Connect with us

Uncategorized

Where Does Israel Fit into Donald Trump’s Middle East Vision?

By HENRY SREBRNIK Donald Trump’s recent visit to the Middle East will lead, the U.S. president promised, to a region where interest has replaced ideology. 

“A new generation of leaders is transcending the ancient conflicts and tired divisions of the past and forging a future where the Middle East is defined by commerce, not chaos; where it exports technology, not terrorism; and where people of different nations, religions, and creeds are building cities together — not bombing each other out of existence.”

Nice words, but behind them is a framework that is consistent with Trump’ approach to the region during his first term, when he crafted the Abraham Accords. He isn’t going to let its age-old animosities get in the way of business. The result is the rise of advisers who champion “realism and restraint,” by which they mean no more misbegotten wars in the Middle East and Central Asia leading to disasters such as the Iraq and Afghanistan quagmires.

Where does this leave Israel? Perturbed. Trump is moving ahead on a whole range of regional issues without including Israel and without heeding Israeli concerns in an expanding number of agreements. Trump visited Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates — yet did not stop in Israel.

It also did not go unnoticed that the last remaining American hostage held by Hamas, Eden Alexander, was released from captivity in a deal brokered by Steve Witkoff, Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was apparently completely bypassed. Witkoff negotiated directly with Hamas through a secret backchannel. Indeed, he even expressed his “disappointment” that America “wants to return the hostages, but Israel is not ready to end the war.”

Now, in a dramatic turn of events, Trump is establishing friendly relations with the new Syrian president, whom he met face-to-face in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman al-Saud looking on. Earlier this year, it was reported that Israel had lobbied Washington to keep its sanctions on Syria, but to no avail. 

Trump lifted all sanctions on a Syrian leadership that Israel understandably regards as a terrorist regime. After all, its new president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, is a former jihadi whose group, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, was until 2016 al-Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria.  Twenty years ago al-Sharaa was languishing in an American military prison in Baghdad, held on suspicion of terrorism on behalf of the Islamic State.

And while Trump has forged a truce with Yemen’s Houthis, in which they promised to no longer attack international shipping in the Red Sea, it seems they will still be able to strike Israel with missiles and drones. The deal served to shield American ships from attacks but said nary a word about Israel’s security. Indeed, it was announced two days after the Houthis had launched a missile that struck Ben Gurion Airport, prompting foreign airlines to flee.

Pro-Israel Republicans and hawkish foreign policy experts worry that Trump’s dealmaking with oil-rich Gulf nations, with trade deals in the hundreds of billions of dollars, puts Israel at a diplomatic disadvantage.

“His approach is obviously completely transactional. If he has a view about U.S. national interest, that view revolves around financial and commercial interests, and that diminishes the value of the alliance with Israel, which is not primarily financial and commercial,” contended Elliott Abrams, a former longtime Republican official who served as Iran envoy in Trump’s first term. The Israel relationship is “based on values. It’s based on military cooperation.”

Financially, “Israel can’t compete with these other states,” remarked David Schenker, who headed the State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs in the first Trump administration. Rather than financial investments, he said, Israel could make concessions to what Trump wants to see in the region. If it doesn’t adapt, Israel could run the risk of being sidelined in Washington.

Trump did make it clear that he remains interested in mediating a normalization agreement between Saudi Arabia and Israel, even as he announced new arms sales to Riyadh and heightened defence cooperation that many expected to be connected to a normalization deal. 

Trump’s various actions, including the deal with the Houthis that ended their of attacks on shipping vessels, but not on Israel; his direct negotiations with Hamas over the release of Edan Alexander; the legitimacy he granted Syria’s new president, and his skipping of Israel as a stop on his Middle East tour, all leave Israel feeling it is on the sidelines during this critical time.

Knowing all this, Israel needs to begin the move towards ending its reliance on U.S. military aid, Netanyahu said in a meeting of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee May 11.

“We receive close to $4 billion for arms. I think we will have to wean ourselves off of American security aid, just as we weaned ourselves off of American economic aid,” Netanyahu told them. He added that, just as stopping economic aid helped spur economic growth in Israel, stopping military aid could help the defence sector.

The remark was made in the context of talks with the U.S. about the next 10-year aid package for Israel.  Things are moving fast in the Middle East.

Henry Srebrnik is a political science professor at the University of Prince Edward Island.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Portuguese artists pull out of Jerry Seinfeld-headlined festival

(JTA) — Several Portuguese artists have dropped out of a comedy festival in Lisbon headlined by Jerry Seinfeld, citing their support for Palestinians and implying opposition to Seinfeld’s support for Israel.

At least six acts over recent days have canceled their appearances at the MEO Commedia a La Carte Fest, a new international comedy festival in the Portuguese capital. The event from Oct. 29 to Nov. 1 has advertised that it will host Seinfeld’s first live appearance in Portugal.

Though none of the artists who withdrew mentioned Seinfeld by name, some hinted at a boycott against his pro-Israel views. The Jewish comedian has become one of Hollywood’s most prominent advocates for Israel since October 2023.

Actress and comedian Inês Aires Pereira announced on Instagram on Saturday that “one of the names” featured at the festival “persistently defends ideas and acts that I consider indefensible,” adding, “We cannot relativize or normalize a genocide.”

The comedy duo Cebola Mol posted a graphic of themselves with a watermelon, widely recognized as a symbol of solidarity with Palestinians. “We will celebrate justice, freedom and joy with you on another occasion,” they said on Instagram.

