Uncategorized
Book bans, Ukraine and the end of Roe: The year 2022 in Jewish ideas
(JTA) — Jewish eras can be defined by events (the fall of the Second Temple, the Inquisition, the founding of Israel) and by ideas (the rabbinic era, emancipation, post-denominationalism). A community reveals itself in the things it argues about most passionately.
It’s too early to tell what ideas will define this era, although a look back at the big debates of 2022 suggests Jews in North America will be discussing a few issues for a long time: the resurgence of antisemitism, the boundaries of free speech, the red/blue culture wars.
Below are eight of some of the key debates of the past year as (mostly) reflected in the Jewish Telegraphic Agency’s opinion section (which I have a hand in editing). They suggest, above all, a community anxious about its standing in the American body politic despite its strength and self-confidence.
Antisemitism and the Black-Jewish alliance
The rapper Kanye West spread canards about Jews and power. Brooklyn Nets star Kyrie Irving shared an antisemitic film on Twitter. And comedian Dave Chappelle made light of both incidents on “Saturday Night Live,” suggesting comics like him had more to fear from cancellation than Jews did from rising antisemitism. The central roles played in these controversies by three African-American celebrities revived longstanding tensions between two communities who haven’t been able to count on their historic ties since the end of the civil rights era. The war of words was particularly vexing for Jews of color, like the rabbi known as MaNishtana and Rabbi Kendell Pinkney — who wondered whether “my mixed Jewish child will grow up in an America where she feels compelled to closet aspects of her identity because society cannot hold the wonder of her complexity.”
Jewish attitudes toward Ukraine
Russia’s war on Ukraine stirred up complex feelings among Jews. It led to an outpouring of support for the innocents caught up in or sent fleeing by Russia’s invasion, and the Jewish president who became their symbol of defiance. It reinvigorated a Jewish rescue apparatus that seemed to have been in hibernation for years. And it probed Jews’ memories of their own historic suffering in Ukraine, often at the hands of the ancestors of those now under attack.
Jews and the end of Roe v. Wade
In June the U.S. Supreme Court voted 5-4 to overturn Roe v. Wade. It was an unthinkable outcome for liberal Jewish activists, women especially, who for 50 years and more had regarded the right to an abortion as integral to their Jewish identity and political worldview. Before the decision came down, Jewish studies scholar Michael Raucher questioned long-held Jewish organizational views that justified abortion only on the narrowest of religious grounds without acknowledging that women “have the bodily autonomy to make that decision on their own.” Conversely, Avi Shafran of Agudath Israel of America welcomed the end of Roe on behalf of his haredi Orthodox organization, writing that the rabbis “who guide us indisputably hold that, absent extraordinary circumstances, terminating a pregnancy is a grave sin.” Responding to Shafran, Daphne Lazar Price, an Orthodox Jewish feminist, argued that even in her stringently religious community, getting an abortion is a “conscious choice by women to follow their religious convictions and maintain their human dignity.”
Colleyville and synagogue safety
A police chaplain walks near the Congregation Beth Israel Synagogue in Colleyville, Texas Jan. 15, 2022. (Andy Jacobsohn/AFP via Getty Images)
After a gunman held a rabbi and three congregants hostage at a Colleyville, Texas synagogue in January, Jewish institutions called for even tighter security at buildings that had already been hardened after the Pittsburgh synagogue massacre in 2018. And yet for some, the sight of armed guards and locked doors undermines the spirit of a house of worship. Raphael Magarik of the University of Illinois Chicago argued that the Colleyville incident shouldn’t lead to an overreaction, especially when congregations are struggling to come back together after the pandemic. Rabbi Joshua Ladon warned about the “impulse to allow fear to define our actions.” Meanwhile, Jews of color said armed guards and police patrols can make them feel unsafe. In a powerful response, Mijal Bitton and Rabbi Isaiah Rothstein of the Shalom Hartman Center wrote that Jewish institutions must think in “expansive and creative ways about how to fight for our combined safety in a way that takes into account the rich ethnic and racial diversity of our communities.”
