Connect with us
The Residences advertisement

Uncategorized

The World Condemns All Acts of Terrorism: Unless the Victims Are Israelis and Jews

A Palestinian Hamas terrorist shakes hands with a child as they stand guard as people gather on the day of the handover of Israeli hostages, as part of a ceasefire and a hostages-prisoners swap deal between Hamas and Israel, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, Feb. 22, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ramadan Abed

In the early days of the October 7th war, those of us who stood with Israel began using the phrase #HamasIsISIS.

It wasn’t a slogan, it was a warning. We had seen it before: the same depravity, the same religious fanaticism disguised as resistance, the same thirst for blood. The scenes coming out of southern Israel that day — families burned alive, children executed, women mutilated — were not a new phenomenon. They were the continuation of a long line of radical Islamist terror, stretching from Raqqa to Gaza, bound together by one ideology: the destruction of life in the name of faith.

Now, in October 2025, Israel has finally brought home the few remaining living hostages. The deal, brokered by President Trump, marks a moment of relief for many families. But even this small victory carries unbearable sorrow. Hamas still refuses to return the bodies of all the murdered hostages, clinging to death as if it were their only leverage.

Meanwhile, reports and videos flood in proving that Hamas is once again turning its guns inward, executing dissenters, killing civilians, and creating fresh mass graves inside Gaza. What kind of movement slaughters the very people it claims to protect? The answer is simple: the same kind that ISIS was.

And yet, the world looks away.

When the Same Crimes Are Judged Differently

It is astonishing how quickly moral clarity disappears when the victims are Israeli and the perpetrators are Palestinian. When ISIS conquered Mosul, enslaved Yazidi women, and lined up thousands of Muslims for execution, the entire international community declared war on terror.

When Al-Qaeda murdered innocents from New York to Nairobi, the world united under one banner: “Never again.”

But when Israel defends itself against a terror organization that shares the exact same ideology, the world changes its tone. Suddenly, restraint is demanded. Suddenly, the victims are accused of “disproportionate response.” Suddenly, the terrorists are “militants” and the killers are “freedom fighters.”

Why is terror under one flag universally condemned, while terror under another is excused?

This double standard is not just hypocrisy, it’s moral suicide.

The Silence That Speaks Volumes

At this very moment, Hamas has unleashed another wave of violence inside Gaza. Reports describe mass executions of civilians accused of collaboration, and videos prove this. Aid convoys are being hijacked. Food and fuel meant for hospitals and children are once again being diverted, likely to fuel more violence.

Where are the international protests? Where are the “Free Gaza” marches now that Gazans are being murdered by Hamas, not Israel?

The answer is chilling: silence.

The same activists who once cried “human rights” now avert their eyes. The same media outlets that broadcast every Israeli airstrike in slow motion now fall silent when the killers are Palestinian. The world’s outrage seems to depend on who holds the gun.

This silence is not neutrality. It is complicity.

The War on Truth

The tragedy is no longer just physical, it is informational. The war against Hamas has become a war for truth itself. Every bomb Israel drops is broadcast without context; every massacre by Hamas is buried beneath euphemisms. Social media has turned lies into weapons, and too many have chosen ignorance over integrity.

Today’s world no longer asks, “Who started the war?” It asks only, “How bad does the response look on camera?”

That’s not justice. That’s theater.

And in this theater of moral blindness, Hamas thrives. Because its victory does not depend on defeating Israel militarily, it depends on convincing the world that evil is resistance and self-defense is oppression.

History Repeats Itself

History is repeating itself, only this time, the victims are once again Jewish.

When the West fought ISIS, it understood the stakes. It knew that civilization itself was at risk. It spoke of the “war against barbarism.” It called it “a fight for humanity.”

But now, when Israel stands on the same front line, the world looks away. It prefers comfortable narratives over hard truths. It chooses moral relativism over moral courage.

This is the greatest betrayal of all, not of Israel alone, but of every principle the civilized world once claimed to uphold.

