violation of American law and an inappropriate interference in the internal politics of our most important ally,” Oren said in a social media post. “I call on the Government of Israel to immediately and thoroughly investigate the claim, to disassociate itself and denounce any such campaign, and to dismiss all the individuals involved.”
There’s a segment of journalists and opinion-makers out there who just want to bash Israel whatever the country does. If the Israeli government had not mobilized on social media, it’d be criticized for having poor public relations and doing a bad job of telling its story. And when the Israeli government does mobilize support on social media, it gets attacked for operating an “influence campaign.” Either it has too little influence, or it has too much influence. A reasonable person would reach the conclusion that what this is all about is not “influence” but Israel, and some people who intensely dislike it.
As a pro-Israel individual active on social media, let me tell you, if there’s some immensely orchestrated synthetic campaign to amplify pro-Israel voices, it doesn’t seem to have benefited me. Instead, I spend a lot of time blocking obnoxious comments from antisemitic or Israel-hating accounts.
It’s delusional to think that American public or congressional support for Israel is the product of a covert spending campaign rather than the result of shared values, religion, and national security and economic interests. Yet it fits perfectly with the worldview of New York Times land, which largely doesn’t share the values or the religion so can’t understand the durability of the US-Israel relationship.
To the Times, the only reason a member of Congress would vote for Israel is that they’ve been conned by a covert influence operation.
What’s remarkable is how few members of Congress have fallen for the New York Times‘ own campaign to erode support for Israel by falsely depicting American Jews as divided over the country and by demonizing Israel for conditions in Gaza that are Hamas’ fault. That Times influence campaign is costing a lot more than the $2 million the newspaper claims Israel spent.
The online comments on the Times article play into all the worst antisemitic stereotypes about Israeli “manipulation” of American democracy. Leave it to the New York Times and its readers to demonize a country for the sin of trying accurately to tell its own story. What bothers the Times most is the chance that Israel might be able to use new and democratic technology tell the truth to the American public without having to rely on the New York Times as an intermediary.
In other words, what really bothers the Times is the chance that the Israeli government can reach America without needing to grant an interview to Tom Friedman. The “influence” the Times is most worried of all about is its own. It is waning.
Ira Stoll was managing editor of The Forward and North American editor of The Jerusalem Post. His media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found here. He also writes at TheEditors.com.
The post ‘Absolute Lies’: Israeli Minister Denounces New York Times Article first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself. Really?
JNS.org – If I asked you to name the most famous line in the Bible, what would you answer? While Shema Yisrael (“Hear O’Israel”) might get many votes, I imagine that the winning line would be “love thy neighbor as thyself” (Leviticus 19:18). Some religions refer to it as the Golden Rule, but all would agree that it is fundamental to any moral lifestyle. And it appears this week in our Torah reading, Kedoshim.
This is quite a tall order. Can we be expected to love other people as much as we love ourselves? Surely, this is an idealistic expectation. And yet, the Creator knows us better than we know ourselves. How can His Torah be so unrealistic?
The biblical commentaries offer a variety of explanations. Some, like Rambam (Maimonides), say that the focus should be on our behavior, rather than our feelings. We are expected to try our best or to treat others “as if” we genuinely love them.
Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi, in his classic text called the Tanya, argues that the actual feelings of love are, in fact, achievable provided that we focus on a person’s spirituality rather than how they present themselves physically. If we can put the soul over the body, we can do it.
Allow me to share the interpretation of the Ramban (Nachmanides), a 13th-century Torah scholar from Spain. His interpretation of the verses preceding love thy neighbor is classic and powerful, yet simple and straightforward.
“Do not hate your brother in your heart. You shall rebuke him, but do not bear a sin because of him” by embarrassing him in public. “Do not take revenge, and do not bear a grudge against your people. You shall love your fellow as yourself, I am God” (Leviticus 19:17-18).
What is the connection between these verses? Why is revenge and grudge-bearing in the same paragraph as love your fellow as yourself?
A careful reading shows that within these two verses are no less than six biblical commandments. But what is their sequence all about, and what is the connection between them?
The Ramban explains it beautifully, showing how the sequence of verses is deliberate and highlighting the Torah’s profound yet practical advice on how to maintain healthy relationships.
