RSS
Macron’s Betrayal: How France Turned Its Back on Israel

French President Emmanuel Macron is seen at the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. Photo: Reuters/Martial Trezzini
For decades, France and Israel stood shoulder to shoulder, their partnership a shining example of trust, strength, and shared purpose. But now, that bond is in serious danger. The reason? French President Emmanuel Macron and other leaders are abandoning Israel because of pressure inside their country, and outside in the international community.
This isn’t just a political divorce; it’s a perfect example of betrayal on the world stage. The fallout between France and Israel exposes a cold, brutal truth: in the ruthless game of global power, even the strongest alliances are breakable. It’s not just a crack in diplomacy — it’s a seismic shift that sends one chilling message to nations everywhere: trust no one.
The Old France-Israel Alliance
In the 1950s and 1960s, France was Israel’s closest ally, supplying arms and technology when no one else would. The two nations collaborated on groundbreaking projects like the development of Israel’s nuclear program, cementing their shared interests in security and innovation. During the 1956 Suez Crisis, they worked side by side, demonstrating the strength of their partnership against shared threats. France’s support wasn’t just strategic; it was a clear statement of solidarity with Israel’s struggle for survival.
But the alliance wasn’t just about military cooperation. Culturally and politically, the two nations mirrored each other in their commitment to democracy and Western ideals. French leaders like Charles de Gaulle saw Israel as a natural ally, and for years, France was Israel’s leading supplier of weapons. This partnership wasn’t just strong — it was essential to both countries’ visions of stability and progress.
France and Oct. 7th
The cracks in the Israel-France relationship didn’t appear overnight, but October 7, 2023, was the tipping point. In a single, devastating Hamas attack, 1,200 Israelis were killed, and over 200 were taken hostage. For Israel, it wasn’t just an act of terror — it was a national trauma, the kind of event that reshaped a nation’s worldview. Adjusting for population differences, Israel lost 15 times as many people as America did on 9/11.
Around the globe, world leaders stood in solidarity with Israel. Yet almost immediately from the outset, Macron’s condemnation was coupled with a lecture on restraint in hopes of subduing Israel’s reaction. Instead of unequivocal support, Macron criticized Israel’s military tactics in Gaza as “disproportionate” and even recommended a global arms embargo on Israel.
In Israel’s darkest hour, the man who should have been a staunch ally chose political correctness over solidarity.
Macron isn’t naive. His response wasn’t a mistake; it was a deliberate strategy. France is working to position itself as a power in Middle Eastern diplomacy by strengthening ties with Arab nations. In 2023, France supported the restoration of relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
Macron has criticized Israeli settlement policies and co-sponsored a UN resolution condemning Israel’s actions in Gaza. France’s president is playing a dangerous game where principles are secondary to ambition. In early 2024, French authorities banned Israeli defense companies from Eurosatory, one of the world’s premier arms fairs. The message was clear: Israel, once a favored partner, was now a liability.
Macron’s pivot away from Israel aligns perfectly with public sentiment in France. A 2024 poll revealed over 60% of French citizens support Palestinian causes. In France, the pro-Palestinian movement has gained unstoppable momentum. Protests against Israel’s actions are the norm, while anti-Israel sentiment finds its way into media and public discourse. Meanwhile, Israelis have lost all trust in France. Only 15% view France as a dependable ally, compared to nearly 60% who did a decade ago.
Trade between France and Israel, which once topped $3 billion annually, has plummeted. Defense collaborations have ended, forcing Israel to deepen ties with other nations, particularly in Asia and the Gulf.
For France, the short-term gains are evident. But these gains come with a long-term cost. Israel is a key regional power and a global leader in technology, defense innovation, and intelligence. Ignoring this will hurt France’s ability to stay competitive in areas like cybersecurity and counterterrorism.