Standing With Israel Is Standing for Civilization

Israel stands on the front line, not because it wants to, but because it has no choice.

If Israel falls, the same terror will not stop at her borders. It never does. It will find new cities, new victims, new excuses.

That is why standing with Israel is not about politics. It is about defending all of us.

It is about understanding that terrorism, no matter its flag or accent, is still terrorism.

It is about reclaiming the moral clarity the world once had, before fear, hypocrisy, and convenience buried it.

And above all, it is about refusing to let the world forget what it once swore after 9/11, after ISIS’ massacres, after every act of terror that tore through innocent lives: Never again means never again for anyone.

And Israel still means it.

Sabine Sterk is the CEO of Time To Stand Up For Israel

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

University of Michigan will have a leader who defended pro-Palestinian protesters in court

A civil rights attorney who defended pro-Palestinian protesters in court and made social media posts viewed as pro-Hezbollah and antisemitic, has won his bid for the University of Michigan Board of Regents.

Michigan is one of a few states in which voters play a direct role in choosing university overseers. As a regent, Amir Makled (D) will help oversee expenditures at the university where his clients, the student protesters, were arrested. The position is unpaid and carries an eight-year term. Democrat Paul Brown won the other seat up for election, maintaining the board’s 6-2 Democratic majority.

Makled beat out Republican challenger Lena Epstein, who is Jewish and previously identified as a “Jewish Messianic believer of Christ,” but recanted the statement and later said she was “100% Jewish.” Mainstream Judaism does not accept Messianic Jews because they believe in the divinity of Christ and try to convert Jews to Jesus.

Epstein told the Forward in an April interview that the Democrats had handed her an opportunity to win the seat by endorsing Makled, who was facing intense scrutiny. In one of his controversial posts, Makled called Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah a “martyr” after he was killed by Israeli strikes in 2024. He lost an endorsement from Service Employees International Union for the posts and later deleted them.

In the regents race, voters picked up to two of six candidates, with the top two winning. Makled received 25.6% of the vote while Brown received 27.2%. Epstein received 22.2% while her fellow Republican Michael Schostak received 22.6%.

Makled’s election comes as part of a wave of Democratic Party wins, including in Michigan, which elected as Senator Abdul El-Sayed (D), who also faced severe backlash for statements related to Israel and Gaza and for appearing alongside streamer Hasan Piker, who has been accused of antisemitic rhetoric.

Israel played a major role in the rhetoric surrounding Michigan’s midterms. But voters, including 60% of Jewish voters that voted for El-Sayed according to early exit polls, favored sharp critics of the Jewish state to candidates in support of it.

The post University of Michigan will have a leader who defended pro-Palestinian protesters in court appeared first on The Forward.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

This grandson of Holocaust survivors is headed to Congress. The ADL has concerns about his antisemitism record.

The election of Daniel Biss, a Jewish critic of Israel, to an Illinois congressional seat Tuesday has sparked a public feud between the Anti-Defamation League and the liberal Zionist group J Street over whether the ADL remains a credible voice in the fight against antisemitism.

After Biss, the former Jewish mayor of Evanston, Ill., won his seat Tuesday night, the ADL Midwest took to social media to express “serious concerns” about Biss’ “approach to antisemitism.”

J Street, which had endorsed Biss, hit back, noting that Biss is the grandson of Holocaust survivors and calling the ADL’s statement “a shanda,” the Yiddish word for disgrace.

“It is hard to read this statement without wondering how far the ADL has drifted from the organization it once was – a gold standard in our community for standing up against bigotry, hatred and discrimination,” J street wrote on X.

Biss, who speaks Hebrew and spent childhood summers in Israel, was elected with 75% of the vote in a district where 11% of the electorate is Jewish.

“It saddens me to watch the ADL, once a preeminent civil rights organization, devolve into an entity that traffics in fear, intimidation and extremism,” Biss wrote in a statement to the Forward. “This kind of rhetoric does nothing to keep the Jewish people safe—in fact, it undermines that very cause.”

