Uncategorized
Jewish villains out to destroy Jesus are a staple of Ukrainian Catholic church pageants in the U.S. The Vatican has remained silent.
At a pizza restaurant in Baltimore last year, a church youth group performed a Ukrainian Christmas pageant that promised patrons “carols, jokes and well wishes for a great year ahead.”
What the audience received was a character called Moshko, a Jewish merchant. Moshko was dressed in black with long sideburns — a villain disrupting the Nativity story.
“Wait, don’t be in a hurry, maybe you’ll get something from Moshko,” the character urges townspeople who are trying to celebrate the birth of Jesus.
After the admirers of infant Jesus reject his overtures, Moshko rushes off to betray the infant Jesus to King Herod.
It was a traditional scene in a vertep, the popular Ukrainian pageant performed during the Christmas season, and the actors came from St. Michael the Archangel Ukrainian Catholic Church in suburban Philadelphia.
Verteps draw on Ukraine’s rich culture, weaving together caroling, dancing, brightly embroidered shirts called vyshyvanky, and elaborate floral crowns into a show that runs for about 10 to 25 minutes. The storylines vary. Many pageants do not include the blatant antisemitic stereotype of the devious Jew who sets out to sabotage Christ. But plenty do.
Ukrainian Catholic religious leaders in the U.S. — appointed to their posts by the pope — have been photographed at verteps featuring the bad-guy Jewish character. Such pageants are also promoted in many instances by churches that they oversee.
They include the church’s highest-ranking leader in the U.S., Metropolitan Archbishop Borys Gudziak, who heads the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in the United States. Gudziak addressed and then joined the audience for a performance by the St. Michael group days after it performed in Baltimore, a moment documented in photos the church posted to Facebook.
Gudziak was deeply familiar with the problematic elements of verteps.
Fifteen years ago, when he was running the largest Catholic university in Ukraine, Gudziak and two colleagues penned an emotional call to remove the Jewish character, often referred to using the antisemitic slur “zhyd,” from performances. He described a sense of foreboding each holiday season.
“At the moment of the highest spiritual culmination of holy Christmas, the vertep ‘Zhyd’ will once again burst into our home — and the seed of evil that the vertep performance was meant to uproot will once again make a nest in our soul,” Gudziak and his colleagues wrote.
In 2019, Pope Francis appointed him to the position of Metropolitan Archbishop of Philadelphia, charged with overseeing U.S. districts for the Ukrainian Catholic church. Gudziak continued to call for friendship between Jews and Catholics. He is on a committee of Interfaith Philadelphia and released a statement following the Capital Jewish Museum shooting last year that condemned antisemitism: “As Catholics, we are called not only to reject such hatred, but to actively foster mutual understanding, respect, and solidarity with the Jewish people.”
But despite these expressions of solidarity, churches within Gudziak’s own archeparchy (the equivalent of an archdiocese) have promoted, organized or hosted pageants featuring negative depictions of Jews. So have other Ukrainian Catholic churches and institutions in the U.S.
The Forward compiled and reviewed video of 10 pageants in the U.S. since 2020 that feature a Jewish character named “zhyd,” “Moshko” or “Chaim,” and sometimes his wife, usually named Sarah. All were posted to social media, in many cases by the churches themselves.
The pageants mix and match a few motifs, all showing these two Jews in a negative light as they try to lure Christians to commit sin. Some tempt the faithful with goods, loans or liquor. Some mock believers for worshipping Christ; curse Christians; summon and collude with the devil, or betray baby Jesus to King Herod, who is seeking to kill him.
Most of the actors playing the zhyd role wore what look to be peyos, the sidelocks traditionally worn by Orthodox Jews. In one instance, the character wore an exaggerated fake nose.
The Forward located photos from an additional eight pageants for which video is not publicly available that show actors with what appear to be peyos or a fake nose.
Those U.S. pageants are part of a global phenomenon, centered in Europe. A Forward review of more than 200 videos of recent verteps internationally associated with the Ukrainian Catholic Church found that when a Jewish character was included, that character in nearly every case was portrayed in a negative light.
The verteps with offensive scenes are almost exclusively performed in the Ukrainian language and have gone largely unnoticed by Jewish organizations in the U.S.
Presented with the Forward’s findings, both the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League raised concerns about the performances.
“The caricatures in these celebrations, depicting Jews as greedy or aligned with evil, are inherently antisemitic and are part and parcel of the same dangerous myths that have fueled violence and pogroms against Jewish communities for centuries,” Ken Jacobson, deputy national director of the ADL, said in an email.
In most instances, the video of the pageants was posted online by official church social media accounts. Gudziak was not the only church official to attend; Bishop Paul Chomnycky in Connecticut and Bishop Benedykt Aleksiychuk in Chicago have also attended pageants that featured a Jewish character.
In 2025, Chomnycky’s eparchy posted photos of the bishop speaking at a holiday event that included a vertep featuring a little boy in peyos. The Forward was unable to obtain video of that performance.
The previous year, Aleksiychuk attended and spoke at a festival where photos posted to social media show at least four verteps had Jewish characters. Video from the one performance for which video was publicly available, which was in Ukrainian, has the Jew cursing the faithful, summoning the devil, and lamenting about not being able to sell alcohol. Aleksiychuk posed for a photo with a different vertep cast, which also had an actor in peyos.
In response to a request for comment from the Forward, Gudziak said in a statement on behalf of himself and the other bishops that he did not condone offensive depictions.
“Christmas pageants have included characters that are objectionable, including ones that are offensive to the Jewish community. I do not condone this as a pastor, educator and scholar,” he said. “We will heighten our vigilance and work with our clergy and parishes to make sure that such expressions will not be repeated.”
