RSS
Iran’s Khamenei Warned Nasrallah of Israeli Plot to Kill Him, Sources Say
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a meeting with Iran’s parliament members in Tehran, Iran, July 21, 2024. Photo: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah to flee Lebanon days before he was killed in an Israeli strike and is now deeply worried about Israeli infiltration of senior government ranks in Tehran, three Iranian sources said.
In the immediate aftermath of the attack on Hezbollah’s booby-trapped pagers on Sept. 17, Khamenei sent a message with an envoy to beseech the Hezbollah secretary general to leave for Iran, citing intelligence reports that suggested Israel had operatives within Hezbollah and was planning to kill him, one of the sources, a senior Iranian official, told Reuters.
The messenger, the official said, was a senior Iranian Revolutionary Guards commander, Brigadier General Abbas Nilforoushan, who was with Nasrallah in his bunker when it was hit by Israeli bombs and was also killed.
Khamenei, who has remained in a secure location inside Iran since Saturday, personally ordered a barrage of around 200 missiles to be fired at Israel on Tuesday, a senior Iranian official said. The attack was retaliation for the deaths of Nasrallah and Nilforoushan, the Revolutionary Guards said in a statement.
The statement also cited the July killing of Hamas Leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran, and Israel‘s attacks on Lebanon. Israel has not claimed responsibility for Haniyeh’s death.
Israel on Tuesday began what it labeled as a “limited” ground incursion against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon.
Iran’s foreign ministry and the office of Israel‘s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, which oversees the country’s foreign intelligence agency Mossad, did not reply to requests for comment.
Nasrallah’s assassination followed two weeks of precise Israeli strikes that have destroyed weapons sites, eliminated half of Hezbollah’s leadership council, and decimated its top military command.
Iran’s fears for the safety of Khamenei and the loss of trust, within both Hezbollah and Iran’s establishment and between them, emerged in the conversations with 10 sources for this story, who described a situation that could complicate the effective functioning of Iran’s Axis of Resistance alliance of anti-Israel irregular armed terrorist groups.
Founded with Iran’s backing the 1980s, Hezbollah has long been the most formidable member of the alliance.
The disarray is also making it hard for Hezbollah to choose a new leader, fearing the ongoing infiltration will put the successor at risk, four Lebanese sources said.
“Basically, Iran lost the biggest investment it had for the past decades,” said Magnus Ranstorp, a Hezbollah expert at the Swedish Defense University, of the deep damage caused to Hezbollah that he said diminished Iran’s capacity to strike at Israel‘s borders.
“It shook Iran to the core. It shows how Iran is deeply infiltrated also: they not only killed Nasrallah, they killed Nilforoushan,” he said, who was a trusted military adviser to Khamenei.
Hezbollah’s lost military capacity and leadership cadre might push Iran towards the type of attacks against Israeli embassies and personnel abroad that it engaged in more frequently before the rise of its proxy forces, Ranstorp said.
IRAN MAKES ARRESTS
Nasrallah’s death has prompted Iranian authorities to thoroughly investigate possible infiltrations within Iran’s own ranks, from the powerful Revolutionary Guards to senior security officials, a second senior Iranian official said. They are especially focused on those who travel abroad or have relatives living outside Iran, the first official said.
Tehran grew suspicious of certain members of the Guards who had been traveling to Lebanon, he said. Concerns were raised when one of these individuals began asking about Nasrallah’s whereabouts, particularly inquiring about how long he would remain in specific locations, the official added.
The individual has been arrested along with several others, the first official said, after alarm was raised in Iran’s intelligence circles. The suspect’s family had relocated outside Iran, the official said, without identifying the suspect or his relatives.
The second official said the assassination has spread mistrust between Tehran and Hezbollah, and within Hezbollah.
“The trust that held everything together has disappeared,” the official said.
The Supreme Leader “no longer trusts anyone,” said a third source who is close to Iran’s establishment.
