RSS
What It’s Like to Be a Non-Jewish, Zionist Student at the University of Minnesota
Smith Hall at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. Photo: AlexiusHoratius.
“The vast majority of Israelis are bad people,” claimed my pro-Palestinian classmate during a discussion a few weeks ago.
The discussion was about the legitimacy of Zionism — the right of the Jewish people to self-determination in their ancestral homeland. According to my classmate’s repugnant belief, most Israelis are inherently bad people because they are both “settlers” and racists. Another one of my pro-Palestinian classmates subsequently chimed in, asserting that Jews don’t have the right to self-determination in the Land of Israel, and that Israel should never have been created.
While these are two fairly insignificant instances of hate perpetuated by pro-Palestinian activists, they are representative of the widespread bigotry and ignorance plaguing the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities campus.
Although I’m not Jewish (I was raised as a Greek Orthodox Christian), I have always identified as a liberal Zionist. I’ve always believed that the Jewish people have the right to self-determination in their ancestral homeland. I’ve always believed that Israel’s right to exist is incontestable. Since the Palestinians have lived in the Land of Israel (which they call Palestine) for generations, I have always believed that Palestinians also have a right to live on the land. In my ideal world, the two peoples would figure out how to both overcome the trauma that they have experienced, and live in peace with one another. I don’t think any rational person would argue that these beliefs are radical or unreasonable.
Certainly, every activist advocating on behalf of Israel that I’ve encountered has understood and welcomed my views. The same can’t be said for the pro-Palestinian demonstrators that I’ve conversed with at the University of Minnesota.
Every time that I mention my Zionist convictions, pro-Palestinian activists become outraged. When pro-Palestinian demonstrators hear the word “Zionism,” many of them wrongly assume that it inherently equates to the oppression of Palestinians. When I remind pro-Palestinian activists that Zionism is simply the right of the Jewish people to self-determination in the Land of Israel, many of them never cease to tell me that I’m wrong.
Whenever pro-Palestinian activists are confronted by the horrors that took place on October 7, 2023, I always hear them argue some variation of “history didn’t begin on October 7.” Yes, that’s definitely correct. However, whenever I talk about the atrocities committed by Palestinians on the Jewish people throughout history, it’s always dismissed as “misleading” or “irrelevant.” Apparently, it’s “misleading” or “irrelevant” when I mention the massacres of Jews that took place in Hebron and Safed in 1929, or the assassination of 127 Jews in Kfar Etzion one day before the State of Israel was declared, or the suicide bombings that took place during the Second Intifada. While pro-Palestinian activists rightly decry the killing of innocent Palestinians, many of them curiously turn a blind eye when confronted with the killing of innocent Israelis.
Moreover, elementary facts about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that I often mention are constantly ignored. For example, when I mention that so many families from the Palestinian elite sold land to the Jews before the establishment of Israel, it’s invariably labelled as “misleading” or “irrelevant” by the Palestinian propagandists that I come in contact with. It’s definitely understandable to be critical of certain Israeli policies (I am myself), but it’s wholly unproductive to ignore basic historical facts that illustrate that both peoples have possessed a role in creating and perpetuating the conflict. I’ve been talked down to and ridiculed many times for simply recounting history and defending the Jewish people’s right to self-determination.
Unfortunately, I’m not alone in my experiences. Radical pro-Palestinian activity and propaganda has a history of being pervasive at the University of Minnesota.
Last year, pro-Palestinian groups continuously denied or justified the massacre of 1,200 Israelis on October 7, 2023. For instance, “VICTORY TO THE AL-AQSA FLOOD” was previously written on the campus quad. During the fall of 2024, pro-Palestinian demonstrators belonging to UMN Students for a Democratic Society “barricaded doors and windows,” “spray-painted security cameras,” and occupied a university building. Earlier this year, “REST IN MARTYRDOM HASSAN NASRALLAH!! GLORY TO HEZBOLLAH! GLORY TO HAMAS!” was written inside of a tunnel on campus.
Earlier this month, pro-Palestinian demonstrators protested a private speech by Yinam Cohen, even going as far to label him a “war criminal” for simply being the Consul General of Israel to the Midwest. Free speech should never be suppressed, but wouldn’t it be more reasonable for pro-Palestinian activists to listen to Cohen and subsequently set up alternative forums to discuss the issue without hating and intimidating others? Recently, I spoke with Michael Oren (a former Israeli ambassador to the US), and I disagreed with him on certain issues. Nevertheless, I still learned a lot from his perspective. If pro-Palestinian activists truly cared about resolving the conflict, wouldn’t they listen to and attempt to understand the other side?
While pro-Palestinian demonstrators at the University of Minnesota incessantly object to actions taken by the United States and Israel, they are dramatically silent on the damage Hamas inflicts upon Gazan civilians. Never have I witnessed pro-Palestinian college demonstrators utter a single word about either the oppression Hamas perpetuates on Gazan civilians, or the recent protests in Gaza, some of which are explicitly against Hamas rule.
