Connect with us

RSS

The Empire State of Jew Hate

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul delivering remarks on major legislation requiring colleges and universities in the state to strengthen hate crime policies. Photo: Darren McGee/Office of Governor Kathy Hochul

Anti-Jewish hate crimes in New York City are multiplying. That’s the takeaway from last week’s release of the NYPD’s end-of-year crime report, showing that of the 641 hate crimes documented by the police in 2024, 54 percent targeted Jews. 

That Jews comprise nearly 12 percent of New York City’s population, yet account for over half of the region’s hate crimes, suggests a failure on the part of politicians, including Governor Kathy Hochul (D) and New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D), to address anti-Jewish animus with the urgency and immediacy it warrants. 

The report’s findings are attributed to a confluence of factors, which include weak leaders who are more inclined to defend criminals than protect Jews, and demographic shifts caused by a migration of students and citizens from countries that are hostile to Judeo-Christian interests.  

As such, the statistics in the NYPD report should surprise no one — especially Jewish New Yorkers, whose encounters with antisemitism can occur at any time and on any avenue.

Whether it’s coming across a poster with a swastika scrawled across a Jewish hostage, or walking past a cohort of keffiyeh-clad agitators who threaten and shout vile hate at anyone perceived as Jewish or pro-Israel, it’s clear that antisemitism is going unchallenged in New York City.

Once thought to be minor conflagrations confined to the Orthodox enclaves of Crown Heights and Borough Park, a resistance to confronting antisemitism with meaningful action has activated a generation of dangerous and emboldened pro-terror supporters.

And no Jew is off-limits.

Over the past year, older Jews have been spit on while walking the streets, and other innocents have been harassed while riding the subway.

In October, the co-chair of the Democratic Majority for Israel, Todd Richman, was assaulted by an antisemitic mob, leaving him bloodied and bruised. Over the last year, up to thousands of morally bankrupt disruptors have found it perfectly acceptable to block NYC streets, shut down bridges, and hurl their genocidal screeds outside of hospitals treating cancer patients grappling with significant illnesses. 

Mayor Adams has repeatedly condemned antisemitism and expressed concern over the violent tenor of the pro-terror rallies. He has joined Jewish New Yorkers to advocate for Israel, and has met with some of New York’s Jewish university students to discuss their experiences with campus Jew hate — something that the state’s Jewish senior Senator, Chuck Schumer, has yet to do. 

But performative displays of outrage are no substitute for a strong police response, something that the Mayor remains reluctant to deploy. At a roundtable for Jewish reporters last month, The New York Post noted that Mayor Adams told one attendee that there’s a need “for real balance to allow peaceful protests and violent protests.” 

When asked about what steps the city can take to tackle anti-Jewish hate, the Mayor responded, “we’re not going to be able to police our way out of this,” and that “you’re still going to have that hate after being arrested.” 

This statement lies at the crux of why antisemitic incidents are rising in NYC, as well as in other Blue state bastions that resist using the law to deter antisemitic criminals. 

Liberal lawmakers like Adams, who may retain genuine affection for his Jewish constituents, are wedded to upholding weak-kneed policies that demonstrate fealty to a progressive dogma rather than a commitment to protecting Jews. 

Like Mayor Adams, Governor Kathy Hochul has talked tough before Jewish audiences at synagogues and ceremonies, yet takes next to no prescriptive measures to combat the Jew hatred in her state. (Although one should ask how allowing hate crimes against Jews to be tolerated is actually “progressive.”)

For months, Governor Hochul has distanced herself from her previous half-hearted support for reinstating an anti-masking law, a move implemented in Republican-led Nassau County over the summer. This law is important, because removing an attacker’s anonymity would be the first step in helping reduce anti-Jewish hate crimes. 

The statistics cited in the NYPD’s report also raise an issue that discomfits the liberal disposition of many New Yorkers — who remark that the rise in antisemitic attacks would have been unthinkable 10 or 20 years ago. And they’re correct.

A combination of a marked surge in foreign student enrollment in the city’s universities, coupled with “asylum seekers” manipulating America’s loosening refugee asylum laws to gain entry into the country, is part of what’s driving the political and cultural transformation of NYC. 

New York City is home to the largest Muslim population in the United States, and Mayor Adams has intimated that his administration has worked to divert antisemitic protests away from Jewish neighborhoods. Still, when NYC’s antisemitic violence is being stoked by influential agitators who are foreign born, it must be acknowledged that the changing demographics of the city have also contributed to the altering social order of NYC. 