He noted that Ukrainian Catholics and Ukrainian-Americans have themselves been hurt by stereotypes, and that his church has been shut down and banned in parts of Ukraine now occupied by Russia.
“We highly value our good relations with the Jewish community in the United States and in Ukraine and are most grateful for the many expressions of Jewish solidarity as our community faces existential threats,” Gudziak said, a reference to Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine.
The Catholic Church is composed of 24 distinct churches, with around 99% of the world’s estimated 1.3 billion Catholics belonging to what is officially known as the Latin Church but generally referred to as the Catholic Church. The Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church is the second-largest Catholic church, with around five million adherents.
While it has some distinct practices and liturgy, the UGCC ultimately reports to the Vatican and is bound by the Catholic Church’s teachings on Jews. Those include guidance stating any dramatic performances that “seek to shift responsibility from human sin onto this or that historical group, such as the Jews, can only be said to obscure a core gospel truth.”
Pope Leo XIV, who became pontiff last year, has come under fire from some Jewish organizations — mostly over his criticism of Israel’s war with Iran — but has called for “a world without antisemitism” and stressed that the Church “does not tolerate” it.
The Vatican did not respond to repeated requests for comment from the Forward about antisemitism in verteps organized by the UGCC. The International Jewish Committee for Interreligious Consultations, an umbrella group that describes itself as representing “world Jewry in dialogue with the Vatican,” also did not respond to requests for comment.
A play with deep roots
Verteps are theatrical performances rooted in Ukrainian folk tradition that mix an account of the Christmas story with characters from early modern Ukraine, transporting Ukrainian Christians to ancient Bethlehem as Mary gives birth to Jesus. The juxtaposition is meant to draw a parallel between the lessons from the Nativity and those that the church beginning in the early 19th century wanted to impart onto Ukrainians.
Indeed, the UGCC isn’t the only institution that stages verteps. Various Ukrainian Orthodox denominations also put on the pageants, as do town councils, schools, civic organizations, and simply groups of friends and neighbors, and many have been updated by removing the offensive elements or replacing them with contemporary characters.
In the traditional vertep script, Jesus, Mary and Joseph face off against the devil and contend with murderous intentions by King Herod. Meanwhile, Ukrainians meant to represent everyday Christians celebrate the Nativity while resisting worldly temptations — merchandise, loans and alcohol — that are often personified by a group of ethnic villains: a Jew, his wife and a Roma character often referred to using a slur.
Throughout the performance, this evil troika wreaks havoc, conspiring with the devil to hurt Jesus, while tempting Ukrainian villagers with goods or alcohol. “If the peasant doesn’t drink, how will Moshko make money?” the Jewish character asks the audience in one popular version of the play.
Verteps were suppressed during Soviet control of Ukraine, reemerging after the fall of communism as a cultural touchstone for many Ukrainians. Russia’s war against Ukraine has supercharged support for Ukrainian nationalism — including verteps.
“People brand this as cherishing Ukrainian tradition, especially nowadays when cherishing tradition is portrayed as resistance to Russian aggression,” said Marta Havryshko, a visiting professor at Clark University who studies nationalism and the Holocaust.
Some scriptwriters have come up with corrective alternatives. For instance, Ukrainian playwright Tetyana Shpaykher produces verteps substituting Vladimir Putin for King Herod and Russian propagandists for the devil — while Sarah and Moshko are entirely absent.
“The Church teaches that God is born to us every year,” Shpaykher told a Ukrainian news outlet last year, “each time within new realities.”
‘Bring everything to the zhyd’
The U.S. performances at issue lean into tradition — and negative portrayals showing Jews as greedy and derisive of Christian faith.
In a January vertep performed at Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Epiphany in Rochester, New York, characters playing the Three Kings rebuke a Jewish merchant for seeking to sell beads to the townspeople, as seen in a video posted to social media and since removed.
In Ukrainian, one king says: “We’re not trading, and we’re not buying, and we don’t need you, zhyd!”
After another announces that they plan to worship the messiah, the zhyd mocks them.
“What does a peasant need the messiah for?” he scoffs. “A peasant must plow, and sow, and learn how to thresh, and bring everything to the zhyd instead of asking God for mercy.”
The zhyd’s response draws on antisemitic stereotypes in which Jews supposedly lived off the labor of others.
The Rochester church did not respond to multiple requests for comment from the Forward about the performance, but other organizations have defended the inclusion of Jewish characters as a reflection of Ukrainian history.
“Vertep characters reflect the social realities and archetypes of the 16th- and 17th-century Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, where these folk traditions developed,” Orest Dudyak, head of the Ukrainian American Youth Association in Tampa Bay, wrote in an email in response to the Forward’s outreach. “The tavern keeper character reflects one such historical social role and was traditionally portrayed as a Jewish figure.”
Jewish tavernkeepers were ubiquitous in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, which covers much of modern Poland and Ukraine, because the nobility granted a monopoly on liquor sales to the Jewish community in exchange for a series of fees.
Glenn Dynner, author of Yankel’s Tavern: Jews, Liquor, & Life in the Kingdom of Poland, said that the system incentivized tavernkeepers to exploit peasants in order to cover the exorbitant fees owed to the local nobleman. But he emphasized the stereotype of Jews pressuring Ukrainian peasants to drink themselves into debt was greatly exaggerated.
“The system was based to a large degree on trust,” Dynner said in an interview. His research found many cases of warm relations between Jewish tavernkeepers and villagers.
