Uncategorized
The quest to replace Park East Synagogue’s 92-year-old rabbi is not going smoothly
(New York Jewish Week) — More than a year after it attracted attention for the abrupt termination of its popular assistant rabbi, Manhattan’s Park East Synagogue was again the scene of a heated squabble on Sunday.
And like last time, the spat centered on who will succeed the Orthodox congregation’s 92-year-old spiritual leader, Rabbi Arthur Schneier.
In the time since the former assistant rabbi, Benjamin Goldschmidt, was ousted, no one has been appointed to take Schneier’s place after his tenure ends. The synagogue announced a search for a “worthy successor” to Schneier 11 months ago, and a public event on Sunday night was supposed to herald the next stage in that process. A candidate for the position, Rabbi Yitzchok Schochet, delivered an hour-long lecture to a crowd of 100 people, including members of the search committee.
But following the talk, the event held in the synagogue’s Charles Brooks Ballroom devolved into a verbal sparring match between Schochet, the rabbi of London’s Mill Hill Synagogue, and Kalman Sporn, a political consultant who describes himself as a “human rights activist.” Sporn questioned Schochet’s past outspoken opposition to same-sex relationships. Schochet claimed that Sporn was engaging in “cancel culture.”
“Park East’s bimah is New York’s hallowed ground for human dignity,” Sporn told the New York Jewish Week. “It must not become a pulpit for prejudice.”
Michael Scharf, who serves on the rabbinic search committee, told the Jewish Week in an emailed statement that Sporn’s comments were “disrespectful” to Schochet.
“Rabbi Schochet is a most distinguished Rabbi with a demonstrable record of great accomplishment, an incredible speaker, a true man of faith, and certainly not one who should be the subject of a smear and libelous campaign emanating from a group of nasty malcontents who obviously did not listen to Rabbi Schochet’s eloquent rejoinders to their issues,” Scharf wrote.
Rabbi Yitzchak Schochet spoke at Park East Synagogue on Sunday about the pursuit of happiness, when some synagogue members began to question him about his record on LGBTQ and Palestinian issues. (Zoom Screenshot)
The incident has prompted congregants to consider whether Schochet has the right temperament to lead a congregation that has hosted a succession of dignitaries, including Pope Benedict XVI. Critics say Schochet’s history of controversy, in addition to his response to being criticized on Sunday, do not accord with the synagogue’s self-image as a distinguished public forum.
And the drama Sunday night has raised the same question that has nagged at the synagogue for more than a year: Who is a fitting replacement for Schneier, a longtime religious freedom activist and former U.S. alternate representative at the United Nations?
Goldschmidt, who was popular among young congregants and was once seen by some as Schneier’s heir apparent, was fired in October 2021. He was subsequently derided by Schneier’s allies as lacking the education and gravitas needed to lead the synagogue. That dispute ended with Goldschmidt founding a breakaway congregation, the Altneu, which also meets on the Upper East Side and has attracted a growing membership.
“Park East has a problem where they really haven’t had a rabbi for many years,” said one member who, like several who discussed the synagogue’s internal debates, wished to remain anonymous. “We’re down on people coming on Saturday. The schools are a problem. Covid hurt us. [Rabbi Schnier] is 92, so on a day-to-day basis, he hasn’t really been involved.”
Schochet, 58, is a Chabad-affiliated rabbi who has held a number of prominent positions in British Jewish communal organizations. For three decades, he has been the rabbi of London’s Mill Hill United Synagogue, an 1,800-member Orthodox congregation in northwest London. According to a biography on the synagogue website, he has also served as the chairman of the Rabbinical Council of the United Kingdom’s United Synagogue, and as a member of the British Chief Rabbi’s cabinet.
But Schochet has also faced backlash for his comments about Palestinians and their supporters. In 2018, the British Holocaust Memorial Day Trust condemned Schochet for referring to Jews who said Kaddish for Palestinians as “kapos,” or Jews who served in positions of authority in Nazi concentration camps.
In 2015, Middle East Monitor, a pro-Palestinian media outlet, criticized Schochet for two tweets he had written four years earlier in response to a user called “Jew4Palestine.” In one, he wrote, “I have a spare Israeli flag if you want to hang yourself on it.” In the second, commenting on unemployment statistics in Gaza, he wrote, “Then again if you include terrorism as work, it’s 100% employed.” Soon afterward, Schochet was removed as a patron of a charity called Faith Matters.
