RSS
Yom Kippur Forces Us to Look Within; Will We Do That This Year?
The late Leonard Cohen sings to IDF troops in the Sinai Peninsula during the 1973 Yom Kippur War. Photo: Twitter.
Throughout history, physical stature has often shaped people’s perceptions of leadership. The belief that taller individuals are more commanding or “presidential” has long influenced how leaders are viewed, with the idea that a greater height equates to greater capability. Indeed, studies have shown that taller people are frequently assumed to possess qualities like confidence and authority, which can lead to an advantage in both politics and the corporate world. This emphasis on height seems almost absurd when we consider that true leadership is far more complex than what meets the eye.
Looking back through history, height has often been a striking feature of many notable figures. Abraham Lincoln, the tallest U.S. president at 6’4″, seemed to tower over his contemporaries both physically and metaphorically, embodying the spirit of leadership that defined his role in abolishing slavery.
Similarly, Thomas Jefferson, at 6’2½”, was exceptionally tall for his era, and his commanding presence undoubtedly amplified his influence as a Founding Father, shaping the nation’s early years. For both Lincoln and Jefferson, physical height seemed to enhance their image as strong, decisive leaders who stood head and shoulders above the rest.
And yet, this emphasis on physical stature isn’t a hard and fast rule when it comes to outstanding leadership. Franklin D. Roosevelt, although he stood at 6’2”, rarely stood at all due to the debilitating effects of polio that left his legs weakened. His greatness lay not in his physical presence but in his charismatic personality, his vision, and his ability to lead the nation through some of its most challenging times.
Likewise, James Madison, Jefferson’s immediate successor, was only 5’4”—a height only slightly below the average for his time—but much shorter than his 1808 election opponent, Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, who was approximately 6 feet tall.
Despite the height difference, Madison won the election, becoming America’s shortest-ever president. He went on to become the “Father of the Constitution”, proving that good leadership is not the result of physical qualities, but is instead driven by intellect and statesmanship.
Interestingly, being tall hasn’t always been a recipe for success in presidential races. The tallest candidate in U.S. history, Winfield Scott, stood at 6’5”, yet he lost the 1852 election to Franklin Pierce, who was only 5’10”. Similarly, John Kerry, who is 6’4” tall, could not convert his height advantage into a victory, losing the 2004 election to George W. Bush, who is 5’11½”.
But while height and appearance often shape perceptions of leadership and a person’s inherent qualities, Yom Kippur invites us to consider quite a different measure of greatness. On this holiest day of the Jewish calendar year, we intentionally avoid physical comforts and distractions.
We desist from eating, drinking, washing, and engaging in physical intimacy—all activities that usually anchor us to the material world. Even our footwear is affected; we forgo leather shoes, a symbol of luxury, and many choose to wear only white clothes and avoid jewelry or other adornments to strip away the physical trappings that can distract us from the true essence of who we are.
This focus on the non-physical reminds us that our value is not in how we look or the material possessions we display, but instead, it is in our actions, our intentions, and our moral fiber. Just as Abraham Lincoln’s legacy wasn’t defined merely by his towering 6’4” frame but by his courage and integrity in leading a divided nation towards unity and virtue, on Yom Kippur we are reminded that great men and women are not necessarily those with an impressive physical stature or great looks, but those who stand tall in their principles and are true to their convictions.
Yom Kippur provides the ultimate contrast to society’s fixation on external traits. During the service, everyone stands together in prayer, shoulder to shoulder, regardless of height, wealth, or status. It is a day when all are equal before God, and the true measure of a person lies in their deeds, their humility, and their commitment to a future of self-improvement.
Unlike the world of politics, where a commanding physical presence might sway voters, God’s vote for us on Yom Kippur – the only election day that genuinely counts – is contingent on who we are on the inside.
So, as we reflect on the meaning of Yom Kippur, we would do well to see beyond the superficial judgments that so often dominate our society. We are challenged to recognize that the accurate measure of a person—whether it is ourselves or those we choose to follow—rests on a foundation of inner qualities. The greatest and most effective leaders are not always tall or conventionally attractive.
Sir Winston Churchill, with his jowly face and stocky figure, stood at just 5’7”, earning him the nickname “British Bulldog.” Yet, despite his diminutive size and rather average features, he commanded immense respect and managed to guide the free world through its darkest hours to triumph over Hitler—a man whose twisted ideology idolized physical perfection.
In the end, Yom Kippur calls us to rise above the trappings of physical appearance and superficial measurements of greatness. We are expected to aspire to become the best versions of ourselves, not by adding inches to our physical height but by expanding our capacity for compassion, honesty, and self-reflection. It is a day that reminds us that while the world may judge whether a leader is any good by how tall they are or by some other meaningless measure, God judges us by how tall we strive to be in our deeds and our dedication to doing what is right.
The author is a rabbi in Beverly Hills, California.
