RSS
She lost a friend in Hamas’ attack. Then neighbors called for a boycott of her ‘ugly zio’ juice bar
When Brooklyn juice bar owner Reut Levi woke up in Israel on Oct. 7, the morning after a friend’s wedding near the Sea of Galilee, she saw she had missed 35 calls from her parents and over 100 push notifications from news outlets about Hamas’ attacks in the south. She soon learned that the terrorists had killed another friend of hers at the Nova music festival. Levi spent the next two weeks in her native Israel, grieving and worrying for her family’s safety.
The turmoil followed her home to Bedford-Stuyvesant, the Brooklyn neighborhood where she lives and opened Tamar Juice Bar in June.
Levi, 37, moved to what locals call Bed-Stuy 15 years ago, she said, because it seemed a safe, tolerant place for a lesbian like her, a person who feels most comfortable in multicultural places. In the few months since the juice bar opened, it had become somewhat of a neighborhood landmark, especially for young, queer Brooklynites.
But Levi learned after Oct. 7 that she has some neighbors who want to see her business fail, and that they said and wrote that it’s because she’s Israeli and Jewish.
“I didn’t expect this and I don’t feel safe anymore,” Levi said. “But I have no choice but to go on with what I’ve always done here.”
She also learned that she has friends she had never met before, mostly Jews and Israelis, who want her business to thrive in Bed-Stuy.
Her experience mirrors that of other business owners targeted since the beginning of the Israel-Hamas war because they are Israel, pro-Israel or Jewish, and comes at a time of spiking antisemitism in the U.S. and and globally. Vandals defaced the facade of Canter’s Deli in Los Angeles, for example. And a Greek diner on Long Island withstood a boycott after its owner flew the Israeli flag outside the restaurant and plastered its windows with posters of those kidnapped by Hamas. Business tanked until droves of customers angered by the boycott began eating there. Levi’s juice shop has also enjoyed such support, but she still wonders whether it can survive war in the Middle East.
‘They ain’t welcome here’
Levi knew Tamar Juice Bar might be vulnerable in the aftermath of Hamas’ attack, as Israel began retaliating in Gaza. Both she and her business partner Michal Mualem are Israeli, Tamar is one of the most popular names in Israel and their menu has a strong Middle Eastern flavor. Levi decided to post only on her personal Instagram account — not the juice bar’s. Most of her posts memorialized the victims of Oct. 7. She did not call for retribution.
“My political view is that I really wish that the people of Gaza will have the most beautiful life as soon as possible,” Levi told me as she lit a cigarette. “They can have it. They must have it.”
Reut Levi serving customers in Tamar Juice Bar in Brooklyn on Nov. 8, 2023. Photo by Camillo Barone
But last Saturday, one of Levi’s customers on Instagram accused her of supporting genocide and called for a boycott of the juice bar. “The same way we are asked to boycott big corporations participating in the oppression of black/brown, let’s keep the same energy with those promoting racism and support of genocide right under our noses,” the customer wrote, tagging the the juice bar’s profile so her followers would know which business to boycott.
Levi decided not to respond so as not to stoke the vitriol. But then other Instagram influencers in Bed-Stuy began posting photos of the juice bar and screenshots of its Instagram profile, with some seemingly inviting neighbors to harass Levi. “Don’t go to this trash ass place yall. Matter of fact feel free to let them know how much they ain’t welcome here,” wrote one.
They posts kept coming: “Bed-Stuy Neighbors Beware: Tamar Juice bar is a Zionist establishment;” “Liberation from apartheid, from colonizers, from occupiers in Bed-Stuy;” “There are ugly zio businesses in our very own neighborhoods who steal & appropriate Pali food & culture.”
The next day the action moved from online to the real world. A woman showed up outside the juice bar, Levi said, and began taking videos of her and calling her a “racist Zionist who supports genocide.” Reut locked herself in the bar and called the police, who told the woman to get away from the premises. A few hours later seven other women entered the bar without ordering anything. Levi said one of them asked her: “Are you the Israeli Jewish person here?” They laughed at her, frightened her “like never before,” Levi said. Shortly after they left she found stickers outside the juice bar calling for “Global Intifada.”