Someone wronged you? Don’t hate him in your heart. Speak to him. Don’t let it fester until it bursts, and makes you bitter and sick.
Instead, talk it out. Confront the person. Of course, do it respectfully. Don’t embarrass anyone in public, so that you don’t bear a sin because of them. But don’t let your hurt eat you up. Communicate!
If you approach the person who wronged you—not with hate in your heart but with respectful reproof—one of two things will happen. Either he or she will apologize and explain their perspective on the matter. Or that it was a misunderstanding and will get sorted out between you. Either way, you will feel happier and healthier.
Then you will not feel the need to take revenge or even to bear a grudge.
Here, says the Ramban, is the connection between these two verses. And if you follow this advice, only then will you be able to observe the commandment to Love Thy Neighbor. If you never tell him why you are upset, another may be completely unaware of his or her wrongdoing, and it will remain as a wound inside you and may never go away.
To sum up: Honest communication is the key to loving people.
Now, tell me the truth. Did you know that not taking revenge is a biblical commandment? In some cultures in Africa, revenge is a mitzvah! I’ve heard radio talk-show hosts invite listeners to share how they took “sweet revenge” on someone, as if it’s some kind of accomplishment.
Furthermore, did you know that bearing a grudge is forbidden by biblical law?
Here in South Africa, people refer to a grudge by its Yiddish name, a faribel. In other countries, people call it a broiges. Whatever the terminology, the Torah states explicitly: “Thou shalt not bear a grudge!” Do not keep a faribel, a broiges or resentment of any kind toward someone you believe wronged you. Talk to that person. Share your feelings honestly. If you do it respectfully and do not demean the other’s dignity, then it can be resolved. Only then will you be able to love your fellow as yourself.
May all our grudges and feelings of resentment toward others be dealt with honestly and respectfully. May all our grudges be resolved as soon as possible. Then we will all be in a much better position to love our neighbors as ourselves.
The post Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself. Really? first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
‘Nonsense’: Huckabee Shoots Down Report Trump to Endorse Palestinian Statehood
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee looks on during the day he visits the Western Wall, Judaism’s holiest prayer site, in Jerusalem’s Old City, April 18, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun
i24 News – US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee on Saturday dismissed as nonsensical the report that President Donald Trump would endorse Palestinian statehood during his tour to the Persian Gulf this week.
“This report is nonsense,” Huckabee harrumphed on his X account, blasting the Jerusalem Post as needing better sourced reporting. “Israel doesn’t have a better friend than the president of the United States.”
Trump is set to visit Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. The leader’s first trip overseas since he took office comes as Trump seeks the Gulf countries’ support in regional conflicts, including the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza and curbing Iran’s advancing nuclear program.
However, reports citing administration insiders claimed that Trump has also set his sights on the ambitious goal of expanding the Abraham Accords. These agreements, initially signed in 2020, normalized relations between Israel and the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan. The accords are widely held to be among the most important achievements of the first Trump administration.
The post ‘Nonsense’: Huckabee Shoots Down Report Trump to Endorse Palestinian Statehood first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
US to Put Military Option Back on Table If No Immediate Progress in Iran Talks
US President Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy-designate Steve Witkoff gives a speech at the inaugural parade inside Capital One Arena on the inauguration day of Trump’s second presidential term, in Washington, DC, Jan. 20, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Carlos Barria
i24 News – Unless significant progress is registered in Sunday’s round of nuclear talks with Iran, the US will consider putting the military option back on the table, sources close to US envoy Steve Witkoff told i24NEWS.
American and Iranian representatives voiced optimism after the previous talks that took place in Oman and Rome, saying there was a friendly atmosphere despite the two countries’ decades of enmity.
However the two sides are not believed to have thrashed out the all-important technical details, and basic questions remain.
The source has also underscored the significance of the administration’s choice of Michael Anton, the State Department’s policy planning director, as the lead representative in the nuclear talks’ technical phases.
Anton is “an Iran expert and someone who knows how to cut a deal with Iran,” the source said, saying that the choice reflected Trump’s desire to secure the deal.
The post US to Put Military Option Back on Table If No Immediate Progress in Iran Talks first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login