The post Yom Kippur Forces Us to Look Within; Will We Do That This Year? first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
US Clamps Sanctions on Israel-bashing UN Rights Monitor Albanese
Francesca Albanese, UN special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, attends a side event during the Human Rights Council at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, March 26, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Denis Balibouse
The Trump administration has imposed sweeping sanctions against Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories, citing the UN official’s lengthy record of singling out Israel for condemnation.
In a post on X, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the sanctions under a February executive order targeting those who “prompt International Criminal Court (ICC) action against U.S. and Israeli officials, companies, and executives.” He accused Albanese of waging “political and economic warfare” against both nations and asserted that “such efforts will no longer be tolerated.”
“Today I am imposing sanctions on UN Human Rights Council Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese for her illegitimate and shameful efforts to prompt [International Criminal Court] action against U.S. and Israeli officials, companies, and executives,” Rubio announced on X/Twitter.
“Albanese’s campaign of political and economic warfare against the United States and Israel will no longer be tolerated,” declared the Trump administration’s top foreign affairs official. “We will always stand by our partners in their right to self-defense.”
Rubio concluded: “The United States will continue to take whatever actions we deem necessary to respond to lawfare and protect our sovereignty and that of our allies.”
The decision to impose sanctions on Albanese marks an escalation in the ongoing feud between the White House and the United Nations over Israel. The Trump administration has repeatedly accused the UN and Albanese of unfairly targeting Israel and mischaracterizing the Jewish state’s conduct in Gaza.
Albanese, an Italian lawyer and academic, has held the position of UN special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories since 2022. The position authorizes her to monitor and report on alleged “human rights violations” by Israel against Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.
Last week, Albanese issued a scathing report accusing companies of helping Israel maintain a so-called “genocide economy.” She called on the companies to cut off economic ties with Israel and warned that they might be guilty of “complicity” in the so-called “genocide” in Gaza.
Critics of Albanese have long accused her of exhibiting an excessive anti-Israel bias, calling into question her fairness and neutrality.
Albanese has an extensive history of using her role at the UN to denigrate Israel and seemingly rationalize Hamas’ attacks on the Jewish state.
In the months following the Palestinian terrorist group’s atrocities across southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Albanese accused the Jewish state of perpetrating a “genocide” against the Palestinian people in revenge for the attacks and circulated a widely derided and heavily disputed report alleging that 186,000 people had been killed in the Gaza war as a result of Israeli actions.
The action comes as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visits Washington, where he has received a warm reception from the Trump administration. Netanyahu has been meeting with US officials to discuss next steps in the ongoing Gaza military operation.
Gideon Sa’ar, Minister of Foreign Affairs for Israel, commended the Rubio announcement with his own post on X/Twitter, exclaiming: “A clear message. Time for the UN to pay attention!”
The post US Clamps Sanctions on Israel-bashing UN Rights Monitor Albanese first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Hardball: Trump Administration Reports Harvard to Accreditor Over Antisemitism Allegations
US President Donald Trump speaks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington, DC, July 8, 2025. Photo: Kevin Lamarque via Reuters Connect.
The Trump administration escalated its showdown against Harvard University on Wednesday, reporting the institution to its accreditor for alleged civil rights violations resulting from its weak response to reports of antisemitic bullying, discrimination, and harassment following Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023 massacre across southern Israel.
The US Department of Education (DOE) announced the action on Wednesday. Citing Harvard’s admitted failure to treat antisemitism as seriously as it treated others forms of hatred in the past, the DOE called on the New England Commission of Higher Education to review and, potentially, revoke its accreditation — a designation which qualifies Harvard for federal funding and attests to the quality of the educational services its provides.
“Accrediting bodies play a significant role in preserving academic integrity and a campus culture conducive to truth seeking and learning,” said Secretary of Education Linda McMahon. “Part of that is ensuring students are safe on campus and abiding by federal laws that guarantee educational opportunities to all students. By allowing anti-Semitic harassment and discrimination to persist unchecked on its campus, Harvard University has failed in its obligation to students, educators, and American taxpayers.”
The DOE, McMahon added, “expects the New England Commission of Higher Education to enforce its policies and practices, and to keep the Department fully informed of its efforts to ensure that Harvard is in compliance with federal law and accreditor standards.”
As previously reported by The Algemeiner, Harvard’s Presidential Task Force on Combating Antisemitism has acknowledged that the university administration’s handling of campus antisemitism fell well below its obligations under both Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and its own nondiscrimination policies.
In a 300-plus-page report, the task force compiled a comprehensive record of antisemitic incidents on Harvard’s campus in recent years — from the Harvard Palestine Solidarity Committee’s endorsement of the Oct. 7 terrorist atrocities to an anti-Zionist faculty group’s sharing an antisemitic cartoon depicting Jews as murderers of people of color. The report identified Harvard’s past refusal to afford Jews the same protections against discrimination enjoyed by other minority groups as a key source of its problem.
Coming several weeks after President Donald Trump ordered the freeze of $2.26 billion in federal research grants and contracts for Harvard, the task force report found it was “clear” that antisemitism and anti-Israel bias have been fomented, practiced, and tolerated not only at Harvard but also within academia more widely.”
The university is now suing the federal government over the funding halt.
