Uncategorized
Magda Teter, 52, educator, scholar and writer
Magda Teter, 52, is the first-ever Shvidler Chair in Judaic Studies at Fordham University, the Jesuit university in the Bronx. Although she is not Jewish, Teter is passionate about Jewish history and culture — as she tells the New York Jewish Week, she grew up in Poland at a time when it was taboo to discuss Jews or Jewish history. As the co-director of Fordham’s Center for Jewish Studies, she’s spearheaded a unique, only-in-New York project: a growing collection of items that detail the once-thriving Jewish community in the Bronx, including yearbooks full of Jewish last names, bar mitzvah invitations and phonebooks full of Jewish-owned businesses. “It’s not only preserving a piece of New York Jewish history, but also a way of life,” she says.
For the full list of this year’s 36 to Watch — which honors leaders, entrepreneurs and changemakers who are making a difference in New York’s Jewish community — click here.
Who is your New York Jewish hero?
Salo Wittmayer Baron, a historian and a community leader
What’s a fun/surprising fact about you?
One of my master’s theses was on the Mongolian translation of the Hebrew Bible
How does your Jewish identity or experience influence your work?
I am not Jewish, but Jewish history and, especially, the Jewish past in Poland have shaped who I am. Growing up in Poland and witnessing the salient past, presence and the stark current absence of Jews were formative for me. Over the decades of studying Jewish history and culture, I have become passionate about its relevance to the broader world. Understanding Jews’ place in history and society, on their own terms but also on the terms imposed on them from the outside, holds much relevance today. Perhaps especially today.
Do you have a favorite inspiring quote?
“The horror of the Holocaust is not that it deviated from human norms; the horror is that it didn’t” — Yehuda Bauer. And: “Hate, it has caused a lot of problems in this world, but it has not solved one yet” — Maya Angelou.
What is your favorite place to eat Jewish food in New York?
I miss “My Favorite” restaurant at West 72nd Street and especially their desserts. Now, it’s Hummus Place.
What are three spots in NYC that all Jewish New Yorkers should visit?
1. Fordham University’s Walsh Family Library and the exhibits in its Henry S. Miller Judaica Research Room (of course!).
2. The Grand Concourse in the Bronx (the Heinrich Heine Fountain; the Bronx Museum, which is a former synagogue; Grand Concourse Seventh Day Adventist Temple, which was Adath Israel until 1972 and more).
3. Teitel Brothers on Arthur Avenue — one of the oldest Jewish businesses in the Bronx (check out the Star of David on the mosaic floor).
Want to keep up with stories of other innovative Jewish New Yorkers? Click here to subscribe to the New York Jewish Week’s free email newsletter.
—
The post Magda Teter, 52, educator, scholar and writer appeared first on Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
Uncategorized
Lebanon Plans UN Complaint Against Israel Over Border Wall
A UN vehicle drives near a concrete wall along Lebanon’s southern border which, according to the Lebanese presidency, extends beyond the “Blue Line”, a U.N.-mapped line separating Lebanon from Israel and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, as seen from northern Israel, November 16, 2025. REUTERS/Shir Torem
Lebanon will file a complaint to the U.N. Security Council against Israel for constructing a concrete wall along Lebanon’s southern border that extends beyond the “Blue Line,” the Lebanese presidency said on Saturday.
The Blue Line is a U.N.-mapped line separating Lebanon from Israel and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. Israeli forces withdrew to the Blue Line when they left south Lebanon in 2000.
A spokesperson for the U.N. secretary-general, Stephane Dujarric, said on Friday the wall has made more than 4,000 square meters (nearly an acre) of Lebanese territory inaccessible to the local population.
The Lebanese presidency echoed his remarks, saying in a statement that Israel’s ongoing construction constituted “a violation of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701 and an infringement on Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.”
Dujarric said the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) had requested that the wall be removed.
An Israeli military spokesperson denied on Friday that the wall crossed the Blue Line.
“The wall is part of a broader IDF plan whose construction began in 2022,” the spokesperson said, referring to the Israel Defense Forces.
“Since the start of the war, and as part of lessons learned from it, the IDF has been advancing a series of measures, including reinforcing the physical barrier along the northern border.”
UNIFIL, established in 1978, operates between the Litani River in the north and the Blue Line in the south. The mission has more than 10,000 troops from 50 countries and about 800 civilian staff, according to its website.
Uncategorized
Iran Says US Is Not Ready for ‘Equal and Fair’ Nuclear Talks
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi speaks during a meeting with foreign ambassadors in Tehran, Iran, July 12, 2025. Photo: Hamid Forootan/Iranian Foreign Ministry/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS
Washington’s current approach toward Tehran does not indicate any readiness for “equal and fair negotiations,” Iran’s foreign minister said on Sunday, after US President Donald Trump hinted last week at potential discussions.
Following Israel’s attack on Iran in June, which was joined by U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, attempts at renewing dialogue on Tehran’s nuclear program have failed.
The United States, its European allies and Israel accuse Tehran of using its nuclear program as a veil for efforts to develop the capability to produce weapons. Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only.
Tehran and Washington underwent five rounds of indirect nuclear talks prior to the 12-days-war, but faced obstacles such as the issue of domestic uranium enrichment, which the U.S. wants Iran to forego.
“The U.S. cannot expect to gain what it couldn’t in war through negotiations,” Abbas Araqchi said during a Tehran conference named “international law under assault.”
“Iran will always be prepared to engage in diplomacy, but not negotiations meant for dictation,” he added.
During the same conference, deputy foreign minister Saeed Khatibzadeh accused Washington of pursuing its wartime goals with “negotiations as a show.”
Uncategorized
Israeli Government Decides ‘Independent’ Commission to Investigate Oct. 7 Failures
The Israeli Supreme Court in Jerusalem. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.
i24 News – The Israeli government has approved the creation of an “independent” commission of inquiry to examine the failures that enabled the Hamas assault of October 7, 2023.
However, in a move sharply criticized by the opposition and contrary to the recommendation of the Supreme Court, the panel will not be a formal state commission of inquiry. Instead, its mandate, authorities, and scope will be determined directly by government ministers.
According to the decision, the commission will receive full investigative powers and must be composed in a way that ensures “the broadest possible public trust.”
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will form a special ministerial committee tasked with defining what the inquiry may investigate, the time periods to be reviewed, and the authority it will receive. The committee has 45 days to deliver its recommendations.
For the past year, the government has repeatedly resisted calls to establish a state commission, arguing at first that such a body could not operate during wartime. Later, some ministers accused Supreme Court President Isaac Amit of being incapable of appointing an impartial chairperson.
But on October 15, the High Court of Justice ruled that there was “no substantive argument” against forming a state commission, giving the government 30 days to respond.
Netanyahu maintains that responsibility for the October 7 failures lies primarily with Israel’s security agencies rather than with political leaders.
His critics accuse him of creating a weaker, government-controlled inquiry designed to limit scrutiny of his decisions, undermining the prospect of full accountability for the deadliest attack in Israel’s history.