Hamas terrorists search for the bodies of deceased hostages, kidnapped by Hamas during the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel, amid a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, Oct. 28, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Haseeb Alwazeer

The armed wing of Hamas said on Tuesday it had found the body of an Israeli soldier who had been held hostage by Palestinian terrorists in Gaza, and that it would hand over the body at 8 pm (1800 GMT).

Hamas said the body was found in Shejaia, an eastern suburb of Gaza City in an area still occupied by Israeli forces, after Israel granted access to the location for teams from Hamas and the International Committee of the Red Cross.

Under a ceasefire deal that took effect on Oct. 10, Hamas turned over all 20 living hostages held in Gaza in return for nearly 2,000 Palestinian convicts and wartime detainees held in Israel. Hamas also promised to turn over the remains of deceased hostages but says Gaza‘s war devastation has made locating bodies difficult. Israel accuses Hamas of stalling.

Before Tuesday, Hamas had returned 20 of the 28 bodies of hostages that had been buried in Gaza. In return, Israel handed over 270 bodies of Palestinians it had killed since the war began in October 2023, Hamas-controlled Gaza health authorities said.

Hamas-led terrorists killed 1,200 people and took 251 hostages in their cross-border attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Israel responded with a military campaign aimed at freeing the hostages and dismantling Hamas’s military capabilities and political rule in neighboring Gaza.

The US-brokered ceasefire has broadly held through repeated incidents of violence.

Israel says three of its soldiers have been killed and it has targeted scores of terrorists it says have approached lines behind which Israeli troops have withdrawn under the truce.

Palestinian health authorities say Israeli forces have killed 239 people in strikes since the truce took effect, although experts have cast doubt on the reliability of such figures, which have been shown to be riddled with inaccuracies and do not distinguish between civilians and combatants.

Hitler and My Mother-in-Law
By Terese Svoboda
O/R Books, 416 pages, $23.00

Patricia Hartwell had many stories from her time as a correspondent for the US Office of War Information. Once, she said, she took a picture with Adolf Hitler’s ashes so American citizens would see that the war was over. It’s a thrilling tale, but nobody knows if it’s true.

The mystery surrounding this photo — where it is, if the ashes were actually Hitler’s, whether there even was a picture — takes center stage in Hitler and My Mother-in-Law, a lengthy memoir by author Terese Svoboda.

As a correspondent for the US Office of War Information during World War II, Hartwell was the first female reporter to arrive at Dachau and Hitler’s Eagle’s Nest. She also pocketed several of Hermann Goering’s medals. Well-researched, engaging, and occasionally cringe-inducing in its depiction of awkward interactions between Svoboda and Hartwell, the book paints Hartwell as a woman who was both morally dubious and undeniably impressive.

Svoboda, author of the novels Cannibal and Dog on Fire, has plenty of reasons not to believe her mother-in-law, who died in 1998 at age 82. She lied in an oral history of Hawaii’s State Foundation on Culture and the Arts about being accepted into Harvard Law School in 1936, even though women weren’t admitted there until 1950. She claimed several times to have been close friends with Eleanor Roosevelt and that she was invited to stay in the White House on occasion. No records of such a relationship with the former-First Lady exist.

While Svoboda doesn’t hold back her criticisms of her mother-in-law — and she has plenty — the memoir does not demonize her. Instead, Svoboda attempts to understand her mother-in-law’s penchant for embellishment in the context of the patriarchal society in which she lived, one that forced impressive women to be quiet about their achievements. Maybe struggling so long for recognition led Hartwell to feel the need to exaggerate her life story.

The book does not just explore the lies Hartwell told others but also the ones she told herself, such as refusing to believe that her second husband, Dickson Hartwell, a World War II veteran and fellow journalist, beat her children.

And yet among all the falsehoods, there are known facts about Hartwell’s life that seem stranger than the ones she invented. During the Allied occupation of Germany, Hartwell served briefly as the mayor of Berchtesgaden, a resort town where Hitler and other Nazi leaders vacationed. She got to see a collection of looted art recovered from Goering — and picked out a painting to take home. Apparently it wasn’t unusual for members of the American press and military to take souvenirs, no matter how heinous their origin story.

The piece, one of Lucas Cranach’s many versions of “Cupid Complaining to Venus,” was one of Hitler’s favorites. Nearly two decades after Hartwell brought it back to New York, Dickson sold the painting, apparently without her permission, to E. A. Silberman Galleries in order to purchase a small newspaper in Arizona. The Jewish-owned art firm then sold the painting to the National Gallery of London for over a hundred times more than what they bought it for.

Hartwell also claimed to have danced with Goering at a party that the American soldiers held the night of his arrest. According to some reports, rather than punishing Goering, the military fraternized with him. Based on her own archival research, Svoboda determines this claim to be plausible.

