RSS
Iran’s Strategic Gambit in Nigeria: The Quds Force’s Proliferating Influence
Gen. Esmail Qaani (center), appointed commander of the IRGC-Quds Force in jan. 2020, at a memorial for his predecessor, Gen. Qassem Solaimani, who was killed in a US air strike in the same month. Photo: Reuters/Abacapress.
Nigeria, a nation celebrated for its cultural diversity and abundant natural resources, now stands at a precipice. The African country faces an array of security challenges that threaten not only its own stability, but also pose a significant risk to the broader region.
In the labyrinth of global geopolitics, Nigeria’s security landscape has become a chessboard for international power plays — with Iran emerging as a formidable player.
The West African giant faces a nuanced threat: the entrenchment of Iranian influence, orchestrated through the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force. This calculated move by Iran not only aims to expand the Islamic Repubic’s strategic depth, but also to undercut Western influence, making Nigeria a focal point of Tehran’s broader “resistance” strategy across Africa.
Nigeria’s security quandaries are diverse and deep-rooted. The northeast reels under the Boko Haram insurgency, a jihadist group with a notorious legacy of violence and radicalism that has spilled blood and sowed discord across the Lake Chad Basin. The northwest and central regions grapple with farmer-herder conflicts that have spiraled into broader ethno-religious violence, providing fertile ground for emerging Islamist extremist factions. Meanwhile, the southeast witnesses a resurgence of separatist violence, particularly around electoral cycles, threatening national unity.
The Niger Delta’s resource curse persists, with militancy and oil theft by gangs challenging state authority and economic stability. These crises strain Nigeria’s military and police, while the impunity enjoyed by perpetrators and alleged abuses by security forces exacerbates grievances.
Amidst this chaos, Iran has found a proxy in Nigeria’s Shia minority, particularly the Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN), led by Sheikh Ibrahim Zakzaky. Inspired by the Iranian Revolution, the IMN envisions a theocratic state model akin to Iran’s. Despite the Nigerian government’s crackdown on the IMN, Tehran’s support remains steadfast, revealing an ambition to cement its ideological and geopolitical foothold. This alliance, however, transcends ideological kinship, encompassing military and intelligence support, though the full extent remains shrouded in secrecy.
The Quds Force’s activities in Nigeria, part of a concerted effort to elevate Iran’s influence across Africa, entail clandestine networks aimed at Western interests and personnel. This “horizontal escalation” strategy signifies Iran’s intent to counter Western presence, leveraging proxies like Hezbollah and the IMN. The provision of ideological and military training to Nigerian Shiites, notably in Lebanon, underscores Iran’s commitment to expanding its proxy warfare model to West Africa, potentially stoking sectarian tensions in a region already fraught with religious strife.
The implications of Iran’s maneuvers in Nigeria extend beyond the immediate security implications for the West African nation. They represent a strategic challenge to Western, particularly US, interests in Africa. Iran’s activities in Nigeria, facilitated through proxies, exemplify Tehran’s broader ambition under its global resistance strategy to counter Western influence and expand its geopolitical reach. This involves a calculated use of soft power, military support, and ideological propagation to cultivate allies and proxies that can serve Iran’s interests, and challenge the existing geopolitical order.
The involvement of the Quds Force in Nigeria also illuminates Iran’s broader strategy of leveraging sectarian identities to forge strategic relationships. By supporting the IMN and establishing ties with Hezbollah, Iran not only aims to challenge Nigerian sovereignty but also to create a network of influence that could serve as a bulwark against Western and Sunni Arab states’ influence in Africa.
The Quds Force’s operations in Nigeria signal a potent mix of ideological zeal and strategic ambition that could exacerbate existing conflicts and spawn new ones. The implications for regional security are profound, as the entrenchment of Iranian influence could lead to a recalibration of alliances and power dynamics in West Africa and beyond.
Moreover, the convergence of Iran’s proxy activities with the broader jihadist landscape in Nigeria, characterized by the presence of Boko Haram and its offshoot, IS-WA, introduces an additional layer of complexity to the security matrix. While these groups have primarily Sunni orientations and objectives that diverge from those of the IMN, the overarching theme of external influence and proxy warfare presents a shared thread. This confluence of interests and the potential for tactical or opportunistic alliances among these disparate groups could pose a significant challenge to counter-terrorism efforts and peace-building initiatives in the region.
Addressing the burgeoning threat posed by the Quds Force and Iran’s wider network in Nigeria requires a nuanced, multifaceted strategy that encompasses diplomatic, military, and socio-economic dimensions.
The international community, particularly Western nations, must recalibrate their engagement with Nigeria and the broader African continent to counter Tehran’s influence effectively. This involves not only bolstering Nigeria’s counter-terrorism capabilities but also supporting governance reforms, socio-economic development, and efforts to address the root causes of extremism and sectarianism.
Strategically, it is imperative to enhance intelligence sharing, bolster defensive capabilities, and strengthen diplomatic ties with African nations to create a united front against external interference. Concurrently, initiatives aimed at fostering intra-faith dialogue and reconciliation can mitigate the sectarian divide that external actors like Iran exploit.
