RSS
Answering the Genocide Charges: The World Is Not Listening
Egyptian trucks carrying humanitarian aid make their way to the Gaza Strip, amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, at the Kerem Shalom crossing in southern Israel, May 30, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Amir Cohen
The mainstreaming of the propaganda that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza is seemingly everywhere on the political, media, and academic spectra. The loud chorus of pro-Hamas demonstrators, who began this circus of hatred, have friends in high places.
Hardly a day passes without the charge of genocide against Israel being leveled by this foreign minister or that UN official, by media pundits and “strategic affairs experts,” or by a range of professors on hundreds of campuses. Now, even the Pope is suggesting that genocide charges should be “carefully investigated.” South Africa is doing the bidding of Hamas and its friends and supporters by bringing the charge to the International Court of Justice.
Beyond the mindless chatter of fellow travelers of the Palestinian narrative, the intention of Hamas and its Iranian handlers is clear: be loud and consistent enough to flip the switch on Israel by making it the victimizer, and not the Oct. 7 victim. Say it enough times and the general public, students at universities, leftist organizations of all stripes, and others will join the ranks — all the better to conceal the actual genocidal intentions of Hamas, the terrorist organization backed by Tehran.
Earlier this month, Israel’s Channel 12 News reported on a powerful response to the blood libelers: in one week, 231 Gazans were evacuated to Israel’s Ramon International Airport, near Eilat, to board flights to the United Arab Emirates for medical treatment.
Among the evacuees were children and adults with chronic diseases. Several countries are now involved in this program.
The easiest, and most logical response to the genocide charge is to state what should be obvious: if Israel were seeking to commit genocide, it would have deployed its Air Force to do so. My guess is that in two or three days, that goal would have been accomplished. But Israel has not committed genocide, nor does it intend to. Israel does not commit genocide.
And “intent” is the key word, which is included in the UN’s own definition of genocide. There is no wish to destroy, or to use another frequently used charge, “ethnically cleanse,” Gaza or the West Bank. The objective is to eliminate Hamas as the actual genocidal enemy it is. Hamas’ venal war objective is to cause as many Palestinian civilian casualties as possible by using its own people as human shields. Many are surely there under the penalty of death by Hamas itself.
Raphael Lemkin, an international lawyer specializing in human rights, coined the term “genocide.” He was born in Poland and lucky enough to make it to the United States before the Holocaust. Lemkin lost 49 family members in the Holocaust. He labored for years to bring about an international convention on genocide, knocking on doors and lobbying incessantly to have the UN adopt such a document.
Journalist Ira Stoll, writing in The Algemeiner, broke a vitally important story last week on how an anti-Israel group, the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, has appropriated the name and is now, among other things, calling for the indictment of Israel’s prime minister “for the crime of genocide” and “expressions of genocidal intent.”
Stoll interviewed members of Lemkin’s family, who are outraged over the institute’s charges against the Jewish State, and the cynical misuse of Lemkin’s name to achieve its objectives.
Beyond that, the basic answers to the genocide charge remain the same: the Israel Defense Forces’ use of text messages, e-mails, personal phone calls, leafleting, and the “knock on the roof” explosives to warn civilians to leave a building or neighborhood, in advance of military action is, according to a report issued after Oct. 7 by the Lieber Institute at West Point, “the gold standard” of warnings practice.
The report states: “…as a matter of policy, the IDF typically exceeds what the law requires.”
The Lieber Institute report echoes what West Point’s Chair of Urban Warfare Studies, John Spencer, has been saying from day one. It was Spencer who early on, called out those who promote inflated and unsubstantiated Gaza (Hamas) Health Ministry figures on civilian casualties in the war in Gaza.
Spencer, acknowledged as perhaps the world’s leading authority on urban warfare, has said from the outset: “Under no definition is Israel committing genocide.” He’s further stated, “…there is no targeting of civilians.” Indeed, the West Point expert, now lecturing on the topic in the public sphere, titles his talks: “The Myth of Genocide in Gaza.”
