Connect with us

Uncategorized

Palestinian Authority Condemns Terrorism Against Arabs — But Not Against Jews

French President Emmanuel Macron welcomes Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, Nov. 11, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Benoit Tessier

The Palestinian Authority (PA) knows perfectly well how to condemn terror attacks on other Arabs. When terror is carried out against Jews, however, it is the fault of the Jews.

In the most recent example, Mahmoud Abbas’ senior advisor, Mahmoud Al-Habbash, used the PA’s official news agency to publicize his fierce condemnation of the Islamist bombing of a mosque in Syria as a “cowardly, heinous act.”

However, when a Palestinian terrorist murdered two Israelis on the same day, Israel was “the one responsible for any action or violent reaction in the region,” according to Abbas’ advisor.

PA condemns terror attack in Syria

Supreme Shari’ah Judge of Palestine and [PA] President [Mahmoud Abbas’] Advisor on Religious Affairs and Islamic Relations Mahmoud Al-Habbash offered condolences to Syrian Minister of Endowments Mohammed Abu Al-Khair Shukri over the victims of the heinous terror bombing at the Ali ibn Abi Talib Mosque in the city of Homs …

Al-Habbash strongly condemned this cowardly heinous act … He also emphasized that terror is directed against the entire [Islamic] nation and requires a united stance to confront it and dry up its sources.

[WAFA, official PA news agency, Dec. 27, 2025]

Click to play

PA condemns Israel for Palestinian terror attack in Israel

Egyptian Al-Qahera News TV host:“What is the message that Israel needs to understand behind such operations, and this operation in particular [i.e., terrorist murdered 2 Israelis]?” …

Mahmoud Al-Habbash:“The first and last one responsible for incidents of this kind is the Israeli policy. ... The one responsible for any action or violent reaction [i.e., terror attack] in the region is the Israeli policy … They are the ones who are guilty and they are the ones who bear responsibility, and they must conduct a self-examination. [emphasis added]

[PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas’ Advisor on Religious Affairs and Islamic Relations Mahmoud Al-Habbash, YouTube channel, Dec. 26, 2025]

The official PA daily likewise refused to condemn the murderous terror attack by Palestinians.

An item about each attack was featured on the very same page of Al-Hayat Al-Jadida. The attack in Israel was framed as an “operation.” Responsibility was shifted almost immediately from the act of terror itself to Israel’s counter-terror action, with the headline emphasizing that “the occupation launches extensive aggression against Qabatiya,” from where the terrorist originated.

There was no condemnation, no expression of sympathy for the victims, and no rejection of violence, as there was with the attack in Syria. This is significant because Abbas has repeatedly told Western leaders that he condemns Palestinian terror and he has been praised for it.

In fact, his supposed condemnation of terror was one of the things for which he received praise from French President Macron. Palestinian Media Watch has stressed repeatedly that Abbas has never condemned Palestinian terror, nor the October 7 atrocities; rather, he has merely regretted their negative impact on Gaza.

Headline: “Two Israelis killed and 6 wounded between Beit Shean and Afula, the occupation launches extensive aggression against Qabatiya”

Two Israelis were killed and six wounded between Beit Shean and Afula in the northern 1948 territories [i.e., Israel] in a ramming and stabbing incident, according to the Israeli occupation police. Hebrew media outlets said that the dual operation in Beit Shean occurred in three locations, and that a woman was stabbed to death, another person was run over to death, and six others were wounded. The occupation police said in a statement that the one who carried out the operation is from the town of Qabatiya south of Jenin, and that he was shot and wounded and evacuated to the hospital in moderate condition.”

[Official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, Dec. 27, 2025]

In the report on the attack in Syria, however, the difference is striking. The PA presidential office issued a full, unequivocal condemnation of “the terror incident.” It stressed that it “denounces and rejects all forms of violence and terror,” quoted the Quran, expressed solidarity with Syria’s leadership and people, offered condolences to the victims’ families, and wished the wounded a speedy recovery.

Headline: “The [PA] presidential office condemns the terror incident in which a mosque was blown up in Homs”

The [PA] presidential office condemned the terror incident against the Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib Mosque in the Wadi Al-Dhahab neighborhood in Homs, Syria, which claimed several victims and wounded. The presidential office emphasized that it denounces and rejects all forms of violence and terror. It expressed solidarity with the people and leadership of the sister Syrian Republic, and support for sister Syria in this painful event. It recalled the Quranic verse: “And who are more unjust than those who prevent the name of Allah from being mentioned in His mosques and strive toward their destruction’” [Quran 2:114, Sahih International translation].