At the meeting on Sunday, however, much of the criticism of Schochet revolved around his past public opposition to same-sex marriage. Jewish law has traditionally prohibited same-sex relationships, and refusing to conduct same-sex weddings remains normative practice among nearly all Orthodox rabbis.
In 2011, Schochet said that “the time-hallowed sacredness of marriage should always be preserved.” In 2012, the rabbi called gay marriage “an assault on religious values.” That same year, he penned an essay for PinkNews, an LGBTQ-focused publication, called “Homosexuality is prohibited in Orthodox Judaism but so is eating bacon, everyone is welcome.”
In 2014, England, Scotland and Wales legalized same-sex marriage. The following year, Schochet wrote that the Torah prohibits homosexual acts, but does not condemn a person for having homosexual feelings.
Schochet did not respond to a New York Jewish Week request for comment.
Sporn has posted tweets criticizing Schochet’s positions, and at the meeting on Sunday, brought up Schochet’s record of controversial statements during the question-and-answer portion of the event.
“I personally have been troubled by some of the positions you have taken in the past,” Sporn said. “You have openly fought efforts for marriage equality, while you want gay people to in your words feel reassured that they are always welcome into synagogues.”
Sporn was eventually cut off from using the microphone. Schochet responded, saying he had seen Sporn’s tweets. He said he had been invited to write an essay for PinkNews in 2012 “precisely because I was deemed as being the more moderate amongst all the Orthodox rabbis on gay issues.”
He added that the previous year, in a segment that aired on the BBC, he defended a gay couple who were denied access to a hotel room by a Christian owner. Schochet also said that a high-ranking member at his synagogue was gay.
“To everyone’s surprise, other than my own and those who know me to be a liberal conservative, I argued that everyone has a right to uphold their religious convictions without compromise,” Schochet wrote in a blog post about the BBC broadcast. “However, what you cannot do is look to impose those on others. That’s religious fundamentalism.”
In that same blog post, Schochet doubled down on his opposition to gay marriage. “If you choose to reject religion and lead a gay lifestyle, or conduct extra marital affairs, then frankly that is your business,” Schochet said. “That I choose to frown upon what you do because my G-d says it is wrong is very much my entitlement.”
Schochet then began to criticize Sporn, mentioning Sporn’s involvement in a scheme to apportion Catholic papal knighthoods for cash.
“You and I can go on canceling each other all night long,” Schochet said. “Cancel culture, which is the scourge and the malaise of our 21st century is, in the words of Barack Obama, scorched earth, partisan politics, where people we disagree with are maligned.”
(In 2019, regarding condemnations of people on social media, Obama said, “That’s not activism. That’s not bringing about change, if all you’re doing is casting stones, you’re probably not going to get that far. That’s easy to do.” A column on the Jewish website Aish.com about Obama’s comments does criticize “this scorched-earth partisan politics – where people with whom we disagree are denied a fair hearing and a voice in public life.”)
Schochet continued, “it divides families, it divides society, it tears apart relationships, it polarizes and pits people against one another. We may always be two Jews as indeed we are with three opinions, but we should always maintain one heart. I invite you to join me in that mission statement.”
When he finished, the crowd erupted into applause. The room became calm, until later, another member of the congregation, who did not use a microphone, stood up and confronted the rabbi about his exchange between him and Sporn — leading Schochet to apologize to Sporn.
“If I did embarrass you, I do genuinely apologize to you profusely and I hope you forgive me, and I mean that sincerely,” he said.
Addressing the crowd following the incident, Schneier — who has led Park East for more than 60 years — said, “When it comes to the selection of a rabbi, it is entirely up to the membership.”
“The purpose of Rabbi Schochet coming here with us, some of you did not have a chance to to hear him, to meet with him, and now I hope you get to know him a bit better,” Schneier said. “All kinds of rumors, forget about them.”
Schochet’s reaction to Sporn was “a personal attack,” the member who wished to remain anonymous said. He added that Schochet’s conduct did not reflect the decorum the synagogue strives to maintain.