Ultimately, a concerted international effort that combines security measures with socio-political reforms can offer a sustainable solution to the complex challenge posed by Iran’s strategic ambitions in Nigeria and Africa at large.
As Nigeria grapples with an array of security challenges, the shadow of Iran’s Quds Force looms large, representing a new front in the geopolitical contestation of Africa. The involvement of the Quds Force, through its support for the IMN and collaboration with Hezbollah, signifies Iran’s ambition to project power and influence far beyond its borders. This development demands vigilant and coordinated responses from both regional and international actors, underscoring the need for a comprehensive strategy to navigate the shadows cast by Iran’s activities in Nigeria, and ensure the continent’s long-term stability and security.
Erfan Fard is a counter-terrorism analyst and Middle East Studies researcher based in Washington, D.C. He focuses on Middle Eastern regional security affairs, with a particular emphasis on Iran, counter-terrorism, IRGC, MOIS, and ethnic conflicts in MENA. Erfan is a Jewish Kurd of Iran, and he is fluent in Persian, Kurdish, Arabic, and English. Follow him from this twitter account @EQFARD.
The post Iran’s Strategic Gambit in Nigeria: The Quds Force’s Proliferating Influence first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
John Fetterman Says His US Senate Votes Will ‘Follow Israel’ During Trump Presidency
US Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) gives an interview in his office in the Russell Senate Office Building in Washington, DC, Jan. 18, 2024. Photo: Rod Lamkey / CNP/Sipa USA for NY Post via Reuters Connect
US Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) on Thursday defended President Joe Biden’s record on Israel and stated that he plans on maintaining his support for pro-Israel efforts advanced by President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration.
During an appearance on the ABC talk show “The View,” Fetterman said that he would remain an “unapologetic” supporter of Israel during the Trump presidency and that he will continue to support legislation and initiatives that benefit the Jewish state.
“I’m a really strong, unapologetic supporter of Israel and it’s really not going to change for me when Trump becomes [president]. My vote and voice is going to follow Israel,” Fetterman said.
Fetterman also vouched for Biden’s record on Israel, although he conceded that he has disagreed with some of Biden’s policy positions regarding the Israel-Hamas war.
“I do think that the president has been a strong supporter of Israel, although there were times when I disagreed with some of the choices he made,” Fetterman said.
In the year following Hamas’s invasion of southern Israel last Oct. 7, Fetterman has emerged as a surprisingly stalwart ally of the Jewish state. He has regularly criticized other Democrats, including Biden, over their perceived fragile and unreliable support of Israel.
The lawmaker openly criticized Biden after the president threatened to withhold arms from Israel if the Jewish state greenlighted military operations in the city of Rafah in southern Gaza. Fetterman repudiated Biden’s ultimatum, saying that the US should “stand with our key ally throughout all of this.” He has also rebuffed pressure by progressives to adopt a more adversarial posture against Israel, saying that he does “not support any conditions” on American military aid to the Jewish sate.
Fetterman on Thursday also lauded Israel for its progress in deteriorating the Hamas terrorist group’s military capabilities. The senator asserted that Hamas needs to be completely eradicated and removed from the Gaza Strip.
“We cannot allow Hamas to function at all. They can’t be a part of any rebuilding Gaza or anything. Hamas has to surrender. It’ll be completely destroyed, and I think right now that largely that’s already happened now,” Fetterman said, adding that he wants to “salute what Israel has accomplished.”
The senator applauded the Jewish state, claiming “they destroyed Hamas, they’ve destroyed Hezbollah and, [they] exposed Iran as absolutely a paper tiger.” The Pennsylvania lawmaker added that Israel’s defensive military actions against Iran revealed that the regime is unable to hold the Middle East “in check.”
“Israel did the hard things and confronted these kinds of organizations and these proxies. And that’s why I’m proud to stand with Israel through it all, until absolutely through to the last hostages are brought back home,” Fetterman said.
The post John Fetterman Says His US Senate Votes Will ‘Follow Israel’ During Trump Presidency first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Democrats’ Support for Israel ‘Absolutely’ Contributed to US Presidential Election Loss, NC Party Chair Claims
Anderson Clayton, chair of the North Carolina Democratic Party, speaks after Democrat Josh Stein won the North Carolina governor’s race, in Raleigh, North Carolina, US, Nov. 5, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Jonathan Drake
Anderson Clayton, chair of the North Carolina Democratic Party, said in a new interview that Democrats’ general support for Israel’s defensive military operations against Hamas in Gaza contributed to their poor performance in last month’s elections.
Clayton made the remarks while appearing on the media outlet Zeteo this week to explain why she believes her party lost big across the US, most notably in the presidential election. Speaking with Mehdi Hasan, a journalist and outspoken critic of Israel, Clayton argued that the Democratic Party “abandoned” wide swaths of its voter base, adding that the party’s support for Israel likely alienated many younger voters.
When asked by Hasan whether the Israel-Hamas war resonated with the electorate in North Carolina, Clayton argued that the ongoing military conflict in Gaza “absolutely” eroded the Democrats’ standing with young voters.