Why, Svoboda wonders, would Hartwell “want to boast of not only meeting the second most evil Nazi, but dancing with him?” If it’s a lie, it’s one that seems to work against its teller. If it’s the truth, it’s one most people would probably like to keep hidden. To some, whether it’s fiction or not may not be important. But Svoboda contends that to those who want to understand the type of person Hartwell was, the truth behind this story is crucial.

Although Svoboda remembers seeing the photo of Hartwell with Hitler’s ashes, it never resurfaced after the woman’s death. According to Svoboda’s husband, Hartwell’s oldest son, the ashes were not Hitler’s, just a random pile picked for a posed photo to mark the end of the war. No matter who — or what — the ashes belonged to, it’s the power behind the story, one of a fallen dictatorship, that mattered. And Hartwell clearly understood the power of stories.

The post She claims she saw Hitler’s ashes and danced with Goering. But is any of it true? appeared first on The Forward.

Once upon a time — which is to say, not recently — Israel had a reputation in the West as an underdog. This, combined with its gold-star management of its international image, a practice known as hasbara, led to a perception of the Jewish nation as a scrappy fighter that triumphed over its bullies, the Arab nations that flank each of its borders. Later, Israeli PR successfully marketed Tel Aviv as a gay mecca to prove its character as a progressive leader, and its success in technology to paint the country as the “Start-up Nation.”

Since Oct. 7, this has changed entirely. Now, Israel, not its Arab neighbors, is widely portrayed as the bully. And this association goes so deep that posters online have begun to bring up Israel outside of any context relating to the war, international politics or anything Jewish. In the current parlance, “spiritually Israeli” has taken hold as a catch-all pejorative.

Take, for example, the World Series. The Los Angeles Dodgers — if you’re not a baseball fan, they just won the World Series — are, this year, the spendiest team in the game, known for hoarding wealth and amassing the best players. Other sports impose salary caps to try to keep the playing field relatively equal, and the games more compelling. Not baseball. (It does levy luxury taxes on teams that spend a lot — but, if you’re already paying your star player $700 million, you just pay the tax, too.)

Which means that the Dodgers’ win was not exactly widely celebrated outside of Los Angeles. “Never forget it’s fuck the Dodgers, fuck Israel and fuck ICE forever,” reads one popular tweet on the game. The Dodgers, as several posts put it, are “spiritually Israeli.” Yet another post referred to the team as the “Tel Aviv Dodgers.”

To be clear: The team has no Israelis. The posters don’t mean the team has a partnership with Tel Aviv, or that any of the players are Jewish. They partially mean the team is punching down. And they mostly mean it’s lame to support a team that seemed nearly guaranteed to win.

“Spiritually Israeli” and its ilk are far from the first anti-Israel slang to pop up in the past two years. Various pejoratives like “Isn’treal” and “Israhell” have been common for years, and gained traction after Oct. 7. Long before the “Hot Girls for Cuomo” and “Hot Girls for Zohran” battle arose in the New York City mayoral battle, there were influencers posting thirst traps captioned: “#freepalestine.” In short, Israel is becoming deeply uncool.

This is all, of course, just the internet. Israel still has the support of the vast majority of U.S. political leaders, for example, who probably don’t keep track of which influencer is posting what about Israel, much less what outfit they were wearing when they did so.

On the other hand, the internet is where much of culture is manufactured today. And however intangible they may be, language and slang do matter reveals societal currents.

Meme encyclopedia Know Your Meme says “spiritually Israeli” is used to call things “culturally empty.” It’s possible to see this as a rebrand of “rootless cosmopolitanism,” an antisemitic idea used to condemn Jews as a corrupting influence on European society. And that is part of the term’s meaning. But really, in practice, it’s used to describe things that are extremely corporate, too big to fail.

Israel is no longer seen as the underdog. And support for Israel in mainstream arenas — politics, government, some media —  is why it has become increasingly, well, unsexy to support the nation. Are you excited about your bank? Or your local Safeway? Just like it’s lame for Starbucks to be your favorite coffee shop instead of somewhere local, or it’s basic to love Taylor Swift instead of a niche musician, it has become cringe to love Israel.

But only among a certain crowd; the people using “spiritually Israeli” are, generally, cultivating an aesthetic of hipsterdom. In practice, though, most people love corporate things; that’s how they got so big. At least one major TikToker built her entire brand on being excited about drinking her daily Starbucks. And Taylor Swift is, of course, one of the most successful pop singers of our time. Israel doesn’t need to be cool to thrive.

So however “spiritually Israeli” it might be, people will continue to like what they like — even if it’s the L.A. Dodgers.

The post How ‘Spiritually Israeli’ became a slur that isn’t really about Israel appeared first on The Forward.