Uncategorized
4,000 Dead and Global Silence: Why the ‘Red-Green’ Coalition Abandoned Iran
A burnt car lies on the road following unrest sparked by dire economic conditions, in a place given as Tehran, Iran, Jan. 10, 2026, in this screengrab from Iran’s state media broadcast footage. Photo: IRIB via WANA(West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
Iran is bleeding, and the world is looking away. In less than a month of nationwide unrest, more than 4,000 people have been killed by the Islamic Republic, according to human rights monitors. The overwhelming majority were peaceful demonstrators. Dozens were children. Major cities have become open crime scenes, their streets stained with the cost of defiance. Yet as the regime wages an internal war against its own population, much of the Western “human rights” establishment has chosen silence.
That silence is not an oversight. It is ideological.
For months, Western activists have paralyzed capitals, universities, and public squares with an obsessive focus on Gaza. Entire movements have been mobilized, careers built, and institutions captured in the name of “justice.” But when millions of Iranians rise up against the world’s most aggressive theocracy — the regime that bankrolls militias from Yemen to Lebanon, and exports violence far beyond its borders — the protest class vanishes. No mass demonstrations. No urgent statements. No moral panic.
This selective outrage exposes the real operating logic of what has come to be known as the “Red-Green” coalition: the convergence of radical leftism and political Islam. This alliance is not rooted in human rights or liberation, but in opposition — to Western liberal democracy, national sovereignty, and Israel. Within this worldview, the clerical regime in Tehran is not a tyranny to be dismantled, but a useful “anti-imperial” actor. Iranians demanding basic freedoms therefore disrupt the narrative. Their deaths are inconvenient.
While Western activists avert their gaze, the Islamic Republic is facing its most serious internal crisis since its founding. The wall of fear that sustained the regime for decades has collapsed.
Economically, the system is imploding in real time. The national currency has disintegrated, wiping out savings and destroying what remains of the middle and merchant classes. The Grand Bazaar — once a pillar of regime stability and a traditional pressure valve — is no longer insulated from revolt. When shopkeepers lose everything, ideology no longer matters.
The slogans echoing across Iran tell the story with brutal clarity. “No Lebanon, no Gaza — our lives for Iran” is not just a chant; it is a rejection of the regime’s core project. For years, Tehran has poured resources into foreign militias while telling its own people to endure poverty for the sake of “resistance.” That lie has collapsed. Iranians now openly name the regime’s priorities as betrayal.
The response from much of the Western left has been a masterclass in moral collapse. The same activists who demand liberation from a democratic state remain silent as Iranian security forces execute wounded protesters in hospitals, torture detainees, and gun down teenagers in the streets. This is not a failure of information. The evidence is abundant. The silence is deliberate.
This is how “organized impunity” works: atrocities are ignored when committed by regimes that position themselves against the West. Accountability is reserved exclusively for democracies. Tyranny is excused so long as it speaks the language of “anti-colonialism.”
The consequences are tangible and dangerous. European institutions continue to delay the most basic moral act: designating the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization. The IRGC is not a conventional military force. It is the regime’s enforcement arm, responsible for internal repression, foreign terror, and the blood now flooding Iranian streets. Endless debate in the face of mass murder is not diplomacy. It is complicity.
The Iranian people do not need Western mediation, dialogue, or technocratic management of their revolution. They need clarity — moral, political, and strategic. The defeat of the clerical regime would be the single most significant blow to radical Islamism in a generation. It would dismantle the central hub of regional destabilization and end a system built on exported antisemitism and permanent war.
Those who claim to champion justice but refuse to stand with Iran’s protesters have already made their choice. They have aligned themselves with power over principle, ideology over life.
History will remember this moment. The Iranian people have already won the cognitive war. They understand that the regime is an occupying force, alien to their future and hostile to their dignity. What remains is the physical struggle.
Peace in the Middle East will not emerge from conferences, slogans, or moral posturing. It will come when the Islamic Republic collapses under the weight of its crimes — and when the world can no longer pretend it did not know what was happening as Iran fought for its freedom.
Amine Ayoub, a fellow at the Middle East Forum, is a policy analyst and writer based in Morocco. Follow him on X: @amineayoubx
Uncategorized
Providence voters pass ballot initiative that could lead to divestment of city funds from Israel
(JTA) — Voters in Providence, Rhode Island, have approved a ballot measure that could result in the city divesting public funds from Israel, according to local media, in a major victory for the Israel boycott movement.
In a major victory for the Israel boycott movement, voters in Providence, Rhode Island, have approved a ballot measure that could result in the city divesting public funds from Israel, according to local media.
With 81 of 82 polling locations partially reported, the Rhode Island Board of Elections tallied 75% voting to approve the measure versus 25% rejecting. Both the Rhode Island Current and the Boston Globe report the measure was approved.
“We are overjoyed that the city of Providence has voted — by more than a 3 to 1 margin — to divest our collective dollars from support for genocide and ethnic cleansing,” Lex Rofeberg, who runs the alternative Jewish engagement network Judaism Unbound and was an organizer with the Providence divestment initiative, told JTA. “This historic moment can serve as an example for other cities around the country hoping to align their investments with their values.”
The ordinance calls for the capital city to refrain from investing in “foreign countries conducting ethnic cleansing, apartheid, illegal military occupation, or genocide.” Though the ballot language does not mention Israel by name, it was heavily supported by local pro-Palestinian groups and opposed by some Jewish and pro-Israel groups.
A representative for the Jewish Alliance of Greater Rhode Island previously told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency that the group would explore legal options to challenge the ballot measure in the event that it passed.