“He ganged [the crowd] up in a mob mentality where they cheered for him,” the member told the Jewish Week. “Instead of answering the question, he attacked him. [Schochet] had such a great opportunity to be diplomatic. This guy is not diplomatic on an interview. Could you imagine if he had a contract? This is almost beyond belief.”
This member also said that Schochet is the only rabbi who has been brought to the synagogue by the search committee.
Another synagogue member told the Jewish Week that Sporn’s tweets attacking Schochet provided critical context for their exchange.
“It did not come across to me as embarrassing to Kalman,” the member said. “It came across to me as Rabbi Schochet saying that what you’re doing is being unfair.”
He added that what is getting lost amidst the squabble is that Park East “is looking for a rabbi.”
“Every member should have the opportunity to come and ask questions,” the member said. “The sense I had from people is that they got a really good understanding of where Rabbi Schochet stands on the issues. Yes, Kalman brought up an issue, and Rabbi Schochet apologized.”
That member said no decisions have been made thus far as to who will be hired.
Meanwhile, Avital Chizhik-Goldschmidt, the wife of Benjamin Goldschmidt, told the New York Jewish Week that the new synagogue they started is “only growing” and that she hasn’t followed developments at her husband’s old congregation.
“I really don’t have anything to do with that place,” Goldschmidt said of Park East Synagogue. “We have moved on.”
—
The post The quest to replace Park East Synagogue’s 92-year-old rabbi is not going smoothly appeared first on Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
Uncategorized
Secular Jews speak Yiddish in Israeli TV series ‘Makom Sameach’
במשך פֿון די לעצטע יאָרן קען מען אויף דער ישׂראלדיקער טעלעוויזיע באַמערקן אַלץ מער דיאַלאָג אויף ייִדיש.
געוויינטלעך הערט מען ייִדיש אין סעריעס וועגן דער פֿרומער וועלט, ווי „שטיסל“ אָדער „קוגל“, אָדער בײַ היסטאָרישע פֿילמען און סעריעס וואָס פֿאַרנעמען זיך מיט סעקולערע ייִדן. קומט די נײַע סעריע „מקום שׂמח“ („אַ גליקלעך אָרט“), אויפֿן קאַנאַל „כּאן 11“, און ווײַזט ווי דווקא חילונים (סעקולערע ייִדן) — הײַנטצײַטיקע תּל-אָבֿיבֿער — רעדן ייִדיש.
אין דער פּראָגראַם זעט מען ווי נערוועזע אַשכּנזישע געשטאַלטן זוכן אַ מער אינטערעסאַנט לעבן אַנטקעגן די נודנע „געוווינהייטן“ פֿון מאָנאָגאַמיע, פּרנסה און דעם זאָרגן זיך סײַ פֿאַר זייערע קינדער, סײַ פֿאַר זייערע עלטערן, ייִדן פֿון דער שארית-הפּליטה.
דער טיטל „מקום שׂמח“ נעמט זיך פֿונעם באַגריף בײַ פּסיכאָטעראַפּיע, וווּ מע עצהט מענטשן וואָס לײַדן פֿון אַ נערוועז-אַטאַקע, זיי זאָלן זיך אויסמאָלן אַ באַקאַנט היימיש אָרט וואָס קען זיי אַ ביסל באַרויִקן. נועה קאָלער, די שעפֿערין פֿון דער סעריע בשותּפֿות מיט רם נהרי, איז מסתּמא באַווירקט געוואָרן פֿון דער בראַסלעווער פֿילם-רעזשיסאָרין רמה בורשטיין, וואָס איז געווען איר רעזשיסאָרין אין דעם דערפֿאָלגרײַכן פֿילם „לעבֿור את הקיר“ (אַריבער דער וואַנט, 2016). מע קען זאָגן אַז די געשטאַלטן וואָס טראָגן מיט זיך די דורותדיקע טראַוומע און ווײַזן אַ טענדענץ צו מעלאַנכאָליע און נערוועזקייט, קוקן זיך די אויגן אויס אויף מקיים צו זײַן ר׳ נחמנס מצווה „לִהְיוֹת בְּשִׂמְחָה תָּמִיד“ — דאָס כּסדרדיקע זוכעניש נאָך אַן אייגן גליקלעך אָרט.
