RSS
Will Pro-Palestinian Boycott Mobs Abandon Their iPhones and Other Devices?
Anti-Israel student protesters have always sought convenient, effortless ways to demonstrate their hatred for Israel.
In the past, this has meant trying to remove Sabra brand hummus from campus food services. Starting at DePaul University in 2010, efforts to embargo the Israeli-made food spread quickly to other campuses (University of Ottowa in 2014, Swarthmore College in 2018, Dickinson College in 2019, and Harvard University in 2022), but after October 7, 2023, student boycott demands grew more expansive.
It’s no longer enough to change brands of hummus. Today’s students want to ban everything from Israel.
Graduate Students at the City University of New York (CUNY), for instance, now demand not only the familiar Sabra prohibition but also a ban of “all fruits and vegetables grown in Israel.” And their list doesn’t end with food. They also demand that the entire CUNY system “cancel all forms of cooperation with Israeli academic institutions, including events, activities, agreements, and research collaborations.”
What goes unsaid here is that not a single student will ever actually live up to these demands. The rhetorical flourishes are purely for show.
If the thousands of college students calling for a boycott of all things Israel want to live up to their sanctimonious rhetoric, they will have to give up a lot more than one brand of hummus. And they will end up sick, hungry, and underemployed.
I call on all anti-Israel, pro-BDS students and faculty members alike to prove that they aren’t the posers and half-milers I say they are by following through on their categorical rejection of any contact with, use of, or compliance with, any and all Israeli technologies, companies, products, ideas, and universities.
I dare these pretenders to put their futures where their mouths are, and abandon entirely anything with the State of Israel.
It won’t be easy.
Let’s start with their cell phones. Israeli technology is central to the iPhone platform, so Apple phones are out. Unfortunately they can’t just switch to Samsung. They’ll have to give up their digital umbilical cords altogether because the cell phone was invented in 1973 by Motorola’s Israeli Research and Development Department.
And it’s not just cell phones they will have to shun. Israeli technology is integral to many modern conveniences that college students rely on. If they want to live up to their anti-Israel commitment, they will have to stop using USB ports (an Israeli invention), thumb drives (an Israeli invention) and firewalls (another Israeli invention). Writing term papers, theses, and dissertations without computers worked for centuries. They’ll adapt.
If today’s protesters ever find gainful employment outside of a few select cities, they will need a car, but they’ll have to boycott all models with cameras pointing outward. An Israeli invention called the Mobileye has been warning of obstacles and keeping drivers in their lanes for years. Mirrors work too, as committed protesters will learn.
“No fruits or vegetables from Israel,” say the CUNY student protesters. Will they also eschew all fruits and vegetables grown with Israeli technology?
Israel invented drip irrigation, which is used in almost all modern agricultural enterprises. After researching which fruits and vegetables were not grown with drip irrigation, anti-Israel protesters might find it easier just to give up fruits and vegetables. Or maybe they’ll grow their own (an unlikely scenario in New York City).
Will they boycott life-saving drugs and research developed by Israel? Multiple sclerosis is treated with a drug called Copaxone, developed at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel.
It may soon be impossible to avoid Israeli NaNose technology and the “Sniff-Phone” which smells diseases before they are manifested, allowing for preventative therapies prior to the onset of symptoms. Committed Israel boycotters will have to shun this technology in favor of the old ways of detecting diseases — often when they are too advanced to treat effectively.
Many of them seem heartless too, but those who one day need heart surgery will have to forgo the flexible stent, invented at an Israeli company called Medinol. The NIR stent or EluNIR has become standard since its invention in 1996. Protesters who shun all things Israel might be able to find some third-world clinic willing to use the rigid stents of an earlier era. I wish them luck.
I suspect that most of the anti-Israel protests are led by faculty and students in the humanities and social sciences, where anti-Israel virtue signaling is de rigueur and comes with few repercussions. Students in other areas of specialization, however, will have to make debilitating career challenges to live up to their performative rhetoric.