And while there are many American Muslims who are patriotic and upstanding contributors to our country, there still exists a notable number of Muslim Americans rooted in an anti-Jewish belief system. A Pew poll in the aftermath of the October 7 massacre in Israel revealed that 49% of American Muslims agreed that “Hamas’s reasons for fighting Israel are valid.” 

Jewish Americans must adapt to the evolving political and societal realities by lobbying our elected officials to do more to combat NYC’s disturbing spike in antisemitic assaults. 

Jewish New Yorkers must cease behaving like unwanted stepchildren who are grateful and satiated with the slightest words of support from politicians whose policies simultaneously create conditions that render the city hostile for Jews. Democratic leaders in the state must stop their second-class treatment of Jewish Americans, whose many contributions to this country began in a city that is slowly turning its back on them. 

Irit Tratt is a pro-Israel and American advocate residing in New York. Follow her on X @Irit_Tratt

The post The Empire State of Jew Hate first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Post Views: 412
Related Topics:
Continue Reading

RSS

Charlie Kirk Sought to Encourage Debate — His Murder Must Not Stop It

Charlie Kirk speaking at the inauguration of Donald Trump in January 2025. Photo: Brian Snyder via Reuters Connect

I first became familiar with Charlie Kirk after October 7, 2023, when my TikTok algorithm began showing me videos of him fiercely, and quite effectively, debating students on college campuses, often those in keffiyehs and with purple hair.

Thus began my fascination with what I soon learned was a man who was dedicating his life to debating and promoting what he believed in.

Charlie Kirk was the face of the young Republican movement, respected even by some Democrats. He had a promising future ahead of him. As Ben Shapiro wrote: “That kid is going to be the head of the Republican National Convention one day.”

Kirk dedicated his life to debate. To disagreement. To hearing the other side and persuading with facts and truth. And this, tragically, cost him his life. His assassination represents the meager and devastating state of the West, a state we have slowly, almost willingly, been accepting for years now.

There is a deep intolerance for differences. People do not want to be persuaded. They do not want to consider another perspective. Instead, they condemn what they believe is wrong, clinging to black-and-white narratives, even when an entire gray area holds the broader picture. They turn their heads away from nuance. Kirk aimed to change that. He devoted his life to it, fully aware of the risks.

As Adam Rubenstein wisely wrote for The Free Press: “Kirk was not naïve. In the video after he is shot, you can see a security team of at least half a dozen bodyguards surround him and spirit him away. Like anyone speaking their mind in public these days, he knew there was a risk.”

Kirk’s assassination signifies a low point for this country — and another attack on free speech. It was an assassination of dialogue, of diplomacy, of the ability to disagree without destruction. And perhaps the most bitter irony is that it all happened on a college campus, an environment that should foster growth mindsets and open-mindedness.

This attack was not only an attack on Charlie Kirk. It was an attack on freedom of thought and expression. And while it succeeded in killing the bright and young 31-year-old so many of us admired, I hope that is a rallying call to protect the broader freedom of speech we still enjoy — at least in part — in this country.

Alma Bengio is Chief Growth Officer at The Algemeiner Journal and founder and writer for @lets.talk.conflict

Post Views: 8
Continue Reading

RSS

Jews Are Indigenous to the Land of Israel — and Everyone Should Know It

The Western Wall and Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Few words in modern political discourse carry as much distortion as “Palestine.” Today, the term is wielded not as history but as a weapon — designed to delegitimize the Jewish State and recast Jews as foreign colonizers in their own homeland.

Take away the propaganda, however, and one unshakable truth remains: the Jewish people are the indigenous nation of the Land of Israel. The Arab claim to “Palestinian indigeneity” simply does not line up with history.

The Jewish people trace their roots back over 3,000 years to the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, who lived in the land of Canaan — later Israel. By the time of King David, Jerusalem was the capital of a united monarchy, and Solomon’s Temple stood as the spiritual and political center of Jewish life. Even after the Babylonian exile, Jews returned, rebuilt, and re-established their national life in Judea.

Despite invasions, destruction, and exile, Jews never abandoned their homeland. They remained in Jerusalem, Galilee, Hebron, Safed, and along the coast. Their prayers, rituals, and festivals kept the bond to Zion alive. This is not the story of outsiders — it is the story of the land’s first and most enduring nation.

Rome tried to sever that bond by force. After the Bar Kokhba revolt in the second century, Emperor Hadrian renamed Judea as Syria Palaestina , borrowing the name of the long-vanished Philistines, and turned Jerusalem into Aelia Capitolina. It was an act of erasure, meant to punish the Jews by striking even their name from the map.

But the attempt failed. Jews continued to live, pray, and return to their ancestral soil. A new label could not undo thousands of years of rootedness.