בײַם צענטער פֿון דער סעריע שטייט דאָס געשטאַלט פֿון ורד (ווערעד) קאָנפֿאָרטי, מײַסטעריש געשפּילט פֿון קאָלער אַליין. ווי עס פּאַסט פֿאַר אַ מענטש מיט אַזאַ משפּחה-נאָמען, וואָס זי האָט געקראָגן פֿון איר מאַן בען קאָנפֿאָרטי (דער אַקטיאָר אַבֿיהו פּנחסובֿ), זוכט זי אין משך פֿון די אַכט קאַפּיטלען שפּורן פֿון „קאָמפֿאָרט“, אַ טרייסט אין איר ליבע־ און משפּחה־לעבן. ס׳איז אָבער בכלל ניט קלאָר, אַז פֿון איר מאַן וועט זי אָט די געוווּנטשענע טרייסט טאַקע געפֿינען. אויף דער זײַט וואַרט אויף איר דער צוציִיקער גײַסטיקער היילער יותּם אַזולײַ (עידן חבֿיבֿ), וואָס פֿאַרקערפּערט, דורך זײַן פֿיזיק און סענסיטיווקייט, אַ שאַרפֿע סתּירה צו ורדס בערישן מאַן. די משפּחה-פּאַטאָלאָגיע פֿאַרפּלאָנטערט זיך נאָך מער ווען ורד שטעלט אָן יותּם צו פּרוּוון היילן איר עקשנותדיקע מאַמע, נעמי ווײַסבאַך (די קאָמישע אַקטריסע תּיקי דײן) פֿון צוקערקרענק, און דערבײַ אויסמײַדן די אַמפּוטירונג פֿון איר פֿוס.
אין דער סעריע מישן די ייִנגערע העלדן אַרײַן געוויסע ייִדישע פֿראַזעס אין זייער העברעיִש, אָבער די צוויי העלדינס פֿונעם עלטערן דור רעדן צווישן זיך טאַקע אַ פֿליסיקן ייִדיש. די צוויי פֿרויען זענען ורדס מאַמע, נעמי, און איר קוזינקע, די פּאַרטיזאַנערקע דבֿורה שלוש — אַ משפּחה-נאָמען וואָס ווערט געוויינטלעך אַסאָצייִרט מיט די ספֿרדישע בויערס פֿון דער שטאָט תּל-אָבֿיבֿ.
דבֿורה ווערט געשפּילט דורך לאה קעניג, וואָס איז שוין אין די נײַנציקער. קעניגס עלטערן האָבן נאָך געשפּילט אין דער ווילנער טרופּע. די רעזשיסאָרן קאָלער און נהרי האָבן באַשלאָסן אַז צווישן זיך זאָלן די עלטערע פֿרויען פֿירן גאַנצע שמועסן אויף ייִדיש. בײַ די קרעדיטן בײַם סוף באַצייכנט מען די ייִדיש־לערערין מרים טרין מיטן טיטל „מתרגלת ייִדיש“, ד״ה די וואָס האָט רעפּיטירט מיט די אַקטריסעס די ייִדיש־שפּראַכיקע רעפּליקן, בעיקר מיט תּיקי דיין וואָס רעדט נישט קיין ייִדיש. דיין האָט זיך אַפֿילו אַ ביסל באַקלאָגט וואָס זי מוז דאָס טאָן. קעניג, בכל-אופֿן, לויבט דיינס ייִדיש.
איין בײַשפּיל פֿון אַ ייִדישן דיאַלאָג אין דער סעריע זעט מען בײַם אָנהייב פֿונעם זעקסטן קאַפּיטל, „סודות חבֿויים“ (באַהאַלטענע סודות). דבֿורה און נעמי טרעפֿן זיך און פֿירן אַזאַ שמועס:
— שלום דבֿורה
— ערשטנס, אַנטשלודיקט זיך בײַ מיר.
— נו, באמת. האָסט אַ פֿרענקישן כּבֿוד.
— אויב דו ביסט געקומען אַהער, מיך נאָך אַמאָל באַליידיקן, קאָנסטו שוין צוריקגיין.
— וואָס שוין האָב איך דיר געזאָגט? איך בין געווען נערוועז און ס׳איז מיר אַרויס — „כּוס אמא שלך!“ צוליב דעם „כּוס אמא שלך“ מישפּטסט מיך אַזוי שווער?
