Uncategorized
What Does the Bondi Beach Attack Show Us About Chinese Attitudes Towards Jews and Israel?
People stand near flowers laid as a tribute at Bondi Beach to honor the victims of a mass shooting that targeted a Hanukkah celebration at Bondi Beach on Sunday, in Sydney, Australia, Dec. 16, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Flavio Brancaleone
The Bondi Beach massacre on December 14, 2025, shocked the world and sparked intense online debates across multiple platforms, including Chinese-language forums.
Based on my observations, reactions to the tragedy across these platforms do not reflect a monolithic “Chinese public opinion,” but rather a fragmented digital ecology in which platform design and online distortion shape whether Jewish victims are humanized — or erased.
Antisemitic commentary appears most visibly in certain Chinese online spaces, appearing as both blatant hatred and indifference towards the victims. When going offline, however, the general population of overseas Chinese students display far greater empathy.
That being said, treating these online reactions as representative of real-world attitudes obscures both the structural production of hate and the quieter presence of solidarity.
On a Reddit-like platform called Zhihu, the focus was rarely on the violence itself, but on blaming the victims.
After the news first broke, many users chose to frame the dead as deserving of harm rather than condemning the attack. In one discussion thread, a post explicitly stated that because one of the people shot fatally — a rabbi — was “pro-Zionist,” he deserved the violence. Another user constructed a popular argument in one post: he praised the shooter as “a heroic figure of resistance.” A third user condemned Australia’s act of criticizing extremism as “cruel and unjust.”
The comment sections for these posts were even more unsympathetic. Commentators used dehumanizing emojis such as squid emojis, comparable to the “juice” emojis circulating in English-language antisemitic spaces to mock not only the victims of the Bondi Beach attack, but Holocaust victims as well. Then, not long after, these posts and comments were quickly deleted by the platform.
On an Instagram-like platform called RedNote (Xiaohongshu), the tone was remarkably different. Praising violence becomes more scarce, but most posts completely ignore the casualties at hand. Users focused on expressing fear about their own public safety, and imagining what it would feel like if such an attack occurred in one’s own neighborhood, while showing no empathy to the dead and the wounded.
Rather than debating what the victims “represented” in the grander political discourse, users spoke about the violence that was displayed at Bondi Beach without mentioning what motivated the attack — which was antisemitism.
After reading these online reactions, I brought the topic into conversations with Chinese international students in my social circle. Unsurprisingly, the students I spoke with were overwhelmingly sympathetic. A male student at UCLA told me that he donated 10 dollars to a fundraiser for the shooting survivors. A female student at USC canceled her planned trip to Australia after the incident and sent messages of condolence to the victims’ families. An Australian friend and a graduate student at the University of Sydney helped organize members of the local Chinese community to send flowers in memory of those who were killed.
Finally, I must address one question: if most people I talk to are sympathetic in real life, then why do hateful comments dominate certain online Chinese platforms?
Incentives offered by these platforms in the form of likes and upvotes by other users drives the disconnect between online hostility and offline sympathy, suggesting that visibility online is shaped less by majority opinion. Instead, the more radical you are, the more rewards you get.
In recent years, official Chinese media rhetoric toward the Jewish people has grown increasingly hostile, particularly following developments in the Middle East and Israel.
Within this environment, antisemitic narratives — often framed as “anti-Zionism” or critiques of Western power — can circulate online with relatively little resistance, especially when they align with prevailing geopolitical sentiments of uniting the third world. However, this tolerance has clear limits. When such commentary becomes too explicit, too violent, or risks drawing international scrutiny, it is often quietly censored or removed. As a result, the opinions that remain visible online are already shaped by political filtering, rather than representing an unmediated public conversation.
The result is a contradictory system in which antisemitic discourse is neither fully endorsed nor consistently suppressed, but selectively managed to avoid reputational damage rather than to protect Jewish communities themselves. In this sense, censorship functions less as a moral boundary than as a tool of image control, intervening not to challenge antisemitism, but to ensure it does not undermine the state’s global standing. What appears as “public opinion” on these platforms therefore reflects layers of moderation and selective visibility rather than the full range of social attitudes.
Taken together, these contrasts suggest that antisemitism in Chinese-language online spaces cannot be understood simply as a reflection of popular sentiment. Rather, it emerges at the intersection of platform design incentives that empower users to share radical thoughts, geopolitical narratives, and selective censorship that prioritizes image over accountability.