Yet in the 19th century the regional Catholic church began to blame widespread drunkenness on Jews, rather than the nobility who converted their surplus grain into vodka for the local peasants. The church propaganda helped solidify the notion that Jews were undermining society.
Dynner, a history professor at the University of Virginia, said in an interview that the Jew became a proxy for anger that otherwise would have been directed at the local nobility in a feudal society. “That’s the way it almost always works,” he said. “There’s a Jewish figure you prop up to siphon off any resentment.”
The resentment has endured through the centuries. In 2016, the director of Lviv’s regional library told a journalist that 17th century Cossack leader Bohdan Khmelnytskyi murdered Jews because they “owned the taverns, and they sold vodka on credit — when people couldn’t pay, they confiscated their property.” Khmelnytskyi’s men killed hundreds of thousands of Jews.
The nuance Dynner described — that Jewish tavernkeepers had complex and sometimes positive relationships with their Christian customers — is almost always missing from the depictions of Jews in verteps.
When Dudyak’s Ukrainian youth group performed in January at Epiphany of Our Lord Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in St. Petersburg, Florida, two Jewish characters were shown wearing what appeared to be peyos. One was referred to as “Moshko,” and together they sought to tempt Christians with goods and loans.
“Get out of here, Moshko, because we’re not going to trade,” a boy playing an angel replies to the Jew. A photo shows the two Jewish characters counting money off stage; it’s common for verteps to have the Jews collect money from the playgoers at the end of the performance.
The Rev. Bohdan Barytskyy, pastor of the St. Petersburg church, apologized for the performance, which he said his church had not organized. “If any individual was hurt or offended by aspects of the performance, I sincerely regret that pain, and I believe such concerns deserve to be heard seriously and respectfully,” Barytskyy wrote in an email.
“I also want to emphasize that I have personally expressed concerns for many years regarding certain traditional portrayals that occasionally appear in some vertep performances, including in previous parishes where I served,” he added. “I have consistently encouraged that depictions which may be perceived as offensive, hurtful, or rooted in outdated stereotypes should not be included, because they do not reflect authentic Christian values or the spirit of respect toward other peoples and faith communities.”
Dudyak, leader of the youth group that performed the play, said in response to an inquiry from the Forward that his troupe had “made a conscious effort to avoid exaggerated or mocking” depictions in the performance.
Other organizers say exaggeration is sometimes the point.
The zhyd in a January vertep organized by the Protection of the Blessed Virgin Mary Ukrainian Catholic Church in Bridgeport, Connecticut, wore a prosthetic nose and danced around with a Gucci bag.
“Like any play, people put the make-up, people put the costumes — and there was a beard, there was glasses, there was a nose, yes there was,” the Rev. Ivan Mazuryk, who runs the church, said in an interview. “But just to make it clear who the character was.”
‘Zhyd’ sparks controversy
Gudziak, the UGCC archbishop based in Philadelphia, was born in Syracuse, New York, but spent years working in Ukraine before being appointed to serve as the church’s senior leader in the U.S.
While he was head of the Ukrainian Catholic University in Lviv, a city in western Ukraine, Gudziak sparked a nationwide discussion over how Jews were depicted in verteps. In a 2011 article in Ukrainian that Guzdiak wrote along with two other university leaders, he argued that the zhyd character was contrary to Catholic values.
Gudziak acknowledged that the zhyd had a long history as part of verteps, and wrote that Jewish and non-Jewish Ukrainians lived side-by-side and sometimes found each other’s customs humorous. But he added that theatrical festivities would spill into the street with serious consequences. “In Ukrainian villages and towns, flocks of boys would chase a Jewish peer down the street, chanting: ‘Zhyd! Zhyd!’”
He discouraged use of the zhyd as part of university verteps and exhorted other Ukrainian Catholics to follow suit.
The appeal set off a national debate that lost steam following Russia’s annexation of Crimea and occupation of eastern areas of the country in 2014, which preceded its full-scale invasion eight years later. Russian propaganda claimed its conflict with Ukraine entailed fighting Nazis, and weaponized claims of antisemitism as a justification for invading the country.
That made it difficult for Ukrainian Jews and others concerned about genuine instances of antisemitism — still widespread in a country that has failed to seriously grapple with its collaboration with Nazi forces during the Holocaust.
“Usually, when we hear someone shouting that ‘Ukrainians are antisemites,’ the Kremlin is involved,” Volodymyr Butkevych, a Ukrainian legal scholar and human rights lawyer, told Radio Free Europe during a 2021 interview about antisemitic expressions in verteps.
This has led to a dynamic in which even Ukrainian Catholic leaders who maintain close ties to American Jews nevertheless engage with verteps that mock Jews.
The Rev. Bohdan Hedz, the leader of St. John the Baptist Ukrainian Catholic Church in Riverhead on Long Island, joined a 2022 Holocaust memorial service at a local synagogue to condemn antisemitism and raise awareness about the war in Ukraine.
“Evil will not prevail,” he said during the event. “My heart goes out to the Jewish community.”
Hedz even said that as a child he had tended to the abandoned Jewish graveyard in his Ukrainian town.
But this December Hedz appeared in the front row of a vertep at his church that featured the familiar Moshko character with peyos and a fake Yiddish accent who tempts the Three Kings and betrays Christ to Herod. He did not respond to calls or emails from the Forward to the church.
Some leaders of the Ukrainian church in the U.S. have bristled at questions over whether they host verteps that present Jews in offensive ways — and say that they have made efforts to improve depictions.
