RSS
Israel’s Allied Muslim States as a Centerpiece of Trump’s Policy of Peace
Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, then-US President Donald Trump, and United Arab Emirates (UAE) Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed display their copies of signed agreements as they participate in the signing ceremony of the Abraham Accords, normalizing relations between Israel and some of its Middle East neighbors, in a strategic realignment of Middle Eastern countries against Iran, on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, US, September 15, 2020. Photo: REUTERS/Tom Brenner/
Since Tehran will soon be able to launch an atomic bomb and will then become a real strategic danger to Israel and the Sunni Arab states, Israel has an existential need to prevent Iran from building nuclear weapons. That’s why Israel is trying to expand relations with all moderate or secular Muslim states that can support or join the Abraham Accords.
In this context, Israel’s and America’s grand strategy in the Middle East must consist of both rebuilding Gaza as soon as possible with a new Palestinian leadership; continuing to contain Iran’s proxies such as Hamas and Hezbollah; and extending the Abraham Accords to Central Asian and Caucasian Turkic-speaking countries such as Kazakhstan or Azerbaijan.
This is the new “big game.” For Donald Trump, the Accords are not just a simple tool for resolving the Middle East conflict by paying (financially or politically) the Arab or Muslim states to make peace with Israel, but should become an informal bloc of states, an intergovernmental club for joint economic development to support US economic policy in various fields. One of the first positive effects of the global Trump plan would be to fight terrorism, whose breeding ground is poverty and fanaticism, through economic development and a new moderate Palestinian government.
The 2020 agreements initiated by Trump led to the establishment of full diplomatic relations between Israel and the UAE and Bahrain, and were the first regional agreements to be signed since 1994 (between Israel and Jordan).
The agreements were named the “Abraham Accords” to emphasize the common belief of Islam and Judaism in the existence of the Prophet Abraham. In reality, the rapprochement between Israel and the Sunni Arab states began in the 2010s due to their common fear of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its nuclear program. Since 2012, the unofficial normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel has been largely based on intelligence sharing against this common threat, and the Omani and Israeli intelligence services have also begun to cooperate.
Now, five years later, how can the Abraham Accords be strengthened and extended to other Arab and non-Arab Muslim states?
According to US think tanks and Israeli media, the next direction of the “Abraham Process” could be the South Caucasus and other Turkic-speaking countries in Central Asia, with a possible alignment of Azerbaijan — a secular state with a moderate Shiite majority that already has a 30-year alliance with Israel. Recently, its state-owned energy giant bought 10% of one of Israel’s gas fields, and the deal was done with the blessing of the US company Chevron.
Azerbaijan’s unique conceptual and practical experience in Muslim-Jewish cooperation (after Turkey’s special experience in the 1990s was ended by President Erdogan’s pro-Hamas strategy) can be used to extend the Abraham Accords to other non-Arab Muslim countries in the Middle East, Central Asia, Southeast Asia and Africa.
Crucially, the UAE, one of the architects and key participants in the Abraham Accords, is also Azerbaijan’s top partner in the Arab world. Similarly, Israel is already promoting a trilateral partnership model for Morocco involving American companies, and plans to extend this approach to the Sunni Gulf monarchies and the US in the areas of defense, AI, and cybersecurity as part of the expansion of the Abraham Accords. Azerbaijan’s participation in such initiatives would strengthen the Muslim component of Israel’s regional partnerships.
If Trump’s plan to rebuild Gaza is adapted to the positions of Riyadh, Cairo, and Amman, the reconstruction — which is necessary in any case — will most likely involve the UAE, Egypt, and possibly other Arab states. Washington could approach Baku with a proposal to participate on a humanitarian basis, acting as a free supplier of energy resources needed for reconstruction efforts and for the needs of the Palestinian population during the active phase of the project.
This could open a window of opportunity for other post-Soviet Turkic countries, such as Kazakhstan, to join the club. Kazakhstan is the gateway to Central Asia, which is rich in coveted minerals such as uranium, lithium, and tantalum, and has some of the largest gas reserves in the world. Kazakhstan is also friendly to Israel. Washington could use the Baku-Jerusalem relationship to contain Iran’s geopolitical ambitions in Central Asia.
Iran is seeking to increase its influence in the region in pursuit of energy and, of course, uranium. Increasing alliances between Israel and other Muslim-majority countries important as the Trump administration works to pressure Iran and further integrate and consolidate Israel’s presence within the framework of a “Greater Middle East.”
Alessandro Bertoldi is the Executive Director of the Milton Friedman Institute.
The post Israel’s Allied Muslim States as a Centerpiece of Trump’s Policy of Peace first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself. Really?
JNS.org – If I asked you to name the most famous line in the Bible, what would you answer? While Shema Yisrael (“Hear O’Israel”) might get many votes, I imagine that the winning line would be “love thy neighbor as thyself” (Leviticus 19:18). Some religions refer to it as the Golden Rule, but all would agree that it is fundamental to any moral lifestyle. And it appears this week in our Torah reading, Kedoshim.
This is quite a tall order. Can we be expected to love other people as much as we love ourselves? Surely, this is an idealistic expectation. And yet, the Creator knows us better than we know ourselves. How can His Torah be so unrealistic?