Alarm bells had already rung within Tehran and Hezbollah about possible Mossad infiltrations after the killing in July of Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr in an Israeli airstrike on a secretive Beirut location while meeting an IRGC commander, two Hezbollah sources and a Lebanese security official told Reuters at the time. That killing was followed a few hours later by the assassination of Hamas leader Haniyeh in Tehran.
Unlike Haniyeh’s death, Israel publicly claimed responsibility for the killing of Shukr, a low-profile figure who Nasrallah nonetheless described, at his funeral, as a central figure in Hezbollah’s history who had built its most important capabilities.
Shukr was key to the development of Hezbollah’s most advanced weaponry, including precision-guided missiles, and was in charge of the Shi’ite groups operations against Israel over the past year, Israel‘s military has said.
Iranian fears about Israeli penetration of its upper ranks stretches back years. In 2021, former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the head of an Iranian intelligence unit that was supposed to target agents of Mossad had himself been an agent for the Israeli spy agency, telling CNN Turk that Israel obtained sensitive documents on Iran’s nuclear program, a reference to a 2018 raid in which Israel obtained a huge trove of top secret documents about the program.
Also in 2021, Israel‘s outgoing spy chief Yossi Cohen gave details about the raid, telling the BBC that 20 non-Israeli Mossad agents were involved in stealing the archive from a warehouse.
PAGER WARNING
Khamenei’s invitation to Nasrallah to relocate to Iran came after thousands of pagers and walkie-talkies used by Hezbollah blew up in deadly attacks on Sept 17 and 18, the first official said. The attacks have been widely attributed to Israel, although it has not officially claimed responsibility.
Nasrallah, however, was confident in his security and trusted his inner circle completely, the official said, despite Tehran’s serious concerns about potential infiltrators within Hezbollah’s ranks.
Khamenei tried a second time, relaying another message through Nilforoushan to Nasrallah last week, imploring him to leave Lebanon and relocate to Iran as a safer location. But Nasrallah insisted on staying in Lebanon, the official said.
Several high-level meetings were held in Tehran following the pager blasts to discuss Hezbollah and Nasrallah’s safety, the official said, but declined to say who attended those meetings.
Simultaneously, in Lebanon, Hezbollah began conducting a major investigation to purge Israeli spies among them, questioning hundreds of members after the pager detonations, three sources in Lebanon told Reuters.
Sheikh Nabil Kaouk, a senior Hezbollah official, was leading the investigation, a Hezbollah source said. The probe was progressing rapidly, the source said, before an Israeli raid killed him a day after Nasrallah’s assassination. Another raid earlier last week had targeted other senior Hezbollah commanders, some of who were involved in the inquiry.
Kaouk had summoned for questioning Hezbollah officials involved in logistics and others “who participated, mediated, and received offers on pagers and walkie-talkies,” the source said.
A “deeper and comprehensive inquiry” and purge were now needed after the killing of Nasrallah and other commanders, the source said.
Ali al-Amin, the editor-in-chief for Janoubia, a news site based that focuses on the Shi’ite community and Hezbollah said reports indicated that Hezbollah detained hundreds of people for questioning after the pagers saga.
Hezbollah is reeling from Nasrallah’s killing in his deep bunker in a command HQ, shocked at how successfully Israel penetrated the group, seven sources said.
Mohanad Hage Ali, deputy research director of the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut with a focus on Iran and Hezbollah, described the offensive as “the biggest intelligence infiltration by Israel” since Hezbollah was founded with Iran’s backing in the 1980s.
The current Israeli escalation follows almost a year of cross-border fighting after Hezbollah began rocket attacks in support of its ally Hamas. The Palestinian terrorist group killed 1,200 people and seized 250 hostages in an attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, launching the war in Hamas-ruled Gaza.
LOSS OF TRUST
The Israeli offensive and fear of more attacks on Hezbollah have also prevented the Iranian-backed group from organizing a nationwide funeral on a scale reflecting Nasrallah’s religious and leadership status, according to four sources familiar with the debate within Hezbollah.
“No one can authorize a funeral in these circumstances,” one Hezbollah source said, lamenting the situation in which officials and religious leaders could not come forward to properly honor the late leader.