Anti-Zionism, antisemitism and “Jew-free zones”
When nine student groups at UC Berkeley’s law school adopted by-laws saying that they will not invite speakers who support Zionism, the Jewish Journal in Los Angeles ran an op-ed with the provocative headline, “Berkeley Develops Jewish Free Zones.” In the essay, Kenneth L. Marcus, who heads the Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, argued that “Zionism is an integral aspect of the identity of many Jews,” and that the bylaws act as “racially restrictive covenants,” precluding Jewish participation. Defenders of the pro-Palestinian students countered that groups often invite only like-minded speakers, and that while being Jewish is an identity, Zionism is a political viewpoint. Faculty, politicians and activists weighed in on both sides of what has become a central debate on campuses and beyond: When does anti-Zionism become antisemitism, and how do you balance free speech rights against the claims by some students that their personal safety hangs in the balance?
“Maus” and school book bans
A Tennessee school board voted to remove “Maus” — Art Speigelman’s epic cartoon memoir about the Holocaust — from middle-school classrooms. (JTA photo)
Caught up in an epidemic of book-banning were Jewish books for children and young adults, a list that includes “The Purim Superhero,” “Family Fletcher” and “Chik Chak Shabbat.” A Texas school board removed a 2018 graphic novel adaptation of Anne Frank’s diary. But perhaps the highest profile case of a Jewish-interest book being banned came when a Tennessee school board voted to remove “Maus” — Art Speigelman’s epic cartoon memoir about the Holocaust — from middle-school classrooms, citing its use of profanity, nudity and depictions of “killing kids.” Coverage of the ban misleadingly depicted “Maus” as an introduction to the Shoah for young adults, while Speigelman recently noted that he had become a reluctant “metonym” for the book-banning issue. Jennifer Caplan explained why the book is indispensable: “‘Maus’ forces the reader to bear witness in a way no written account can, and the [illustrations] are especially good at forcing the eye to see what the mind prefers to glide past.”
Artificial intelligence and real-life dilemmas
Artificial intelligence, or AI, has become a fact of corporate life, with computing advances that power robotic automation, computer vision and natural-language text generation. But what captured the public imagination — and dread — this year were sites like Dall-E, which threatened the livelihood of graphic designers by generating original, credible illustrations with no more than a simple prompt, and ChatGPT, which is able to expound cogently and humanly on practically any topic. Beyond everyday ethical dilemmas (“Can I write my book report using ChatGPT?”) AI raised profound questions about what it means to be human. “Rabbis have historically been very open to the idea of nonhuman sentience and have tended to see parallels between humans and nonhumans as an excuse to treat nonhumans better,” wrote David Zvi Kalman in an essay on the prospect of creating artificial life. Similarly, Mois Navon suggested in JTA that “if a machine is sentient, it is no longer an inanimate object with no moral status or ‘rights’ … but rather an animate being with the status of a ‘moral patient’ to whom we owe consideration.
A Pulitzer for “The Netanyahus”
Author Joshua Cohen won the 2022 Pulitzer Prize in Fiction for his novel “The Netanyahus.” (Roberto Serra—Iguana Press/Getty Images)
Joshua Cohen was the somewhat surprising winner of the Pulitzer Prize in Fiction for his novel “The Netanyahus: An Account of a Minor and Ultimately Even Negligible Episode in the History of a Very Famous Family.” Or maybe not so surprising: The book is a fictionalized treatment of a real-life visit in the late 1950s by the Israeli historian Benzion Netanyahu for a job interview at a university very much like Cornell. With Benzion’s son Benjamin angling for an ultimately successful return to office in real life, a satire about Jewish power, right-wing Zionism and Israeli self-regard might have seemed to the judges very much of the moment. As critic Adam Kirsch wrote in a JTA essay, Cohen concludes that both American and Israeli Jewish identities “are absurd, crying out for the kind of satire that can only come from intimate knowledge.” Others weren’t amused. Jewish Currents criticized the novel for being derivative of both Philip Roth and Saul Bellow, and the Jewish Review of Books said that the novel includes “a capsule history of Zionism that is so blatant a distortion that I just gave up.”
—
The post Book bans, Ukraine and the end of Roe: The year 2022 in Jewish ideas appeared first on Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
Uncategorized
Syria Leads World in Improving Freedom, Report Says, Amid Concerns Over Regime’s Jihadist Links
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa attends the Ministry of Awqaf conference titled “Unity of Islamic Discourse” at the Conference Palace in Damascus, Syria, Feb. 16, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi
The same week that an influential survey of global freedom named Syria as the most improved country in the world, Syrian authorities announced a crackdown on alcohol sales in Damascus amid persecution for those failing to fast for a full day during Ramadan.