The Rev. Daniel Schaicoski, the leader of Immaculate Conception Ukrainian Catholic Church outside Detroit, explained to the Forward that a long-haired character wearing a hat in a vertep produced by a church-affiliated school was not meant to represent a Jew but rather played a Willy Wonka-style role and handed out candy to the audience at the end of the show.
Schaicoski said that when he arrived at Immaculate Conception more than two decades ago the vertep included a Moshko character, which he insisted be removed from future productions.
“I said this is not right and people could see it — on video or whatever — and misunderstand,” Schaicoski said in a phone interview. He added that bishops from the Ukrainian church had circulated a letter to priests several years ago asking them to make sure that their verteps did not include offensive characters.
But when asked about photo albums from verteps at his church in 2017 and 2019 that both featured a character wearing a skullcap with artificial sidelocks attached — similar in appearance to how zhyd characters are often portrayed in verteps — Schaicoski refused to answer additional questions in a text exchange.
“We don’t do that. I am here for 30 years, we never did that. But I see you will not stop this shameless persecution!” Schaicoski wrote in a text message afterward. “You hunt people and then make yourselves victims, shame on you.”
Other church leaders also stopped responding when asked about vertep photographs.
The Rev. Hugo Soutus, who leads Dormition of the Mother of God Ukrainian Catholic Church in Phoenix, initially responded to an inquiry about a vertep hosted by his church where photos show a character wearing a black hat and what appeared to be artificial sidelocks by requesting more information. He signed off: “Shalom!”
But when sent a link to photos of the vertep, including a post shared by his church, Soutos stopped responding. The Facebook post has since been deleted.
Others were even more curt.
Photos of performances in 2023 and 2024 at St. Joseph the Betrothed Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church in Chicago show included a character with a black hat and sidelocks. One of the images posted by the church to social media shows the character holding beads, which are often hawked by Jewish vertep characters.
Church leaders did not respond to emails asking about the character and a woman who answered the phone at the church said: “Yes, I remember that email — that email was forwarded to our lawyer, OK? Thank you,” before hanging up.
Another Chicagoland church, the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary Ukrainian Catholic Church in Palos Park, also did not respond to emails asking about a photo of a character wearing a similar outfit in its vertep last year.
“There’s no one here to help you,” a receptionist at the church said before hanging up on a Forward reporter.
A long Catholic struggle
The Catholic Church has a long history of theatrical productions that demonize and scapegoat Jews. Unlike verteps that portray the birth story of Jesus, passion plays, which originated in 12th century Europe, collectively blamed Jews for the death of Jesus and often presented Jews as evil — sometimes wearing horns.
Nostra Aetate, a declaration on Catholic-Jewish relations released as part of Vatican II in 1965, declared that Jews could no longer be held responsible as a group for killing Jesus and led to the withdrawal of official church blessings for passion plays that promoted that narrative.
But it still took decades of concerted lobbying by Jewish organizations, led by the American Jewish Committee, to root out antisemitic portrayals in the Oberammergau Passion Play, which is performed once every ten years in Germany and is considered the most prominent production of its kind in the world.
Producers of the Oberammergau began to make reforms in 1990 — 25 years after Nostra Aetate — and it would take another 30 years for the AJC to declare a kind of victory in 2022, when the play began to embrace Jewish rituals in a positive light.
Official Vatican guidelines, detailed by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in a 1988 policy paper focused on passion plays but expounding on “general principles” of church teaching, strongly discourage negative portrayals of Jewish characters. The document states that theatrical productions — “extraliturgical depictions of the sacred mysteries” — should “conform to the highest possible standards of biblical interpretation and theological sensitivity.” The paper also quoted Pope John Paul II’s declaration that Catholic teaching should present Jews “in an honest and objective manner, free from prejudices and without any offenses.”
But it can be difficult to enforce this guidance at the parish level. While the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church is technically controlled by the Vatican, its relationship with Rome is often uneven. For decades, Rome has refused to elevate the UGCC to a “patriarchate,” a status that would grant it more autonomy from the Vatican. Analysts suggest Vatican officials have rejected these repeated requests in part over concerns that the move would provoke the Russian Orthodox Church, which claims Ukraine as its religious territory.
Major Archbishop Sviatoslav Shevchuk, head of the Kyiv-based UGCC — and who himself hosted a vertep with a character in peyos in 2024 — has in turn criticized the Vatican over its response to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, telling local media in 2023 that “the pope does not fully understand the pain of Ukraine” and that “all the pope tried to do for Ukraine after the full-scale invasion failed.” In office for a year, Pope Leo has not significantly shifted the church’s approach in Ukraine.
Language is also a barrier. Like the religious services, most verteps take place in Ukranian, making it difficult for officials outside the church to understand what’s being performed.
Verteps themselves are often organized by individual church members. In other cases, local Ukrainian theater troupes perform versions that were created without input from church leaders. St. Sophia Ukrainian Catholic Church in suburban Raleigh, North Carolina, said that was the case with the vertep they hosted in January that featured Moshko betraying Jesus to King Herod.
“We will not use this version of the vertep again,” the church wrote in a statement to the Forward, adding that it would ensure future performances “align with the values of our Church and with the teachings of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, which firmly rejects antisemitism.”
But, to date, none of the Catholic institutions that could exert formal pressure on the UGCC to stamp out antisemitic verteps have been willing to comment publicly on the performances.
The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which has taken a firm stand against far-right Catholic pundits who have trafficked in antisemitism, declined to weigh in on the Forward’s findings.
The Catholic Church’s inaction on verteps is at odds with the new pope’s message on Jews and the church.
Pope Leo met last month with representatives from New York City’s Jewish federation and emphasized the church’s “firm stand against antisemitism.”
