Uncategorized
Israeli Hostages Describe Systematic Starvation, Torture, Isolation, Forced Conversions in Hamas Captivity
Released Israeli hostage, Omri Miran, held in Gaza since the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attack by Hamas, embraces his father, Dani Miran, after his release as part of a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, in Reim, Israel, Oct. 13, 2025. Photo: Israel Defense Forces/Handout via REUTERS
Israeli hostages who returned from Gaza on Monday began giving structured accounts of their captivity that described torture, starvation, prolonged isolation, confinement in underground cages, and efforts by their Hamas captors to convert them to Islam.
Several freed hostages said they were kept alone for months at a time with little food or light. Avinatan Or, abducted from the Nova music festival in October 2023, spent more than two years in isolation and saw other hostages only at the point of release. An initial medical examination found he had lost between 30 percent and 40 percent of his body weight and relatives said he had been “starved and terrified” for extended periods, Israel’s Channel 12 reported.
Or was reunited with his girlfriend, former hostage Noa Argamani, who was released in a rescue operation by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) in June 2024, along with three other hostages. He did not know about Argamani’s fate until his release. The two were featured in a viral video filmed by Hamas of their kidnapping, becoming symbols of the acts of terrorism of that day.
Hamas-led Palestinian terrorists from Gaza kidnapped 251 hostages and murdered 1,200 people during their invasion of and rampage across southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. All the living hostages still in captivity were released on Monday as part of the US-brokered ceasefire deal to halt fighting between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. However, the Palestinian terrorist group has still not handed over the remains of 19 deceased hostages, violating its obligation under the agreement to release everyone who was abducted during the Oct. 7 atrocities.
Relatives of one of the living hostages freed this week, Omri Miran, 48, said he had been held in 23 separate places above ground and in tunnels. His brother Nadav said Miran remained roughly aware of the days and how much time had passed. There were long stretches in which guards passed the time alongside him. “Sometimes he would cook food for his captors, and they loved his cooking,” Nadav said, adding that some guards used Hebrew to communicate and that card games filled parts of the day. Miran, a father of two, returned home this week and was filmed playing with his daughters. His brother said he “looks pale, but his sense of humor is the same.”
Other accounts focused on the loss of time and physical restraint. Elkana Bohbot, 36, who worked at the Nova festival, told his wife he had been chained in a tunnel for most of his captivity and that the lack of sunlight erased any sense of day or date, except for the date of his wedding anniversary in which he insisted on a shower. His terrorist guard at first refused, then removed his chains and showered him. At times he said he was shown images of rallies and public appeals by his family seeking his release.
Reports from the families described harsher treatment during the early phase of captivity and in the weeks before release. The mother of 22-year-old Matan Angrest, a soldier, said her son had faced “very severe torture” in the initial months. “He remembers being beaten so badly that he lost consciousness,” she said. She described guards dragging him while covered in black sacks and tunnel walls collapsing around him during fighting above ground. In the last four months he was confined to a small, dark tunnel under “special guard,” she said.
According to his mother, captors told Angrest that Israelis had given up on the hostages and that Hamas had conquered Israel and were planning “the next Oct. 7.” They also falsely claimed his Holocaust survivor grandparents were dead. Learning that they were alive after his return “motivated” him, she said.
Families also cited changes in the way some hostages were handled as ceasefire talks advanced. Ilan Dalal, father of Guy Gilboa-Dalal, said he had been held in a tunnel with another hostage, Evyatar David, until about a month ago, after which he was moved separately and then held in another tunnel with a different hostage, Alon Ohel, until release. His son had been “force-fed” in recent weeks, likely the result of international outcry after Hamas released footage showing an emaciated David being forced to dig his own grave.
Accounts from twins Gali and Ziv Berman, snatched from Kfar Aza, said they were held separately in total isolation and were unaware the other was alive. It was the longest time the twins had ever spent apart. They told family members there were times of food scarcity and times when more food was available. Some guards spoke Hebrew. The twins said that while underground they could hear IDF activity nearby but could not determine where they were or what was happening above ground.
Religious coercion featured in the account of Rom Braslavski, who was held largely in isolation by the Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorist group, according to his mother, Tami. She told Israel’s Channel 13 news that he “suffered abuse” but she declined to elaborate further. She said guards demanded that he convert to Islam and promised better treatment if he read the Quran or observed Ramadan fasts. He refused, she said, and upon release “kept saying, ‘I am Jewish … I am strong,’ and he put on tefillin,” referring to small leather boxes with straps traditionally wrapped on one’s head and arm at the start of weekday morning prayers.
Tami Braslavski described psychological tactics that included false claims that “Iran bombed Israel” and stitched footage designed to convince him his parents had abandoned him.