The presidential office expressed its sincerest condolences to the families of the victims and wished a speedy recovery to the wounded. It wished Syria and the Syrian people perpetual stability and prosperity.”

[Official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, Dec. 27, 2025]

When terror strikes anywhere in the Arab world other than Israel, the Palestinian Authority knows exactly how to respond. It uses the word terror. It condemns. It empathizes. It invokes moral and religious language. It stands with the victims. This is a far cry from what the PA does when the victims are Jews.

The Palestinian Authority’s claim that it opposes “all forms of violence and terror” is therefore a demonstrable lie. For the PA, terror is only terror when the victims are not Jews.

Ephraim D. Tepler is a contributor to Palestinian Media Watch (PMW). Itamar Marcus is the Founder and Director of PMW, where a version of this article first appeared.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Somalia’s South West State Says It Has Severed Ties With the Federal Government

FILE PHOTO: Somalia’s presidential candidate of South West state Abdiaziz Hassan Mohamed speaks inside the Somali Parliament house in Mogadishu, Somalia April 30, 2018. Photo: REUTERS/Feisal Omar/File Photo

Somalia’s South West state said on Tuesday it was suspending all cooperation and relations with the government in Mogadishu, the latest sign of strain in the Horn of Africa country’s fragile federal system.

At a press conference, South West officials accused the federal government of arming militias and trying to unseat the state’s president, Abdiaziz Hassan Mohamed Laftagareen. Somalia’s defense and information ministers did not respond to Reuters’ requests for comment.

Disputes over constitutional changes, elections and the balance of power between Mogadishu and regional administrations repeatedly open up political fault lines in Somalia. The South West administration says relations with Mogadishu worsened after the federal government pushed through constitutional amendments opposed by some state leaders.

Travel agencies told Reuters on Tuesday that commercial flights between Mogadishu and Baidoa, the administrative capital of South West state, had been halted. Humanitarian flights, including for United Nations operations, were continuing. Baidoa, which lies about 245 km (150 miles) northwest of Mogadishu, is a politically and militarily sensitive city because it hosts federal troops, regional security forces and international humanitarian operations in a zone affected by drought, conflict and displacement.

The Mogadishu government’s relations with other states have also been fraught. Somaliland declared independence in 1991 and has long been outside Mogadishu’s control. The administration of semi-autonomous Puntland said in March 2024 it would no longer recognize the federal government until disputed constitutional amendments were approved in a nationwide referendum.

Semi-autonomous Jubbaland suspended ties with Mogadishu in November 2024 in a dispute over regional elections.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Report: Iran Sees Control of Strait of Hormuz as Victory Over US, Israel

An LPG gas tanker at anchor as traffic is down in the Strait of Hormuz, amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Shinas, Oman, March 11, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo

i24 NewsIran is showing no indication it is ready to end the war with the United States and Israel, as officials say Tehran is relying on its control over the Strait of Hormuz to increase global economic pressure and strengthen its position.

According to regional officials cited by The Washington Post, Iran is rejecting diplomatic efforts to identify an off-ramp and instead escalating attacks on neighboring countries. An Iranian diplomat said the strategy is to “make this aggression super expensive for the aggressors,” as Tehran faces sustained military pressure.

The Strait of Hormuz remains central to Iran’s calculations. The waterway carries roughly one-fifth of global fuel shipments, and its partial closure has disrupted energy markets. US President Donald Trump issued a 48-hour deadline for Iran to reopen the route, warning of further escalation if it does not comply.

Iranian officials and diplomats said the leadership views its ability to maintain pressure through the strait as a short-term success, even as infrastructure damage mounts. “They don’t feel any pressure to negotiate,” one European diplomat based in the Gulf said, adding that Iran sees its influence over oil markets as a form of leverage.

At the same time, efforts to mediate a ceasefire have so far failed. Officials from Qatar and Oman approached Iran last week, but Tehran said it would only engage if US and Israeli strikes stopped first. An Iranian diplomat said the country would not accept a “premature ceasefire” and is seeking guarantees, including compensation and commitments to prevent future attacks.

The war has already caused significant damage. The Pentagon says more than 15,000 targets have been struck across Iran, while Iranian authorities report over 1,200 civilian deaths. The conflict has also expanded regionally, with Iranian strikes targeting energy infrastructure in Gulf states following attacks on its own facilities.