No doubt, the IDF’s exemplary efforts to warn civilians have led to its loss of the element of surprise on many occasions. Last month, I met a former IDF military judge and prosecutor, and we discussed the issue. He has been “in the room” when split-second decisions needed to be made whether or not to carry out a military strike on terrorists, if harm to civilians might be a consequence of military action. He confirmed the “abort” option that is often used when non-combatants might be unintended victims.
Yet, the genocide blood libel persists — and grows. As do its companion charges, that famine, starvation, and thirst among Gazans is widespread. Each time the issue is raised, it seems, Israel needs to bring out the charts and tables to show that hundreds of relief trucks carrying aid are entering Gaza, but that Hamas corruption — and especially, its heavy skimming of goods intended for civilians, often at the point of a gun — invariably winds up diverting the assistance away from the civilian population.
Indeed, many thought this issue had been dealt with months ago on two tracks. The Famine Review Committee (an international organization comprised of nutrition and food experts), after having first suggested that a famine was “imminent” in Gaza, later said that the charge was “not plausible.” And the chief economist of the UN’s World Food Program, Arif Husain, also reversed himself, saying simply that there was no data to support the famine allegation.
So we are left with the facts. Israel and the IDF have borne the brunt of a modern-day blood libel punctuated and trumpeted by diplomats, news analysts, ideologically myopic academics, and social media users, 24/7.
Ferrying your enemy’s sick — in the midst of an existential war — to receive medical attention in friendly countries ought to be commended by peace-loving people everywhere.
It is not, and that is an unforgivable shame.
Daniel S. Mariaschin is the CEO of B’nai B’rith International. As the organization’s top executive officer, Mariaschin directs and supervises B’nai B’rith programs, activities and staff around the world.
The post Answering the Genocide Charges: The World Is Not Listening first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Conservative Pro-Israel Advocate Charlie Kirk Assassinated at University Event in Utah
Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist credited with amassing youth support for the Republican Party, speaking at the inauguration of Donald Trump in January. Photo: Brian Snyder via Reuters Connect
Conservative activist and staunch pro-Israel advocate Charlie Kirk died on Wednesday after being shot during an event at Utah Valley University, according to a statement by US President Donald Trump posted to the Truth Social media platform. He was 31 years old.
“The great, and even Legendary, Charlie Kirk, is dead,” Trump wrote. “No one understood or had the Heart of the Youth in the United States of America better than Charlie. He was loved and admired by ALL, especially me, and now, he is no longer with us. Melania and my Sympathies go out to his beautiful wife Erika, and family.”
He added, “Charlie we love you!”
Kirk — founder of the Turning Point USA nonprofit, which is credited for drawing masses of young people, typically a reliable voting bloc for Democrats, to the Republican Party — was answering audience questions when a gunman fired off the fatal shot which impacted his neck, causing him to become limp and bleed profusely.
Since the advent of his career, Kirk has been a faithful supporter of Israel, taking on activists of both the far left and far right who promoted rising antisemitism and sought to undermine the US-Israel alliance.
“There’s a dark Jew hate out there, and see it, and I see it,” Kirk told a student during a podcast episode which aired earlier this year. “Don’t get yourself involved in that. I’m telling you it will rot your brain. It’s bad for your soul. It’s bad. It’s evil. I think it’s demonic.”
Born on Oct. 14, 1993, in Arlington Heights, Illinois, Kirk formally entered the political arena in 2012, five months before the reelection of former President Barack Obama, to found Turning Point USA (TPUSA) — which served as a bellwether of declining youth support for the progressive consensus on race, free speech, and economics that took hold in American college campuses in the 1960s.
TPUSA grew rapidly, challenging campus primacy of the College Republicans organization and exuding confidence in conservative ideas at a moment when political scientists and other experts speculated that the Republican Party would decline to the point that the Democratic Party would achieve long-standing majorities in local and federal government.