ס׳רובֿ צוקוקער, וואָס קענען סײַ ייִדיש סײַ העברעיִש, לאַכן ווען זיי הערן ווי פֿון דיינס מויל, דער אַלטער ייִדישער באָבען, לאָזט זיך אַרויס די זאַפֿטיקע ישׂראלדיקע קללה „כּוס אמא שלך“. אַנדערע האַלטן דעם אויסדרוק אָבער ווי צו וווּלגאַר און איבערגעטריבן אין דעם קאָנטעקסט. אָבער אַזוי ווערט דער אַלטער סטערעאָטיפּ וועגן ייִדיש אין אַ געוויסן מאָס איבערגעקערט: די פּראָסטע קללה וואָס האָט זיך בײַ נעמין אַרויסגעכאַפּט מיט יאָרן צוריק און דערבײַ קאַליע געמאַכט די באַציִונגען צווישן די צוויי ייִדענעס איז דווקא אַ העברעיִשעאַראַבישע (דיינס געשטאַלט איז אַ ישׂראלי), בעת דבֿורה, די עלטערע „מער ייִדישלעכע“ פֿרוי דאָ, קאָן בשום-אופֿן נישט פֿאַרטראָגן צו הערן אַזאַ וווּלגאַרע פֿראַזע. אָט די בולטע איראָניע וואָס שײך די סטערעאָטיפּן פֿון העברעיִש־רעדער און ייִדיש־רעדער העלפֿט דאָ שאַפֿן אַ שאַרפֿע און אַמוזירנדיקע סצענע.
קאָלער, וואָס קומט פֿון אַ משפּחה מיט לעבן-געבליבענע פֿון חורבן, האָט אויף אַן אינטערוויו אין 2024 דערציילט, אַז זי איז אויפֿגעוואַקסן אין אַ היים פֿול מיט הומאָר. „די באָבע פֿלעג זיך וויצלען, ווען היטלער האָט זיך באַוויזן אויף דער טעלעוויזיע, זאָגנדיק אַז דער ימח־שמוניק איז ׳אַ חבֿר מײַנער׳. אָבער דאַן איז געקומען דער 7טער אָקטאָבער…“
די הײַנטיקע פּאָליטיק שפּילט אין „מקום שׂמח“ אָבער אַ קנאַפּע ראָלע און נאָר דורך סובטילע פּרטים: ווען ורד און בען מיינען אויף אַ רגע אַז זייער פֿאַרווײַלונג-צימער אינעם גליל ווערט אָנגעגריפֿן פֿון צפֿון; אָדער ווען ורדס ברודער נדבֿ ווײַסבאַך (רועי עידן) גייט אַרום אָנגעטאָן אין מיליטערישע מונדירן. אָבער אַפֿילו אָט דער שטאַרקער ישׂראלדיקער זעלנער האָט שטענדיק מורא פֿאַר זײַן ייִדיש מאַמעלע און פּראָבירט זי וואָס מער אויסמײַדן.
נעמיס שטענדיקע וואָרענונג, אַז זי וועט זיך נישט לאָזן אָפּערירן ווײַל „כ׳וויל נישט זײַן קיין בעל-מום אין מדינת-ישראל!“ קען מען אויסטײַטשן אַז אין ישׂראל קען מען זיך נישט דערלויבן צו זײַן אַ שוואַכינקע. די סעריע טוט אַ מערקווירדיקע אַרבעט בײַם אַרויסטרײַבן די שדים פֿונעם עבֿר וואָס רודפֿן דאָס ישׂראלדיקע באַוווּסטזײַן, אָבער פֿון דער אַנדערער זײַט קען מען די סעריע קריטיקירן אַז זי דערווײַטערט זיך פֿון זאָגן עפּעס באַטײַטיקס וועגן די הײַנטיקע פּלאָגענישן און בלוטיקע מלחמות.
אינעם זיבעטן קאַפּיטל „תּיירות יהודית“ (ייִדישער טוריזם), נעמט ורד אָן איר מאַמעס בקשה אַז פֿאַר דער אָפּעראַציע וויל זי באַזוכן ווילנע, כּדי צו זען דעם געטאָ וווּ איר באָבע פּעסיע איז געווען. דער גאַנצער קאַפּיטל איז טאַקע פֿילמירט געוואָרן אין ווילנע, און מיר באַקומען אַ שלל אויסערגעוויינטלעכע קאָמישע און דראַמאַטישע סיטואַציעס.
