RSS
The New Orleans Attack and Hamas’ October 7 Massacre Share the Same Ideology and Motivation
Shamsud-Din Jabbar, a suspect in the New Orleans attack, is seen in this picture obtained from social media, released in November 2013, in Fort Johnson (formerly Fort Polk), Louisiana, US, 1st Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division via Facebook via REUTERS
The tragic terror attack in New Orleans on New Year’s Day is yet another reminder of the persistent threat of extremist ideologies in the West. While the immediate focus is on this horrific event, it’s crucial that we don’t allow such incidents, often labeled as “lone wolf” attacks, to overshadow the broader issue of radical Islamism, which continues to challenge Western societies.
The terrorist’s actions, carried out hours after posting videos expressing a desire to kill people and featuring ISIS symbols, highlight the ideological motivations behind these attacks. While the FBI has not confirmed a direct ISIS affiliation, the presence of ISIS-related imagery and the killer’s premeditated plan signal a deeper ideological commitment to terror. The attack also involved firearms and improvised explosive devices (IEDs), showcasing the deadly, calculated nature of these assaults.
However, the “lone wolf” label can be misleading. While these individuals may act alone in execution, they are often driven by powerful ideologies. Islamism, a radical political ideology advocating for the establishment of an Islamic state under Sharia law, continues to thrive in certain segments of Western societies. This ideology, which justifies violence as a means of achieving political goals, is not confined to isolated groups or individuals — it is a growing threat.
This issue was starkly brought into focus in October 2023, with the Hamas-led massacre in Israel. On October 7, Hamas militants launched an unprecedented assault, killing approximately 1,200 people and taking hundreds of hostages. This attack, one of the deadliest in recent memory and the worst in Israel’s histoy, was not an isolated incident, but part of Hamas’ long-standing agenda to destroy Israel and establish an Islamic state. The brutality of October 7 is just one example of the kind of radicalism promoted by Islamist groups like Hamas, whose violent methods echo those of ISIS and other extremist organizations.
The ideology driving groups like Hamas and ISIS shares a goal: the imposition of their version of Islam through violent means. These ideologies promote terror as a political tool. Whether through organized groups like Hamas or individuals radicalized in the West, the core motivation remains the same: a radical, uncompromising vision of Islam that justifies violence to achieve its goals.
This form of radical Islamism, while often dismissed as an issue confined to the Middle East, has spread globally. In Western countries, it is particularly alarming to see these ideologies gaining traction in local communities, leading to violent acts carried out by individuals like the New Orleans killer.
The problem with this kind of Islamism is that it does not merely present an ideological challenge — it is inherently violent. The radicalization process, whether it occurs in a war zone or in Western cities, is fueled by extremist interpretations of Islam. While the majority of Muslims do not subscribe to these beliefs, the existence of such ideologies within the Muslim community creates a dangerous undercurrent that must be addressed.
In the aftermath of the New Year’s attack, President Joe Biden and local authorities prioritized swift action and investigation. However, addressing the underlying problem of radical Islamism requires more than just focusing on individual attacks. Governments must confront the broader networks of influence that enable these ideologies to thrive. Whether it’s ISIS, Hamas, or lone-wolf attackers, they are all products of the same ideological machinery that promotes radicalism.
The rise of radical Islamism requires a coordinated global response. This includes intelligence-sharing among nations and improved efforts to monitor and prevent radicalization within communities. The use of social media by extremists highlights the importance of monitoring online platforms for signs of radicalization. However, questions remain about whether Western societies are doing enough to act on such signals in real-time.
Moreover, Western countries must ensure that Muslim communities are not isolated or preyed upon by extremist groups. Integration — socially, economically, and politically — helps prevent disenfranchised individuals from turning to violent ideologies. Community engagement, education, and open dialogue between Muslim leaders and broader society can foster an environment that isolates radical elements and promotes a peaceful, inclusive vision of Islam.
The role of the media also cannot be overstated. While it is natural to focus on the details of an attack, it is equally important to address the broader ideological threat posed by Islamism. The media often highlights the individual perpetrator, but the real issue lies in the ideas that drive these attacks.