Despite mounting losses, analysts say Iran’s leadership believes prolonging the conflict could shift pressure onto Washington and its allies through rising energy prices and regional instability. “We’re still on an escalatory path,” said Alan Eyre, a former US official, adding that Tehran is attempting to “up the costs” rather than move toward negotiations.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Persistent Iran War, Energy Price Surge Set to Sway Wavering Stocks

Stock ticker. Photo: Ahmad Ardity/Wikimedia Commons.

A Middle East crisis that has convulsed markets should remain the focal point for Wall Street in the near term, as investors stay glued to developments in Iran and the fallout from surging energy prices.

As the US-Israeli war on Iran stretches to three weeks, an over 40% jump in oil prices is driving worries about higher inflation and stagnating economic growth.

Inflationary concerns on Friday were prompting markets to rule out any equity-friendly interest rate cuts this year, which investors previously had been counting on, with futures trading instead suggesting modest chances of hikes in 2026. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell expressed deep uncertainty at the US central bank’s meeting on Wednesday about how the crisis would factor into the economy, muddying its ability to forecast conditions ahead.

US stocks suffered sharp declines to end the week. The benchmark S&P 500 stock index posted its fourth straight weekly decline and hit a six-month low, while the Nasdaq Composite ended down nearly 10% below its October all-time high.

Middle East tensions escalated this week. Iran attacked energy facilities across the region following Israel’s strike on its gas field, while officials told Reuters on Friday that the US military is deploying thousands of Marines to the Middle East.

“This is a situation that’s so fluid,” said Chris Fasciano, chief market strategist at Commonwealth Financial Network. “We could have a resolution in the next week or it could go on for some time. And the longer it goes on, you start to think about the impacts it could have on the US economy.”

WATCHING OIL, STOCKS’ ‘ORDERLY’ REACTION

Swings in crude prices have rippled through asset classes. US crude settled around $98 a barrel on Friday, while Brent ended around $112. In addition to the attacks on energy infrastructure, traffic has stalled in the Strait of Hormuz, through which around a fifth of the world’s crude oil and liquefied natural gas normally passes.

The 20-day correlation between the S&P 500 and US crude stood at -0.89 late on Friday, according to LSEG data, a strong inverse relationship that showed they have tended to move in opposite directions.

“If you’re a trader, you watch oil prices because I do think that that’s generally giving the leading indicator as to how the financial markets are viewing the outlook for the conflict,” said Eric Kuby, chief investment officer at North Star Investment Management Corp.

The S&P 500 energy sector, which includes shares of oil companies, has gained since crude prices began to spike in late February, but the group accounts for less than a 4% weight in the benchmark index.

The latest declines left the S&P 500 down 6.8% from its record closing high set in late January. The pullback has mostly lacked the chaotic quality of the abrupt equity slide last April following President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff announcement that set off broad economic worries, Fasciano said.

“This has been fairly orderly, which I think is an encouraging sign,” Fasciano said. “And I think it’s because the underlying fundamentals for corporate America are still fairly robust and are offering some support.”

TREASURY YIELDS, MARKET TECHNICALS ALSO IN FOCUS

Fast-climbing Treasury yields, driven higher by the energy price spike and caution from global central banks, were looming as a risk factor for stocks. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield was last at 4.38% on Friday, its highest level since last summer.

Keith Lerner, chief investment officer at Truist Advisory Services, said he was watching whether the 10-year Treasury yield sustainably rises above 4.3%, which could increase pressure on stocks, while he was also eyeing 4.5% as a key level.

“Rates going higher means borrowing costs are somewhat higher. And then that could actually slow the economy,” Lerner said. “At some point, if they keep going higher, then the relative attractiveness of (bond) yields becomes more attractive relative to equities.”

Stocks were also around key technical levels. The S&P 500 on Thursday closed below its 200-day moving average — a closely watched long-term trendline — for the first time since May. With another decline on Friday, the index ended at its lowest point since September and fell below November lows that strategists had also identified as worrisome levels.

Reports on manufacturing, services activity and consumer sentiment highlight a relatively light week ahead for US economic data. A major energy conference in Houston that will feature top global industry executives could draw Wall Street’s attention.

Events in Iran were likely to loom largest. In a note on Thursday morning, analysts at UBS Global Wealth Management said the latest developments were “pushing markets to price in a higher risk of prolonged conflict, deeper infrastructure damage and higher-for-longer crude prices.”

“While a less damaging outcome in the Strait of Hormuz remains possible, recent events have narrowed that path and heightened the risk of continued volatility,” the UBS analysts said.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News