Citing Nostra Aetate’s call to reject discrimination and harassment — and “shared spiritual ancestry in Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Joseph” — Pope Leo said: “In a world still wounded by division and conflict, it called us to move beyond past misunderstandings toward collaboration for the common good.
The post Jewish villains out to destroy Jesus are a staple of Ukrainian Catholic church pageants in the U.S. The Vatican has remained silent. appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
These rivals in a close House race agree on Israel. They’re fighting over who Jewish voters can trust.
Israel and antisemitism have emerged as central issues in several closely watched midterm races. But in New York’s 17th Congressional District, where Jewish voters could help decide one of the country’s most competitive House contests, the two candidates have more in common on those issues than their campaigns suggest.
Cait Conley, the Democratic challenger to incumbent Republican U.S. Rep. Mike Lawler, is not a progressive Democrat who Republicans have been warning Jewish voters about in recent campaigns. An Army combat veteran and former national security official, she strongly supports Israel, opposes additional conditions on U.S. military aid and rejects accusations that Israel committed genocide in Gaza. She has also criticized New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani over his statement marking the third anniversary of the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack and has vowed to confront antisemitism within her own party. But that may not be enough to win Jewish votes from Lawler, who is popular with Jewish voters.
The district includes Rockland and Putnam counties and parts of Westchester and Dutchess. It has one of the largest Jewish populations in the country, with Jews making up an estimated 19% of its population, according to a 2024 study. It is one of the key House races where Jewish voters could make the difference in a closely contested election that will determine which party controls Congress.
Kamala Harris carried the district by a narrow 50-49 margin in 2024, and it voted for Joe Biden by a 59-39 margin before that. The late Jewish congresswoman Nita Lowey, a Democrat, represented the district for three decades until her retirement in 2020. Her successor, former Rep. Mondaire Jones, chose not to run in the redrawn district in 2022 and instead lost a bid for a House seat representing parts of Manhattan and Brooklyn. During his unsuccessful 2024 campaign against Lawler, Jones had to delete a social media post that some deemed insulting to Orthodox Jews after he remarked that the former Republican House Speaker’s meeting with Rabbi David Twersky, the 86-year-old spiritual leader known as the Skverer Rebbe in Rockland County, “was a waste of everyone’s time.”
Conley, 31, faces a difficult challenge in her bid to unseat Lawler, who has deep relationships with Orthodox and Hasidic voters since he first won his seat in the 2022 midterms by a narrow margin of about 2,000 votes, thanks in part to strong support from the large Hasidic communities in Monsey, New Square and New Hempstead in Rockland County.
That makes the race a test of whether a moderate, pro-Israel Democrat can win back Jewish voters who have grown concerned about the growing influence of progressives within the Democratic Party.
In separate interviews with the Forward, Conley and Lawler both stressed their support for Israel and commitment to fighting rising antisemitism. To draw a contrast, Lawler, 40, questioned whether Conley would stick to her positions if elected, while Conley accused him of using his ties to Jewish voters to distract from his support for President Donald Trump’s agenda.
A Democrat who rejects conditions on Israel aid
Conley, a West Point graduate and 16-year Army combat veteran who later served as counterterrorism director on President Joe Biden’s National Security Council and oversaw election security efforts at the Department of Homeland Security, occupies a different position on Israel than many progressive Democrats.
She supports Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state, backs continued U.S. military assistance and opposes imposing conditions on that aid, including on offensive weapons.
“I do not believe that what is going on in Gaza is a genocide, and I do not believe in further conditioning assistance to Israel, so it continues to have the means to defend itself against the very real threats that are posed,” Conley said in an interview. “I will be an effective and strong advocate for the Jewish community and assistance to Israel in the Democratic Party.”
Conley said her experience serving in the Middle East shaped her understanding of the threats Israel faces, particularly from Iran and terrorist organizations.
At the same time, she supports a two-state solution and believes American politicians should be able to criticize Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or other Israeli leaders without questioning Israel’s legitimacy. She expressed concern, though, that criticism of Israeli government policies can sometimes become an excuse for targeting Jews. Conley also supports expanding federal security grants for synagogues and other religious institutions.
Conley said she supported the targeted American strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in 2025, but opposes Trump’s war with Iran because she believes it has made the United States less secure and increased energy prices.
Lawler isn’t buying Conley’s pro-Israel pitch
Lawler dismissed the suggestion that he and Conley hold essentially the same positions on Israel and antisemitism.
“That’s laughable on its face,” he said in an interview.
His central argument is that Conley may sound like a moderate on the campaign trail but would ultimately follow Democratic leaders in Congress, as support for Israel becomes increasingly divisive within the party.
“She’ll be a rubber stamp on whatever the majority of the Democrats want to do,” Lawler said, citing the July vote to eliminate the $3.3 billion in annual military assistance to Israel. A record 103 of 212 Democrats supported the measure. Another 10 Democrats abstained. Conley “is not going to stand up and be a lone voice on these issues,” he said.
“At the end of the day,” Lawler added, “I have a very clear record of delivering on these issues, and there’s staunch differences in approach.”
A Republican who speaks the community’s language
Lawler’s relationship with Orthodox and Hasidic voters goes beyond his positions on Israel. A practicing Catholic, Lawler has made those relationships part of his political brand, going back to his election to the State Assembly in 2020. He has taken credit for lowering the temperature in Rockland County after local GOP officials in 2019 posted a video widely criticized as antisemitic. He regularly attends community celebrations and has helped arrange meetings between local rabbis and religious leaders, President Donald Trump and Republican leadership.