“I lived in Israel. I know what an Intifada is, and I can assure you it’s not a good thing,” Levi told me.
A future in Bed-Stuy?
Levi got the idea for her business when she first moved to the U.S. and began working at a mall in upstate New York managing two kiosks which sold smoothies and ice cream. One day, she decided, she would also sell smoothies, but infused with the flavors of Israel. Tamar Juice Bar — tamar means “date” in Hebrew — offers a date-flavored smoothie. Another is called “Chic or Shuk,” a reference to Middle Eastern markets. Spiced honey cake is also on the menu.
The juice bar seemed a good fit for the neighborhood, but after Saturday’s incident, Levi feared her five-month-old business was about to die.
Then, on Monday afternoon, customers began showing up by the dozens, not to heckle, but to order smoothies, encouraged in private Facebook groups by Israeli and Jewish New Yorkers who had heard that she was being doxxed. A rabbi from Brooklyn ordered ten juices for ten police officers, and made them aware of the harassment Levi faced.
As she and I spoke outside the juice bar earlier this week, an Israeli man installed security cameras inside and outside the business. “I had bought them months ago but always felt safe here, so I didn’t install them,” Levi told me. “Today, however, I’m afraid, and this Israeli guy offered to install them for me for free to make me feel safer.”
Levi, who has removed every symbol of Israel and Judaism she ever had in her shop, worries about its future.
“I didn’t want to bring politics here. Jews and Israelis from all over New York have been coming in this week, but what will happen when they leave? Will my old customers from the neighborhood come back?”
The post She lost a friend in Hamas’ attack. Then neighbors called for a boycott of her ‘ugly zio’ juice bar appeared first on The Forward.
RSS
Colorado Attack Suspect Charged with Assault, Use of Explosives
FILE PHOTO: Boulder attack suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman poses for a jail booking photograph after his arrest in Boulder, Colorado, U.S. June 2, 2025. Photo: Boulder Police Department/Handout via REUTERS
A suspect in an attack on a pro-Israeli rally in Colorado that injured eight people was being held on Monday on an array of charges, including assault and the use of explosives, in lieu of a $10-million bail, according to Boulder County records.
The posted list of felony charges against suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, in the attack on Sunday also includes charges of murder in the first degree, although police in the city of Boulder have said on social media that no victims died in the attack. Authorities could not be reached immediately to clarify.
Witnesses reported the suspect used a makeshift flamethrower and threw an incendiary device into the crowd. He was heard to yell “Free Palestine” during the attack, according to the FBI, in what the agency called a “targeted terror attack.”
Four women and four men between 52 and 88 years of age were transported to hospitals after the attack, Boulder Police said.
The attack took place on the Pearl Street Mall, a popular pedestrian shopping district near the University of Colorado, during an event organized by Run for Their Lives, an organization devoted to drawing attention to the hostages seized in the aftermath of Hamas’ 2023 attack on Israel.
Rabbi Yisroel Wilhelm, the Chabad director at the University of Colorado, Boulder, told CBS Colorado that the 88-year-old victim was a Holocaust refugee who fled Europe.
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said Soliman had entered the country in August 2022 on a tourist visa that expired in February 2023. He filed for asylum in September 2022. “The suspect, Mohamed Soliman, is illegally in our country,” the spokesperson said.
The FBI raided and searched Soliman’s home in El Paso County, Colorado, the agency said on social media. “As this is an ongoing investigation, no additional information is available at this time.”
The attack in Boulder was the latest act of violence aimed at Jewish Americans linked to outrage over Israel’s escalating military offensive in Gaza. It followed the fatal shooting of two Israel Embassy aides that took place outside Washington’s Capital Jewish Museum last month.
Ron Halber, CEO of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington, said after the shooting there was a question of how far security perimeters outside Jewish institutions should extend.
Boulder Police said they would hold a press conference later on Monday to discuss details of the Colorado attack.
The Denver office of the FBI, which is handling the case, did not immediately respond to emails or phone calls seeking clarification on the homicide charges or other details in the case.
Officials from the Boulder County Jail, Boulder Police and Boulder County Sheriff’s Office did not immediately respond to inquiries.