Following news of Kirk’s death, the Jewish community deluged social media with tributes to Kirk and prayers for his family and friends.
“Please stop what you’re doing and pray for our friend Charlie Kirk. Many in the Jewish community are reciting chapters from the Book of Psalms, and I ask you do the same,” Shabbos Kestenbaum, a Jewish civil rights advocate, tweeted. “Something is deeply broken in America. The political violence must END. GOD HELP AMERICA.”
“We have no words,” StopAntisemitism, a Jewish civil rights advocacy group, tweeted.
Meanwhile, Jewish conservative influencer Emily Austin said, “With deep pain and sorrow, we mourn the passing of Charlie Kirk. May he rest in peace, and may God welcome him into His eternal care. This is a profound loss for the world — Charlie was a truly blessed soul whose impact will never be forgotten.”
Kirk is survived by his wife, Erika, and his two young children.
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
RSS
Lebanon’s Army to Disarm Hezbollah Near Israeli Border Within 3 Months in First Step to Restore State Control
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and members of the cabinet stand as they attend a cabinet session to discuss the army’s plan to disarm Hezbollah, at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, Lebanon, Sept. 5, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
Lebanon’s army plans to fully disarm Hezbollah near the Israeli border within three months, the first step in the Lebanese government’s plan to restore authority and curb the influence of the Iran-backed terror group within the country.
On Tuesday, Lebanon’s Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi confirmed to AFP that the government received a five-stage plan last week from the military to enforce a policy placing all weapons under state control.
The move follows Lebanese authorities’ approval last month of a US-backed initiative to disarm Hezbollah in exchange for a halt to Israeli military operations in the country’s south.
Amid mounting international pressure to disarm the terrorist group, Lebanon’s cabinet tasked the army with developing a strategy to establish a state monopoly on arms.
For years, Israel has demanded that Hezbollah be barred from carrying out activities south of the Litani, located roughly 15 miles from the Israeli border.
However, Hezbollah has pushed back against any government efforts, insisting that negotiations to dismantle its arsenal would be a serious misstep while Israel continues airstrikes in the country’s south.
The terrorist group has even threatened protests and civil unrest if the government tries to enforce control over its weapons.
But as Hezbollah emerged weakened from a yearlong conflict with Israel, calls for the Islamist group’s disarmament have gained new momentum, reshaping a power balance it had long controlled in Lebanon.
Last fall, Israel decimated Hezbollah’s leadership and military capabilities with an air and ground offensive, following the group’s attacks on Jerusalem — which they claimed were a show of solidarity with the Palestinian terrorist organization Hamas amid the war in Gaza.
In November, Lebanon and Israel reached a US-brokered ceasefire agreement that ended a year of fighting between the Jewish state and Hezbollah.
Under the agreement, Israel was given 60 days to withdraw from southern Lebanon, allowing the Lebanese army and UN forces to take over security as Hezbollah disarms and moves away from Israel’s northern border.
However, Israel maintained troops at several posts in southern Lebanon beyond the ceasefire deadline, as its leaders aimed to reassure northern residents that it was safe to return home.
Jerusalem has continued carrying out strikes targeting remaining Hezbollah activity, with Israeli leaders accusing the group of maintaining combat infrastructure, including rocket launchers — calling this “blatant violations of understandings between Israel and Lebanon.”
RSS
Israeli Military Expert: Doha Strike Was Backed by US and Qatar Coup, Will Bring Hostage Deal Closer
A damaged building, following an Israeli attack on Hamas leaders, according to an Israeli official, in Doha, Qatar, Sept. 9, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa
Israel’s unprecedented strike on Hamas leaders in Doha this week was not a rogue act of military aggression, but rather the outcome of quiet coordination between Qatar and the US that could bring a hostage deal closer, Israeli intelligence expert Eyal Pinko said on Wednesday.