Earlier this year, William Paul, the son of Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, confronted him in a Washington bar, believing the New York congressman was Jewish. Paul later apologized and said he has a drinking problem for which he is seeking treatment.
His presence in the community has become so familiar that his campaign even has Yiddish materials and songs promoting his reelection. The songs are shared in popular WhatsApp groups, played at weddings and blasted from trucks driving through Hasidic neighborhoods to encourage people to vote.
Lawler’s campaign is aiming to surpass the 22,000 votes he received in Hasidic neighborhoods in 2022 and 26,000 votes in 2024, as polls show the race is a dead heat. In an interview with Punchbowl News, he predicted 30,000 Orthodox votes, arguing that the community’s participation is difficult for pollsters to capture.
In his interview with the Forward, Lawler said his popularity comes from a simple strategy: showing up.
“I am really the first elected official that has shown up, you know, consistently and publicly in this community, and not just to see the leadership of the community, but to meet the people,” he said. Lawler has even picked up some Yiddish vocabulary along the way. Asked what word he had learned, Lawler quipped, “I love the word shanda to describe Chuck Schumer,” using a Yiddish term for disgrace about the Senate Democratic leader, who is Jewish.
Lawler believes his efforts have helped build support beyond the Orthodox and Hasidic communities, including among Reform and secular Jews who might otherwise vote Democratic but are concerned about their party’s direction on Israel. “Democrats have effectively abandoned Jewish Americans,” he said.
Conley acknowledged Lawler’s visibility in the community but questioned whether it is matched with policies that benefit Jewish families. “Mike Lawler shows up for the photo op, but when it comes to acting, he turns his back on the community every time,” she said. Conley pointed particularly to his support for Republican-led legislation cutting Medicaid spending and other federal benefits.
A fight over antisemitism in politics
Conley said her own outreach has focused on convincing Jewish voters that she understands their security concerns and shares their commitment to Israel, even as she disagrees with Lawler on domestic policy.
She also spoke of a personal connection to the Jewish community as a member of the LGBTQ community, recalling how Jewish Americans stood up for LGBTQ rights. “That’s why I proudly stand beside them and let them know that there are people who deeply care and will proudly stand shoulder to shoulder with them and fight back against antisemitism,” she said.
As Lawler highlights his ties to Jewish voters and questions whether Conley would stand up to anti-Israel voices in the Democratic Party, Conley accuses him of associating with Republicans who have faced accusations of antisemitic rhetoric and ties to white nationalists.
She said Lawler had a double standard: condemning antisemitism among Democrats while supporting Republicans who have faced accusations of antisemitic rhetoric or associations with white nationalists. “He is the biggest hypocrite,” she said of Lawler. “He is a political operative who will do whatever is politically convenient for his political ambition.”
Conley cited, for example, Peter Oberacker, a Republican state legislator running against Democratic Rep. Josh Riley in the neighboring 19th District, who came under fire after a Facebook post from Veterans Day 2015 resurfaced in which he paid tribute to his grandfather who served in the Nazi-German military during World War II. Lawler attended Oberacker’s campaign launch last year and praised him. Lawler also contributed $5,000 to his campaign.
Conley described Oberacker as an “overt Nazi sympathizer” and said Lawler’s support for him undermined his claim to be a defender of Jewish Americans. Conley also pointed to Lawler’s past connections with members of the New York State Young Republicans, whose group was disbanded following a Politico investigation exposing racist and antisemitic messages. Lawler condemned it and called for those involved to resign from leadership positions.
Asked directly about the criticism, Lawler defended Oberacker. “He’s not an antisemite,” Lawler said, adding that Oberacker represents Jewish constituents in the state Senate. He dismissed Conley’s accusations as an attempt to distract from her own political alliances. “I think Cait is grasping at straws,” he said.
Lawler pointed to Conley’s decision to run on the Working Families Party ballot line, a progressive party that endorsed Mamdani in last year’s mayoral primary and has accused Israel of genocide. He also noted her remarks in a September interview, when she said that she “respects” what Mamdani represents to many New Yorkers. “I don’t respect antisemites,” Lawler said.
Lawler was the lead sponsor of the bipartisan Antisemitism Awareness Act that would require the Department of Education to use the controversial International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism — which classifies most anti-Zionism as antisemitic — when investigating allegations of discrimination. It passed in the House in 2024 by an overwhelming majority of 320-91, but was stalled in the Senate due to resistance over constitutionally protected free speech. It was reintroduced in the House last year.
More recently, Lawler partnered with Rep. Josh Gottheimer, a Jewish moderate Democrat from New Jersey, on a bipartisan House resolution condemning antisemitic rhetoric from online personalities including Hasan Piker and Candace Owens.
Conley said she recognizes the rise of “extremism and antisemitism in both parties” and has heard from Jewish voters who feel abandoned by some of the same political allies they once supported. By speaking out on these issues and committing to confront them within her own party, Conley is aiming to convince these voters that they do not have to support a Republican to feel protected.
“The Jewish community knows they have a home in the Democratic Party. Period,” she said.
The post These rivals in a close House race agree on Israel. They’re fighting over who Jewish voters can trust. appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
Rift between Abdul El-Sayed and Haley Stevens puts Michigan Jews on edge
(JTA) — ANN ARBOR, Michigan — An 11th-hour public feud between Michigan Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed and his pro-Israel former primary rival is further exacerbating tensions between Jewish voters and the nominee ahead of Tuesday’s midterm elections.
U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens, who this summer narrowly lost the race for the Democratic nomination to El-Sayed, had previously endorsed her former competitor and was set to join him at a rally Sunday in the crucial final days of campaigning. Michigan is locked in a tight race that could help determine which party controls the Senate.