On Thursday, the nonprofit advocacy group Freedom House released its annual report reviewing the rise and fall of freedom around the world, rating countries based on their political rights and civil liberties. The organization offered a grim overall assessment, noting that freedom had fallen for the 20th consecutive year, with 54 nations declining in 2025. Today only 21 percent of human beings live in countries classified as free, a drop of 46 percent from 20 years ago, according to the report.
“Even as 2026 has brought new opportunities for those living under authoritarian rule from Venezuela to Iran, the last 20 years have been a dark period for global freedom,” Freedom House CEO Jamie Fly said in a statement. “Those who still enjoy the blessings of freedom must do more to counter authoritarianism and provide more effective support for the democratic aspirations of people standing up to repression around the world, or this persistent decline will continue.”
However, one Middle Eastern country in particular stood as a bright spot countering the trend.
“Syria received the world’s largest score improvement for the year, bringing cautious optimism to a region dominated by entrenched authoritarian rule,” the report stated.
Last year, “foreign and independent local media outlets were able to report critically from inside Syria, civil society organizations were able to register and operate more freely, and oppressive Assad-era legal restrictions started to be rolled back,” the report added, referring to long-time Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, who was toppled in December 2024.
Ahmed al-Sharaa became Syria’s official president after leading the rebel campaign that ousted Assad — whose Iran-backed rule had strained ties with the Arab world during the nearly 14-year Syrian war — in an offensive spearheaded by al-Sharaa’s Islamist group, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a former al Qaeda affiliate.
Since taking power, al-Sharaa has sought to depict himself as a moderate leader who wants to unify his country and attract foreign investment to rebuild it after years of civil war. Many foreign leaders and experts have been skeptical of him, however, questioning whether he is still a jihadist trying to disguise his extremism.
Incidents of sectarian violence — including the mass killing of pro-Assad Alawites — have deepened fears among minority groups about the rise of Islamist factions and drawn condemnation from global powers currently engaged in discussions on sanctions relief and humanitarian aid.
The US has moved to lift an array of sanctions previously imposed on Syria under Assad. Until recently, al-Sharaa was sanctioned by the US as a foreign terrorist with a $10 million bounty on his head.
However, Freedom House said it observed significant improvement for the freedom of Syrians, despite major challenges.
Freedom House described how in Syria today, “citizens and a transitional government face profound challenges in erecting a democratic system after more than half a century of dictatorship. The civil war that began in 2011 has devastated public institutions and infrastructure, while sectarian polarization and ongoing violence further complicate efforts to create credible transitional justice mechanisms and introduce the rule of law.”
An example of that sectarianism manifested on Monday evening, when the Damascus governorate announced a number of measures to restrict alcohol sales. The rules will require nightclubs and bars with liquor licenses to convert into cafe licenses. The city will only allow alcohol purchases with sealed bottles from stores in majority Christian places. This conflicts with Syrian law, which does not ban alcohol, as well as human rights treaties signed by Syrian protecting the right to drink alcohol.
The regulations also limit the locations of alcohol vendors, banning them from operating 75 meters from houses of worship and schools with only three months to comply. One unnamed bar owner told The Arab Weekly that he had anticipated the change and would close in response. He noted that he had seen a decline in his customers since the rise of l-Sharaa’s government last year. Other restaurants have reportedly adapted to the change by taking alcohol off of menus or shifting to serving drinks in teacups.
Syria’s leaders have opposed religious freedom in other ways recently, with The Arab Weekly citing reports of arrests and firings for those who break Ramadan fasts early.
Freedom House researchers offered additional insights into the depths of authoritarianism around the world and its hot spots. The states with the heaviest drop in rankings last year were Guinea-Bissau (−8), Tanzania (−7), Burkina Faso, (−5), Madagascar (−5), and El Salvador (−5).
The countries which received the worst overall scores were South Sudan (0), Sudan (1), and Turkmenistan (1) on the organization’s 100-point scale.
Iran saw a fall by one point, reaching a score of 10 total points, with Freedom House explaining that authorities arrested more than 21,000 people “as part of a crackdown on alleged espionage and collaboration following the regime’s 12-day war with Israel in June” and that the regime had expelled “some 1.8 million Afghan migrants and refugees without regard for their basic rights.”