Israel has the greatest number of tech companies outside of Silicon Valley, but its influence on the field extends far beyond Israel. The recent Miami Tech and Invest Conference showed the extent to which Israeli companies are “transforming Miami into a global tech hub.” Any student of computer science or software engineering, as well as any budding tech entrepreneur, will suffer greatly by boycotting all things Israel.
STEM students who refuse to work with Israeli technologies, scientists, and universities will sabotage their careers. They will likely wind up at the bottom of their professions — far from important research and Nobel Prize winners. Israeli universities and research companies are responsible for many breakthroughs in detecting and treating cancer, and Israelis have dominated the Nobel Prize in chemistry for most of the 20th century.
Naturally, none of the student demands should be taken seriously. In America today, no one virtue signals like a college student. Their hunger strikes begin after breakfast and end at lunch — so too do their demands end the moment they sign a resolution or shout in front of the camera.
Of course, I would love for just one anti-Israel, BDS, boycotting/divesting protester to prove me wrong and truly refrain from using or benefitting from anything derived from Israeli ingenuity. Write me, using pen and paper of course, and tell me how it’s going.
Chief Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) Political Correspondent A.J. Caschetta is a principal lecturer at the Rochester Institute of Technology and a fellow at Campus Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum where he is also a Milstein fellow. A version of this article originally appeared at IPT.
The post Will Pro-Palestinian Boycott Mobs Abandon Their iPhones and Other Devices? first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Tensions escalated at a weekly pro-Israel rally in Toronto—but similar events stay calmer elsewhere
Toronto’s weekly rally in support of Israel, which has now run for 61 consecutive weeks and counting, turned into a more consistently chaotic scene this fall. What was once a […]
The post Tensions escalated at a weekly pro-Israel rally in Toronto—but similar events stay calmer elsewhere appeared first on The Canadian Jewish News.
RSS
University of Minnesota Suspends, Fines Pro-Hamas Rioters: Campus Groups
The University of Minnesota, Twin Cities has reportedly suspended and demanded financial restitution from seven pro-Hamas activists who were arrested for commandeering the Morrill Hall administrative building on Oct. 21, an action which aimed to pressure school officials into enacting a boycott of Israel.
According to statement from Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and other anti-Israel campus groups posted on social media, seven of eight students charged with misconducting themselves on that day have been “found guilty” by a university disciplinary tribunal. Each has been fined about $5,500, the statement further alleged, and suspended for periods ranging from one to five semesters.
“Alongside arbitrary suspensions, the university intends to withhold the transcripts of those arrested,” the statement continued. “This means for the duration of the suspension the students are unable to transfer to a different institution without forfeiting the credits they have rightfully earned and paid for. To even be readmitted after suspensions, the students have to do 20 hours of community service and write a 5-10 page essay about the ‘difference between vandalism and protest.’”
A spokesman for the university declined to comment on the matter, saying “federal and state privacy laws prevent the university from confirming or commenting on any specifics related to individual student discipline.” Instead the university pointed The Algemeiner to the university’s “Student Conduct Code and its Administrative Policy: Resolving Alleged Student Conduct Code Violations, as well as the Twin Cities campus-specific Student Conduct Code Procedure,” noting that “together, these outline how disciplinary processes work, from collecting and investigating facts, to initial recommendations regarding discipline, through appellate rights and hearing options.”
Students for Justice in Palestine is getting out ahead of the matter, however, and calling on its followers to deluge university officials and local lawmakers with demands for all charges against the students be dropped. SJP maintains that the students are innocent despite that law enforcement found cause to charge them with rioting and trespassing. One student was charged with assault, according The Minnesota Daily. Additionally, it was alleged that protesters — 11 in total, three of whom are alumni — held university employees working inside Morrill Hall captive, barring their leaving the building “for an extended period of time.”
“Spread the word!” the group said in a statement. “Talk to your friends, email your professors, don’t let this go silent!”
The October incident was not the first commandeering of a university administrative building this semester.
Last month, a mob of Students for Justice in Palestine members invaded and occupied the Westlands administrative building at Sarah Lawrence College in New York and vowed not to surrender it unless school officials adopt the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. The action was apparently precipitated by the college’s declining to accept SJP’s divestment recommendations — which aim to compromise Israel’s national security and leave the world’s lone Jewish state vulnerable to jihadist extremists.