Uncategorized
Heritage Foundation staff confront president over antisemitism, defense of Tucker Carlson
The president of the Heritage Foundation, Kevin Roberts, apologized to his staff on Wednesday for his refusal to condemn Tucker Carlson after the right-wing broadcaster aired a friendly interview with white nationalist Nick Fuentes.
During a tense, two-hour all-hands meetings, staff members challenged Roberts’ leadership, questioned Heritage’s credibility, and warned that his stance had gravely damaged the foundation’s relationships with Jewish partners and donors
“I made a mistake and I let you down and I let down this institution. Period. Full stop,” Roberts said.
He specifically apologized for a previous comment defending Carlson in which he decried a “venomous coalition” attacking the commentator. The phrase, he said, was “a terrible choice of words, especially for our Jewish colleagues and friends.”
The meeting, audio and video of which were leaked online, laid bare deep divisions inside America’s most influential conservative think tank, torn between Roberts’ attempt to mend fences and a staff revolt from within its senior ranks.
Several Heritage employees, including longtime fellows and legal scholars, told Roberts they no longer had confidence in his leadership. Others said his refusal to draw moral lines between Carlson and antisemites like Fuentes had caused lasting reputational harm.
“I made the mess, I want to clean it up,” Roberts told employees, adding that he had offered his resignation to the board but felt a “moral obligation” to stay and repair the damage.
Several staffers demanded that Roberts publicly repudiate Carlson. Two called for him to resign.
“You have shown a stunning lack of both courage and judgment,” said Amy Swearer, a senior legal fellow who has worked at Heritage for eight years. “I stand here today with no ability to say I have confidence in your leadership.”
“It has become increasingly difficult to continue to defend the Heritage Foundation,” added Rachel Greszler, another senior fellow. “I do not believe that you are the right person to lead.”
The confrontation followed days of turmoil triggered by Roberts’ decision to post a video in which he said Heritage would not “distance” itself from Carlson despite his friendly interview with Fuentes, a Holocaust denier who has praised Adolf Hitler. Roberts framed his position as a defense of “grace” and “free speech,” saying the right should avoid “canceling” its own.
That message sparked outrage across the political spectrum. Prominent Republicans, including Sen. Ted Cruz, denounced Fuentes as a “Nazi.” Jewish organizations that had partnered with Heritage on its antisemitism initiative, Project Esther, cut ties. Conservative commentators such as Ben Shapiro blasted Roberts for embracing a “no enemies to the right” ethos.
One of the most emotional moments at the meeting came during comments from Daniel Flesch, a Jewish staffer with Heritage’s Allison Center for National Security, who oversees Project Esther. He described being unable to defend Heritage to Jewish allies and friends.
“It has been six days… where as an organization we have been unable to utter the words…‘Tucker’s an antisemite, and we as Heritage do not want to associate with him,’” Daniel said. “We are bleeding trust, reputation, perhaps donors.”
Robert Rector, a Heritage veteran of 47 years, invoked conservative icon William F. Buckley Jr., who in the 1960s sought to expel antisemitic and racist elements from the conservative movement.
“Buckley’s view was that we have to expunge all antisemitism from the movement and expel the lunatics,” Rector said. “This is what built the conservative movement. We are now reversing that.”
Hans von Spakovsky, another senior Heritage figure, warned Roberts that the think tank’s credibility could not be salvaged without a clean break from Carlson.
“The damage done to the reputation of Heritage is the worst I have ever seen,” von Spakovsky said. “If the Heritage Foundation and you do not dump Tucker Carlson publicly, we are not going to repair that damage.”
The meeting also exposed generational and ideological divides on the right. One young staffer argued that Heritage should not prioritize defending Israel and accused the leadership of promoting “Christian Zionism” — a comment that drew audible gasps.
Roberts and his deputies reaffirmed the foundation’s pro-Israel stance, but the exchange underscored how some younger conservatives, animated by online populism and isolationism, are challenging traditional right-wing support for Israel.
—
The post Heritage Foundation staff confront president over antisemitism, defense of Tucker Carlson appeared first on Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
Uncategorized
As Mamdani’s victory reverberates beyond NYC, Jews must choose solidarity over shock
The ascendance of Zohran Mamdani stunned many Jewish New Yorkers, and now that he has been elected, many Jews in New York and across the country feel fear and foreboding. The city that long stood as the beating heart of American Jewish life, creative, intellectual, and spiritual, has elected a man who denies the Jewish right to national self-determination, traffics in rhetoric that isolates our community, and aligns with movements hostile to Jewish safety and dignity.
