Connect with us

Uncategorized

Exposed: Leaked Report Reveals the Anti-Israel Bias Rotting the BBC From Within

The BBC logo is seen at the entrance at Broadcasting House, the BBC headquarters in central London. Photo by Vuk Valcic / SOPA Images/Sipa USA via Reuters Connect

The BBC has once again been exposed for its virulent anti-Israel bias.

On Monday, November 3, The Telegraph published a scoop that, according to a leaked internal report, the British Broadcaster’s Panorama program edited a video from the January 6 riots to make it appear as if US President Donald Trump had incited violence.

Then, the next day, The Telegraph published another bombshell from the same leaked report: anti-Israel bias in the BBC’s coverage of the war in Gaza is endemic, with managers either ignoring or refusing to rectify this deeply ingrained breach of journalistic standards.

For those of us who have kept a close eye on the BBC’s coverage from even before the October 7 attacks, this was not a surprise but a confirmation: The anti-Israel bias in BBC reports is not coincidental, but central to its content.

The report, which was composed by Michael Prescott, a former adviser to the BBC’s Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee, reveals widespread anti-Israel bias at both BBC Arabic and BBC News.

When it comes to BBC Arabic, a partially government-funded department that is supposed to counter misinformation in the Arabic-speaking world, the Prescott Report pointed to numerous instances of journalistic malfeasance, including:

  • Platforming journalists who had made antisemitic comments;
  • Spreading Hamas and Hezbollah propaganda as legitimate news sources;
  • Translating BBC News articles that were critical of Israel into Arabic but not translating a single article on the Israeli hostages or those that were critical of Hamas;
  • Portraying a Hamas terrorist attack in Jaffa as a military operation.

In effect, instead of providing its audience with quality and objective coverage of Israel, BBC Arabic resorted to platforming those who called for Jews to be “burned” and serving as a mouthpiece for organizations that are designated as terror groups by the United Kingdom.

Instead of serving as a tool to fight disinformation, BBC Arabic became a source of disinformation.

The Prescott Report’s investigation of BBC News was not that better.

The report noted numerous instances where BBC News gave too much credence to Hamas propaganda, was slow to rectify misinformation, and intentionally spread falsehoods.

Some examples of this included:

  • Continuing to uncritically parrot the claim that 70 percent of victims were Gaza were women and children, even though growing evidence pointed to the questionability of this statistic;
  • The BBC had to pull a documentary about children in Gaza after it was discovered that the main narrator was the son of a Hamas minister.
  • Spreading the baseless claim that some Palestinians buried in mass graves found outside Gaza hospitals had had their hands bound and were killed execution-style. Despite there being no evidence for this Hamas-created claim, it was still aired by BBC News.
  • After UN rights chief Tom Fletcher made the absurd claim that 14,000 children would die within 48 hours if aid could not get to them, it was quickly refuted by none other than the BBC. However, this did not stop a BBC News anchor from putting the allegation to Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon.
  • A letter by 600 lawyers claiming that it was illegal to ship arms to Israel got widespread publicity. A 1,000-lawyer letter that argued the opposite received remarkably less attention.
  • The BBC repeatedly claimed that the International Court of Justice had found a plausible case of genocide in Gaza. Even though the Court’s former president, Joan Donoghue, explained on a BBC program that this was a misinterpretation of the Court’s decision, it still took months for BBC News to publish a clarification.

At HonestReporting, none of this came as a surprise to us. Even before the war in Gaza, we had been tracking the anti-Israel animus that has infected all strata of the public British broadcaster, from freelancers to top managers.

Other examples of this anti-Israel bias that we have covered include:

  • The broadcaster’s refusal to refer to Hamas as “terrorists” even though the entire group has been designated as a terrorist organization by the United Kingdom since 2021.
  • The broadcasting of the false claim that an Israeli airstrike on Al-Ahli Hospital had killed 500 people. BBC correspondent Jon Donnison was certain that this had been an Israeli strike, even though, hours later, it was proven to have been a misfired Islamic Jihad rocket and the original death toll provided had been wildly overinflated.
  • In a July 2023 interview with former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett, BBC anchor Anjana Gadgil unabashedly claimed that the IDF was “happy to kill children”;
  • The BBC turned a blind eye to its highest-paid star, Gary Lineker, breaching guidelines by allowing him to share anti-Israel and antisemitic content online with only minimal objections from the British broadcaster.

The most disturbing aspect of the leaked Prescott Report and The Telegraph’s coverage is not the blatant anti-Israel bias that has taken root in the British broadcaster’s newsroom. It is the indifference or encouragement of upper management to what are continuous breaches of journalistic standards.

When it comes to BBC Arabic, the report notes that for years, managers had brushed off criticism of its programming.