While the attack in New Orleans is tragic and demands full attention, we must not let it distract from the broader issue of radical Islamism in the West. Only by addressing the root causes of this violence can we hope to prevent future tragedies, and ensure a safer, more inclusive world for everyone.
The post The New Orleans Attack and Hamas’ October 7 Massacre Share the Same Ideology and Motivation first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
US State Department Revokes Visas of UK Punk Rap Act Bob Vylan Amid Outrage Over Duo’s Chants of ‘Death to the IDF’
Bob Vylan music duo performance at Glastonbury Festival (Source: FLIKR)
The US State Department has revoked the visas for the English punk rap duo Bob Vylan amid ongoing outrage over their weekend performance at the Glastonbury Festival, in which the pair chanted “Death to the IDF.”
The State Department’s decision to cancel their visas would preclude a planned fall concert tour of the US by the British rappers.
“The [US State Department] has revoked the US visas for the members of the Bob Vylan band in light of their hateful tirade at Glastonbury, including leading the crowd in death chants. Foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors to our country,” Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau wrote on X/Twitter on Monday.
During a June 28 set at Glastonbury Festival, Bob Vylan’s Pascal Robinson-Foster ignited a firestorm by leading the crowd in chants of “Death, death, to the IDF,” referring to the Israel Defense Forces. He also complained about working for a “f—ing Zionist” during the set.
The video of the performance went viral, sparking outrage across the globe.
The BBC, which streamed the performance live, issued an on‑screen warning but continued its broadcast, prompting criticism by government officials for failing to cut the feed.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer and festival organizers condemned the IDF chant as hate speech and incitement to violence. The Israeli Embassy in London denounced the language as “inflammatory and hateful.”
“Millions of people tuned in to enjoy Glastonbury this weekend across the BBC’s output but one performance within our livestreams included comments that were deeply offensive,” the BBC said in a statement following the event.
“These abhorrent chants, which included calls for the death of members of the Israeli Defense Forces … have no place in any civil society,” Leo Terrell, Chair of the US Department of Justice Task Force to Combat Antisemitism, declared Sunday in a statement posted on X.
Citing the act’s US tour plans, Terrell said his task force would be “reaching out to the U.S. Department of State on Monday to determine what measures are available to address the situation and to prevent the promotion of violent antisemitic rhetoric in the United States.”
British authorities, meanwhile, have launched a formal investigation into Bob Vylan’s controversial appearance at Glastonbury. Avon and Somerset Police confirmed they are reviewing footage and working with the Crown Prosecution Service to determine whether the performance constitutes a hate crime or incitement to violence.
United Talent Agency (UTA), one of the premier entertainment talent agencies, dropped the duo, claming “antisemitic sentiments expressed by the group were utterly unacceptable.”
The band defended their performance on social media as necessary protest, stating that “teaching our children to speak up for the change they want and need is the only way that we make this world a better place.”
The post US State Department Revokes Visas of UK Punk Rap Act Bob Vylan Amid Outrage Over Duo’s Chants of ‘Death to the IDF’ first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Dem House Leader Hakeem Jeffries Urges Mamdani to ‘Aggressively Address’ Antisemitism in NYC if Elected Mayor
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY). Photo: Wikimedia Commons.
US House Democratic leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (NY) urged Democratic nominee for mayor of New York Zohran Mamdani to “aggressively address the rise in antisemitism” if he wins the general election in November.
“‘Globalizing the intifada’ by way of example is not an acceptable phrasing,” Jeffries said Sunday on ABC’s This Week. “He’s going to have to clarify his position on that as he moves forward.”
“With respect to the Jewish communities that I represent, I think our nominee is going to have to convince folks that he is prepared to aggressively address the rise in antisemitism in the city of New York, which has been an unacceptable development,” he added.
Jeffries’s comments come as Mamdani has been receiving an onslaught of criticism for defending the controversial phrase “globalize the intifada.”
Mamdani first defended the phrase during an appearance on the popular Bulwark Podcast. The progressive firebrand stated that he feels “less comfortable with the banning of certain words.” He invoked the US Holocaust Museum in his defense, saying that the museum used the word intifada “when translating the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising into Arabic, because it’s a word that means ‘struggle.’”
