Uncategorized
Where Does Israel Fit into Donald Trump’s Middle East Vision?
By HENRY SREBRNIK Donald Trump’s recent visit to the Middle East will lead, the U.S. president promised, to a region where interest has replaced ideology.
“A new generation of leaders is transcending the ancient conflicts and tired divisions of the past and forging a future where the Middle East is defined by commerce, not chaos; where it exports technology, not terrorism; and where people of different nations, religions, and creeds are building cities together — not bombing each other out of existence.”
Nice words, but behind them is a framework that is consistent with Trump’ approach to the region during his first term, when he crafted the Abraham Accords. He isn’t going to let its age-old animosities get in the way of business. The result is the rise of advisers who champion “realism and restraint,” by which they mean no more misbegotten wars in the Middle East and Central Asia leading to disasters such as the Iraq and Afghanistan quagmires.
Where does this leave Israel? Perturbed. Trump is moving ahead on a whole range of regional issues without including Israel and without heeding Israeli concerns in an expanding number of agreements. Trump visited Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates — yet did not stop in Israel.
It also did not go unnoticed that the last remaining American hostage held by Hamas, Eden Alexander, was released from captivity in a deal brokered by Steve Witkoff, Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was apparently completely bypassed. Witkoff negotiated directly with Hamas through a secret backchannel. Indeed, he even expressed his “disappointment” that America “wants to return the hostages, but Israel is not ready to end the war.”
Now, in a dramatic turn of events, Trump is establishing friendly relations with the new Syrian president, whom he met face-to-face in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman al-Saud looking on. Earlier this year, it was reported that Israel had lobbied Washington to keep its sanctions on Syria, but to no avail.
Trump lifted all sanctions on a Syrian leadership that Israel understandably regards as a terrorist regime. After all, its new president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, is a former jihadi whose group, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, was until 2016 al-Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria. Twenty years ago al-Sharaa was languishing in an American military prison in Baghdad, held on suspicion of terrorism on behalf of the Islamic State.
And while Trump has forged a truce with Yemen’s Houthis, in which they promised to no longer attack international shipping in the Red Sea, it seems they will still be able to strike Israel with missiles and drones. The deal served to shield American ships from attacks but said nary a word about Israel’s security. Indeed, it was announced two days after the Houthis had launched a missile that struck Ben Gurion Airport, prompting foreign airlines to flee.
Pro-Israel Republicans and hawkish foreign policy experts worry that Trump’s dealmaking with oil-rich Gulf nations, with trade deals in the hundreds of billions of dollars, puts Israel at a diplomatic disadvantage.
“His approach is obviously completely transactional. If he has a view about U.S. national interest, that view revolves around financial and commercial interests, and that diminishes the value of the alliance with Israel, which is not primarily financial and commercial,” contended Elliott Abrams, a former longtime Republican official who served as Iran envoy in Trump’s first term. The Israel relationship is “based on values. It’s based on military cooperation.”
Financially, “Israel can’t compete with these other states,” remarked David Schenker, who headed the State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs in the first Trump administration. Rather than financial investments, he said, Israel could make concessions to what Trump wants to see in the region. If it doesn’t adapt, Israel could run the risk of being sidelined in Washington.
Trump did make it clear that he remains interested in mediating a normalization agreement between Saudi Arabia and Israel, even as he announced new arms sales to Riyadh and heightened defence cooperation that many expected to be connected to a normalization deal.
Trump’s various actions, including the deal with the Houthis that ended their of attacks on shipping vessels, but not on Israel; his direct negotiations with Hamas over the release of Edan Alexander; the legitimacy he granted Syria’s new president, and his skipping of Israel as a stop on his Middle East tour, all leave Israel feeling it is on the sidelines during this critical time.
Knowing all this, Israel needs to begin the move towards ending its reliance on U.S. military aid, Netanyahu said in a meeting of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee May 11.
“We receive close to $4 billion for arms. I think we will have to wean ourselves off of American security aid, just as we weaned ourselves off of American economic aid,” Netanyahu told them. He added that, just as stopping economic aid helped spur economic growth in Israel, stopping military aid could help the defence sector.
The remark was made in the context of talks with the U.S. about the next 10-year aid package for Israel. Things are moving fast in the Middle East.
Henry Srebrnik is a political science professor at the University of Prince Edward Island.
Uncategorized
Mistrial Declared in Case of Students Charged After Stanford Anti-Israel Protests
FILE PHOTO: A student attends an event at a protest encampment in support of Palestinians at Stanford University during the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, in Stanford, California U.S., April 26, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo
A judge declared a mistrial on Friday in a case of five current and former Stanford University students related to the 2024 pro-Palestinian protests when demonstrators barricaded themselves inside the school president’s office.
Twelve protesters were initially charged last year with felony vandalism, according to prosecutors who said at least one suspect entered the building by breaking a window. Police arrested 13 people on June 5, 2024, in relation to the incident and the university said the building underwent “extensive” damage.