Russia and China maintained their scores of 12 and 9, respectively, with Freedom House stating that “Russian authorities took further steps to suppress antiwar speech and independent journalism, while Chinese officials cracked down on small but multiplying protests.”
The report noted numerous military coups in Africa, identifying nine since 2019 with Madagascar the most recent.
“Mali provides just one example of the lasting damage done by military coups. Conditions in several countries, including Burkina Faso and Niger, continued to deteriorate in 2025 after a wave of military coups beginning in 2019 toppled governments across the Sahel and West Africa,” the report stated. “In both countries, freedom continued to decline in the years following the coups, as the junta leaders acted unilaterally to consolidate power and used increasingly violent methods to suppress dissent.”
In Burkina Faso, the military indefinitely suspended elections, while in Niger the junta dissolved all political parties.
“We continue to see that the desire for freedom is universal,” said Yana Gorokhovskaia, who co-authored the report and works as Freedom House’s research director. “From Belarus to Zimbabwe, people around the world are taking great personal risks to stand up and defend their fundamental rights.”
Gorokhovskaia said that to reverse the global decline in freedom, “democratic governments and societies must demonstrate their solidarity with those seeking freedom, in part through funding and diplomatic support for frontline human rights defenders and nongovernmental organizations.”
Uncategorized
College Republicans Chapter Sues University of Florida for Deactivating Group Over Nazi Salutes
Members of University of Florida’s College Republicans chapter. Photo: Screenshot
The University of Florida’s College Republicans chapter has teamed up with a local far-right lawyer to sue the school for closing the student club after learning that two of its leaders photographed themselves pantomiming the Nazi salute.
“The University of Florida punitively deactivated and shut down the [University of Florida College Republicans] in response to alleged viewpoints expressed by a member … and in an effort to silence the club and chill its future free speech,” said the lawyer, Anthony Sabatini, who was seemingly enlisted to defend the student club’s right to support Nazism. “No university policy, rule, or law provides UF a lawful basis for the deactivation. We are seeking an emergency preliminary injunction.”
Sabatini is an alumnus of the University of Florida and was once a “Lincoln Fellow” selected by the Claremont Institute, a think tank in California known for its rejection of the so-called “east coast” wing of the conservative movement and advocacy of “post-liberalism.” Sabatini’s social media activity includes reposts of material by Tucker Carlson and Ann Coulter, as well as his denouncing Republicans such as US Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and White House chief of staff Susan Wiles as “piece[s] of s–t.” He has also endorsed James Fishback, a candidate for governor of Florida who built his reputation by criticizing Israel and refusing to condemn antisemitic podcaster Nicholas Fuentes.
On March 8, Sabatini tweeted, “I hated Mark Levin before it was cool,” an allusion to the Jewish political commentator’s feuds with far-right provocateurs who have attempted to foster suspicion around his membership in the conservative movement.
As previously reported by The Algemeiner, the University of Florida said last week it would shutter its College Republicans chapter at the request of the Florida Federation of College Republicans (FFCR), which disbanded the group.
Since then, members of the student club have alleged that the Florida Federation lacks jurisdiction over the organization, insisting that it is registered with the College Republicans of America group. There are several contending “College Republican” groups, including the original College Republican National Committee founded in 1892, College Republicans United, the National Federation of College Republicans (NFCR), and College Republicans.
Regardless of the outcome of the legal dispute, the incident marked the second time this month that conservative youth were publicly outed for indulging Nazism and the white supremacist movement.
Earlier this month, leaked texts revealed dozens of antisemitic and racist texts exchanged by young Republicans in Miami-Dade County, Florida, some of which fantasized about engaging in onanism in an all-white country.
As first reported by The Miami Herald, the group chat, created on WhatsApp, was described by its members as “Nazi heaven” for the daily barrage of extremist comments contributed to it. Individuals affiliated with the Miami-Dade Country Republicans, Turning Point USA, and College Republicans casually said “ni—er,” denounced women as “whores,” and spoke rapturously about Adolf Hitler.
Dariel Gonzalez, according to the Herald, was one of the chat’s most prolific contributors, bandying about comments regarding “color professors” and telling members that “You can f–k all the k—kes you want. Just don’t marry them and procreate.”