The strike, which officials have said was planned months ago, came a day after 10 Israelis were killed by Hamas in Gaza and Jerusalem. Four were soldiers who died in an attack on an Israeli tank in northern Gaza. The separate shooting attack in Jerusalem, in which six Israelis were killed and several more wounded, was the “straw that broke the camel’s back,” Pinko, a national security expert who served in Israeli intelligence for more than three decades, said in a press briefing.
Pinko contended that while Qatar publicly condemned the attacks, it also enabled them. “I am sure they were involved and the attack was coordinated with the [Qataris],” Pinko later told The Algemeiner.
The most recent round of negotiations to secure a Gaza ceasefire and hostage-release deal were nothing more than a “deception” by the US and Israel designed to gather Hamas leaders in one place “in order to set the timing to eliminate them,” he said.
Pinko said the strike should also be seen in light of US President Donald Trump’s impatience with the stalled hostage talks, arguing it showed Trump was on board with assassinations of Hamas leaders despite public declarations that he was “very unhappy” with the attack. He also pointed to Trump’s comments from last month, in which the US president predicted the Gaza conflict would reach a “conclusive ending” within two or three weeks.
Qatar, which has long hosted Hamas’s exiled leadership, benefits strategically from replacing the terrorist group’s leaders loyal to Iran with figures it can trust, Pinko maintained. Doha holds billions of dollars belonging to Hamas officials and has no interest in letting Ankara or Tehran displace it as the group’s patron. The timing of the attack is also significant, Pinko said, coming in the wake of Israel’s strikes against Iran’s nuclear program over the summer. “Iran is in a very bad situation. Qatar can easily overcome Iran,” he said.
Pinko further argued that the strike may serve to bring forward the release of the Israeli hostages still being held in Gaza since Hamas itself was no longer a coherent negotiating partner. The terrorist group operating in Gaza had become fragmented, “divided into five families that are fighting each other” and sometimes giving the impression that “they hate each other more than they hate Israel,” Pinko said. Recent talks proved “there was no longer a decisionmaker in Hamas,” and this disarray had allowed Hamas leaders to drag out the process with unrealistic demands. Removing those figures, he argued, would leave room for Qatar to install leaders who could cut a deal. “This will make the negotiation process much faster,” he said.
Pinko’s assessment stands in stark contrast to the fears of some of the families of the remaining 48 hostages held in Gaza, who said in a statement they had “grave fear” the Doha strike could sabotage the chances of bringing their loved ones home.
He placed the operation in a wider context, linking it to the revival of the Abraham Accords and US efforts to build a trade corridor from India through the Gulf to Israel and Europe as a counterweight to China’s trillion-dollar Belt and Road initiative, ending with Gaza as a key trade hub. “Trump is very serious in making the northern part of the Gaza Strip as [having] US autonomy. That will be the end of the American belt and road initiative to compete with the Chinese,” he said.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday called on Qatar, which “gives safe haven [and] harbors terrorists,” to expel them or bring them to justice, adding that if they don’t, “we will.”
Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, for his part said his country would retaliate over the strike, and accused Netanyahu of “wasting” Qatar’s time in negotiations and “leading the Middle East to chaos.”
Pinko called out Doha for its “duplicity” in pretending to be a peacemaker on the one hand, while “fueling Hamas and hatred” in the US and Europe, on the other.
“They are against Israel in their DNA. They don’t want Israel to exist,” he said. “So Gaza and Hamas are a very important asset for them.”
Some critics have denounced the Doha strike as a violation of international law, but international law experts note that Article 51 of the UN Charter recognizes a state’s inherent right to self-defense and that this right is not confined by geography if attacks are directed from outside its borders. The so-called “unwilling or unable” doctrine holds that if a host country does not act against militants on its soil, the victim state may use proportionate force.
The US relied on this doctrine when it killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan in a 2011 operation that was widely hailed by Western governments and the UN, whose then secretary-general Ban Ki-moon said at the time that he was “very much relieved by news that justice has been done” and called it “a watershed moment in our common global fight against terrorism.”