“Westlands is occupied,” SJP said in a series of statements published on Instagram during the occupation. “Students have occupied Westlands to demand immediate action on the genocide of Palestinians. Administration has failed to meet our disclosure deadline. Westland residents are safe: they can come and go at will. We need your support: Walkout to the south lawn, bring food donations, sign divestment proposal.”
SJP also called on students to obstruct justice to prevent the quelling of their activity, imploring them to amass “as many bodies blocking doors as possible” and instructing them to wear “mask [sic] and indiscernible clothing, hats, scarves, etc to support the student intifada.” In that time, National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP), which coordinates activities at individual colleges, cheered the insurrectionist behavior, using the same incendiary language as the students.
The occupations of the campus buildings come amid concerns that the over 150 pro-Hamas groups operating on colleges campuses and elsewhere across the US are planting the seeds of domestic terrorism.
“The movement contains militant elements pushing it toward a wider, more severe campaign focused on property destruction and violence properly described as domestic terrorism,” researcher Ryan Mauro wrote in a recently published report, titled Marching Toward Violence: The Domestic Anti-Israeli Protest Movement, a project of the Capital Research Center (CRC). “It demands the ‘dismantlement’ of America’s ‘colonialist,’ ‘imperialist,’ or ‘capitalist,’ system, often calling for the US to be abolished as a country.”
Drawing on statements issued and actions taken by SJP and their collaborators, Mauro made the case that toolkits published by SJP herald Hamas for perpetrating mass casualties of civilians; SJP has endorsed Iran’s attacks on Israel as well as its stated intention to overturn the US-led world order; and other groups under its umbrella have called on followers to “Bring the Intifada Home.” Such activities, the report explained, accelerated after Hamas’s massacre across southern Israel last Oct. 7, which pro-Hamas groups perceived as an inflection point in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and an opportunity. By flooding the internet and college campuses with agitprop and staging activities — protests or vandalisms — they hoped to manufacture a critical mass of youth support for their ideas, thus creating an army of revolutionaries willing to adopt Hamas’s aims as their own.
The result has been a series of the kinds of incidents seen in academia throughout 2024 fall semester since Hamas’s onslaught.
In October, when Jews around the world mourned on the anniversary of the Oct. 7 atrocities, a Harvard University student group called on pro-Hamas activists to “Bring the war home” and proceeded to vandalize a campus administrative building. The group members, who described themselves as “anonymous,” later said in a statement, “We are committed to bringing the war home and answering the call to open up a new front here in the belly of the beast.”
On the same day, the Harvard Palestine Solidarity Committee (PSC) issued a similar statement, saying “now is the time to escalate,” adding, “Harvard’s insistence on funding slaughter only strengthens our moral imperative and commitment to our demands.”
More recently, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) student wrote a journal article which argued that violence is a legitimate method of effecting political change and, moreover, advancing the pro-Palestinian movement.
As The Algemeiner has previously reported, pro-Hamas activists have already demonstrated that they are willing to hurt people to achieve their goals.
Last year, in California, an elderly Jewish man was killed when an anti-Zionist professor employed by a local community college allegedly pushed him during an argument. At Cornell University in upstate New York, a student threatened to rape and kill Jewish female students and “shoot up” the campus’ Hillel center. Violence, according to a report by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), was most common at universities in the state of California, where an anti-Zionist activist punched a Jewish student for filming him at a protest.
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
The post University of Minnesota Suspends, Fines Pro-Hamas Rioters: Campus Groups first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Hamas Responds to Trump Threat to Unleash ‘Hell’ on Terror Group if Hostages Not Freed by His Inauguration
Hamas has responded to US President-elect Donald Trump’s warning that there will be “all hell to pay” in the Middle East if the Palestinian terrorist group does not release all of the remaining hostages in Gaza before his inauguration next month, claiming that Israel has “sabotaged” several potential ceasefire deals and should be held responsible for perpetuating the ongoing war.
On Monday, Trump vowed to take strong action if the hostages kidnapped during Hamas’s invasion of southern Israel last Oct. 7 who remain in captivity are not freed quickly.