Instead, many pro-Palestinian demonstrators at the University of Minnesota are committed to utilizing the Gazan population as a statistic in order to delegitimize Israel. At the University of Minnesota, bigotry and ignorance about Zionism and the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remain prevalent. As someone who isn’t Jewish, I can’t imagine how my Jewish peers are feeling in reaction to the omnipresence of anti-Zionism (and antisemitism), but I will always be there to defend them.
Richard McDaniel is an undergraduate political science student at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
The post What It’s Like to Be a Non-Jewish, Zionist Student at the University of Minnesota first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Syria’s Sharaa Says Talks With Israel Could Yield Results ‘In Coming Days’
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa speaks at the opening ceremony of the 62nd Damascus International Fair, the first edition held since the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, in Damascus, Syria, Aug. 27, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi
Syria’s President Ahmed al-Sharaa said on Wednesday that ongoing negotiations with Israel to reach a security pact could lead to results “in the coming days.”
He told reporters in Damascus the security pact was a “necessity” and that it would need to respect Syria’s airspace and territorial unity and be monitored by the United Nations.
Syria and Israel are in talks to reach an agreement that Damascus hopes will secure a halt to Israeli airstrikes and the withdrawal of Israeli troops who have pushed into southern Syria.
Reuters reported this week that Washington was pressuring Syria to reach a deal before world leaders gather next week for the UN General Assembly in New York.
But Sharaa, in a briefing with journalists including Reuters ahead of his expected trip to New York to attend the meeting, denied the US was putting any pressure on Syria and said instead that it was playing a mediating role.
He said Israel had carried out more than 1,000 strikes on Syria and conducted more than 400 ground incursions since Dec. 8, when the rebel offensive he led toppled former Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad.
Sharaa said Israel’s actions were contradicting the stated American policy of a stable and unified Syria, which he said was “very dangerous.”
He said Damascus was seeking a deal similar to a 1974 disengagement agreement between Israel and Syria that created a demilitarized zone between the two countries.
He said Syria sought the withdrawal of Israeli troops but that Israel wanted to remain at strategic locations it seized after Dec. 8, including Mount Hermon. Israeli ministers have publicly said Israel intends to keep control of the sites.
He said if the security pact succeeds, other agreements could be reached. He did not provide details, but said a peace agreement or normalization deal like the US-mediated Abraham Accords, under which several Muslim-majority countries agreed to normalize diplomatic ties with Israel, was not currently on the table.
He also said it was too early to discuss the fate of the Golan Heights because it was “a big deal.”
Reuters reported this week that Israel had ruled out handing back the zone, which Donald Trump unilaterally recognized as Israeli during his first term as US president.
“It’s a difficult case – you have negotiations between a Damascene and a Jew,” Sharaa told reporters, smiling.
SECURITY PACT DERAILED IN JULY
Sharaa also said Syria and Israel had been just “four to five days” away from reaching the basis of a security pact in July, but that developments in the southern province of Sweida had derailed those discussions.
Syrian troops were deployed to Sweida in July to quell fighting between Druze armed factions and Bedouin fighters. But the violence worsened, with Syrian forces accused of execution-style killings and Israel striking southern Syria, the defense ministry in Damascus and near the presidential palace.
Sharaa on Wednesday described the strikes near the presidential palace as “not a message, but a declaration of war,” and said Syria had still refrained from responding militarily to preserve the negotiations.
RSS
Anti-Israel Activists Gear Up to ‘Flood’ UN General Assembly
US Capitol Police and NYPD officers clash with anti-Israel demonstrators, on the day Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses a joint meeting of Congress, on Capitol Hill, in Washington, DC, July 24, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Umit Bektas
Anti-Israel groups are planning a wave of raucous protests in New York City during the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) over the next several days, prompting concerns that the demonstrations could descend into antisemitic rhetoric and intimidation.
A coalition of anti-Israel activists is organizing the protests in and around UN headquarters to coincide with speeches from Middle Eastern leaders and appearances by US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The demonstrations are expected to draw large crowds and feature prominent pro-Palestinian voices, some of whom have been criticized for trafficking in antisemitic tropes, in addition to calling for the destruction of Israe.
Organizers of the demonstrations have promoted the coordinated events on social media as an opportunity to pressure world leaders to hold Israel accountable for its military campaign against Hamas in Gaza, with some messaging framed in sharply hostile terms.
On Sunday, for example, activists shouted at Israel’s Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon.
“Zionism is terrorism. All you guys are terrorists committing ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza and Palestine. Shame on you, Zionist animals,” they shouted.
BREAKING: PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTORS CONFRONT “ISRAELI” AMBASSADOR DANNY DANON AT THE UNITED NATIONS
1/5 pic.twitter.com/4G1VYEMGzV
— Within Our Lifetime (@WOLPalestine) September 14, 2025
The Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM), warned on its website that the scale and tone of the planned demonstrations risk crossing the line from political protest into hate speech, arguing that anti-Israel activists are attempting to hijack the UN gathering to spread antisemitism and delegitimize the Jewish state’s right to exist.