The group chat’s exposure comes at a time when, according to recent polling, young Republicans have increasingly embraced antisemitism and conspiracy theories.
Right-wing antisemitism is surging in popularity among conservative youth, seemingly in part due to the influence of online commentators such as Nick Fuentes, Candace Owens, and Tucker Carlson.
In September, a conservative magazine at Harvard University published an opinion piece which bore likeness to key tenets of Nazi doctrine, as first articulated in 1925 in Hitler’s autobiographical manifesto Mein Kampf, or My Struggle, and later in a blitzkrieg of speeches he delivered throughout the Nazi era to justify his genocide of European Jews.
Written by David F.X. Army, the article chillingly echoed a January 1939 Reichstag speech in which Hitler portended mass killings of Jews as the outcome of Germany’s inexorable march toward war with France and Great Britain. Whereas Hitler said, “France to the French, England to the English, America to the Americans, and Germany to the Germans,” Army wrote, “Germany belongs to the Germans, France to the French, Britain to the British, America to the Americans.”
Army also called for the adoption of notions of “blood, soil, language, and love of one’s own” in response to concerns over large-scale migration of Muslims into Europe.
In Nazi ideology, “blood and soil,” or Blut und Boden, encapsulated the party’s belief in eugenics and racial purity; the German “Aryans’” right to expand into Eastern Europe to amass new Lebensraum, or “living space”; and the transformation of the German peasantry into an agricultural class which stood in contrasts to Jews, many of whom lived in cities.
Meanwhile, antisemitic hate crimes have spiked to record levels across the US.
In January, Stephen Pittman, 19, allegedly ignited a catastrophic fire which decimated the Beth Israel Congregation synagogue in Jackson, Mississippi. After being arrested, Pittman confessed and told US federal investigators that he targeted the institution over its “Jewish ties,” according to court filings.
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
Uncategorized
‘I’m alive!’: Netanyahu speaks in-person amid ongoing online rumors claiming he’s dead
“I am alive — and you are all witnesses,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday, opening a rare in-person news conference with foreign reporters in Jerusalem.
Netanyahu was addressing a viral online rumor that he had been killed in an Iranian missile strike on March 8. The false claims gained traction after a Sunday press conference in which he appeared via Zoom, taking questions from Israeli journalists without disclosing his location amid ongoing Iranian ballistic missile attacks and following the assassination of senior regime figures.
The low-quality video he later posted on X fueled further speculation, as some users pointed to what they claimed was a six-fingered hand as evidence that it had been AI-generated to conceal his death.
In an effort to put the rumors to rest, Netanyahu released a video of himself ordering coffee on the outskirts of Jerusalem. But the clip took on a life of its own online. Much of the attention shifted to the barista, a young woman behind the counter whose warm smile went viral.
“I have got to ask you a question the entire internet is dying to hear the answer on: Is Benjamin Netanyahu dead?” media personality Mehdi Hasan asked Sen. Chris Van Hollen, a Democrat from Maryland who is a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, in an interview on Wednesday. Van Hollen, a fierce Netanyahu critic, was unequivocal. “No,” he said. “He is not dead.”
Netanyahu at start of press conference with foreign press:
“First of all, I just want to say I’m alive — and you’re all witnesses.” pic.twitter.com/B1ogphOTTD
— Jacob N. Kornbluh (@jacobkornbluh) March 19, 2026
Netanyahu’s appearance on Thursday was not only meant to show proof of life. It was also an attempt to counter criticism from some in the MAGA movement that Israel dragged the U.S. into an endless war with Tehran, and as U.S public opinion is turning against the joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran.
On Tuesday, a senior intelligence official resigned to protest the administration’s approach. Joe Kent, who had been director of the federal National Counterterrorism Center, claimed that Israeli officials had used lies to convince President Donald Trump to start the war.
The isolationist wing of the conservative movement — associated with antisemitic influencers like Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes — amplified those claims, adding further conspiracy theories, including claiming Israeli involvement in the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk last year.
“Does anyone really think that someone can tell President Trump what to do?” Netanyahu asked rhetorically. “Come on. President Trump always makes his decisions on what he thinks is good for America, and may I add, what is also good for future generations.”
The post ‘I’m alive!’: Netanyahu speaks in-person amid ongoing online rumors claiming he’s dead appeared first on The Forward.