The biblical commentaries offer a variety of explanations. Some, like Rambam (Maimonides), say that the focus should be on our behavior, rather than our feelings. We are expected to try our best or to treat others “as if” we genuinely love them.
Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi, in his classic text called the Tanya, argues that the actual feelings of love are, in fact, achievable provided that we focus on a person’s spirituality rather than how they present themselves physically. If we can put the soul over the body, we can do it.
Allow me to share the interpretation of the Ramban (Nachmanides), a 13th-century Torah scholar from Spain. His interpretation of the verses preceding love thy neighbor is classic and powerful, yet simple and straightforward.
“Do not hate your brother in your heart. You shall rebuke him, but do not bear a sin because of him” by embarrassing him in public. “Do not take revenge, and do not bear a grudge against your people. You shall love your fellow as yourself, I am God” (Leviticus 19:17-18).
What is the connection between these verses? Why is revenge and grudge-bearing in the same paragraph as love your fellow as yourself?
A careful reading shows that within these two verses are no less than six biblical commandments. But what is their sequence all about, and what is the connection between them?
The Ramban explains it beautifully, showing how the sequence of verses is deliberate and highlighting the Torah’s profound yet practical advice on how to maintain healthy relationships.
Someone wronged you? Don’t hate him in your heart. Speak to him. Don’t let it fester until it bursts, and makes you bitter and sick.
Instead, talk it out. Confront the person. Of course, do it respectfully. Don’t embarrass anyone in public, so that you don’t bear a sin because of them. But don’t let your hurt eat you up. Communicate!
If you approach the person who wronged you—not with hate in your heart but with respectful reproof—one of two things will happen. Either he or she will apologize and explain their perspective on the matter. Or that it was a misunderstanding and will get sorted out between you. Either way, you will feel happier and healthier.
Then you will not feel the need to take revenge or even to bear a grudge.
Here, says the Ramban, is the connection between these two verses. And if you follow this advice, only then will you be able to observe the commandment to Love Thy Neighbor. If you never tell him why you are upset, another may be completely unaware of his or her wrongdoing, and it will remain as a wound inside you and may never go away.
To sum up: Honest communication is the key to loving people.
Now, tell me the truth. Did you know that not taking revenge is a biblical commandment? In some cultures in Africa, revenge is a mitzvah! I’ve heard radio talk-show hosts invite listeners to share how they took “sweet revenge” on someone, as if it’s some kind of accomplishment.
Furthermore, did you know that bearing a grudge is forbidden by biblical law?
Here in South Africa, people refer to a grudge by its Yiddish name, a faribel. In other countries, people call it a broiges. Whatever the terminology, the Torah states explicitly: “Thou shalt not bear a grudge!” Do not keep a faribel, a broiges or resentment of any kind toward someone you believe wronged you. Talk to that person. Share your feelings honestly. If you do it respectfully and do not demean the other’s dignity, then it can be resolved. Only then will you be able to love your fellow as yourself.
May all our grudges and feelings of resentment toward others be dealt with honestly and respectfully. May all our grudges be resolved as soon as possible. Then we will all be in a much better position to love our neighbors as ourselves.
The post Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself. Really? first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
‘Nonsense’: Huckabee Shoots Down Report Trump to Endorse Palestinian Statehood
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee looks on during the day he visits the Western Wall, Judaism’s holiest prayer site, in Jerusalem’s Old City, April 18, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun
i24 News – US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee on Saturday dismissed as nonsensical the report that President Donald Trump would endorse Palestinian statehood during his tour to the Persian Gulf this week.
“This report is nonsense,” Huckabee harrumphed on his X account, blasting the Jerusalem Post as needing better sourced reporting. “Israel doesn’t have a better friend than the president of the United States.”
Trump is set to visit Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. The leader’s first trip overseas since he took office comes as Trump seeks the Gulf countries’ support in regional conflicts, including the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza and curbing Iran’s advancing nuclear program.
However, reports citing administration insiders claimed that Trump has also set his sights on the ambitious goal of expanding the Abraham Accords. These agreements, initially signed in 2020, normalized relations between Israel and the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan. The accords are widely held to be among the most important achievements of the first Trump administration.
The post ‘Nonsense’: Huckabee Shoots Down Report Trump to Endorse Palestinian Statehood first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
US to Put Military Option Back on Table If No Immediate Progress in Iran Talks
US President Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy-designate Steve Witkoff gives a speech at the inaugural parade inside Capital One Arena on the inauguration day of Trump’s second presidential term, in Washington, DC, Jan. 20, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Carlos Barria
i24 News – Unless significant progress is registered in Sunday’s round of nuclear talks with Iran, the US will consider putting the military option back on the table, sources close to US envoy Steve Witkoff told i24NEWS.
American and Iranian representatives voiced optimism after the previous talks that took place in Oman and Rome, saying there was a friendly atmosphere despite the two countries’ decades of enmity.
However the two sides are not believed to have thrashed out the all-important technical details, and basic questions remain.
The source has also underscored the significance of the administration’s choice of Michael Anton, the State Department’s policy planning director, as the lead representative in the nuclear talks’ technical phases.
Anton is “an Iran expert and someone who knows how to cut a deal with Iran,” the source said, saying that the choice reflected Trump’s desire to secure the deal.
The post US to Put Military Option Back on Table If No Immediate Progress in Iran Talks first appeared on Algemeiner.com.