This moment strikes a community already reeling from the Hamas attacks of Oct. 7, 2023, and the wave of antisemitism that followed. Mamdani was the encampment candidate, lifted by the same forces that turned American campuses into arenas of cruelty and open hatred of Jews. For many, the outcome feels like the city we built, enriched and defended turning its back on us.
But panic provides no preparation, and despair offers no strategy. The Jewish people endured darker nights than this one. We never surrendered. We stood together, protected one another, and built stronger than before.
Clarity must guide us now. We reject the divisive and bigoted politics that carried Mamdani to Gracie Mansion. In his brief career he has championed efforts to delegitimize and demonize Israel, entertained defunding New York institutions that support Israelis, leveled baseless accusations of grave abuses, rejected the IHRA definition of antisemitism, opposed ceremonial resolutions honoring the State of Israel, failed to join resolutions commemorating the Holocaust, and — perhaps most galling to many — refused to condemn the call to “globalize the intifada,” a slogan that glorifies violence against Jews.
These actions reveal conviction, and we harbor no illusions about engagement. A few softened remarks before victory cannot erase years of radical rhetoric and targeted hostility. Tactical moderation rarely if ever equals moral transformation.
Events in New York echo beyond the city. When the largest Jewish community in the Diaspora faces rhetorical and political assault, extremists everywhere take notice. The effects reach synagogues, schools, students, and families across the United States. This moment concerns more than one election; it defines the boundaries of decency in public life.
Criticism of Israeli policy belongs in democratic discourse. Demonization of Israel and excuses for violence against Jews do not. That inversion, condemning Israel while minimizing Hamas atrocities, reflects not a pursuit of justice but an obsession with Jews. The Jewish people know this story from centuries of repetition, and we recognize it instantly because we survived it before.
But we also know what needs to come next.
We will fortify our institutions. We will organize for communal safety. We will advocate relentlessly at the municipal, state and federal levels. We will strengthen alliances with leaders who refuse to equivocate about Jewish life. And we will secure resources, philanthropic and governmental, to protect our people and our future in this still-great city.
We proceed without illusions. Leadership demands moral seriousness. When the mayor’s office abandons that duty, others will step forward. Jewish safety, dignity and continuity depend on our resolve, not on the goodwill of any administration.
New York stands as a city of Jewish strength, energy and resilience. That truth will not change. In this difficult hour, we choose solidarity over shock, courage over resignation, and resolve over naïveté. We lift one another up, safeguard our community, and affirm that our story never belonged to those who stand against us.
Let us not mourn, but organize.
—
The post As Mamdani’s victory reverberates beyond NYC, Jews must choose solidarity over shock appeared first on Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
Uncategorized
China and Qatar Move to Broaden Strategic, Economic Ties in Region
The Chinese national flag is seen in Beijing, China April 29, 2020. REUTERS/Thomas Peter/File Photo
China and Qatar are broadening ties and joint initiatives as both countries work to deepen their partnership amid shifting Middle East dynamics and China’s efforts to expand its regional influence, according to recent statements from politicians of both countries.
On Monday, Chinese Vice President Han Zheng held talks with Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani in Doha on the sidelines of the Second World Summit for Social Development, focusing on regional developments and expanding bilateral cooperation.
The expanding Beijing-Doha relationship comes as Qatar seeks to position itself as a key player in the Middle East — pursuing a role in post-war Gaza and broadening its regional influence — while China aims to counter Western influence, navigate US sanctions, and expand its presence across the region.
During their meeting, the Chinese top diplomat pledged to deepen ties with Qatar across multiple sectors and elevate their strategic relationship to new levels.
He also stressed Qatar’s unique and influential role in the Middle East amid rising regional tensions and shifting power dynamics, reaffirming Beijing’s support and calling Doha a key ally.
“Deep political mutual trust forms the foundation of China-Qatar relations,” Zheng said during a joint press conference.
“We are committed to working with Qatar to implement the key agreements reached by our two heads of state and to maintain high-level exchanges,” he continued, referring to the recently signed agreements between the two countries, set to broaden the scope of their joint projects.
“We will continue to support each other on issues concerning our core interests and deepen cooperation in energy, artificial intelligence, and the digital economy, aiming to elevate our bilateral relationship to new heights,” he said.
The Chinese top diplomat vowed to deepen ties with Qatar, emphasizing China’s enduring commitment to their growing partnership and its aim to foster initiatives that benefit both nations.
For its part, the Qatari diplomat praised China’s long-standing role as Qatar’s largest trading partner, noting that the relationship holds vital importance for the country.
Al-Thani also expressed appreciation to China for its support in safeguarding Qatar’s territorial sovereignty and national security.