Uncategorized
Britain Fails to Protect All Its Citizens from Iranian Threats
Demonstrators attend the “Lift the Ban” rally organized by Defend Our Juries, challenging the British government’s proscription of “Palestine Action” under anti-terrorism laws, in Parliament Square, in London, Britain, Sept. 6, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Carlos Jasso
The former head of MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove, had explicitly named Iranian agents in the UK as a threat against Britain’s Jewish community. His warning was issued well before the recent attack on the Manchester synagogue that left two people dead.
“There is a threat, there is a problem, whether it’s the inspiration of radicals who are going to attack the Jewish community, or whether it’s organizing demonstrations which intimidate the Jewish community and encouraging those,” Sir Dearlove told The Jewish Chronicle.
Yet despite Iran’s extensive network and footprint in the UK and the “significant threat” it poses to the United Kingdom, none of the numerous outlets and individuals propagating Iran’s influence in Britain have registered under the Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS) — clearly breaking the law and getting away with it.
When the UK’s Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS) received Royal Assent in July 2023, it was heralded as a landmark moment in Britain’s national security framework. Ministers and security officials described it as a “game changer” — a vital new tool to expose covert lobbying, counter foreign interference, and to protect British democracy. Then–Security Minister Tom Tugendhat confidently promised in a video on his YouTube channel that the measures would be used “immediately.”
Fast forward more than two years, and that “game changer” has so far turned out to be little more than a public relations exercise.
A three-month grace period was introduced in July 2025 to allow individuals and organizations to comply. Iran and Russia were placed under the enhanced tier, with officials warning that anyone acting on their behalf in the UK without registering could face up to five years in prison.
Security Minister Dan Jarvis boldly declared: “The Foreign Influence Registration Scheme sends a clear message: the UK will not tolerate covert foreign influence in our democracy. Those who fail to register risk up to five years in prison.”
Despite these strong words, for more than two years after the law was passed, no one knew how or where to register. There was no visible register, no clear process, and no enforcement. Repeated questions to the Home Secretary and Home Office went unanswered.
Only this month did the government finally publish a working link to the register: Foreign Influence Registration Scheme
And what does it reveal?
Just four registrations. Not from Iran, Russia, or China — the so-called “hostile states” — but from Congo and Bosnia!
It’s an outcome that makes a mockery of the government’s promises and exposes how disconnected Westminster’s security postures are from practical enforcement.
This comes despite repeated warnings from intelligence professionals. In 2013, the influential think tank Policy Exchange published an 87-page report, Tehran Calling, outlining Iran’s deep network of cultural, media, and charitable outlets in the UK.
More recently, in July 2025, the UK’s Intelligence and Security Committee released a 260-page report describing Iran as a “significant threat” to the UK, identifying journalists and regime critics in Britain as key targets of Iranian intelligence operations.
If the Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (FIRS) and the National Security Act were meant to mark a decisive leap forward in defending Britain from such threats, they have instead highlighted just how toothless and symbolic UK legislation has become.
Two years on, FIRS has had virtually zero impact — turning what was supposed to be a robust national security reform into a bureaucratic embarrassment.
The scheme’s purpose was sound: inspired by America’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), it aimed to make foreign influence transparent. But poor delivery, lack of enforcement, and political complacency have left it hollow. Critics who warned it would be “symbolic rather than substantive” have been proven right.
Meanwhile, covert influence operations, cyber campaigns, and recruitment of British youth for propaganda or criminal acts continue unimpeded.
Iran has continued to organize its annual Al-Quds Day rallies openly carrying posters of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, and the police officers tasked with policing the rallies having no idea about what FIRS is!
Since the start of 2022, according to Sir Ken McCallum, the director general of MI5, the UK has responded to 20 Iran-backed plots, presenting potentially lethal threats to British citizens and UK residents.
In May of this year, the Israeli embassy in London was the target of an alleged terror plot involving a group of Iranian nationals who were detained by police after a series of raids across England. It is thought it was the Israeli intelligence who tipped off their British counterparts.
With only four entries to show for all the hype, the Foreign Influence Registration Scheme has not just failed to deliver — it has undermined faith in the UK’s ability to take its own national security seriously.
Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) Senior Fellow Potkin Azarmehr is a London-based investigative journalist, business intelligence analyst, and TV documentary maker who was born in Iran. He regularly contributes to several newspapers and television stations on Iran and Middle East related news. You can follow him on Twitter @potkazar. A version of this article was originally published by IPT.