Outside the UN last week, masked protesters belonging to the activist group INDECLINE kicked a realistic replica of Netanyahu’s decapitated head as though it were a soccer ball.
US activist group plays soccer with Bibi’s mock decapitated HEAD right outside NYC UN HQ
Peep shot at 00:40
Footage posted by INDECLINE collective just as UN General Assembly about to kick off
‘Following the game, ball was donated to Palestinian Genocide Museum’ pic.twitter.com/TQ84sgZhKr
— RT (@RT_com) September 9, 2025
Within Our Lifetime (WOL), a radical anti-Israel activist group, has vowed to “flood” the UNGA on behalf of the pro-Palestine movement.
WOL, one of the most prolific anti-Israel activist groups, came under immense fire after it organized a protest against an exhibition to honor the victims of the Oct. 7 massacre at the Nova Music Festival in southern Israel. During the event, the group chanted “resistance is justified when people are occupied!” and “Israel, go to hell!”
“We will be there to confront them with the truth: Their silence and inaction enable genocide. The world cannot continue as if Gaza does not exist,” WOL said of its planned demonstrations in New York. “This is the time to make our voices impossible to ignore. Come to New York by any means necessary, to stand, to march, to demand the UN act and end the siege.”
Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM), two other anti-Israel organizations that have helped organize widespread demonstrations against the Jewish state during the war in Gaza, also announced they are planning a march from Times Square to the UN headquarters on Friday.
“The time is now for each and every UN member state to uphold their duty under international law: sanction Israel and end the genocide,” the groups said in a statement.
JVP, an organization that purports to fight for “Palestinian liberation,” has positioned itself as a staunch adversary of the Jewish state. The group argued in a 2021 booklet that Jews should not write Hebrew liturgy because hearing the language would be “deeply traumatizing” to Palestinians. JVP has repeatedly defended the Oct. 7 massacre of roughly 1,200 people in southern Israel by Hamas as a justified “resistance.” Chapters of the organization have urged other self-described “progressives” to throw their support behind Hamas and other terrorist groups against Israel
Similarly, PYM, another radical anti-Israel group, has repeatedly defended terrorism and violence against the Jewish state. PYM has organized many anti-Israel protests in the two years following the Oct. 7 attacks in the Jewish state. Recently, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) called for a federal investigation into the organization after Aisha Nizar, one of the group’s leaders, urged supporters to sabotage the US supply chain for the F-35 fighter jet, one of the most advanced US military assets and a critical component of Israel’s defense.
The UN General Assembly has historically been a flashpoint for heated debate over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Previous gatherings have seen dueling demonstrations outside the Manhattan venue, with pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian groups both seeking to influence the international spotlight.
While warning about the demonstrations, CAM noted it recently launched a new mobile app, Report It, that allows users worldwide to quickly and securely report antisemitic incidents in real time.
RSS
Nina Davidson Presses Universities to Back Words With Action as Jewish Students Return to Campus Amid Antisemitism Crisis
Nina Davidson on The Algemeiner’s ‘J100’ podcast. Photo: Screenshot
Philanthropist Nina Davidson, who served on the board of Barnard College, has called on universities to pair tough rhetoric on combatting antisemitism with enforcement as Jewish students returned to campuses for the new academic year.
“Years ago, The Algemeiner had published a list ranking the most antisemitic colleges in the country. And number one was Columbia,” Davidson recalled on a recent episode of The Algemeiner‘s “J100” podcast. “As a board member and as someone who was representing the institution, it really upset me … At the board meeting, I brought it up and I said, ‘What are we going to do about this?’”
Host David Cohen, chief executive officer of The Algemeiner, explained he had revisited Davidson’s remarks while she was being honored for her work at The Algemeiner‘s 8th annual J100 gala, held in October 2021, noting their continued relevance.
“It could have been the same speech in 2025,” he said, underscoring how longstanding concerns about campus antisemitism, while having intensified in the aftermath of Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel, are not new.
Davidson argued that universities already possess the tools to protect students – codes of conduct, time-place-manner rules, and consequences for threats or targeted harassment – but too often fail to apply them evenly. “Statements are not enough,” she said, arguing that institutions need to enforce their rules and set a precedent that there will be consequences for individuals who refuse to follow them.
She also said that stakeholders – alumni, parents, and donors – are reassessing their relationships with schools that, in their view, have not safeguarded Jewish students. While supportive of open debate, Davidson distinguished between protest and intimidation, calling for leadership that protects expression while ensuring campus safety.
The episode surveyed specific pressure points that administrators will face this fall: repeat anti-Israel encampments, disruptions of Jewish programming, and the challenge of distinguishing political speech from conduct that violates university rules. “Unless schools draw those lines now,” Davidson warned, “they’ll be scrambling once the next crisis hits.”
Cohen closed by framing the discussion as a test of institutional credibility, asking whether universities will “turn policy into protection” in real time. Davidson agreed, pointing to students who “need to know the rules aren’t just on paper.”
The full conversation is available on The Algemeiner’s “J100” podcast.