“Everybody is talking about the hostages who are being held so violently, inhumanely, and against the will of the entire World, in the Middle East – But it’s all talk, and no action!” Trump posted on the social media platform Truth Social. “Please let this TRUTH serve to represent that if the hostages are not released prior to January 20, 2025, the date that I proudly assume Office as President of the United States, there will be ALL HELL TO PAY in the Middle East, and for those in charge who perpetrated these atrocities against Humanity.”
“Those responsible will be hit harder than anybody has been hit in the long and storied History of the United States of America. RELEASE THE HOSTAGES NOW!” he added.
Hamas addressed Trump’s threat in a statement shared with and reported by multiple news outlets.
Basem Naim, a senior Hamas official, defended the terrorist group’s conduct in the war. Shifting blame onto Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for allegedly undercutting efforts to secure the release of the hostages, Naim said that Trump’s comments were intended for Netanyahu and Israel, falsely claiming that the Jewish state has executed a so-called “genocide” in Hamas-ruled Gaza.
“Since the beginning of this genocide, Hamas has publicly announced and been active in seeking a permanent ceasefire to end the Israeli aggression against our people; a deal which would have included a full prisoners’ exchange,” Naim said. “However, Netanyahu has sabotaged all these attempts. At many times, we were extremely close to signing on a deal, but due to his savage actions and decisions, these deals broke down.”
Therefore, the Hamas spokesperson and Political Bureau member continued, “Hamas understands that Trump’s message is actually directed first towards Netanyahu and his government. They need to end their evil game by using negotiations as a cover for their personal political ideological interests.”
Naim added that Hamas supports a three-phase ceasefire proposal unveiled by US President Joe Biden in late May that ultimately failed due to conflicting interpretations over the deal’s terms, claiming that the internationally designated terrorist group was eager to see an end to the war, the release of “prisoners from both sides,” and “a better future … full of hope, dignity, and prosperity.”
Hamas-led Palestinian terrorists kidnapped over 250 hostages during their massacre across southern Israel last Oct. 7, dragging them into neighboring Gaza. There are currently 101 captives still in the Palestinian enclave, at least a third of whom are believed to be dead.
In the year following the brutal slaughter led by Hamas, the Biden administration has attempted multiple times to broker a ceasefire between Israel and the terrorist organization to halt fighting in Gaza. However, Hamas has demanded that any ceasefire deal must include terms that guarantee a permanent end to the war and Israel’s total removal from the Gaza Strip. Israel has said that it is determined to both dismantle Hamas’s military and governing capabilities and free all the hostages, alive and dead.
“[I’m] ready for a ceasefire at any moment. But ending the war, I’m not ready for that, because we also need to achieve the elimination of Hamas,” Netanyahu told Israel’s Channel 14 in a recent interview.
Despite Naim’s insistence that Israel has served as the lone impediment to peace in the war-torn enclave, Hamas has rejected several temporary ceasefire offers, with US officials questioning Hamas’s commitment to reaching a truce.
In contrast to Hamas’s response, Israeli leaders welcomed Trump’s threat.
“Hamas needs to release the hostages,” Netanyahu said at the start of a cabinet meeting on Tuesday. “President Trump put the emphasis in the correct place, on Hamas, and not on the Israeli government, as is customary in some places.”
The Israeli premier added, “It is a forceful statement, which makes it clear that there is only one responsible for this situation, and that is Hamas.”
Meanwhile, the Hostage and Missing Families Forum, which represents family members of the missing and kidnapped individuals, expressed gratitude for Trump’s remarks: “It is now evident to all: the time has come. We must bring them home NOW.”
During his presidential campaign, Trump called for the release of all American hostages around the world, including the Israeli-American dual nationals still in Gaza.
Trump has also urged Israel to “finish” the war in Gaza as soon as possible, arguing that the protracted conflict has damaged the Jewish state’s international image.
The post Hamas Responds to Trump Threat to Unleash ‘Hell’ on Terror Group if Hostages Not Freed by His Inauguration first appeared on Algemeiner.com.