אַן אַנדער באַנוץ פֿון ייִדיש, וואָס פֿאַרחידושט בלי-שום-ספֿק די ישׂראלישע צוקוקערס געשעט אין אַן אַנדער עפּיזאָד, ווען נעמי פֿאַנטאַזירט אַז אַ באַרימטע ישׂראלדיקע טעלעוויזיע־פּערזענלעכקייט, מאָשיק גלאַמין, קומט צו איר אַרײַן אין דער דירה און הייבט אָן רעדן מיט איר אויף ייִדיש. ער זינגט איר אַפֿילו אַ שלאָפֿליד אויף ייִדיש: „תּל-אָבֿיבֿ פֿאַר האַלבער נאַכט דער ווינט וויל גאָרנישט בלאָזן נאָך און די לופֿט איז שווער און שטיקט און שטיקט מיך איך בין נישט זיכער וואָס צו זאָגן צי כּדאַי בכלל צו פֿרעגן, נישט פֿרעגן.“
קאָלער און נהרי האָבן אַ סך וואָס צו זאָגן וועגן דער הײַנטיקער ישׂראלדיקער געזעלשאַפֿט, וועגן אירע מוראס און שטרעבונגען. לאָמיר נאָר האָפֿן אַז אין זייערע צוקונפֿטדיקע שאַפֿונגען וועלן זיי אויך באַהאַנדלען די האַרבע שוועריקייטן פֿון מלחמה און שלום, וואָס פֿאַרשטיקן אונדזער אַלעמענס לופֿט.
https://www.kan.org.il/content/kan/kan-11/p-962212/s1/967128/
בילדער:
01 די הויפּט געשטאַלטן פֿון דער סעריע „מקום שׂמח“ (פֿון רעכטס): יותם, נעמי, ורד און בען (KAN 11)
02 ורד (קאָלער) און בען (פּנחסאָוו) לעבן אַדורך אַ קריזיס אין זייער זיווג-לעבן (KAN 11)
03 ורד (קאָלער) און איר מאַמע נעמי (דיין) זוכן אַ פֿאַרהיילונג אויפֿן ברעג-ים (KAN 11)
The post Secular Jews speak Yiddish in Israeli TV series ‘Makom Sameach’ appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
Over 300 rabbis and Jewish leaders call for removal of UN official who denied Oct. 7 rapes
(JTA) — Over 300 Jewish leaders, including women’s rights advocates and rabbis, urged the United Nations on Tuesday to remove Reem Alsalem, the U.N. rapporteur on violence against women and girls, for denying that rape occurred during Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel.
The letter, which was addressed to U.N. secretary-general Antonio Guterres, came two weeks after Alsalem claimed in a post on X that “No independent investigation found that rape took place on the 7th of October.”
In the letter, its signatories express their “horror and outrage” at Alsalem’s rhetoric, and cite two U.N. reports from March 2024 and July 2025 that concluded that there was “reasonable grounds” to believe that sexual violence had taken place during the attacks “in multiple locations, including rape and gang rape.”
The petition was organized by Amy Elman, a professor at Kalamazoo College who has authored books on antisemitism and state responses to sexual violence, and Rafael Medoff, the director of the David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies. It was shared with the Jewish Telegraphic Agency soon after being sent to Guterres.
“The targeted sexual abuse of Israelis by Hamas and its supporters is one weapon in the arsenal of those seeking Israel’s obliteration,” Elman said in a statement. “It’s outrageous that deniers such as Reem Alsalem are aiding and abetting the sexual violence by claiming it never happened. These apologists should be ashamed of themselves.”
The letter’s signatories include Deborah Lipstadt, the former antisemitism envoy; Judith Rosenbaum, the head of the Jewish Women’s Archives; Rabbi Irving Greenberg, the former chairman of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum; Rabbi Deborah Waxman, the president of Reconstructing Judaism; and Hebrew College president Rabbi Sharon Cohen Anisfeld.