Worse, it may leave France sidelined in future alliances or partnerships, as other Western nations — like the US or Germany –fill the gap. In chasing short-term rewards, Macron is gambling with France’s influence and relevance in the long run. His behavior raises a troubling question: Is appeasement worth the price of betrayal?
And for Israel, the question is even harder: if a country like France can’t be trusted, who can?
France isn’t the only nation making these calculations. Across the world, leaders are watching and learning. And that is bad news for Israel.
There’s still a glimmer of hope for reconciliation. Macron’s recent praise of Israel’s ceasefire with Hamas suggests a willingness for diplomacy. But words alone won’t fix what’s broken. Trust, once shattered, takes years — if not decades — to rebuild.
France’s betrayal of Israel is more than a political drama; it’s a wake-up call. In a world where alliances are increasingly transactional, Macron’s actions highlight the fragility of global partnerships.
Macron isn’t just betting on France’s future — he’s redefining what it means to be an ally. And the rest of the world is taking notes.
The writer is a high school student from Great Neck, New York, passionate about advocacy and government. Through his writing and activism, he engages others in meaningful conversations about U.S. politics, international relations, and Israel’s significance as both a homeland for the Jewish people and a key ally of the United States.
The post Macron’s Betrayal: How France Turned Its Back on Israel first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Netanyahu Accuses France, Britain, Canada of ‘Emboldening’ Hamas

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during a press conference, in Jerusalem, May 21, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun/Pool
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused the leaders of France, Britain, and Canada of wanting to help the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas after they threatened to take “concrete action” if Israel did not stop its latest offensive in Gaza.
The criticism, echoing similar remarks from Foreign Minister Gideon Saar on Thursday, was part of a fightback by the Israeli government against the increasingly heavy international pressure on it over the war in Gaza.
“You’re on the wrong side of humanity and you’re on the wrong side of history,” Netanyahu said.
The Israeli leader has regularly criticized European countries as well as global institutions from the United Nations to the International Court of Justice over what he says is their bias against Israel.
Israeli officials have been particularly concerned about growing calls for other countries in Europe to follow the example of Spain and Ireland in recognizing a Palestinian state as part of a two-state solution.
Netanyahu argues that a Palestinian state would threaten Israel, and he has framed the killing of two Israeli embassy staffers in Washington on Tuesday by a man who allegedly shouted “Free Palestine” as a clear example of that threat.
He said “exactly the same chant” was heard during the attack on Israel by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023.
“They don’t want a Palestinian state. They want to destroy the Jewish state,” he said in a statement on the social media platform X.
“I could never understand how this simple truth evades the leaders of France, Britain, Canada, and others,” he said, adding that any moves by Western countries to recognize a Palestinian state would “reward these murderers with the ultimate prize.”
Instead of advancing peace, the three leaders were “emboldening Hamas to continue fighting forever,” he said.
The Israeli leader said Hamas, which issued a statement welcoming the move, had thanked French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and Canada‘s Mark Carney over what he said was their demand for an immediate end to the war.
The leaders’ statement on Monday did not demand an immediate end to the war, but a halt to Israel’s new military offensive on Gaza and a lifting of its restrictions on humanitarian aid. Israel had prevented aid from entering Gaza since March, in an effort to prevent Hamas from stealing the supplies, before relaxing its blockade this week.
“By issuing their demand – replete with a threat of sanctions against Israel, against Israel, not Hamas – these three leaders effectively said they want Hamas to remain in power,” Netanyahu said.
“And they give them hope to establish a second Palestinian state from which Hamas will again seek to destroy the Jewish state.”
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said France, which like Britain and Canada designates Hamas as a terrorist organization, was “unwaveringly committed to Israel’s security” but he said it was “absurd and slanderous” to accuse supporters of a two-state solution of encouraging antisemitism or Hamas.
French government spokesperson Sophie Primas said France did not accept Netanyahu‘s accusations, adding: “We need to de-escalate this rising tension between our two states and work to find lasting peace solutions, for Israel and for Palestine.”
