RSS
New York Times Blames Israel for West Bank Economic Misery, Omitting Crucial Context
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas attends the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, April 28, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Hamad I Mohammed
A front-page article in Sunday’s New York Times carried the online headline “Away from the War in Gaza, Another Palestinian Economy Is Wrecked.” It blamed Israel for ruining the livelihoods of West Bank Palestinians by curbing payments from the Israeli government to the Palestinian Authority (PA).
“In a recent report, the World Bank said that the authority’s financial health ‘has dramatically worsened in the last three months, significantly raising the risk of a fiscal collapse.’ It cited the ‘drastic reduction’ in tax transfers from Israel and ‘a massive drop in economic activity,’” the Times reported.
The Times referred to “measures to starve the Palestinian Authority of funds, pushed by far-right members of the Israeli government who want to annex the West Bank and resettle Gaza.” The newspaper said the measures “have alarmed the Biden administration,” whose officials “worry that an economic crash in the West Bank could lead to more violence.”
What the Times article omitted is that American and Israeli law restricts payments to the PA if it pays terrorists or their survivors for their acts against Israelis.
After Oct. 7, 2023, the Palestinian Authority stepped up payments to the families of hundreds of new “martyrs” and recognized thousands of new prisoners, detained terrorism suspects who are also eligible for payments from the PA. Itamar Marcus and Ephraim Tepler of the watchdog group Palestinian Media Watch, citing figures from the official Palestinian Authority news service WAFA, conservatively estimate the prisoner payments at about $16.4 million a month and the martyr payments at about $15 million a month. Martyrs also get a one-time reward or bonus payment. According to Marcus and Tepler, PA civil servants are getting by on 50 percent of their salaries, while the imprisoned terrorists are getting paid at the full rate.
In 2018, PA President Mahmoud Abbas said he’d prioritize the martyr and prisoner payments above any other expenditure. “Even if we have only a penny left, we will give it to the martyrs, the prisoners, and their families,” he said then. “We view the prisoners and the martyrs as planets and stars in the skies of the Palestinian struggle, and they have priority in everything.”
While polling in unfree areas isn’t always reliable, a survey from March 2024 indicated that 71 percent of West Bank Palestinians support the Oct. 7 attack on Israel, about the same level as Gaza Palestinians. Sixty-four percent of the West Bank Palestinians said they prefer Hamas to remain in control of Gaza.
Because the Times omitted the explanation for the withheld funds, the article made it sound like the Israelis were being cruel, vindictive, or, as the phrase “far-right,” suggested, extremist. It made it sound like those far-right Israelis were to blame for the Palestinians’ economic plight. Absent from the article was any suggestion that the Palestinians themselves could turn the situation around by making different decisions about prioritizing martyr payments and prisoner salaries.
It’s not clear why the Times didn’t mention any of this. The article did give a hint when it mentioned one source who “praises the Palestinian security forces, two of whose commanders were in the room monitoring the interview.”” The Times reporter, Steven Erlanger, who once, while a Boston Globe reporter, survived being shot, is not easily intimidated. But you kind of wonder why he didn’t interview the Palestinian security forces about whether they were getting paid in full, and whether they agree that they should take a back seat to martyrs and prisoners in the Palestinian Authority payroll prioritization scheme. Imagine how good an economy the Palestinians could have if they spent the money on education and economic development rather than corruption and subsidies for terrorists.
The Times article described Palestinians having a hard economic time. There are also plenty of Israelis, both Arabs and Jews, having a hard economic time because of the war. This Times article didn’t mention them. The underlying and unstated assumption of the Times has been that Palestinian Arab support for terrorism should be consequence-free for the Palestinian Arabs.
It’s a complicated situation, because economic suffering in the West Bank can hurt even those Palestinian Arabs who oppose Hamas and favor peace with Israel. If there’s a hope for peace, though, it’s in the idea that the Palestinians might eventually figure out that eradicating the terrorists, rather than subsidizing them, is the best path out of misery and toward prosperity. For the Palestinians’ sake, for Israel’s sake, and for America’s sake, I hope the Palestinians do eventually come to that realization. It might well involve their having to read some newspaper other than The New York Times.
Ira Stoll was managing editor of The Forward and North American editor of The Jerusalem Post. His media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found here.
The post New York Times Blames Israel for West Bank Economic Misery, Omitting Crucial Context first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Syria’s Foreign Minister in Washington, a First in 25 Years
Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad Hassan al-Shibani speaks during a press conference in Moscow, Russia, July 31, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov/Pool
Syria’s foreign minister arrived in Washington on Thursday, the first official visit at that level in more than 25 years as the US makes a pro-Damascus policy push, lifting sanctions and mediating between the new Islamist rulers and Israel.
Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shibani will meet US lawmakers to discuss the lifting of remaining US sanctions on his country, Senator Lindsey Graham was quoted as saying by Axios. Two sources familiar with the trip confirmed the visit to Reuters.
It comes after some senior US diplomats focused on Syria were abruptly let go from their posts amid Washington‘s pivot, as the US seeks to integrate its longtime Syrian Kurdish allies with the central administration of President Ahmed al-Sharaa.