Dispute over whether sexual violence took place as Hamas murdered about 1,200 people in Israel on Oct. 7 has solidified as a point of sustained interest for some of Israel’s staunchest critics who allege that Israel and its supporters are using claims of rape as propaganda. Even the United Nations, frequently maligned by Israel and its supporters over its record toward Israel, has drawn allegations of complicity in the propaganda campaign from pro-Palestinian voices — though the U.N. rapporteur on Palestinian rights, Francesca Albanese, who has faced her own calls for dismissal from the Trump administration, has also publicly questioned the claims.
In addition to the U.N. reports, independent reporting and research by an Israeli nonprofit have validated claims of sexual violence on Oct. 7.
In the X exchange that spurred the new letter, Alsalem was arguing with another user about the Israeli government’s prosecution of soldiers accused of abusing a Palestinian detainee.
A day later, Alsalem posted a link to a Substack podcast from October where she criticized the credibility of the March 2024 U.N. report and said she had sought contact with the Israeli government to confirm its findings but had not received a response.
“The media, certain organizations and the world basically fell into the trap that Israel set up, which is to project that there was barbaric sexual violence being committed by these barbarian Palestinian men, and it was spun around and disseminated and very much used in order to then justify the genocide,” said Alsalem on the podcast.
Medoff said in a statement that Alsalem’s continued employment reflected inconsistent standards when it comes to Israel and antisemitism.
“If a UN official made such a remark concerning rape victims from any other ethnic or religious group, there would be an international uproar,” he said. “The same standard should apply to Israeli Jewish women who were sexually assaulted by Hamas terrorists.”
The post Over 300 rabbis and Jewish leaders call for removal of UN official who denied Oct. 7 rapes appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
Rome synagogue memorial for 2-year-old killed in 1982 Palestinian terror attack vandalized
(JTA) — A synagogue in Rome and a memorial for a 2-year-old boy killed in a 1982 attack by Palestinian terrorists on the city’s Great Synagogue were vandalized on Monday by unknown individuals.
The plaque dedicated to Stefano Gaj Taché, who was killed in the attack that also left 37 injured, is located on the Monteverde synagogue, also known as the Beth Michael Synagogue, in Rome.
The unknown vandals spray painted black on the memorial, and also wrote “Free Palestine” and “Monteverde anti-Zionist and anti-fascist” on the facade of the synagogue, according to the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera.
The vandalism was condemned by Victor Fadlun, the president of the Jewish Community of Rome, who said in a post on Instagram that the incident came amid a “a climate of intimidation” where antisemitism has “become a tool of political protest.”
“We place our trust in the police and call for the government’s strong intervention to halt this spiral of hatred,” Fadlun continued.
The incident comes amid a recent series of antisemitic vandalism in Rome, an epicenter of pro-Palestinian activism that has continued to see large demonstrations even after the ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza.
In October, the words “Dirty Jews, may you all burn” were spray-painted on the shutters of a kosher bakery, and in June a sign at another local synagogue was defaced with the words “Sieg Heil” and ”Juden Raus.”
“This is an act that outrages the Jewish community and deeply wounds it, because the plaque is dedicated to a child murdered by Palestinian terrorism and because this is a meeting place where young people and children meet, where they pray and create a sense of community,” Fadlun told Corriere della Sera. “Attacking the synagogue in this way means disavowing and violating the right of Jews to be able to come together and lead a normal life.”
In a subsequent post on Instagram, Fadlun said Italian President Sergio Mattarella had spoken to him over the phone to express his “solidarity” in relation to the synagogue vandalism.
Antonio Tajani, the Italian minister of foreign affairs, also condemned the vandalism in a post on X, adding that he has called Fadlun as well.
The European Jewish Congress also condemned the vandalism in a post on X. “This is not ‘anti-Zionism.’ It is antisemitism: the targeting of Jewish memory, Jewish mourning and Jewish history,” the group said. “Stefano’s name is a symbol of one of Italy’s darkest terror attacks. His memory should be protected, not desecrated. We stand in solidarity with the Jewish community of Italy and call on authorities to investigate this hate crime and ensure that such acts are treated with the seriousness they deserve.”
The post Rome synagogue memorial for 2-year-old killed in 1982 Palestinian terror attack vandalized appeared first on The Forward.