Asked about Netanyahu‘s remarks, Britain‘s armed forces minister Luke Pollard said London stood with Israel in their right to self-defense. “But that self-defense must be conducted within the bounds of international humanitarian law,” he said.
“At this moment, we stand fast against terrorism, but we also want to make sure that the aid is getting into Gaza,” Pollard told Times Radio.
Israel’s offensive in Gaza was launched following the Oct. 7, 2023, attack, which killed some 1,200 people and saw 251 taken as hostage into Gaza.
The post Netanyahu Accuses France, Britain, Canada of ‘Emboldening’ Hamas first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Hezbollah Seeks Boost in Lebanon Vote as Disarmament Calls Grow

A banner depicting late Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and campaign poster of the candidates running for municipal elections, are placed along a street in Nabatieh, southern Lebanon, May 19, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Aziz Taher
Campaign posters in south Lebanon are urging support for Hezbollah in elections on Saturday as the Iran-backed terrorist group aims to show it retains political clout despite the pounding it took in last year’s war with Israel.
For Hezbollah, the local vote is more important than ever, coinciding with mounting calls for its disarmament and continued Israeli airstrikes, and as many of its Shi’ite Muslim constituents still suffer the repercussions of the conflict.
Three rounds of voting already held this month have gone well for the Islamist group. In the south, many races won’t be contested, handing Hezbollah and its allies early wins.
“We will vote with blood,” said Ali Tabaja, 21, indicating loyalty to Hezbollah. He’ll be voting in the city of Nabatieh rather than his village of Adaisseh because it is destroyed.
“It’s a desert,” he said.
The south’s rubble-strewn landscape reflects the devastating impact of the war, which began when Hezbollah opened fire in support of Hamas at the start in October 2023 of the Gaza conflict and culminated in a major Israeli offensive.
Hezbollah emerged as a shadow of its former self, with its leaders and thousands of its fighters killed, its influence over the Lebanese state greatly diminished, and its Lebanese opponents gaining sway.
In a measure of how far the tables have turned, the new government has declared it aims to establish a state monopoly on arms, meaning Hezbollah should disarm – as stipulated by the US-brokered ceasefire with Israel.
Against this backdrop, the election results so far indicate “the war didn’t achieve the objective of downgrading Hezbollah‘s popularity in the community,” said Mohanad Hage Ali of the Carnegie Middle East Center, a think tank. “On the contrary, many Shia now feel their fate is tied to Hezbollah‘s fate.”
“This [Hezbollah‘s election performance’ really matters,” Hage Ali added. “It shows they still represent the great majority of Shi’ites and underlines the reality that any attempt by other Lebanese to disarm them by force would risk being seen as a move against the community and jeopardize civil peace.”
Hezbollah‘s arms have long been a source of division in Lebanon, sparking a brief civil conflict in 2008. Critics say Hezbollah has unilaterally involved Lebanon in wider Middle East conflicts.
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun has called for dialogue with Hezbollah over a national defense strategy, implying discussion of its weaponry, but talks have yet to begin.
Foreign Minister Youssef Raji, a Hezbollah opponent, has said that Lebanon has been told there will be no reconstruction aid from foreign donors until the state establishes a monopoly on arms.
Hezbollah, in turn, has put the onus on the government over reconstruction and accuses it of failing to take steps on that front, despite promises that the government is committed to it.
A US State Department spokesperson said that while Washington was engaged in supporting sustainable reconstruction in Lebanon, “this cannot happen without Hezbollah laying down their arms.”
“We have also made clear transparency and economic reform are the only path to greater investment and economic recovery for the country,” the spokesperson said in response to a Reuters query.
DISARMAMENT TERMS
Hezbollah says its weapons are now gone from the south but links any discussion of its remaining arsenal to Israel’s withdrawal from five positions it still holds, and an end to Israeli attacks.
Israel says Hezbollah still has combat infrastructure including rocket launchers in the south, calling this “blatant violations of understandings between Israel and Lebanon.”
