RSS
Could Syria Become the Next Afghanistan?
Rebel fighters holds weapons at the Citadel of Aleppo, after Syrian rebels announced that they have ousted Bashar al-Assad, in Aleppo, Syria, Dec. 9, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Karam al-Masri
As a high school student, I’m constantly reminded of the threats posed to me and my peers. Whether it’s the devastating reality of school shootings or the fear of a subway attack in New York, our schools and media make us hyper-aware of the dangers lurking in the world today.
But amidst all this fear, one question lingers: Why is the world so silent about the obvious and growing threat of terrorism?
The recent New Year’s Eve attacks in New Orleans and Las Vegas are stark reminders of this danger. Both incidents, now being investigated as acts of terrorism, have cast a shadow over what should have been a celebration of hope and renewal. For me and my peers, these events reinforce the reality of living in a world where such threats feel constant and inescapable.
These attacks are not isolated incidents — but part of a chilling new wave of terrorism. And there is now the potential for more instability, with the collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria. The instability in Syria is eerily reminiscent of Afghanistan’s past — ungoverned spaces where extremist ideologies take root and flourish. Yet, while the global community acknowledges the lessons of Afghanistan, it seems reluctant to confront the threat brewing in Syria with the same urgency.
As students, we’re taught history to avoid repeating its mistakes. But the parallels between Syria’s current state and Afghanistan’s history are undeniable. Afghanistan’s instability in the 1980s and 1990s led to the Taliban coming to power, which allowed Al-Qaeda to rise, culminating in the devastating 9/11 attacks. Today, groups like Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) in Syria could represent a similar threat, using ungoverned territories to grow their influence and recruit from vulnerable populations.
HTS, an offshoot of Al-Qaeda, has rebranded itself to appear more moderate, but its core ideology remains rooted in global jihadism. In the past, the group has capitalized on the despair and instability in refugee camps, particularly in Jordan, where over 1.3 million displaced Syrians reside. These camps, marked by poverty and trauma, provide fertile ground for extremist narratives to take hold. HTS’ recruitment strategies often use propaganda, social media, and local networks to spread its ideology far beyond Syria.
As a student living in constant fear of the next potential attack, I wonder why these realities aren’t discussed more openly. We’re bombarded with stories about personal safety — lockdown drills, active shooter training — but global terrorism feels like a distant, ignored threat.
Unlike Al-Qaeda or the Taliban, HTS has diversified its funding, making it more resilient and adaptable. The group sustains itself through local taxation, private donations, and control over trade routes. It even collects fees from humanitarian aid deliveries in areas under its influence. This financial independence allows HTS to evade traditional counterterrorism measures and extend its reach globally. If it decides to pursue a malign influence in the Middle East, the entire world could soon feel the consequences.
History has shown us the cost of ignoring instability in regions like Afghanistan and Iraq. The collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s regime has plunged Syria into chaos, creating conditions perfect for the growth of extremist groups like HTS. This is not just a Middle Eastern problem — it’s a global one. The international community must act decisively to stabilize the region by providing humanitarian aid, countering extremist narratives, and fostering diplomatic solutions. Failure to act risks turning Syria into the next Afghanistan, with devastating consequences for the entire world.
The time to act is now. If the global community remains silent, we risk allowing history to repeat itself — at a cost we cannot afford.
The writer is a high school student from Great Neck, New York, passionate about advocacy and government. Through his writing and activism, he engages others in meaningful conversations about U.S. politics, international relations, and Israel’s significance as both a homeland for the Jewish people and a key ally of the United States.
The post Could Syria Become the Next Afghanistan? first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
3rd Round of Nuclear Talks Between Iran, US Concludes in Oman
Atomic symbol and USA and Iranian flags are seen in this illustration taken, September 8, 2022. Photo: REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
i24 News – The third round of talks between Iran and the United States over Tehran’s rapidly advancing nuclear program has concluded on Saturday, US media reported.
The two sides are understood to have discussed the US lifting of sanctions on Iran, with focuses on technical and key topics including uranium enrichment.
On April 12, the US and Iran held indirect talks in Muscat, marking the first official negotiation between the two sides since the US unilaterally withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal in May 2018 during President Donald Trump’s first term.
The second round of indirect talks took place in Rome, Italy, on April 19.
All parties, including Oman, stated that the first two rounds of talks were friendly and constructive, but Iranian media pointed out that the first two rounds were mainly framework negotiations and had not yet touched upon the core issues of disagreement.
According to media reports, one of the key issues in the expert-level negotiations will be whether Washington will allow Iran to continue uranium enrichment within the framework of its nuclear program. In response, Araghchi made it clear that Iran’s right to uranium enrichment is non-negotiable.
The US, Israel and other Western actors including the United Nation’s nuclear agency reject Iranian claims that its uranium enrichment is strictly civilian in its goals.