The United States has also been mediating between Israel and Syria. Sharaa, who is due to visit New York next week for the UN General Assembly, said negotiations to reach a security pact with Israel could yield results “in the coming days.”
The United States had placed crippling sanctions on Syria since 2011 after former President Bashar al-Assad, an ally of Iran and Russia, cracked down protests against him that triggered an almost 14-year civil war.
After he was toppled by Sharaa’s forces in a quick sweep in December, Washington and Damascus have been working to warm up ties, with US President Donald Trump announcing that he would move to lift the sanctions after meeting Sharaa in May.
RSS
Saudi Arabia, Nuclear-Armed Pakistan Sign Mutual Defense Pact
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif embrace each other on the day they sign a defense agreement, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Sept. 17, 2025. Photo: Saudi Press Agency/Handout via REUTERS
Saudi Arabia and nuclear–armed Pakistan signed a mutual defence pact late on Wednesday, significantly strengthening a decades-old security partnership a week after Israel’s strikes on Qatar upended the diplomatic calculus in the region.
The enhanced defense ties come as Gulf Arab states grow increasingly wary about the reliability of the United States as a security guarantor.
Asked whether Pakistan would now be obliged to provide Saudi Arabia with a nuclear umbrella, a senior Saudi official told Reuters: “This is a comprehensive defensive agreement that encompasses all military means.”
Pakistan is the only nuclear–armed, Muslim-majority nation, and also fields the Islamic world’s largest army, which it has regularly said is focused on facing down neighboring foe India.
The agreement was the culmination of years of discussions, the Saudi official said when asked about the timing of the deal. “This is not a response to specific countries or specific events but an institutionalization of long-standing and deep cooperation between our two countries,” the official added.
Israel’s attempt on Sept. 9 to kill the political leaders of Hamas with airstrikes on Doha, while they were discussing a proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza that Qatar is helping to mediate, infuriated Arab countries.
Before the Gaza war, Gulf monarchies – US allies – had sought to stabilize ties with both Iran and Israel to resolve longstanding security concerns. Over the past year, Qatar has been subjected to direct hits twice, once by Iran and once by Israel.
Israel is widely understood to possess a sizeable nuclear arsenal but maintains a policy of nuclear ambiguity, neither confirming nor denying possessing such weapons.
Pakistan had said its nuclear weapons are only aimed, as a deterrent, against India, and its missiles are designed with a range to hit anywhere to its east in India.
NUCLEAR UMBRELLA
Pakistani state television showed Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the kingdom’s de facto ruler, embracing after signing the agreement. Also there was Pakistan‘s army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, regarded as the country’s most powerful person.
“The agreement states that any aggression against either country shall be considered an aggression against both,” a statement from the Pakistani prime minister’s office said.
Pakistan‘s decades-old alliance with Saudi Arabia – the site of Islam’s holiest sites – is rooted in shared faith, strategic interests and economic interdependence.
Pakistan has long had soldiers deployed in Saudi Arabia, currently estimated at between 1,500 and 2,000 troops, providing operational, technical and training help to the Saudi military. That includes assistance to the Saudi air and land forces.
Saudi Arabia has loaned Pakistan $3 billion, a deal extended in December, to shore up its foreign exchange reserves.
The Saudi deal comes months after Pakistan fought a brief military conflict with India in May.
India’s ministry of external affairs spokesperson, Randhir Jaiswal said in a post on X on Thursday that India was aware of the development, and that it would study its implications for New Delhi’s security and for regional stability.
The senior Saudi official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, acknowledged the need to balance relations with Pakistan and India, also a nuclear power.
“Our relationship with India is more robust than it has ever been. We will continue to grow this relationship and seek to contribute to regional peace whichever way we can.”
Pakistan and India fought three major wars since the two countries were carved out of British colonial India in 1947.
After they both acquired nuclear weapons in the late 1990s, their conflicts have been more limited in scale because of the danger of nuclear assets coming into play.
RSS
UN Sanctions on Iran to Be Reimposed, France’s Macron Says
French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, Sept. 15, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/Pool
European powers will likely reimpose international sanctions on Iran by the end of the month after their latest round of talks with Tehran aimed at preventing them were deemed not serious, France’s President Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday.
Britain, France, and Germany, the so-called E3, launched a 30-day process at the end of August to reimpose UN sanctions. They set conditions for Tehran to meet during September to convince them to delay the “snapback mechanism.”
The offer by the E3 to put off the snapback for up to six months to enable serious negotiations is conditional on Iran restoring access for UN nuclear inspectors – who would also seek to account for Iran‘s large stock of enriched uranium – and engaging in talks with the US.
When asked in an interview on Israel’s Channel 12 whether the snapback was a done deal, Macron said:
“Yes. I think so because the latest news from the Iranians is not serious.”
E3 foreign ministers, the European Union foreign policy chief, and their Iranian counterpart held a phone call on Wednesday, in which diplomats on both sides said there had been no substantial progress, though the door was still open to try and reach a deal before the deadline expired.
The 15-member UN Security Council will vote on Friday on a resolution that would permanently lift UN sanctions on Iran – a move it is required to take after the E3 launched the process.
The resolution is likely to fail to get the minimum nine votes needed to pass, say diplomats, and if it did it would be vetoed by the United States, Britain, or France.