When the most extreme voices are the most visible, Jewish suffering risks being reduced to abstraction or spectacle. Recognizing this distortion is a necessary first step toward confronting antisemitism without reproducing new misreadings or stereotypes of Chinese communities themselves. In a censored environment, silence and removal are themselves forms of distortion, shaping not only what can be said but what can be seen.
Angella Tang is a UChicago Biology student and a CAMERA fellow passionate about fostering cross-cultural and interfaith understanding.
Uncategorized
Australia PM Albanese ‘Profoundly Sorry’ for Failing to Prevent Bondi Beach Attack
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese speaks at the Sydney Opera House during a National Day of Mourning for the victims of the Dec. 14, 2025, mass shooting at a Jewish Hanukkah celebration at Bondi Beach, in Sydney, Australia, Jan. 22, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Jeremy Piper
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Thursday he was “profoundly sorry” for his failure to prevent the Bondi Beach mass shooting, as the country observed a day of mourning for the victims of the attack.
Police say a father and son opened fire at an event celebrating the Jewish festival of Hanukkah on Dec. 14, killing 15 people in Australia‘s worst mass shooting in decades.
They say the two men were inspired by Islamic State to carry out the attack, which the government has called an act of terrorism against Jewish people.
Flags were flown at half-mast across the country ahead of a memorial event at Sydney’s iconic Opera House, where Albanese apologized to the relatives of the victims in the audience.
“You came to celebrate a festival of light and freedom and you left with the violence of hatred. I am deeply and profoundly sorry that we could not protect your loved ones from this evil,” Albanese said to sustained applause in his speech at the event.
Last month, the prime minister said he was “sorry for what the Jewish community and our nation as a whole has experienced” – an apology that some relatives said was insufficient.
A minute’s silence, including on the country’s main television channels, was held across the nation just after 7 pm in Sydney (0800 GMT) as the memorial event began.
Event attendees lit candles and heard speeches from other lawmakers, as well as Jewish prayers and video tributes.
Buildings across the country, including cricket stadiums in Melbourne and Perth, were also illuminated, while play was paused during the Australian Open tennis tournament to observe the minute’s silence.
The Bondi attack shocked the nation and led to calls for tougher action on antisemitism and gun control, with critics of Albanese saying he had not done enough to crack down on a spate of attacks on the Jewish community in recent years.
The government disputes this, and has already passed legislation tightening background checks for gun licenses, as well as separate legislation that would lower the threshold for prosecuting hate speech offenses.
Uncategorized
US Pitches ‘New Gaza’ Development Plan
A drone view shows Palestinians walking past the rubble, following Israeli forces’ withdrawal from the area, amid a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, in Gaza City, Oct. 11, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas
The United States on Thursday announced plans for a “New Gaza” rebuilt from scratch to include residential towers, data centers, and seaside resorts, part of President Donald Trump’s push to advance an Israel-Hamas ceasefire shaken by repeated violations.
Trump has parlayed the ceasefire into a broader “Board of Peace” initiative aimed at resolving conflicts globally.
After hosting a signing ceremony for the board in Davos, Switzerland, on Thursday, Trump invited his son-in-law Jared Kushner to present development plans for Gaza, its densely populated cities and towns now in ruins from two years of war.
“In the beginning, we were toying with [building] a free zone, and then [having] a Hamas zone,” Kushner told an audience in Davos of Trump’s early plans to rebuild Gaza, where nearly the entire 2 million population is internally displaced.
“And then we said, you know what? Let’s just plan for catastrophic success.”
‘MASTER PLAN‘
Kushner presented the audience with a slideshow depicting a “master plan” for what he termed a “New Gaza,” displayed on a color-coded map with areas reserved for residential development, data centers, and industrial parks.
The slides included an image of a Mediterranean coastline packed with glittering towers akin to those in Dubai or Singapore. They suggested redevelopment would begin in Rafah in the south, an area under complete Israeli military control.
But they did not address key issues such as property rights or compensation for Palestinians who lost their homes, businesses, and livelihoods during the war. Nor did they address where displaced Palestinians might live during the rebuilding.
Kushner did not say who would fund the redevelopment, which would first require clearing an estimated 68 million tons of rubble and war debris.
A conference will be held in Washington in the coming weeks “where we’ll announce a lot of the contributions that will be made … from the private sector,” Kushner said, without elaborating.
The slides shown by Kushner were nearly identical to slides leaked to the Wall Street Journal in December. The newspaper reported then that the US had offered to “anchor” 20% of the redevelopment project, without going into detail.