Several commanders killed last week were buried discreetly on Monday, with plans for a proper religious ceremony when the conflict ends.
Hezbollah is mulling the option of securing a religious decree to bury Nasrallah temporarily and hold an official funeral when the situation permits, the four Lebanese sources said.
Hezbollah has refrained from officially appointing a successor to Nasrallah, possibly to avoid making his replacement a target for an Israeli assassination, they said.
“Appointing a new Secretary General could be dangerous if Israel assassinates him right after,” said Amin. “The group can’t risk more chaos by appointing someone only to see them killed.”
The post Iran’s Khamenei Warned Nasrallah of Israeli Plot to Kill Him, Sources Say first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
The Perils of BDS at UK’s Bates College
Anti-Israel demonstration supporting the BDS movement, Paris France, June 8, 2024. Photo: Claire Serie / Hans Lucas via Reuters Connect
At Bates College, we pride ourselves on cultivating critical thinkers equipped to tackle the world’s challenges, and to help humanity.
Yet, the local chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) seems determined to undermine these principles by championing the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. BDS is not a campaign rooted in justice; it is an effort to destroy the Jewish State, through the use of economic harm, divisiveness, and intellectual dishonesty.
Last year, SJP urged Bates President Garry Jenkins to mark the beginning of his tenure by disclosing the college’s investment portfolio and divesting from what they call “systems of oppression and genocide.” While their rhetoric may resonate with the uncritical, it collapses under scrutiny — because Israel does not commit genocide, and does not operate under a system of oppression.
The BDS movement draws its inspiration from the international pressure that helped end apartheid in South Africa. But in completely distorting the meaning and history of apartheid, BDS is not only dangerous, but spreading historical falsehoods.
The term “apartheid,” as defined by the United Nations, refers to policies designed to establish and maintain racial domination. To equate this with Israel’s treatment of its citizens and its handling of territorial disputes is an egregious distortion. Since its founding in 1948, Israel has granted full citizenship, legal equality, and access to state institutions to all its Arab citizens. Israeli Arabs vote, serve in the Knesset, and hold prominent positions in society — a reality that utterly contradicts the claim of systemic racial domination.
Critics, including SJP, often point to the Gaza Strip and the West Bank as evidence of Israel’s so-called apartheid policies. But these claims ignore the historical and legal context.
Under the Oslo Accords, Palestinians in these territories have self-governance. Their status is not the result of racial discrimination, but of the unresolved conflict and their own leadership’s persistent refusal to negotiate in good faith. And just as Americans and Canadians do not have the same rights — it is absurd to suggest that people inside and outside of Israel should all be covered by the same set of laws. To suggest that Israel owes full citizenship rights to individuals outside its recognized borders is as absurd as expecting Americans to vote in Canadian elections.
In practice, BDS’ initiatives have also inflicted serious economic hardship on Palestinians. Consider the 2014 closure of SodaStream’s West Bank factory, where 90% of the workforce was Palestinian. Workers lost jobs offering wages and benefits far superior to local alternatives — all because BDS advocates prioritized ideological purity over pragmatic solutions.
Before the current war, over 100,000 Palestinians enjoyed similar employment opportunities in Israel. If BDS advocates had their way, how many Palestinian families would be left to suffer under the weight of their society’s self-wrought economic failings?
Even prominent Palestinian voices reject BDS. Human rights activist Bassam Eid has labeled the movement counterproductive, arguing that it fosters “hatred, enmity, and polarization” rather than advancing Palestinian nationhood. He’s right. BDS isn’t about building a future; it’s about tearing one down, regardless of the collateral damage.
At its core, the BDS movement is antithetical to the ideals of a liberal arts education. Rather than promoting intellectual rigor and open dialogue, it traffics in ideological conformity and intellectual censorship. By embracing BDS, SJP pushes Bates toward a path of illiberalism, where complex geopolitical realities are flattened into simplistic slogans and dissent is stifled. This is not progress — it is regression.
As the new semester begins, Bates College has a choice to make. Will it remain a place where critical thinking and genuine dialogue flourish, or will it succumb to the pressures of a movement that substitutes propaganda for policy and division for dialogue? If SJP’s agenda prevails, Bates will fail its mission and betray the very principles it claims to uphold.