The post Colorado Attack Suspect Charged with Assault, Use of Explosives first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Iran Poised to Dismiss US Nuclear Proposal, Iranian Diplomat Says
Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi attends a press conference following a meeting with Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Moscow, Russia, April 18, 2025. Photo: Tatyana Makeyeva/Pool via REUTERS
Iran is poised to reject a US proposal to end a decades-old nuclear dispute, an Iranian diplomat said on Monday, dismissing it as a “non-starter” that fails to address Tehran’s interests or soften Washington’s stance on uranium enrichment.
“Iran is drafting a negative response to the US proposal, which could be interpreted as a rejection of the US offer,” the senior diplomat, who is close to Iran’s negotiating team, told Reuters.
The US proposal for a new nuclear deal was presented to Iran on Saturday by Omani Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr Albusaidi, who was on a short visit to Tehran and has been mediating talks between Tehran and Washington.
After five rounds of discussions between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and President Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, several obstacles remain.
Among them are Iran’s rejection of a US demand that it commit to scrapping uranium enrichment and its refusal to ship abroad its entire existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium – possible raw material for nuclear bombs.
Tehran says it wants to master nuclear technology for peaceful purposes and has long denied accusations by Western powers that it is seeking to develop nuclear weapons.
“In this proposal, the US stance on enrichment on Iranian soil remains unchanged, and there is no clear explanation regarding the lifting of sanctions,” said the diplomat, who declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter.
Araqchi said Tehran would formally respond to the proposal soon.
Tehran demands the immediate removal of all US-imposed curbs that impair its oil-based economy. But the US says nuclear-related sanctions should be removed in phases.
Dozens of institutions vital to Iran’s economy, including its central bank and national oil company, have been blacklisted since 2018 for, according to Washington, “supporting terrorism or weapons proliferation.”
Trump’s revival of “maximum pressure” against Tehran since his return to the White House in January has included tightening sanctions and threatening to bomb Iran if the negotiations yield no deal.
During his first term in 2018, Trump ditched Tehran’s 2015 nuclear pact with six powers and reimposed sanctions that have crippled Iran’s economy. Iran responded by escalating enrichment far beyond the pact’s limits.
Under the deal, Iran had until 2018 curbed its sensitive nuclear work in return for relief from US, EU and U.N. economic sanctions.
The diplomat said the assessment of “Iran’s nuclear negotiations committee,” under the supervision of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was that the US proposal was “completely one-sided” and could not serve Tehran’s interests.
Therefore, the diplomat said, Tehran considers this proposal a “non-starter” and believes it unilaterally attempts to impose a “bad deal” on Iran through excessive demands.
NUCLEAR STANDOFF RAISES MIDDLE EAST TENSIONS
The stakes are high for both sides. Trump wants to curtail Tehran’s potential to produce a nuclear weapon that could trigger a regional nuclear arms race and perhaps threaten Israel. Iran’s clerical establishment, for its part, wants to be rid of the devastating sanctions.
Iran says it is ready to accept some limits on enrichment, but needs watertight guarantees that Washington would not renege on a future nuclear accord.
Two Iranian officials told Reuters last week that Iran could pause uranium enrichment if the US released frozen Iranian funds and recognized Tehran’s right to refine uranium for civilian use under a “political deal” that could lead to a broader nuclear accord.
Iran’s arch-foe Israel sees Iran’s nuclear program as an existential threat and says it would never allow Tehran to obtain nuclear weapons.
Araqchi, in a joint news conference with his Egyptian counterpart in Cairo, said: “I do not think Israel will commit such a mistake as to attack Iran.”
Tehran’s regional influence has meanwhile been diminished by military setbacks suffered by its forces and those of its allies in the Shi’ite-dominated “Axis of Resistance,” which include Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis in Yemen, and Iraqi militias.
In April, Saudi Arabia’s defence minister delivered a blunt message to Iranian officials to take Trump’s offer of a new deal seriously as a way to avoid the risk of war with Israel.