The case was tried in Santa Clara County Superior Court against five defendants charged with felony vandalism and felony conspiracy to trespass. The rest previously accepted plea deals or diversion programs.
The jury was deadlocked. It voted nine to three to convict on the felony charge of vandalism and eight to four to convict on the felony charge to trespass. Jurors failed to reach a verdict after deliberations.
The charges were among the most serious against participants in the 2024 pro-Palestinian protest movement on US colleges in which demonstrators demanded an end to Israel’s war in Gaza and Washington’s support for its ally along with a divestment of funds by their universities from companies supporting Israel.
Prosecutors in the case said the defendants engaged in unlawful property destruction.
“This case is about a group of people who destroyed someone else’s property and caused hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage. That is against the law,” Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said in a statement, adding he sought a new trial.
Anthony Brass, a lawyer for one of the protesters, told the New York Times his side was not defending lawlessness but “the concept of transparency and ethical investment.”
“This is a win for these young people of conscience and a win for free speech,” Brass said, adding “humanitarian activism has no place in a criminal courtroom.”
Protesters had renamed the building “Dr. Adnan’s Office” after Adnan Al-Bursh, a Palestinian doctor who died in an Israeli prison after months of detention.
Over 3,000 were arrested during the 2024 US pro-Palestinian protest movement, according to media tallies. Some students faced suspension, expulsion and degree revocation.
Uncategorized
Exclusive: FM Gideon Sa’ar to Represent Israel at 1st Board of Peace Meeting in Washington on Thursday
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar speaks next to High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission Kaja Kallas, and EU commissioner for the Mediterranean Dubravka Suica as they hold a press conference on the day of an EU-Israel Association Council with European Union foreign ministers in Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 24, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Yves Herman
i24 News – Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar will represent the country at the inaugural meeting of the Gaza Board of Peace in Washington on Thursday, i24NEWS learned on Saturday.
The arrangement was agreed upon following a request from Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who will not be able to attend.
Netanyahu pushed his Washington visit forward by a week, meeting with US President Donald Trump this week to discuss the Iran situation.
A U.N. Security Council resolution, adopted in mid-November, authorized the Board of Peace and countries working with it to establish an international stabilization force in Gaza and build on the ceasefire agreed in October under a Trump plan.
Under Trump’s Gaza plan, the board was meant to supervise Gaza’s temporary governance. Trump thereafter said the board, with him as chair, would be expanded to tackle global conflicts.
Uncategorized
Two Men Jailed in UK for Islamic State-Inspired Plot to Kill Hundreds of Jews
Weapons seized from the home of Walid Saadaoui, 38, who along with Amar Hussein, 52, has been found guilty at Preston Crown Court of plotting to kill hundreds in an Islamic State-inspired gun rampage against the Jewish community, in Britain, in this handout picture obtained by Reuters on December 23, 2025. They are due to be sentenced on Friday. Photo: Greater Manchester Police/Handout via REUTERS
Two men were jailed on Friday for plotting to kill hundreds in an Islamic State-inspired attack on the Jewish community in England, a plan prosecutors said could have been deadlier than December’s mass shooting at Sydney’s Bondi Beach.
Walid Saadaoui, 38, and Amar Hussein, 52, were both convicted after a trial at Preston Crown Court, which began a week after an unrelated deadly attack on a synagogue in the city of Manchester, in northwest England.
Prosecutors said the pair were Islamist extremists who wanted to use automatic firearms to kill as many Jews as they could in an attack in Manchester.
They were found guilty little more than a week after a mass shooting at a Jewish Hanukkah celebration on Bondi Beach in which 15 people were killed.
Prosecutor Harpreet Sandhu said on Friday that, had Saadaoui and Hussein carried out their plan, it “could have been very much more serious” than the attacks in Australia and Manchester.
Judge Mark Wall sentenced Saadaoui to a minimum term of 37 years and Hussein to a minimum term of 26 years, saying: “You were very close to being ready to carry out this plan.”
Hussein refused to attend his sentencing, having refused to attend most of his trial, which Wall said reflected Hussein’s cowardice, describing him as “brave enough to plan to threaten an unarmed group with an AK-47 but not sufficiently courageous to face up to what he did.”
POTENTIALLY ONE OF DEADLIEST ATTACKS ON UK SOIL
Saadaoui had arranged for two assault rifles, an automatic pistol and almost 200 rounds of ammunition to be smuggled into Britain through the port of Dover when he was arrested in May 2024, Sandhu told jurors at the trial.
He added that Saadaoui planned to obtain two more rifles and another pistol, and to collect at least 900 rounds of ammunition.
“This would likely have been one of the deadliest terrorist attacks ever carried out on British soil,” Wall said.
Unbeknown to Saadaoui, however, a man known as “Farouk,” from whom he was trying to get the weapons, was an undercover operative who helped foil the plot.
Walid Saadaoui’s brother Bilel Saadaoui, 37, was found guilty of failing to disclose information about acts of terrorism. He was sentenced to six years in jail.