In an absurd example of how far removed BBC executives are from reality, Jonathan Munro, the senior controller of BBC News content, dismissed claims of bias made against the broadcaster in an earlier investigation, claiming that it published “exceptional journalism” and viewed it as a positive that BBC Arabic was almost as popular as Al Jazeera.

With the Qatari state broadcaster seen as a benchmark of Arabic-language news, it is no surprise that BBC Arabic has sunk to such lows.

The management at BBC News is not better. The report accuses the British broadcaster of seeking to dismiss complaints against its coverage and of attempting to protect its image rather than rectifying serious breaches.

As former Director of BBC Television, Danny Cohen, wrote in an op-ed covering this latest scandal, the anti-Israel rot in the BBC reaches all the way to “Director General Tim Davie and CEO of BBC News Deborah Turness, whose consistent modus operandi against all criticism appears to be to deny, defend and deflect.”

For months, HonestReporting has been showcasing the negligent management of BBC News by Tim Davie and Deborah Turness that has allowed vile anti-Israel bias to fester throughout its coverage.

Will this leaked report finally force the British broadcaster to come to terms with its blatantly biased reporting, or will it continue to circle the wagons and ignore the anti-Israel morass that is slowly destroying its journalistic reputation?

The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

The Israel news we don’t hear – and the forces that silence us

I spent part of Shabbat reading about the stunning performance of the Israeli stock market — which is up dramatically since Oct. 7, outpacing the gains of the S&P by a significant margin.

The 35 Israeli stocks with the largest market capitalizations are up a whopping 90 percent since Oct. 7. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 was up 60 percent during that same time period.

I wondered why I had not read more about this, and was struck by what Eugene Kandel, the chairman of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, told Investors Business Daily.

“Israel was, and still is, under a PR attack from ideological actors, who finance huge campaigns against us,” Kandel said. “But even during these two years, the collaboration with so many organizations, companies, governments and investors did not stop despite threats and protests.”

Why aren’t we hearing about those collaborations?

Then the news of the Bondi Beach Hanukkah shooting broke. Instantly, all the peace of Shabbat dissipated, along with all the thoughts of collaborations — and who is covering what and why, and in which language.

Instead, I thought again of how terrorists worldwide seem to own a well-thumbed Jewish calendar. The date and timing of this massacre — on yet another Jewish holiday — was no accident, and Jews around the world know this.

We are living through a sustained campaign to make Jews afraid to be Jews. Attacks on Jewish holidays are an effort to erase Jewish joy, Jewish observance, and in the case of Hanukkah, Jewish history.

And perhaps we are also under a sustained campaign to minimize Jewish achievement.

Some politicians take notice

Some politicians are making efforts to look at the often-exhausting layers of what is happening and find ways to name them.

I appreciate the effort to find language for all of this. Representative Brian Mast, the chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and a Florida Republican, commented that he discerns a “very specific network that is in place that works together to sow antisemitism that is now, in many cases, working on the left and right across the media, to go out there and put this wedge in this relationship.”

He was referring to the U.S.-Israel connection.

Speaking at a Hudson Institute conference on antisemitism, he called this network a “very, very serious global threat across multinational organizations, media across the globe and adversaries and terrorist organizations.”

When he said “media,” I thought of the minimal coverage of the Israeli stock exchange and the strength of Israeli stocks.

The relief of acknowledgment

I felt a strange sigh of relief as I read Mast’s comments. It was the relief of actual acknowledgment. It was the relief of hearing someone trying to name things, even though I’m not sure if “network” is the best possible word.

Because something must be said.

What I noticed the day after the Bondi Beach massacre was the deep silence. The silence came from so many people that maybe “network” was the right word for it.

I went to a non-denominational holiday party this week, and no one mentioned what had happened in Australia. I wondered what the conversation would have been like if the shooting had happened at a Christmas tree lighting, or a drag story hour that turned into carnage. What would the conversation have been if any other group, but the Jewish community, had been targeted?

It’s unlikely that there would be total silence. Total non-acknowledgment. No words in a room of people who work with words.

The threat we face is not just the threat Representative Mast detailed, or the PR threat Kandel described. It’s also the silence, a silence so loud that it is visible as candlelight in the darkness.

How to respond to silence

I don’t know how to answer silence, but maybe some wiser people out there do.

Late last night, I saw a reel of a very long line of cars with menorahs on their roofs driving along the New York State Thruway, not far from the Palisades Mall, just a short drive from where I grew up.

The line of cars went on and on. The silent message was Do not be afraid. And I saw it as a response to Bondi Beach.

I hope there are more Hanukkah menorahs lit tonight, not less. And I also hope that we can consider bringing layers of truth into the light. Sometimes, layers represent both a dose of reality and an antidote against despair.