Instead of a show of unity, Stevens is now forcefully criticizing El-Sayed for his recent criticism of Israel and for not condemning a PAC ad, made by an outside group to boost his campaign, that blamed Israel for rising grocery prices. El-Sayed has shot back, invoking Stevens’ close relationship with the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC.
Stevens, who represents a large Jewish district in suburban Detroit, unloaded on El-Sayed Friday in a series of interviews with the New York Times published early Saturday morning.
On social media Friday, Stevens had said she expected El-Sayed to shortly condemn the ad, paid for by Rebellion PAC, a project of far-left commentator Cenk Uygur. El-Sayed had earlier distanced himself from the ad but had not commented on its content.
“We are not going to say that the cost of groceries is because of Jews and the Jewish state,” Stevens told the Times, adding, “Maybe it is what you want people to believe.” She stopped short of formally rescinding her endorsement of El-Sayed.
The feud comes at a moment when much of the Democratic establishment has coalesced behind El-Sayed in the key Senate race, even as deep concerns remain among many traditionally Democratic Jewish voters. Stevens’ own fiancée, Jewish Democratic megadonor Jason Turkish, said this week he would be voting for Republican nominee Mike Rogers. Stevens told the Times she had met with a rabbi in advance of their wedding and was mulling converting to Judaism.
In a statement sent to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency and other outlets Friday, El-Sayed accused Stevens of “relitigating a primary that ended three months ago.” He also said he had already “defeated” spending “from outside corporations and AIPAC” on behalf of Stevens.
El-Sayed did not mention the Uygur ad, nor another ad — this one produced by his campaign — that featured a brief clip of far-right commentator and anti-Israel voice Tucker Carlson announcing he wouldn’t vote for Rogers. Stevens had publicly urged El-Sayed to take down the Carlson ad, which the campaign had aired on conservative TV channels.
The El-Sayed campaign has dropped Stevens’ name from its description of Sunday’s planned Detroit church event, which is now scheduled to feature Rep. Jim Clyburn of South Carolina and Sen. Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland. USA Today and other outlets have reported that El-Sayed’s campaign has asked Stevens to stay away from all future events.
Stevens and Turkish did not return a JTA request for comment.
In her social media statement Friday prior to El-Sayed’s response, Stevens had outlined Jewish constituent concerns about El-Sayed, noting that he himself has used rhetoric akin to blaming Michigan’s financial ills on Israel.
“The ad did not invent its argument; it dramatized one Dr. El-Sayed has made in his own words throughout this campaign: that Israel is the reason Michigan cannot afford schools, health care, and child care,” Stevens wrote. “Abdul promises to get money out of politics. He can begin by getting Israel out of his explanation for everything Michigan cannot afford.”
Both Turkish, in an earlier JTA interview from a Rogers event, and Stevens, to the Times, said their final breaking point with El-Sayed came after a recent debate in which the nominee had declined to say whether Israel or Iran posed a bigger threat to the United States.
El-Sayed on Friday did condemn a separate comment from anti-Israel streamer and former campaign ally Hasan Piker, who is Uygur’s nephew. In a stream this week, Piker had compared the heavily Jewish Detroit suburb of West Bloomfield to a “KKK neighborhood,” adding, “The supremacist attitude underlying their worldview is identical.”
In a statement to Jewish Insider about Piker’s comments, El-Sayed noted he grew up near West Bloomfield and stated, “Comparing Jewish Michiganders to the Ku Klux Klan is utterly inappropriate and flat out wrong.”
Meanwhile, Republicans are jumping at the Jewish divide. Rogers, a former congressman, has seized on the intraparty feud to appeal to Jewish voters who had supported Stevens in the primary. Earlier this week, President Donald Trump called Jews who back El-Sayed “crazy,” leading to condemnation from some Jewish leaders.
This article originally appeared on JTA.org.
The post Rift between Abdul El-Sayed and Haley Stevens puts Michigan Jews on edge appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
BDS is on the ballot in Illinois, sort of
(JTA) — On a recent weeknight, a local Jewish federation official met with a small group of Jews in suburban Chicago for an election organizing event.
Leaders of the group preemptively barred journalists, and anyone they deemed could be a journalist, from entry on Zoom.
Chicago Jewish leaders were quietly organizing an effort with big implications: how to convince voters to defend a state law designed to shield Israel from boycotts.
“It’s a fight, to put it simply,” Dan Goldwin, public affairs officer at Chicago’s Jewish United Fund, told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
JUF and other Jewish groups, Goldwin said, would be mounting “planned and meaningful opposition” to growing progressive efforts to overturn the law, which bars the state from investing pension funds in international companies that boycott Israel. Illinois was the first state to pass a law targeting the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions movement, and many other states followed suit soon after.
Now activists in some Illinois towns are leading the charge to repeal that first-in-the-nation law. Those efforts have resulted in a handful of ballot measures ceremonially opposing the law that will appear in municipalities around the state on Nov. 3.
“Illinois, which was really a laboratory for creating anti-BDS state laws years back, inevitably has become a site for backlash,” James Loeffler, a Jewish historian at Johns Hopkins University and author of “Exceptional Hatred: Antisemitism and the Fight Over Free Speech in Modern America,” told JTA.
The measures appear to have no binding power over the anti-boycott law itself, which has been on the books since 2015 and would require action by the state legislature and governor to overturn.
A representative for JB Pritzker, Illinois’ Jewish Democratic governor who is often rumored to be a 2028 presidential candidate, did not return a request for comment on Pritzker’s views about the state law or the ballot initiatives.
