RSS
Harvard Let Students Mourn the US Election; Where Was That Sympathy Post-October 7?
Students accusing Israel of genocide at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, Nov. 16, 2023. Photo: REUTERS/Brian Snyder
In the aftermath of Donald Trump’s victory in the US election, Harvard professors quickly rescheduled or even canceled classes, offering students space to “process” their emotions.
Class attendance was optional, assignments were extended, and some professors even opened their offices as “spaces to grieve” the results of an election.
This was their response to an exercise of the democratic process. Harvard’s response last year to the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust stands in telling contrast.
On October 7, 2023, when 1,200 Israelis, Americans, and others were massacred by Hamas and Palestinian terrorists, Jewish students were faced not with grief counselors and sympathetic professors, but a mob that was often incited by those same professors.
The overwrought response to the results of a free and democratic election — which Palestinians have been denied for almost two decades by their own leaders — reveals a troubling pattern of emotional manipulation and simplification by Harvard. It’s a real-world manifestation of a problem that follows the pattern of social media rage-bait.
On TikTok, algorithm-driven narratives often prioritize distortion over substance. TikTok’s content caters to user preferences, often resulting in echo chambers and oversimplified narratives. However, users generally understand the platform’s nature — it is social media, designed for quick consumption and viral spread. There’s an implicit understanding that content is often exaggerated or sensationalized for engagement.
Harvard, on the other hand, purports to be a bastion of higher learning and critical thinking. Strikingly, its treatment of the Israel-Palestinian conflict has devolved into a similar pattern of reductionism and emotional manipulation. The difference? Harvard’s approach comes with the veneer of academic credibility, making it far more insidious.
On social media, professional expertise is often seen as a plus. Commercial landscapers, fashion designers like me, and devoted activists are sought out for our conclusive opinions. But academia is supposed to be different. Higher education isn’t supposed to deliver an endless stream of hot takes. Universities are meant to teach and hone the process of discovering truth, in contrast to activists who advance crystallized conclusions. You would think that Harvard would want its students in class the day after a pivotal election to engage with the results, not encourage students to retreat from this challenge under the guise of “processing their emotions” — a “processIng” notably free of supervision from mental health professionals.
“It’s indoctrination, not education,” a faculty member is quoted as saying in the academic audit conducted by the Harvard Jewish Alumni Alliance (HJAA) released in May 2024.
False accusations of Israeli genocide are buttressed by academic theories like settler colonialism. The HJAA audit found that the settler colonialism framework exists across the School of Public Health, the Divinity School, and the English and Anthropology departments of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, not just in fields focused on the Middle East.
Since October 8, 2023, Harvard has stubbornly demonstrated that it has sunk below the intellectual standards of TikTok in its approach to the ongoing Middle East conflict. Both Harvard and the social media company present a crude, simplified, and emotionally provocative view of this prominent issue, but at least with TikTok, users know what they’re getting. Harvard today is no better for academic discourse than the comment section on a social media video, the place where carefully cited facts are given the same weight as the poop emoji. In that context, it makes sense that professors would feel students need space to “grieve” a presidential election that didn’t go their way.
However egregious Harvard’s failings are in comparison to TikTok, there is one significant difference, where Harvard does offer hope. We are mired in debates about making social media safe and free, safeguarding the First Amendment while protecting the vulnerable. Clean solutions for social media are elusive. But Harvard does have a clear path to improvement.
Harvard’s recent steps toward institutional neutrality should be applauded and taken as a starting point. Harvard must demonstrate a clear commitment to stamping out antisemitism by adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of antisemitism, conducting an independent investigation into the issue on campus, and actually enforcing the university’s own code equally and transparently. Faculty members, who too often are the ones pushing antisemitism on their students, should have additional training to combat this. And if professors continue to make campus unsafe for the Jewish community, the administration needs to act as the adult in the room and dismiss them.
Harvard could also end its collaboration with Birzeit University, known for educating would-be terrorists, graduating actual terrorists, some while imprisoned for conducting lethal terror attacks, hosting military parades featuring mock suicide bombers, and barring Israelis from entering.
Scores of students are already reconsidering their attendance at this storied institution because of its failure to prevent campus from turning into the worst iterations of a social media echochamber. Harvard can either renew its focus on academic integrity — and Veritas — or ride the social media cycle through to irrelevance like MySpace and Friendster.
Roni Brunn is the Vice President of Media Relations at the Harvard Jewish Alumni Alliance and a social media content creator.