The vote makes Providence the largest municipality yet to vote in favor of some form of Israel divestment, following the lead of Somerville, Massachusetts, whose voters approved a nonbinding divestment measure last year. Providence is home to an estimated 15,000 Jews, or around 7% of its population. Progressive Jewish groups, including the local chapter of Jewish Voice for Peace, were among the ballot measure’s advocates.
The city’s mayor, Brett Smiley, a pro-Israel Democrat who converted to Judaism while in office, lost his primary to a democratic socialist, an early indicator of which way the divestment vote would go.
Activist initiatives to challenge U.S. financial aid to Israel have picked up steam in the years since the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attacks and ensuing Gaza war. On the morning of Election Day, President Donald Trump, who described aid to Israel as a political liability, announced the U.S. would end nearly $4 billion in annual military aid to Israel by the end of the year.
The post Providence voters pass ballot initiative that could lead to divestment of city funds from Israel appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
Republican Lawler concedes to Democrat Conley in fierce battle for Jewish vote in NYC suburbs
(JTA) — Republican congressman Mike Lawler has conceded to Democratic challenger Cait Conley, a former national security official, after competing fiercely for Jewish voters in the lower Hudson Valley of New York.
Lawler has been a staunchly pro-Israel member since joining Congress in 2023, and was endorsed by the Republican Jewish Coalition and the pro-Israel lobbying group AIPAC.
Conley was endorsed by the pro-Israel group Democratic Majority for Israel, and has said she supports Israel while opposing the Benjamin Netanyahu government.
Lawler, who is Catholic, has deep ties to the district’s large Orthodox Jewish population, and touted their support recently when asked about the neck-and-neck polling.
Both Lawler and Conley have tried tying their opponent to polarizing figures in their respective parties. Lawler has asserted that Conley, a moderate, will not separate herself from the progressive wing of the Democratic Party and particularly New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who has a lower favorability rating outside the city. Conley denounced Mamdani’s statement on the three-year anniversary of the Oct. 7, 2023 attack after Lawler challenged her to do so during a debate.
Conley, meanwhile, has tied Lawler to President Donald Trump, accusing him of being a rubber stamp for Trump’s legislative priorities.
The post Republican Lawler concedes to Democrat Conley in fierce battle for Jewish vote in NYC suburbs appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
In early LA mayoral results, Karen Bass holds slim lead over Nithya Raman, who sparred with DSA on Israel
Early returns in the Los Angeles mayoral election showed incumbent Karen Bass with a slim lead over Councilmember Nithya Raman, whose comments on Israel became a flashpoint in the race.
The first batch of results — totaling about 500,000 votes — showed Bass leading Raman, 50.8% to 49.2%.
The final outcome may not be known until Wednesday or later, a common occurrence in tight California races due to the preponderance of mail-in ballots. Nearly 90% of California voters did so by mail in the June primary.
But if the primary results are any indication, Bass’ lead may evaporate as more votes are counted.
In the June 2 open primary — a system in which the top two vote-getters from any party advance to a runoff — Raman trailed a Republican, Spencer Pratt, by eight points for second place behind Bass. She won the ensuing batches of mail-in ballots, but did not pass Pratt until June 7. She ultimately surpassed him by more than four percentage points.
Raman, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, has clashed with the organization — and frustrated many of her Jewish constituents — while trying to strike a balance on Israel. She has called the war in Gaza a genocide, but declined to adopt the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions platform — a stance that led the DSA to consider expelling her.
Bass, a mainstream Democrat who served six terms in Congress before running for mayor in 2022, entered the race as a historically unpopular incumbent, largely thanks to her response to the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires. Raman endorsed Bass prior to declaring her own candidacy on the last day to enter the race, a move Bass has characterized as a personal betrayal.
The polls swung back and forth in the weeks leading up to the election. Bass, who won most labor endorsements, was leading until September, when one poll sponsored by the Los Angeles Times showed Raman ahead by 11 points with a third of voters still undecided. A follow-up poll by the Times last week showed the two in a dead heat.
Unlike many other DSA candidates up for election across the country on Tuesday, Raman, an urban policy wonk who immigrated to the U.S. from India when she was 6, never made Israel a focal point of her campaign. Instead, she focused more on housing, homelessness and budget policy.
But her membership in the DSA, an interview she granted Hasan Piker during the primary and the genocide comments dogged her anyway, especially among Jewish Angelenos.
Raman, after publicly condemning the DSA’s anti-Israel statements after Oct. 7, sponsored a resolution for a ceasefire and return of hostages in March 2024, disappointing mainstream Jewish groups who called the motion one-sided. Then, during the primary, Raman told Piker she believed the Gaza war was a genocide and that Israel was an apartheid state. She also said she would not seek the endorsement of pro-Israel Democratic party groups as she had in 2024.
Her record on Israel seemed likely to come up when Raman participated in the candidate forum for Jewish voters Sept. 29. But Raman struggled to get through answers about the DSA, Piker and especially genocide and BDS — which she called a “legitimate form of peaceful protest” — leading to loud audience groans. During Bass’ turn on stage, the mayor said she did not support BDS and did not believe the war in Gaza was a genocide.
Mail-in voters historically skew to the left, and the primary vote may offer a preview of the margin Raman might need.
In that election, about 58% of the total votes were tallied election night, when Bass led Raman 36.5% to 21%. Raman got the biggest share of the ensuing ballot batches, beating Bass by about five percentage points.
The post In early LA mayoral results, Karen Bass holds slim lead over Nithya Raman, who sparred with DSA on Israel appeared first on The Forward.