The Arab story is very different; their origins lie in the Arabian Peninsula. The earliest records available to us describe nomadic tribes in Arabia and the Syrian desert. Their cultural centers were Mecca, Medina, Yemen, and Petra. It was only in the 7th century, with the rise of Islam, that Arab armies exploded out of Arabia and conquered the region. By 636 CE, they had invaded Byzantine Judea; within a century they ruled from Spain to Persia. Their presence in Judea was the result of conquest, not continuity.

For over a thousand years, under successive empires — Umayyad, Abbasid, Crusader, Mamluk, Ottoman, and finally British — the local Arab population never called itself “Palestinian.” They identified as Arabs, Muslims, Christians, or by their city and clan. In fact, during the British Mandate, the word Palestinian referred almost exclusively to Jews: the Palestine Post was a Jewish newspaper, the Palestine Symphony Orchestra was Jewish, and the Palestine Brigade that fought in World War II was Jewish.

Many Arabs in the region rejected the label, insisting instead that they were part of greater Syria or the wider Arab nation.

Only in the mid-20th century, particularly under Yasser Arafat and the PLO, did a separate “Palestinian” identity emerge. It was born not from centuries of shared history but from a political need: to create a narrative that could challenge Jewish nationhood and delegitimize Israel. It was, and remains, a tool of war by other means.

This is the historical bottom line: Jews are the only people with an unbroken, 3,000 year bond to the Land of Israel. The name Palestine was a Roman punishment, not an Arab heritage. Arabs arrived in the 7th century as conquerors from Arabia. The idea of a Palestinian people is a modern invention, forged in the 20th century as part of a political campaign against the Jewish State.

Israel is not a colonial project. It is the restoration of an ancient nation to its ancestral homeland. Jews are not foreigners in Judea; they are Judea’s people. By every measure — historical, cultural, and even genetic — the Jewish nation’s claim is authentic, continuous, and undeniable.

Sabine Sterk is the CEO of Time To Stand Up For Israel.

Post Views: 5
Continue Reading

RSS

Israel Attacked Terrorists in Qatar — and the Media Attacked Israel

Vehicles stop at a red traffic light, a day after an Israeli attack on Hamas leaders, in Doha, Qatar, Sept. 10, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa

On Tuesday, September 9, Israel targeted those who sought its destruction and planned the barbaric October 7, 2023 massacre.

Israel launched the daring attack on the Hamas leadership in their Qatari safe haven, after their ongoing refusal to agree to a Gaza ceasefire deal and in the aftermath of a deadly terror attack in Jerusalem, which Hamas claimed responsibility for.

But the media still shilled for Hamas by making Israel look like a rogue state attacking a key diplomatic player and destroying any chance for peace.

News outlets used three methods to achieve this goal:

  • Direct accusations
  • Subtle differentiation between a “legitimate” Hamas political wing and its military one
  • The glorification of Qatar as a business hub rather than a terrorist hub

The Independent and The Washington Post shamelessly employed headlines that portrayed Israel as the regional bully and an aggressor randomly attacking other Middle East countries in a bid for regional domination.

Sky News even blamed Israel for a previous attack on Qatar, although the Iranian regime carried it out:

After we publicly highlighted it, Sky quietly rectified its faux pas with no acknowledgment of the correction.

Meanwhile, the Economist was worried that attacking the very terrorists who ordered the mass murder of Jews on Oct. 7 was “a bridge too far” and that Israel had “crossed a line:”

And the BBC’s security correspondent called Israel’s surprising act of self defense “a campaign of score settling:”

NPR and The Wall Street Journal took the subtle approach of creating a false dichotomy between Hamas’ military and political wings — although the entire group is internationally designated as a terror organization.

This naive approach depicted the targeted Hamas leaders as legitimate officials simply because they carried pens and wore suits instead of AK-47s and green headbands.

They may not have got their hands dirty but this does not absolve them from orchestrating numerous bloody terror attacks, including the slaughter and kidnapping of thousands of people in Israel on October 7, 2023.

Finally, many outlets decried the violation of Qatar’s sovereignty, painting it as a peace-seeking state focused on business and regional cooperation, rather than a patron of terrorists.

The New York Times went as far as calling Qatar “a safe haven for business and tourism in a volatile region,” while it was, in fact, a safe haven for the region’s top jihadists.

How can this media distortion be explained? Why is a facade of legitimacy conferred upon terrorists in suits?

There are only two possible answers: Either the media believe the facade the terrorists want to sell, or they are carrying out an anti-Israel agenda.

Both options are detrimental to professional journalism, as well as to basic human ethics.

The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.

Post Views: 9
Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News