The Holocaust Museum repudiated Mamdani in a statement, calling his comments “offensive.”
Mamdani has continued to defend the slogan despite ongoing criticism, arguing that pro-Palestine advocates perceive it as a call for “universal human rights.”
Mamdani, the 33‑year‑old state assembly member and proud democratic socialist, defeated former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and other candidates in a lopsided first‑round win in the city’s Democratic primary for mayor, notching approximately 43.5 percent of first‑choice votes compared to Cuomo’s 36.4 percent.
The election results have alarmed members of the local Jewish community, who expressed deep concern over his past criticism of Israel and defense of antisemitic rhetoric.
“Mamdani’s election is the greatest existential threat to a metropolitan Jewish population since the election of the notorious antisemite Karl Lueger in Vienna,” Rabbi Marc Schneier, one of the most prominent Jewish leaders in New York City, said in a statement. “Jewish leaders must come together as a united force to prevent a mass Jewish Exodus from New York City.”
Some key Democratic leaders in New York, such as US Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Gov. Kathy Hochul, have congratulated and complimented Mamdani, but have not yet issued an explicit endorsement. Each official has signaled interest in meeting with Mamdani prior to making a decision on a formal endorsement.
The post Dem House Leader Hakeem Jeffries Urges Mamdani to ‘Aggressively Address’ Antisemitism in NYC if Elected Mayor first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Israel Eyes Ties With Syria and Lebanon After Iran War
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar attends a press conference with German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul (not pictured) in Berlin, Germany, June 5, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Christian Mang
Israel is interested in establishing formal diplomatic relations with long-standing adversaries Syria and Lebanon, but the status of the Golan Heights is non-negotiable, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said on Monday.
Israeli leaders argue that with its rival Iran weakened by this month’s 12-day war, other countries in the region have an opportunity to forge ties with Israel.
The Middle East has been upended by nearly two years of war in Gaza, during which Israel also carried out airstrikes and ground operations in Lebanon targeting Iran-backed Hezbollah, and by the overthrow of former Syrian leader and Iran ally Bashar al-Assad.
In 2020, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Morocco became the first Arab states to establish ties with Israel since Jordan in 1994 and Egypt in 1979. The normalization agreements with Israel were deeply unpopular in the Arab world.
“We have an interest in adding countries such as Syria and Lebanon, our neighbors, to the circle of peace and normalization, while safeguarding Israel‘s essential and security interests,” Saar said at a press conference in Jerusalem.
“The Golan will remain part of the State of Israel,” he said.
Israel annexed the Golan Heights in 1981 after capturing the territory from Syria during the 1967 Six-Day War. While much of the international community regards the Golan as occupied Syrian land, US President Donald Trump recognized Israeli sovereignty over it during his first term in office.
Following Assad’s ousting, Israeli forces moved further into Syrian territory.
A senior Syrian official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Syria would never give up the Golan Heights, describing it as an integral part of Syrian territory.
The official also said that normalization efforts with Israel must be part of the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative and not carried out through a separate track.
A spokesperson for Syria‘s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
The 2002 initiative proposed Arab normalization with Israel in exchange for its withdrawal from territories including the Golan Heights, the West Bank, and Gaza. It also called for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.
Throughout the war in Gaza, regional power Saudi Arabia has repeatedly said that establishing ties with Israel was conditional on the creation of an independent Palestinian state.
Israel‘s Saar said it was “not constructive” for other states to condition normalization on Palestinian statehood.
“Our view is that a Palestinian state will threaten the security of the State of Israel,” he said.
In May, Reuters reported that Israel and Syria‘s new Islamist rulers had established direct contact and held face-to-face meetings aimed at de-escalating tensions and preventing renewed conflict along their shared border.
The same month, US President Donald Trump announced the US would lift sanctions on Syria and met Syria‘s new president, urging him to normalize ties with Israel.
The post Israel Eyes Ties With Syria and Lebanon After Iran War first appeared on Algemeiner.com.