The post Iran Poised to Dismiss US Nuclear Proposal, Iranian Diplomat Says first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
The Islamist Crescent: A New Syrian Danger
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa speaks during a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron after a meeting at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, May 7, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Stephanie Lecocq/Pool
The dramatic fall of the Assad regime in Syria has undeniably reshaped the Middle East, yet the emerging power dynamics, particularly the alignment between Saudi Arabia and Turkey, warrant profound scrutiny from those committed to American and Israeli security. While superficially presented as a united front against Iranian influence, this new Sunni axis carries a dangerous undercurrent of Islamism and regional ambition that could ultimately undermine, rather than serve, the long-term interests of Washington and Jerusalem.
For too long, Syria under Bashar al-Assad served as a critical conduit for Iran’s destabilizing agenda, facilitating arms transfers to Hezbollah and projecting Tehran’s power across the Levant. The removal of this linchpin is, on the surface, a strategic victory. However, the nature of the new Syrian government, led by Ahmed al-Sharaa — a figure Israeli officials continue to view with deep suspicion due to his past as a former Al-Qaeda-linked commander — raises immediate red flags. This is not merely a change of guard; it is a shift that introduces a new set of complex challenges, particularly given Turkey’s historical support for the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization deemed a terror group by Saudi Arabia and many other regional states.
Israel’s strategic calculus in Syria has always been clear: to degrade Iran’s military presence, prevent Hezbollah from acquiring advanced weaponry, and maintain operational freedom in Syrian airspace. Crucially, Israel has historically thought it best to have a decentralized, weak, and fragmented Syria, with reports that it has actively worked against the resurgence of a robust central authority. This preference stems from a pragmatic understanding that a strong, unified Syria, especially one under the tutelage of an ambitious regional power like Turkey, could pose much more of a threat than the Assad regime ever did. Indeed, Israeli defense officials privately express concern at Turkey’s assertive moves, accusing Ankara of attempting to transform post-war Syria into a Turkish protectorate under Islamist tutelage. This concern is not unfounded; Turkey’s ambitious, arguably expansionist, objectives — and its perceived undue dominance in Arab lands — are viewed by Israel as warily as Iran’s previous influence.
The notion that an “Ottoman Crescent” is now replacing the “Shiite Crescent” should not be celebrated as a net positive. While it may diminish Iranian power, it introduces a new form of regional hegemony, one driven by an ideology that has historically been antithetical to Western values and stability. The European Union’s recent imposition of sanctions on Turkish-backed Syrian army commanders for human rights abuses, including arbitrary killings and torture, further underscores the problematic nature of some elements within this new Syrian landscape. The fact that al-Sharaa has allowed such individuals to operate with impunity and even promoted them to high-ranking positions should give Washington pause.
From an American perspective, while the Trump administration has pragmatically engaged with the new Syrian government, lifting sanctions and urging normalization with Israel, this engagement must be tempered with extreme caution. The core American interests in the Middle East — counterterrorism, containment of Iran, and regional stability — are not served by empowering Islamist-leaning factions or by enabling a regional power, like Turkey, whose actions have sometimes undermined the broader fight against ISIS. Washington must demand that Damascus demonstrate a genuine commitment to taking over the counter-ISIS mission and managing detention facilities, and unequivocally insist that Turkey cease actions that risk an ISIS resurgence.
The argument that Saudi Arabia and Turkey, despite their own complex internal dynamics, are simply pragmatic actors countering Iran overlooks the ideological underpinnings that concern many conservatives. Turkey’s ruling party, rooted in political Islam, and its historical ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, present a fundamental challenge to the vision of a stable, secular, and pro-Western Middle East. While Saudi Arabia has designated the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, its alignment with Turkey in Syria, and its own internal human rights record, means that this “new front” is far from a clean solution.
The Saudi-Turkey alignment in Syria is a double-edged sword. While it may indeed serve to counter Iran’s immediate regional ambitions, it simultaneously risks empowering actors whose long-term objectives and ideological leanings are deeply problematic for American, Israeli, and Western interests. Washington and Jerusalem must approach this new dynamic with extreme vigilance, prioritizing the containment of all forms of radicalism — whether Shiite or Sunni — and ensuring that any strategic gains against Iran do not inadvertently pave the way for a new, equally dangerous, Islamist crescent to rise in the heart of the Levant.
Amine Ayoub, a fellow at the Middle East Forum, is a policy analyst and writer based in Morocco. Follow him on X: @amineayoubx
The post The Islamist Crescent: A New Syrian Danger first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login