The post 3rd Round of Nuclear Talks Between Iran, US Concludes in Oman first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Hamas Says It’s Open to 5-Year Gaza Truce, One-Time Release of All Hostages
Demonstrators hold signs and pictures of hostages, as relatives and supporters of Israeli hostages kidnapped during the Oct. 7, 2023 attack by Hamas protest demanding the release of all hostages in Tel Aviv, Israel, Feb. 13, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Itai Ron
i24 News – The Palestinian jihadists of Hamas said they were willing to secure an agreement with Israel that that would see them remain in charge of the enclave, a source told international media. The deal would include an internationally guaranteed five-year truce and the release of all Israeli hostages in a single batch.
The latest bid to seal a ceasefire follows an Israeli proposal which Hamas had rejected earlier in April as “partial,” urging a “comprehensive” agreement to halt the war ignited by the October 7 massacres.
Israel demands the return of all hostages seized in the 2023 attack, and the disarmament of Hamas, which the jihadists rejected as a “red line.”
An earlier Israeli offer, rejected by the Palestinian terrorists, included a 45-day ceasefire in exchange for the return of 10 living hostages.
More than a month into a renewed Israeli offensive in Gaza after a two-month truce, a Hamas official said earlier this week that its delegation in Cairo would discuss “new ideas” on a ceasefire.
The post Hamas Says It’s Open to 5-Year Gaza Truce, One-Time Release of All Hostages first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Suspected Chemical Blast at Iran’s Bandar Abbas Kills 4, Injures Hundreds
People walk after an explosion at the Shahid Rajaee port in Bandar Abbas, Iran, April 26, 2025. Photo: Mohammad Rasoul Moradi/IRNA/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
A huge blast on Saturday likely caused by the explosion of chemical materials stored at Iran’s biggest port, Bandar Abbas, killed at least four people and injured more than 500, Iranian state media reported.
The explosion, which hit the Shahid Rajaee section of the port, occurred as Iran began a third round of nuclear talks with the United States in Oman, but there was no immediate indication of a link between the two events.
Hossein Zafari, a spokesperson for Iran’s crisis management organization, appeared to blame the explosion on poor storage of chemicals in containers at Shahid Rajaee.
“The cause of the explosion was the chemicals inside the containers,” he told Iran’s ILNA news agency.
“Previously, the Director General of Crisis Management had given warnings to this port during their visits and had pointed out the possibility of danger,” Zafari said.
An Iranian government spokesperson, however, said that although chemicals had likely caused the blast, it was not yet possible to determine the exact reason.
Iran’s official news channels aired footage of a vast black and orange cloud of smoke billowing up above the port in the aftermath of the blast, and an office building with its doors blown off and papers and debris strewn around.
Bandar Abbas is Iran’s largest port and handles most of its containers in transit.
The blast shattered windows within a radius of several kilometers and was heard in Qeshm, an island 16 miles south of the port, Iranian media said.
The semi-official Tasnim news agency posted footage of injured men lying on the road being tended to amid scenes of confusion.
State TV earlier reported that poor handling of flammable materials was a “contributing factor” to the explosion. A local crisis management official told state TV that the blast took place after several containers stored at the port exploded.
As relief workers tried to put out fires, the port’s customs officials said trucks were being evacuated from the area and that the container yard where the explosion occurred likely contained “dangerous goods and chemicals.” Activities at the port were halted after the blast, officials said.
DEADLY INCIDENTS
A series of deadly incidents have hit Iranian energy and industrial infrastructure in recent years, with many, like Saturday’s blast, blamed on negligence.
They have included refinery fires, a gas explosion at a coalmine, and an emergency repairs incident at Bandar Abbas killed one worker in 2023.
Iran has blamed some other incidents on its arch-foe Israel, which has carried out attacks on Iranian soil targeting Iran’s nuclear program in recent years and last year bombed the country’s air defenses.
Tehran said Israel was behind a February, 2024 attack on Iranian gas pipelines. And in 2020, computers at Shahid Rajaee were hit by a cyberattack. The Washington Post reported that Iran’s arch-foe Israel appeared to be behind that incident as retaliation for an earlier Iranian cyberattack.
Israel has indicated it is nervous about the outcome of US-Iran talks, demanding a full dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear program. Tehran says the program is used solely for peaceful purposes, while international observers say it is getting closer to being able to build a bomb.
There was no immediate comment from Israeli military or Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office when asked for comment on whether Israel was in any way involved in Saturday’s explosion.
Oil facilities were not affected by the blast on Saturday, Iranian authorities said. The National Iranian Petroleum Refining and Distribution Company said in a statement that it had “no connection to refineries, fuel tanks, distribution complexes and oil pipelines.”
The post Suspected Chemical Blast at Iran’s Bandar Abbas Kills 4, Injures Hundreds first appeared on Algemeiner.com.