As The Algemeiner reported, a survey of swing voters by Blueprint, a Democrat-leaning research firm, found the issue of Israel and the Palestinians barely registered as motivation for choosing Republican Donald Trump over Democrat Kamala Harris in the presidential race. Voters were more worried about inflation, immigration, and certain cultural issues. Among those voters for whom it was a factor, the survey found more people concerned that Harris was too “pro-Palestine” than those upset she was too “pro-Israel.”
Nonetheless, Hasan, citing anti-Israel protests at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, suggested that Democrats’ support for Israel disillusioned and enraged many young voters.
Clayton defended the “Uncommitted Movement” — an effort launched by anti-Israel activists to persuade the Democratic Party to officially endorse an arms embargo against the Jewish state and not support outgoing US President Joe Biden — as “using political power in the right way.”
She added that Democrats should be “embracing” anti-Israel efforts like the Uncommitted Movement, saying “that is something that we want so see more of in our party.”
The North Carolina Democratic Party has been plagued with accusations of antisemitism in the year following Hamas’s invasion of southern Israel last Oct. 7. Members of the state party refused to support a resolution condemning the terrorist attacks in Israel, sparking outrage among Jews within the state.
North Carolina Democrats also originally voted against the creation of an official Jewish caucus, despite already having similar groups for black and LGBT party members. Clayton was notably among 16 North Carolina Democrats who refused to vote on the creation of the caucus. After facing backlash, the party eventually voted to officially recognize the Jewish Caucus in December 2023.
Ryan Jenkins, the president of the Progressive Caucus of the North Carolina Democratic Party, attacked Jewish members of his party while defending the initial decision to block the recognition of a Jewish caucus.
“They have done nothing but whine and play the victim and attack people, and we are sick of it,” Jenkins said in reference to Jewish Democrats. “Every single abstention was a no vote that didn’t want to get targeted.”
“If the Democratic Party caves to it, that’s the end of the Democratic Party. We’re not Democrats; we’re the Jewish Caucus. We’re a Zionist group. Because they control everything,” Jenkins added. “We’re telling them very clearly they are allowed to threaten and bully us and they will get their way every single time and that our rules don’t apply.”
Leaders within the North Carolina Democratic Party have also accused Israelis of being “child killers” and have publicly participated in protests condemning the Jewish state. In 2022, the party infuriated North Carolina Jews when it passed a resolution accusing Israel of being an “apartheid state” that discriminates against Palestinians.
The post Democrats’ Support for Israel ‘Absolutely’ Contributed to US Presidential Election Loss, NC Party Chair Claims first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
US Sen. Tom Cotton Introduces Bill to Mandate Federal Usage of ‘Judea and Samaria’ Instead of ‘West Bank’
US Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) speaks during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, March 11, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Julia Nikhinson
US Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) has introduced legislation that would ban the federal government from using the term “West Bank” and instead use the terminology “Judea and Samaria.”
On Thursday, Cotton introduced the “Retiring the Egregious Confusion Over the Genuine Name of Israel’s Zone of Influence by Necessitating Government-use of Judea and Samaria (RECOGNIZING Judea and Samaria) Act.” The senator argued that the legislation would “align US policy language with the geographical and cultural significance of the region.”
“The Jewish people’s legal and historic rights to Judea and Samaria goes back thousands of years. The US should stop using the politically charged term West Bank to refer to the biblical heartland of Israel,” Cotton said in a statement.
US Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-NY) — a stalwart ally of Israel, like Cotton — issued a statement in support of the bill, arguing that the official usage of Judea and Samaria is necessary in “defending the integrity of the Jewish state.”
“The Israeli people have an undeniable and indisputable historical and legal claim over Judea and Samaria, and at this critical moment in history, the United States must reaffirm this,” Tenney said. “This bill reaffirms Israel’s rightful claim to its territory. I remain committed to defending the integrity of the Jewish state and fully supporting Israel’s sovereignty over Judea and Samaria.”
US President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, has vowed to use the words Judea and Samaria in lieu of the West Bank.
“I can’t say something I don’t believe. As you well know, I’ve never been willing to use the term ‘West Bank.’ There is no such thing. I speak of Judea and Samaria,” Huckabee told Israeli media outlet Arutz Sheva in an interview. “I tell people there is no ‘occupation.’ It is a land that is ‘occupied’ by the people who have had a rightful deed to the place for 3,500 years, since the time of Abraham.”
If the US federal government were to adopt the official usage of Judea and Samaria instead of the West Bank, it would be aligning itself with the terminology preferred by Israel. Such a move could signal a shift in US policy closer to the Jewish state and in favor of further expansion of Jewish communities in the territory.
Critics have argued that such a shift in language could inflame tensions in the Middle East, complicating the possibility of reaching a two-state solution to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Following the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, in which the Jewish state secured its independence, the Kingdom of Jordan promulgated the term “West Bank” to describe the territory it controlled west of the Jordan River. Since Israel captured the area in the Six-Day War in 1967, it has governed them as Judea and Samaria.
The post US Sen. Tom Cotton Introduces Bill to Mandate Federal Usage of ‘Judea and Samaria’ Instead of ‘West Bank’ first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login