Yet the municipal measures, which will be presented to the Chicago suburb of Oak Park as well as communities around Champaign, Peoria and other towns, come at a moment when support for Israel has declined precipitously, particularly among Democrats. Following the country’s military response to the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attacks, interest in BDS as a lever of protest has been rekindled on the left.
Residents of Providence, Rhode Island, will vote on a more consequential measure on Election Day that could result in the city divesting its pension funds from Israel. Somerville, Massachusetts, a Boston suburb, has been charged with finding a way to do the same following a successful divestment vote last year.
The Illinois BDS campaign, in contrast, targets a statewide law that has been on the books for more than a decade. Activists turned to gathering signatures for ballot measures in a handful of communities after a state representative’s efforts to repeal the law were scuttled during the most recent legislative session.
The law was signed by Pritzker’s Republican predecessor, Bruce Rauner. Upon its initial passage, the law was celebrated by Jewish leaders including the then-head of the JUF, Chicago’s Jewish federation arm.
“In the face of the BDS movement, legislators are simply determined to stand with a key U.S. ally and to align our values with our investments and trade policies,” Steven Nasatir wrote then.
He praised the Illinois law as having “real teeth” and stated, “We’re seeking to replicate our statewide success on the county and local level throughout Illinois and to assist other communities to do the same across the country.”
Dozens of other states, led by both Democrats and Republicans, have since followed suit with similar laws, many of which are more restrictive than Illinois’. Among the most contentious anti-BDS laws is in Arkansas, which requires anyone doing business with the state to sign a pledge affirming they will not boycott Israel.
Such laws have been challenged numerous times in court, with objectors arguing that they impinge on free speech rights. Loeffler sees the laws as “a continuation of a long story of trying to balance free speech versus equal protection in the law, when it comes to Jewish Americans.”
In 2023 the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to Arkansas’ law, allowing it to stand without providing a defense of the general legality of such laws.
Daniel Biss, a Jewish Democratic congressional candidate running for a seat in Illinois, recently told JTA that he supports efforts to repeal the state law.
“I don’t support the BDS movement,” Biss, who held Israeli citizenship when he was younger, told JTA during a recent visit to Detroit. “I don’t think it builds a broad coalition for justice. But I also don’t think government should be involved in criminalizing free speech, and I think it’s important to say that the law on the books in Illinois is very strange.”
Proponents of Illinois’ law argue that it is narrower in scope than other state anti-BDS laws, targeting only international companies that have boycotted Israel for political reasons.
“We don’t want to be seen as restricting people’s ability to protest and boycott on their own,” Goldwin told JTA. The goal, he said, was to ensure that the state’s “priorities are aligned in how they invest.”
But even with those limitations, the list of companies barred from Illinois state investments for boycotting Israel – currently numbering 27, according to the state investment board that applies the law – includes entries that appear to go beyond the parameters of the law.
One of the companies is Air Canada, which Goldwin said was on the list because of years-old news items about the airline dropping Israeli-owned Sabra hummus from its in-flight menu. According to Goldwin, the state investment board gave the airline an opportunity to affirm that they are not boycotting Israel but Air Canada has not done so. Goldwin believes that is due to simple oversight.
“Mistakes can happen,” Goldwin said. “It’s just amplified because everything gets so focused on Israel.” A spokesperson for Air Canada did not return a JTA request for comment.
The most significant town casting a vote on the symbolic rejection of Illinois’ anti-BDS law is Oak Park, which also has the most organized Jewish community of the municipalities where these votes are being held. Oak Park’s ballot measure, as written, asks the state to “repeal laws that ban state investment in businesses that boycott the state of Israel.”
Jewish Community and Friends for Democracy, a local ad-hoc group, is organizing against the ballot measure with the help of JUF.
“We are hopeful that Oak Park voters will reject the divisive and misleading campaign,” a recent communication from Jewish Community and Friends for Democracy to its supporters reads. “Neighbors hearing from their Jewish neighbors and friends makes a big difference—indeed, it may make ‘THE’ critical difference in the outcome.”
The group’s organizers declined requests from JTA to comment. The ballot measure followed an earlier effort by activists in Oak Park Township, a separately incorporated community, to pass a more stridently worded BDS measure by voice vote at a town hall meeting. After local Jewish groups mobilized against the township measure, that effort was defeated.
This summer, following the signature-gathering phase, two Oak Park residents filed an objection in an unsuccessful effort to prevent the new measure from reaching the ballot on technical grounds. A follow-up lawsuit challenging the objection was also unsuccessful in preventing the measure from making the ballot.
Oak Parkers For Free Speech, a local activist group that had pushed the ballot measure, told JTA in August that the successful ballot placement “marks a victory for democracy.”
“By upholding our referendum, the board affirmed the right of community members to tell legislators that their constituents want the unconstitutional Illinois anti‑boycott law repealed,” the group wrote in an emailed statement. “On election day, we look forward to a victory for free speech and human rights.”
Other regions casting votes on whether to oppose the anti-BDS law include Champaign and Cunningham Townships, located near and around the University of Illinois; Normal Township, near Illinois State University in Bloomington; and multiple townships in the Peoria area in central Illinois.
The Jewish federations of Champaign-Urbana and Peoria did not return requests for comment. Rebecca Weininger, regional director for the Anti-Defamation League’s Midwest office, told local news outlets, “The social impact of repealing the anti-BDS law will be catastrophic to Jews.”
This article originally appeared on JTA.org.
The post BDS is on the ballot in Illinois, sort of appeared first on The Forward.