Trump has floated the idea of transforming Gaza, ruled for years by the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas, into the “Riviera of the Middle East,” an idea that has drawn criticism from Palestinians.
RAFAH CROSSING
Kushner’s presentation in Davos followed remarks by Ali Shaath, the Palestinian technocrat leader backed by Washington to administer the enclave under Trump’s 20-point plan for Gaza.
A key unfulfilled element of the ceasefire has been the reopening of Gaza’s key Rafah border crossing with Egypt for the entry and exit of Palestinians. Shaath, speaking by video link, announced the Rafah crossing would open next week.
“Opening Rafah signals that Gaza is no longer closed to the future and to the war,” Shaath said.
Israel, which controls the Gaza side of the crossing, has rejected reopening it until Hamas fulfills its ceasefire obligation of returning the remains of the last hostage held in the territory.
After Shaath’s announcement, an Israeli political source said a special effort was being made to return Ran Gvili’s remains and that Israel would discuss reopening the crossing starting next week.
The next phase of Trump’s Gaza plan would see Hamas disarm and international peacekeepers deploy in the crowded, coastal enclave as Israeli troops withdraw further. The first phase left Israel in control of well over half of Gaza, with Hamas holding a sliver of territory along the coast.
Israel has continued to carry out air and artillery strikes in Gaza, often accusing Hamas terrorists of preparing attacks on its troops or encroaching into areas it controls.
Israel launched its air and ground war in Gaza after a Hamas-led cross-border attack on Oct. 7, 2023, that killed 1,200 people. Palestinian terrorists also kidnapped 251 hostages during the massacre.
Uncategorized
Israel Selects Noam Bettan to Compete in 2026 Eurovision Song Contest
Noam Bettan, Israel’s representative for the Eurovision Song Contest 2026, poses in this undated handout photo. Photo: Courtesy of Kan, Timor Elmalach/Handout via REUTERS
Noam Bettan will represent Israel in the 70th Eurovision Song Contest in Vienna, Austria, in May, after winning the Israeli singing competition “Hakochav Haba” (“The Next Star”) this week.
This year will mark the first time since 2022 that Israel will be sending a male contestant to the Eurovision contest. For the last few years, Israel has been represented in the Eurovision competition by women: Yuval Raphael in 2025, Eden Golan in 2024, and Noa Kirel in 2023.
Bettan will participate in the first semifinal of the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest in Vienna on May 12. There will be a second semifinal on May 14 and based on the results of the audience and jury vote, the top 10 countries from both semifinals will advance to compete in the grand final on May 16.
Bettan, 27, was raised in Ra’anana, Israel, to French parents who immigrated to Israel with their two older sons. Bettan, who was also born in Israel, is fluent in French. He released his debut album in 2023, “Above the Water,” and a number of his songs have become hit singles in Israel including “Madame,” which he used as his audition song for “Next Star” this year. He has performed across Israel with his band. In 2018, he competed on the Israeli singing talent show “Aviv or Eyal,” where he finished in third place.
The finale of this year’s “Rising Star” aired on Israeli television on Tuesday night and the four finalists included Bettan, Gal De Paz, Shira Zloof, and Alona Erez. In the final they performed covers of songs, with Bettan performing a Hebrew track, before the top three advanced to the superfinal, where Bettan performed a rendition of the French song “Dernière danse.” The song that Bettan will sing in the 2026 Eurovision will be selected internally by a committee convened by Israel’s public broadcaster Kan, which organizes Israel’s participation in the Eurovision. The song is expected to be announced in March.
Bettan previously auditioned for “Next Star” as a teenager, but failed to make it on to the show. After being crowned the winner on Tuesday night, he thanked the Israeli public for selecting him to represent his country in the Eurovision.
“I will give it my all, I’ll do everything I can to represent our country. It’s such a huge f–king privilege,” he said.
Israel has participated in the Eurovision 46 times and won the contest four times, most recently in 2018 with Netta Barzilai and her song “Toy,” which gave Israel the opportunity to host the contest in Tel Aviv in 2019.
In December, members of the European Broadcasting Union, which organizes the Eurovision, voted that Israel will be allowed to compete in the contest this year despite demands from several countries to ban the Jewish state because of its military actions in the Gaza Strip during the Israel-Hamas war. Following the EBU’s announcement, Spain, Ireland, Iceland, the Netherlands, and Slovenia announced their decision to pull out of this year’s Eurovision in protest. Other countries are facing increasing pressure to withdraw from the song contest because of Israel’s involvement, and two past Eurovision winners have returned their trophies to the EBU in protest of Israel’s participation this year.