Yes, a father and son attacked the Jewish community on a holiday. But it is deeply important and also true that an unarmed Muslim father and fruit seller named Ahmed al Ahmed jumped on one of the gunmen and undoubtedly saved many lives.

The video of that heroic act should be watched by all.

It is a reminder that perhaps there is another “network” out there, a network of those who object to hatred. And it is a reminder that generalizations can only take us so far; as my mentor James Alan McPherson taught me, a story is about an individual at an individual moment in time.

Ahmed al Ahmed showed us all the power of an individual. And the power of a single layer in any truth, and in any story.

As for all those under-discussed Israeli companies holding on in wartime, through boycotts, pushing up the index by 90 percent since the worst day in Israeli history, continuing to collaborate with partners around the globe despite a PR onslaught to isolate them — even in this darkness, and in this silence, we see you.

The post The Israel news we don’t hear – and the forces that silence us appeared first on The Forward.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Zohran Mamdani visits the Rebbe’s Ohel, increasingly a pilgrimage site for politicians

(New York Jewish Week) — Zohran Mamdani visited the gravesite of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement’s late leader on Monday, one day after the shooting that killed 15 people at an Australian Hanukkah event hosted by Chabad.

Yaacov Behrman, a Crown Heights activist who works as a PR liaison for Chabad, said Mamdani reached out about visiting the gravesite, known as the Ohel.

“Following the terrorist attack in Sydney, Australia, the mayor-elect asked to visit the Ohel to pay his respects and came last night,” said Behrman, who was present during Mamdani’s visit.

The New York City mayor-elect did not publicly share anything about his visit to the Ohel on Monday, but a photo obtained and posted by Forward journalist Jacob Kornbluh showed Mamdani wearing a black velvet kippah standing at the gravesite.

Mamdani had shared a lengthy statement on Sunday morning calling the Bondi Beach attack a “vile act of antisemitic terror.”

“I mourn those who were murdered and will be keeping their families, the Jewish community, and the Chabad movement in my prayers,” Mamdani wrote.

Mamdani specifically mentioned Rabbi Eli Schlanger, who was killed in the attack, and his “deep ties to Crown Heights,” the Brooklyn neighborhood that is home to the headquarters of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement.

“What happened at Bondi is what many Jewish people fear will happen in their communities too,” Mamdani wrote.

Monday marked Mamdani’s first known visit to the Ohel, which is in the Old Montefiore Cemetery in Queens, and is a site with particular significance for adherents and admirers of the Chabad movement. It is the resting place of the movement’s two most recent leaders: Menachem Mendel Schneerson, known as the Lubavitcher Rebbe, and his father-in-law, Yosef Yitzchak Schneerson.

In recent years, it has become an oft-visited site by Jewish and non-Jewish politicians and public figures.

The Ohel draws 1 million visitors per year, according to Chabad’s website, who are “religious and not, laypeople and leaders, Jews and non-Jews, each one coming to pray, seek inspiration and find solace.”

Mamdani’s predecessor, Mayor Eric Adams, has visited the Ohel at least seven times, and has said that he finds himself there during “the most difficult days” of his life. President Donald Trump visited the Ohel to mark the first anniversary of Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel.

Other visitors to the site in the last five years include Ivanka Trump; New York Gov. Kathy Hochul; then-Long Island congressman Lee Zeldin, who is Jewish and now heads Trump’s EPA; Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. during his presidential candidacy; Rep. Mike Lawler; Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand; and New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker. Argentinian president Javier Millei and Sara Netanyahu, the wife of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have both visited from abroad.

“There’s nothing opulent about it,” Rabbi Motti Seligson, a Chabad spokesperson, told the Free Press during a tour of the Ohel in early 2025.

Visitors have found deep meaning in their time in the open-roofed mausoleum. Booker, who prays at the Ohel on the eve of his elections, told the Free Press that he finds “something universally spiritual about that sacred space” even though he is not Jewish.

“I find my visits are both grounding and expanding,” Booker said.

Mamdani’s visit to the Ohel comes as Chabad officials and Jewish leaders are doubling down on their efforts to celebrate Hanukkah with public menorah lightings around New York City. Those events have surged in attendance in the wake of the Bondi Beach attack.

The visit is Mamdani’s most recent appearance in a primarily Orthodox Jewish space as he seeks to overcome skepticism among many Jewish voters who were turned off by Mamdani’s opposition to Israel. Voters in Crown Heights, where the Chabad-Lubavitch community is headquartered, turned out heavily for Andrew Cuomo in November’s general election.

The mayor-elect attended a celebration by the Satmar Hasidic sect last week, which is anti-Zionist for religious reasons. He was endorsed by a Satmar rabbi, Moishe Indig, and was welcomed to a sukkah by Indig in the fall.