David King is a recent graduate of Bates College and a fellow with CAMERA on Campus, which works to promote fair and accurate coverage of Israel and the Middle East in academic settings.
The post The Perils of BDS at UK’s Bates College first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Yemen’s Houthis to Target Only Israel-Linked Vessels Following Gaza Deal
Ships are docked at the Red Sea port of Hodeidah, Yemen, July 31, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Khaled Abdullah
Yemen’s Houthis will limit their attacks on commercial vessels to Israel–linked ships provided the Gaza ceasefire is fully implemented, the Humanitarian Operations Coordination Center (HOOC) said.
The Sanaa-bsed HOCC, which liaises between Houthi forces and commercial shipping operators and is associated with the Houthi military, said it was stopping “sanctions” against vessels owned by US or British individuals or entities, as well as ships sailing under their flags.
“We affirm that, in the event of any aggression against the Republic of Yemen by the United States of America, the United Kingdom, or the usurping Israeli entity, the sanctions will be reinstated against the aggressor,” it said in an email sent to shipping industry officials dated Jan. 19.
“You will be promptly informed of such measures should they be implemented.”
The HOCC said the Iran-backed Houthis, an internationally designated terrorist organization, would stop targeting Israeli-linked ships “upon the full implementation of all phases of the agreement.”
Many of the world’s biggest shipping companies have suspended voyages through the Red Sea and diverted their vessels around southern Africa to avoid being attacked.
The Houthis have carried out more than 100 attacks on ships since November 2023 and sunk two vessels, seized another, and killed at least four seafarers.
They have targeted the southern Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, which are joined by the narrow Bab al-Mandab strait, a chokepoint between the Horn of Africa and the Middle East.
Hamas released three Israeli hostages in Gaza and Israel freed 90 Palestinian prisoners on Sunday, the first day of a ceasefire suspending a 15-month-old war.
CAUTION
Executives from shipping, insurance, and retail industries told Reuters last week that they were not ready to return to the Red Sea trade route because of uncertainty over whether the Houthis would continue to attack shipping.
A spokesperson for Germany container shipping group Hapag-Lloyd said on Monday the company was still monitoring the situation, adding: “We will return to the Red Sea when it is safe to do so.”
The Houthis have attacked ships in recent months based on outdated information, Jakob Larsen, chief safety & security officer with shipping association BIMCO, said.
“In recent months, they have made several false claims about successful attacks, thereby slightly undermining their credibility,” he said on Monday.
“Assuming the ceasefire holds and the US also refrains from using force, shipping companies are expected to gradually resume operations through the Red Sea.”
Insurers were also were waiting for test voyages to determine if war risk premiums would ease, market sources said on Monday, asking not to be named.
Higher war risk insurance premiums, paid when vessels sail through the Red Sea, have meant additional costs of hundreds of thousands of dollars for a seven-day voyage for any ships still sailing through the area.
The Houthis hold the Bahamas-flagged Galaxy Leader and its 25 crew members, which was seized by the militia’s commandos in international waters in November 2023.
“The Filipinos, Mexicans, Romanians, Bulgarians, and Ukrainian who were on board are desperate to leave Yemen,” the vessel’s owner Galaxy Maritime Ltd and manager STAMCO Ship Management said on Monday.
“Some have been hospitalized with malaria and one can only guess at their mental state.”
The post Yemen’s Houthis to Target Only Israel-Linked Vessels Following Gaza Deal first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Revolting: Media Claim Moral Equivalence Between Terrorists and Hostages in Appalling Ceasefire Coverage
A combination picture shows undated handout images of hostages Ori Danino, Carmel Gat, Hersh Goldberg-Polin, Eden Yerushalmi, Alexander Lobanov, and Almog Sarusi, who were kidnapped by Hamas during the Oct. 7 attacks, and then executed to prevent their return to Israel. Photo: Courtesy of Bring Them Home Now/Handout via REUTERS
The families of Israeli hostages still held in Gaza gathered in Tel Aviv on Wednesday night as details of a tentative ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas were announced.
Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani announced the agreement, which was followed by a speech by US President Joe Biden, who described the deal as one primed to bring a “permanent end to the war.”
While some of the exact terms remain unclear — including the names of those who will be released and the precise timing — what is certain is that hundreds of Palestinian prisoners, many jailed for violent and deadly terrorism offenses, will be set free. This includes approximately 1,300 terrorists, around 250 of whom are serving life sentences.
Yet, the media’s coverage of the ceasefire deal has defied belief, managing to portray the release of over 1,000 Palestinian terrorists and prisoners not only as a positive step — but also as somehow morally equivalent to the freeing of Israeli hostages kidnapped during Hamas’ October 7, 2023, terror attacks.
The Associated Press, for example, claimed the deal would involve the release of “hundreds of Palestinian women and children imprisoned by Israel” — a gross misrepresentation of the facts by one of the world’s largest news agencies.
Enough with the false moral equivalence, @AP. The “hundreds of Palestinian women & children imprisoned by Israel” are in jail for terror and violent offenses while Israel’s hostages were brutally kidnapped by Hamas.
And there’s more abysmal reporting of a possible ceasefire
pic.twitter.com/BjFu6i5PIY
— HonestReporting (@HonestReporting) January 15, 2025
Sky News went even further, claiming the exchange involved “the release of a number of hostages in exchange for [the] release of Palestinian prisoners as well, including women, children, sick, and elderly on both sides” — drawing a grotesque and false equivalence between innocent hostages and prisoners held for violent offenses.
“The release of a number of hostages in exchange for a release of a number of Palestinian prisoners as well, including women & children & sick & elderly on both sides.”
No, @SkyNews, Israeli hostages are not morally equivalent to Palestinian prisoners held for terror offenses. pic.twitter.com/gRWSpaZaEa
— HonestReporting (@HonestReporting) January 15, 2025
Meanwhile, the AFP devoted its coverage to the families of Palestinian prisoners feeling “hopeful” about the ceasefire deal.
In a shamelessly sympathetic piece, the AFP interviewed Wafaa Ghalmi, whose husband, Ahed Ghalmi, is serving a life sentence plus five years for leading the terror cell that assassinated Israeli Tourism Minister Rehavam Ze’evi in 2001.
Ghalmi expressed her delight at the possibility of her husband’s release, calling it a “happy” time for her family and others in Gaza.
In addition, numerous outlets, including Reuters, NPR, and Sky News, opted to describe the Palestinian prisoners as “detainees,” suggesting they are being held for political reasons rather than for violent terrorist acts.
Even more worryingly, some media outlets suggested that Israel is violating the terms of the deal — before it even took effect.
Reuters, for example, implied that Israeli airstrikes on Wednesday night were a breach of the ceasefire, despite the fact that the truce has not yet commenced. Former MSNBC pundit Mehdi Hasan also weighed in, claiming the agreement would only hold if “Israel sticks to it,” conveniently ignoring Hamas’ long history of breaking ceasefire agreements.
In the coming days, as the ceasefire continues to take effect in stages, it is crucial to remind the media of some key facts:1. Israel has never violated a ceasefire agreement with Hamas.
2. Hamas initiated this war on October 7, 2023, when its terrorists crossed the border, massacred innocent civilians, and kidnapped hundreds of men, women, and children. These hostages have been held in inhumane conditions in Gaza’s underground tunnels.
3. There is no moral equivalence between the Israeli hostages — innocent civilians ripped from their homes and a music festival — and the hundreds of terrorists legitimately held in Israeli prisons for violent offenses.
4. Israel’s war in Gaza is against Hamas, a terrorist organization sworn to Israel’s annihilation. Hamas has vowed to repeat October 7 “again and again,” while using Palestinian civilians as human shields and refusing to release the innocent people it abducted.
The media must do their job and report these facts.
The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.
The post Revolting: Media Claim Moral Equivalence Between Terrorists and Hostages in Appalling Ceasefire Coverage first appeared on Algemeiner.com.