The ADL has long faced scrutiny from critics who view the watchdog group as labeling too broad a swath of Israel criticism as antisemitic, while less forcefully condemning antisemitism when it comes from the political right.

“Our statement speaks for itself,” an ADL spokesperson wrote in an email to the Forward.

In its statement, the ADL pointed to a specific set of concerns involving Biss’ record as mayor of Evanston, Illinois, the college town home to Northwestern University.

Biss did not provide Evanston police support that Northwestern requested after reported “antisemitic conduct” at the Gaza war encampment on campus in April 2024, the ADL said, “raising serious questions about whether the safety, dignity, and equal access of Jewish students were treated with the urgency they required.”

Biss has defended his decision not to dispatch police to the encampment, writing in response to a congressional inquiry that forcibly clearing the protest would have gone against police department advice and suppressed “constitutionally protected speech.”

The ADL also said that Biss “dismissed scrutiny of his response as a politically motivated attack fueled by AIPAC, rather than substantively addressing the concerns raised by Jewish students and community members.”

Biss made opposition to AIPAC a central theme of his primary campaign for Congress after the hardline pro-Israel lobbying group spent millions opposing him and supporting another candidate, state Sen. Laura Fine.

In an interview with the Forward in March, Biss said it was “absurd” that AIPAC opposes imposing any conditions on U.S. military aid to Israel. “And then try to enforce it with millions of dollars of dark money, is certainly bad for democracy and bad for our politics here in America,” Biss added.

At the same time, Biss faced pressure to his left on Israel in the primary, defeating Kat Abughazaleh, a Palestinian-American who has characterized Israel’s conduct in Gaza as a genocide. Biss, who has described himself as a progressive Zionist, declined to use the word genocide, despite repeated calls from Abughazaleh to do so.

In a March op-ed in The Nation, Biss wrote that he believed he was one of AIPAC’s top targets partly because “I’m the grandson of Holocaust survivors. My mother is Israeli. My extended family lives in Israel. AIPAC knew that they couldn’t dismiss me as anti-Israel or antisemitic.”

The ADL also criticized Biss for supporting the repeal of an anti-BDS law, which bars Illinois from investing public pension funds in companies that boycott Israel. That position, the ADL said, “raises additional concerns about his willingness to stand against efforts to isolate and delegitimize the Jewish state.”

In an April Substack post explaining his position, Biss said that he personally opposes the global movement to boycott Israel, but he does not believe the government should “stop people from using their economic agency to advocate for their values.”

Biss will succeed Rep. Jan Schakowsky, a Jewish lawmaker who represented the district for nearly three decades and was also an outspoken critic of AIPAC.

The post This grandson of Holocaust survivors is headed to Congress. The ADL has concerns about his antisemitism record. appeared first on The Forward.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

At the Vatican, two elderly men — one Jewish, one Catholic — exchange gifts and mutual admiration

On Wednesday, two senior citizens, Robert Zimmerman, 85, a Jew originally from Minnesota, and Robert Prevost, 71, a Catholic of Chicago, had a brief meeting at the younger man’s office in central Italy.

Sources on the scene report that Zimmerman was in town for business and Prevost, who goes professionally by Leo, had recently cited Zimmerman’s work in the preface to a book about nuclear disarmament.

Both men dressed in uniform, looking a bit Spy Vs. Spy, with Zimmerman in a black hoodie and Prevost in white with a small white skull cap. The confab was brief, a bulletin from Prevost’s workplace reported, consisting of “greetings and a few lighthearted exchanges.”

Prevost gifted Zimmerman with prayer beads, and Zimmerman presented Prevost with a copy of his memoir, published under his pen name, Bob Dylan.

While Zimmerman was raised in a Jewish home, he had, for a time in the late 1970s to early 1980s, converted to born-again Christianity, confounding many.

The post At the Vatican, two elderly men — one Jewish, one Catholic — exchange gifts and mutual admiration appeared first on The Forward.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News