During the Democratic primary, he made an appearance at a breakfast organized by the Council of Jewish Organizations of Flatbush, where there was a large Orthodox Jewish population.

The photo of Mamdani at the Ohel circulated in Jewish WhatsApp groups, and has been shared by some local Chabad chapters’ social media pages.

“His decision to go was surprising,” Chabad Virginia Beach wrote in an Instagram post. “But we all know that when light and darkness meet, light has the power to transform. And this place is a place of light.”

The post Zohran Mamdani visits the Rebbe’s Ohel, increasingly a pilgrimage site for politicians appeared first on The Forward.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Iran Opposes Grossi’s UN Secretary-General Candidacy, Accuses Him of Failing to Uphold International Law

UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi holds a press conference on the opening day of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) quarterly Board of Governors meeting in Vienna, Austria, Sept. 8, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Elisabeth Mandl

Iran has publicly opposed International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director-General Rafael Grossi’s potential appointment as UN Secretary-General next year, accusing him of failing to uphold international law by not condemning US and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites during the 12-day war between Iran and Israel in June.

During a UN Security Council meeting on Monday, Iran’s Ambassador to the UN, Amir Saeid Iravani, sharply criticized Grossi, calling him unfit” to serve as UN Secretary-General next year, Iranian media reported. 

“A candidate who has deliberately failed to uphold the UN Charter — or to condemn unlawful military attacks against safeguarded, peaceful nuclear facilities … undermines confidence in his ability to serve as a faithful guardian of the charter and to discharge his duties independently, impartially, and without political bias or fear of powerful states,” the Iranian diplomat said. 

With UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres’ term ending in December next year, member states have already begun nominating candidates to take over the role ahead of the expected 2026 election.

Since the start of the war in Gaza, Israel’s relationship with Guterres has spiraled downward, reaching a low point last year when then-Foreign Minister Israel Katz labeled the UN “antisemitic and anti-Israeli” and declared Guterres persona non grata after the top UN official failed to condemn Tehran for its ballistic missile attack against the Jewish state.

Last week, Argentina officially nominated Grossi to succeed Guterres as the next UN Secretary-General.

To be elected, a nominee must first secure the support of at least nine members of the UN Security Council and avoid a veto from any of its five permanent members — the United States, China, Russia, the United Kingdom, and France. 

Afterward, the UN General Assembly votes, with a simple majority needed to confirm the organization’s next leader.

As head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog since 2019, Grossi has consistently urged Iran to provide transparency on its nuclear program and cooperate with the agency, efforts the Islamist regime has repeatedly rejected and obstructed.

Despite Iran’s claims that its nuclear program is solely for civilian purposes rather than weapons development, Western powers have said there is no “credible civilian justification” for the country’s nuclear activity, arguing it “gives Iran the capability to rapidly produce sufficient fissile material for multiple nuclear weapons.”

With prospects for renewed negotiations or nuclear cooperation dwindling, Iran has been intensifying efforts to rebuild its air and defense capabilities decimated during the 12-day war with Israel.

On Monday, Mohammad Eslami, head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), declared that the IAEA has no authority to inspect sites targeted during the June war, following Grossi’s renewed calls for Tehran to allow inspections of its nuclear sites and expand cooperation with the agency.

Iran has also announced plans to expand its nuclear cooperation with Russia and advance the construction of new nuclear power plants, as both countries continue to deepen their bilateral relations.

According to AEOI spokesperson Behrouz Kamalvandi, one nuclear power plant is currently operational, while other two are under construction, with new contracts signed during a recent high-level meeting in Moscow.

Kamalvandi also said Iran plans to build four nuclear power plants in the country’s southern region as part of its long-term partnership with Russia.

During a joint press conference in Moscow on Tuesday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reiterated Iran’s commitment to defending the country’s “legal nuclear rights” under the now-defunct 2015 nuclear deal, noting that Tehran’s nuclear policies have remained within the international legal framework.

Iran’s growing ties with Russia, particularly in nuclear cooperation, have deepened in recent years as both countries face mounting Western sanctions and seek to expand their influence in opposition to Western powers.

Russia has not only helped Iran build its nuclear program but also consistently defended the country’s “nuclear rights” on the global stage, while opposing the imposition of renewed economic sanctions.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has described the reinstatement of UN sanctions against Iran as a “disgrace to diplomacy.”

In an interview with the Islamic Republic of Iran News Network (IRINN), Lavrov accused European powers of attempting to blame Tehran for the collapse of the 2015 nuclear deal, despite what he described as Iran’s compliance with the agreement.

Prior to the 12-day war, the IAEA flagged a series of Iranian violations of the deal.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News