The post Harvard Let Students Mourn the US Election; Where Was That Sympathy Post-October 7? first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Israeli Foreign Minister Says ‘No Place’ for Macron Visit if France Continues With Palestinian State Recognition
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar attends a press conference with German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul (not pictured) in Berlin, Germany, June 5, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Christian Mang
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar on Thursday urged his French counterpart to drop France’s plan to recognize a Palestinian state, saying that French President Emmanuel Macron is not welcome to visit the Jewish state if Paris “persists in its initiative and in efforts that harm Israel’s interests.”
According to a statement from his office, Saar spoke with French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, calling on him to reconsider France’s initiative to recognize a Palestinian state.
He warned that such a move would “undermine stability in the Middle East and harm Israel’s national and security interests.”
As long as France proceeds with its planned unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state this month, Saar said that there would be “no place” for Macron to visit Israel.
“Israel seeks good relations with France, but France must respect Israel’s position when it comes to matters essential to its security and future,” the top Israeli diplomat said during their conversation.
Macron plans to recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly this month as part of its “commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East,” even though nearly 80 percent of French citizens reject the move.
Israeli officials have condemned the initiative, calling it a “reward for terrorism” and warning that it would undermine future diplomatic talks.
Saar has criticized France’s recent actions, accusing it of consistently undermining Israel on the international stage.
More recently, tensions escalated after his French counterpart asserted the Palestinian Authority (PA) had ended its “pay-for-slay” program — a claim the Israeli diplomat firmly rejects as false.
The PA, which has long been riddled with accusations of corruption, has also maintained for years a so-called “pay-for-slay” program, which rewards terrorists and their families for carrying out attacks against Israelis.
Under the policy, the Palestinian Authority Martyr’s Fund makes official payments to Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails, the families of “martyrs” killed in attacks on Israelis, and injured Palestinian terrorists. Reports estimate that approximately 8 percent of the PA’s budget is allocated to paying stipends to convicted terrorists and their families.
Abbas had announced plans to reform the system earlier this year, but the PA has continued to issue payments, with top officials saying they will not deduct any of the funds.
“You speak of the war, but your moves against the State of Israel not only undermine stability and will not bring peace — they prolong the war. And it is no coincidence that Hamas praised them,” Saar said in a post on X, responding to Barrot in a heated public exchange.
“The rest is empty words and illusions. Back in Paris and at conferences, you may believe and promote these illusions. Here, we will not buy them,” the Israeli diplomat continued.
Dear Jean Noël,
I was astonished to read your claim that the Palestinian Authority allegedly “ended” the pay-for-slay payments. The facts on this matter are clear and unequivocal (and I am sure they are also known to French intelligence): The PA simply replaced the old system… https://t.co/r1sxS9nf55
— Gideon Sa’ar | גדעון סער (@gidonsaar) September 3, 2025
During his conversation with Barrot, Saar also argued that PA President Mahmoud Abbas has avoided holding elections for nearly 20 years due to his limited support among Palestinians, making him an unreliable interlocutor.
Western powers have been negotiating with the PA on conditions for Gaza governance after Hamas is removed from power, while the PA continues to pledge reforms — a strategy experts say is unlikely to succeed given its lack of credibility and ongoing support for terrorism against Israel.
According to a poll by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PCPSR), if an agreement is reached to end the war in Gaza, only 40 percent of Palestinians “support the return of the PA to managing the affairs of the Gaza Strip,” while 56 percent oppose it.
US officials have also condemned France’s initiative to recognize a Palestinian state, arguing that the move would do little to advance peace.
On Thursday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington has warned other countries that recognizing a Palestinian state would only create more problems.
“We told all these countries, we told them all, we said if you guys do this recognition stuff it’s all fake, it’s not even real, if you do it you’re going to create problems,” Rubio said during a press conference in Ecuador.
“There’s going to be a response, it’s going to make it harder to get a ceasefire and it may even trigger these sorts of actions that you’ve seen, or at least these attempts at these actions,” the US official continued, referring to Israel’s plans to consider annexation in the West Bank.
Dear @jnbarrot,
Listen to @SecRubio words.
You know it’s true.
Don’t whitewash “pay for slay”.
Don’t whitewash PA crimes! pic.twitter.com/EMJeGDZivE— Gideon Sa’ar | גדעון סער (@gidonsaar) September 4, 2025
RSS
Sen. Tom Cotton Urges FBI to Investigate Palestinian Youth Movement Leader Who Called for Targeting F-35 Program
US Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) speaks during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, March 11, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Julia Nikhinson
US Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) has called on the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to investigate a pro-Hamas activist who urged supporters to sabotage the US supply chain for the F-35 fighter jet, one of America’s most advanced military assets and a critical component of Israel’s defense.