A French diplomatic source said reconstruction would not materialize if Israel continues striking and the Lebanese government does not act fast enough on disarmament.
Donors also want Beirut to enact economic reforms.
Hashem Haidar, head of the government’s Council for the South, said the state lacks the funds to rebuild, but cited progress in rubble removal. Lebanon needs $11 billion for reconstruction and recovery, the World Bank estimates.
In Nabatieh, a pile of rubble marks the spot where 71-year-old Khalil Tarhini’s store once stood. It was one of dozens destroyed by Israeli bombardment in Nabatieh’s central market.
He has received no compensation and sees little point in voting. Expressing a sense of abandonment, he said: “The state did not stand by us.”
The situation was very different in 2006, after a previous Hezbollah-Israel war. Aid flowed from Iran and Gulf Arab states.
Hezbollah says it has aided 400,000 people, paying for rent, furniture, and renovations. But the funds at its disposal appear well short of 2006, recipients say.
Hezbollah says state authorities have obstructed funds arriving from Iran, though Tehran is also more financially strapped than two decades ago due to tougher US sanctions and the reimposition of a “maximum pressure” policy by Washington.
As for Gulf states, their spending on Lebanon dried up as Hezbollah became embroiled in regional conflicts and, echoing the US, they declared it a terrorist group in 2016. Saudi Arabia has echoed the Lebanese government’s position of calling for a state monopoly of arms.
Hezbollah lawmaker Hassan Fadlallah said it was up to the government to secure reconstruction funding and that it was failing to take “serious steps” to get the process on track.
He warned that the issue risked deepening divisions in Lebanon if unaddressed. “How can one part of the nation be stable while another is in pain?” he said, referring to Shi’ites in the south and other areas, including Beirut’s Hezbollah-dominated southern suburbs, hard hit by Israel.
The post Hezbollah Seeks Boost in Lebanon Vote as Disarmament Calls Grow first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
US Ambassador to Turkey Will Serve as Special Envoy to Syria

US Ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and US Special Envoy Keith Kellogg attend the Turkey-US-Ukraine trilateral talks in Istanbul, Turkey, May 16, 2025. Photo: Arda Kucukkaya/Turkish Foreign Ministry/Handout via REUTERS
Tom Barrack, the US ambassador to Turkey, said on Friday he has assumed the role of special envoy to Syria, as the Trump administration moves to lift sanctions on the country.
Barrack said in a post on X that he would support US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in removing US sanctions on Syria after President Donald Trump made a landmark announcement earlier this month that Washington would unwind the measures.
“As President Trump’s representative in Türkiye, I am proud to assume the role of the US Special Envoy for Syria and support Secretary Rubio in the realization of the President’s vision,” Barrack said.
Barrack is a private equity executive who has long advised Trump and chaired his inaugural presidential committee in 2016.
Reuters reported earlier this week the US planned to appoint him as special envoy.
The move suggests US acknowledgement that Turkey has emerged with key regional influence on Damascus since rebels ousted Syria‘s former president Bashar al-Assad in December, ending 14 years of civil war.
Trump met with Syria‘s interim president Ahmed al-Sharaa in Saudi Arabia on May 14 and urged him to normalize ties with longtime foe Israel.
Barrack attended a US-Turkish meeting focused on Syria that was held in Washington on Tuesday, where sanctions relief and efforts to counter terrorism were discussed.
Removing US sanctions would clear the way for greater engagement by humanitarian organizations working in Syria, and ease foreign investment and trade as the country tries to rebuild.
“The cessation of sanctions against Syria will preserve the integrity of our primary objective – the enduring defeat of ISIS – and will give the people of Syria a chance for a better future,” Barrack said in the post on X.
ISIS refers to the Islamic State terrorist organization.
The post US Ambassador to Turkey Will Serve as Special Envoy to Syria first appeared on Algemeiner.com.