President Trump has spoken scathingly of Harvard, calling it, for example, an “Anti-Semitic, Far Left Institute … with students being accepted from all over the world that want to rip our Country apart” in an April post to his Truth Social platform.
In recent weeks, however, both Trump and McMahon had commended Harvard’s constructive response in negotiations over reforms the administration has asked it to implement as a precondition for restoring federal funds. The requested reforms include hiring more conservative faculty, shuttering diversity, equity, and inclusion [DEI] programs, and slashing the size of administrative offices tangential to the university’s central educational mission.
The administration has since changed its tone in the wake of a report by The Harvard Crimson that interim Harvard President Alan Garber has said “behind closed doors” that he has no intention of doing anything that would make Harvard more palatable to conservatives.
Earlier this month, the Trump administration’s Joint Task Force to Combat Antisemitism issued Harvard a formal “notice of violation” of civil rights law. Charging that Harvard willfully exposed Jewish students to a flood of racist and antisemitic abuse both in and outside of the classroom, it threatened to strip whatever remains of Harvard’s federal funding.
“Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources and continue to affect Harvard’s relationship with the federal government,” wrote the federal officials comprising the multiagency Task Force. “Harvard may of course continue to operate free of federal privileges, and perhaps such an opportunity will spur a commitment to excellence that will help Harvard thrive once again.”
In Wednesday’s announcement, US Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said Harvard’s conduct “forfeits the legitimacy that accreditation is designed to uphold.”
“HHS and Department of Education will actively hold Harvard accountable through sustained oversight until it restores public trust and ensures a campus free of discrimination,” he said.
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
The post Hardball: Trump Administration Reports Harvard to Accreditor Over Antisemitism Allegations first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
IDF Strikes Hezbollah Sites in South Lebanon as Terror Group Pushes to Rebuild Amid US Disarmament Talks
IDF operating in southern Lebanon. Photo: IDF Spokesperson
Israeli forces uncovered and destroyed Hezbollah weapons caches in southern Lebanon on Wednesday, as a new report indicated that despite ongoing U.S.-led efforts to secure a disarmament deal, the Iran-backed group is making repeated, largely concealed attempts to rebuild its military presence in the area.
Troops carried out several operations targeting Hezbollah infrastructure in southern Lebanon on Wednesday morning, destroying weapons depots, explosives and multibarrel launchers concealed in forested terrain, the IDF said, in violation of the November ceasefire, which requires Hezbollah to withdraw its forces 20 miles from the Israeli border.
A new report released this week by the Alma Research and Education Center found that Hezbollah is focused on rebuilding in three areas: operational deployment, weapons acquisition, and financial recovery.
“Hezbollah didn’t give up its resistance narrative and motivation,” Alma’s director, Lt. Col. (Res.) Sarit Zehavi, told The Algemeiner.
“It wants to rebuild its capabilities and infrastructures, whether it’s the villages that will be used as human shields or the military infrastructure in South Lebanon and in Lebanon in general.”
According to Zehavi, Hezbollah is attempting to return Radwan fighters to positions south of the Litani River as part of a wider plan to restore its elite forces to operational readiness. The IDF on Monday killed Radwan commander Ali Abd al-Hassan Haidar in a targeted strike. The action came hours after US Special Envoy for Syria Thomas Barrack met with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri in Beirut to discuss a long-term deal that would include an Israeli withdrawal and complete disarmament of Hezbollah.
Barrack described the Lebanese response to the proposal as positive. Later, he issued a blunt warning to Hezbollah in response to a vow by the terror group’s leader, Naim Qassem, not to lay down its arms. “If they mess with us anywhere in the world, they will have a serious problem with us,” Barrack said in an interview with Lebanese news network LBCI. “They don’t want that.”
Zehavi said it was premature to predict the outcome of the diplomatic efforts. She warned that the challenge of disarming Hezbollah remains enormous and emphasized that the Lebanese Armed Forces have not demonstrated the capability or willingness to confront the group.
“It’s too soon to be optimistic or pessimistic,” she said, noting that no firm commitments have emerged from the Beirut talks.
Hezbollah’s efforts to smuggle and manufacture weapons have been complicated by both Israeli strikes and the regional realignment over recent months. While Israeli strikes have disrupted many supply routes, according to Zehavi, Syrian authorities have intercepted far more Hezbollah-bound weapons than the Lebanese Army, which claims to have uncovered 500 arms caches but has provided no evidence.
The financial front marks the third aspect of Hezbollah’s rebuilding effort. Last week, the group halted cash payments to Shiite civilians whose homes were damaged in the war, citing liquidity problems. Zehavi attributed the shortfall to disruptions in Iran’s funding networks — an outcome of the 12-day war against the regime in Tehran — and said the constraints would likely hamper Hezbollah’s ability to compensate its base and sustain operations.
“I hope they will continue to have problems with the cash flow, that way it will be very difficult for them to recover,” she said.
The post IDF Strikes Hezbollah Sites in South Lebanon as Terror Group Pushes to Rebuild Amid US Disarmament Talks first appeared on Algemeiner.com.