Uncategorized
Tucker’s Ideas About Jews Come from Darkest Corners of the Internet, Says Huckabee After Combative Interview
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee looks on during the day he visits the Western Wall, Judaism’s holiest prayer site, in Jerusalem’s Old City, April 18, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun
i24 News – In a combative interview with US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, right-wing firebrand Tucker Carlson made a host of contentious and often demonstrably false claims that quickly went viral online. Huckabee, who repeatedly challenged the former Fox News star during the interview, subsequently made a long post on X, identifying a pattern of bad-faith arguments, distortions and conspiracies in Carlson’s rhetorical style.
Huckabee pointed out his words were not accorded by Carlson the same degree of attention and curiosity the anchor evinced toward such unsavory characters as “the little Nazi sympathizer Nick Fuentes or the guy who thought Hitler was the good guy and Churchill the bad guy.”
“What I wasn’t anticipating was a lengthy series of questions where he seemed to be insinuating that the Jews of today aren’t really same people as the Jews of the Bible,” Huckabee wrote, adding that Tucker’s obsession with conspiracies regarding the provenance of Ashkenazi Jews obscured the fact that most Israeli Jews were refugees from the Arab and Muslim world.
The idea that Ashkenazi Jews are an Asiatic tribe who invented a false ancestry “gained traction in the 80’s and 90’s with David Duke and other Klansmen and neo-Nazis,” Huckabee wrote. “It has really caught fire in recent years on the Internet and social media, mostly from some of the most overt antisemites and Jew haters you can find.”
Carlson branded Israel “probably the most violent country on earth” and cited the false claim that Israel President Isaac Herzog had visited the infamous island of the late, disgraced sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
“The current president of Israel, whom I know you know, apparently was at ‘pedo island.’ That’s what it says,” Carlson said, citing a debunked claim made by The Times reporter Gabrielle Weiniger. “Still-living, high-level Israeli officials are directly implicated in Epstein’s life, if not his crimes, so I think you’d be following this.”
Another misleading claim made by Carlson was that there were more Christians in Qatar than in Israel.
Uncategorized
Pezeshkian Says Iran Will Not Bow to Pressure Amid US Nuclear Talks
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian attends the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit 2025, in Tianjin, China, September 1, 2025. Iran’s Presidential website/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Saturday that his country would not bow its head to pressure from world powers amid nuclear talks with the United States.
“World powers are lining up to force us to bow our heads… but we will not bow our heads despite all the problems that they are creating for us,” Pezeshkian said in a speech carried live by state TV.
Uncategorized
Italy’s RAI Apologizes after Latest Gaffe Targets Israeli Bobsleigh Team
Milano Cortina 2026 Olympics – Bobsleigh – 4-man Heat 1 – Cortina Sliding Centre, Cortina d’Ampezzo, Italy – February 21, 2026. Adam Edelman of Israel, Menachem Chen of Israel, Uri Zisman of Israel, Omer Katz of Israel in action during Heat 1. Photo: REUTERS/Athit Perawongmetha
Italy’s state broadcaster RAI was forced to apologize to the Jewish community on Saturday after an off‑air remark advising its producers to “avoid” the Israeli crew was broadcast before coverage of the Four-Man bobsleigh event at the Winter Olympics.
The head of RAI’s sports division had already resigned earlier in the week after his error-ridden commentary at the Milano Cortina 2026 opening ceremony two weeks ago triggered a revolt among its journalists.
On Saturday, viewers heard “Let’s avoid crew number 21, which is the Israeli one” and then “no, because …” before the sound was cut off.
RAI CEO Giampaolo Rossi said the incident represented a “serious” breach of the principles of impartiality, respect and inclusion that should guide the public broadcaster.
He added that RAI had opened an internal inquiry to swiftly determine any responsibility and any potential disciplinary procedures.
In a separate statement RAI’s board of directors condemned the remark as “unacceptable.”
The board apologized to the Jewish community, the athletes involved and all viewers who felt offended.
RAI is the country’s largest media organization and operates national television, radio and digital news services.
The union representing RAI journalists, Usigrai, had said Paolo Petrecca’s opening ceremony commentary had dealt “a serious blow” to the company’s credibility.
His missteps included misidentifying venues and public figures, and making comments about national teams that were widely criticized.