In a letter sent to FBI Director Kash Patel on Wednesday, Cotton warned that Aisha Nizar, a leader and organizer of the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM), “directly endangered US national security” when she addressed a Palestinian conference in Detroit last week. Durin the event, Nizar told attendees that targeting “nodes” in the F-35 production process could have “a huge impact” on the program.
“We need to be surgical. We need to be strategic … Because there are many different points of these supply chains of death that we can intervene in and we must intervene in,” Nizar said at the People’s Conference for Palestine.
The F-35 program is widely regarded as a cornerstone of US and allied air power, and Israel is the only country in the Middle East authorized to operate the jets. Cotton argued that calls to undermine the program represent not just anti-Israel activism, but also a direct assault on American workers and defense readiness.
“Nizar’s statements constitute direct incitement of violence against US national security interests by advocating for actions against the men and women who build the F-35,” Cotton wrote. He urged the FBI to “immediately examine Nizar’s actions and take any necessary actions to mitigate the threat.”
PYM has emerged as one of the most radical anti-Israel, pro-Hamas groups in the US since the war in Gaza started, organizing raucous protests targeting Jewish and pro-Israel events across the country.
Nizar has previously faced legal trouble over her role in disruptive protests amid the Israel-Hamas war, including a demonstration that shut down the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco. Cotton, an outspoken supporter of the US-Israel strategic alliance, said her ties to PYM, which he has accused of harboring antisemitic views and benefiting from questionable tax-exempt donations, warrant closer scrutiny.
“The defense supply chain is a key to our military’s ability to fight and win wars. We must protect that supply chain from all enemies, foreign and domestic,” he concluded in his letter.
RSS
Israeli Military Says It Controls 40% of Gaza City, Plans to Expand Operation in Coming Days
Palestinians inspect the site of an Israeli strike on a tent, outside Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, Sept. 4, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Khamis Al-Rifi
Israel controls 40 percent of Gaza City, a military spokesperson said on Thursday, as thousands of residents defied Israeli orders to leave in order for soldiers to target Hamas terrorists without civilians in harm’s way.
In Gaza City, Israeli forces have advanced through the outer suburbs and are now a few kilometers (miles) from the city center.
“We continue to damage Hamas’s infrastructure. Today we hold 40 percent of the territory of Gaza City,” Israeli military spokesperson Brigadier General Effie Defrin told a news conference, naming the Zeitoun and Sheikh Radwan neighborhoods. “The operation will continue to expand and intensify in the coming days.”
“We will continue to pursue Hamas everywhere,” he said, adding that the mission will only end when Israel‘s remaining hostages are returned and Hamas’s rule ends.
Defrin confirmed that army Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir told cabinet ministers that without a day-after plan, they would have to impose military rule in Gaza. Far-right members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government have been pushing for Israel to impose military rule in Gaza and establish settlements there, which Netanyahu has so far ruled out.
Israel launched the offensive in Gaza City on Aug. 10, in what Netanyahu says is a plan to defeat Hamas terrorists in the part of Gaza where Israeli troops fought most heavily in the war’s initial phase.
The campaign has prompted international criticism because of the humanitarian crisis in the area and has provoked unusual levels of concern within Israel, including accounts of tension over strategy between some military commanders and political leaders.
The Israeli military has said it is operating on the outskirts of Gaza City to dismantle terrorists’ tunnels and locate weapons.
Much of Gaza City was laid to waste in the war’s initial weeks in October-November 2023. About a million people lived there before the war, and hundreds of thousands are believed to have returned to live among the ruins, especially since Israel ordered people out of other areas and launched offensives elsewhere.
Israel, which has now told civilians to leave Gaza City again for their safety, says 70,000 have done so, heading south. Palestinian officials say less than half that number have left and many thousands still lie in the path of Israel‘s advance.
The war began on Oct. 7, 2023, when Palestinian terrorists led by Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing some 1,200 people, most of them civilians, and taking 251 hostages into Gaza.
Israel responded with a military campaign aimed at freeing the hostages and dismantling Hamas’s military capabilities and political rule in neighboring Gaza.
Prospects for a ceasefire and a deal to release the remaining 48 hostages, 20 of whom are thought to still be alive, appear dim.