The festival announced on Friday that performances by the groups Tributo Pop and Conjunto Cuca Monga were also canceled, but did not provide reasons. Two other acts, comedian Pedro Tochas and visual artist Vhils, shared their cancellations on Instagram without further details.

Seinfeld has aligned himself with Israel during its current conflict in Gaza, following decades of largely avoiding commenting on political issues. He visited Israel in December 2023 to meet with the families of hostages seized by Hamas on Oct. 7 of that year. Since then, he has attracted attention for a series of dismissive remarks toward pro-Palestinian advocates.

During an appearance last year at Duke University, Seinfeld compared pro-Palestinian activists with the Ku Klux Klan, saying, “The Klan is actually a little better here because they can come right out and say, ‘We don’t like Blacks, we don’t like Jews.’ OK, that’s honest.”

Representatives of Seinfeld and producers of the MEO Commedia a La Carte Fest did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The post Portuguese artists pull out of Jerry Seinfeld-headlined festival appeared first on The Forward.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

UK, France, Canada to ban goods from Israeli settlements

(JTA) —

The United Kingdom, France and Canada will ban goods produced in the West Bank settlements and Jewish neighborhoods of East Jerusalem, British Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband told Parliament on Tuesday, explaining that all such communities were deemed by his country to be illegal.

The declaration exacerbated the rising tensions riling the traditionally strong Israel-U.K. alliance. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar warned that these steps stoked antisemitism against British Jews in an on-camera statement to reporters in Jerusalem.

Sa’ar charged that the measures were a politicized hostile action deliberately taken ahead of Friday’s Jewish New Year holiday, with an eye toward influencing the country’s Oct. 27 elections.

Israel, he said, is responding by closing the British Consulate in Jerusalem that services Palestinians. It will also remove British representatives from the International Gaza Support Center in Kiryat Gat and halt the British training of Palestinian Authority security forces. He added that Israel would bar the entry of 12 British politicians and other nationals involved in anti-Israel activity.

France and Canada have also announced a ban on the import of settlement goods, Miliband told parliament. He noted that the Netherlands, Ireland, Belgium, Spain and Norway have either banned goods or in the process of doing so.

In the same address, Miliband affirmed Israel’s right to exist, reflected on his own Jewish roots and rejected the notion that there was a connection between the policy steps against West Bank settlement activity and the safety of British Jews.

What is motivating the U.K., Miliband said, is “a deep sense of shame about what has unfolded in Palestine under the eyes of the international community” as well as Israel’s “clear intent to bury the Palestinian state.”

In response, he said, the U.K. “will introduce an import ban on goods from illegal settlements in the occupied [Palestinian] territory” as part of a “new comprehensive sanctions regime” that will be put in place within nine months.

This will include, he said, “action against specific companies and individuals who provide services, such as construction, infrastructure, financing or real estate for settlement expansion.”

To those who “finance or facilitate illegal settlements, let me say this, you will face the full force of U.K. sanctions,” Miliband warned.

Miliband clarified that the ban would not affect the export of religious items or life-saving Israeli medications. He explained that trade with the settlements was minimal and that the greater impact would be the sanctions on services.

As part of declaring the ban, Miliband said that the British government is also adopting the International Court of Justice’s 2024 advisory opinion that all Israeli settlement activity over the pre-1967 border was illegal.

But others in Parliament pushed back against Miliband’s declaration. MP Richard Tice of Britain’s right-wing Reform party said that the sanctions were a grave mistake that would “embolden the scourge of antisemitism against British Jews on British streets,” endanger ties with the United States and lead to “tit for tat” sanctions from Israel.

Miliband shot back that “no British Jew is responsible for the policies of the Israeli government and it behooves all of us to make sure that there can be no confusion about that,” saying that Tice’s statement “fell foul” of that goal.

The U.K. action is the latest escalation in tensions between Israel and the Labour-led British government headed by Prime Minister Andy Burnham, who took power in July.

The prior government, led by former Labour Premier Keir Starmer, had already angered Israel by recognizing Palestinian statehood in 2025, suspending licenses for the export of arms to Israel and freezing talks toward a free-trade agreement.

France and Canada are also announcing a ban on the import of settlement goods, Miliband told parliament. He explained that the Netherlands, Ireland, Belgium, Spain, and Norway have either banned goods or in the process of doing so.

In concert with Miliband’s appearance at Parliament, Britain and 11 other countries issued a joint statement pledging “their intention to introduce national and/or support European restrictions on trade in goods with settlements which are illegal under international law.”

Those other countries were Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden.

The 12-country bloc said it was taking this step to maintain the viability of the two-state resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, describing the situation in the West Bank as “rapidly deteriorating.”

In its statement, the bloc stressed that it was taking this step amid an “unprecedented level of settler violence and settlement expansion, including the unacceptable decision to publish tenders for the E1 settlement project.” That project is seen as cutting through land that would render a Palestinian state unviable.

The post UK, France, Canada to ban goods from Israeli settlements appeared first on The Forward.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

California Gov. Newsom, a presidential hopeful, slams Netanyahu and AIPAC in PBS interview

(JTA) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a 2028 presidential hopeful, ventured farther than ever in his criticisms of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a weekend interview that delved into the Democratic Party’s relationship with Israel.

“I think it’s overwhelmingly opposed to the current regime in Israel,” Newsom said of the party, in a PBS News Hour interview with Amna Nawaz.

Pressed by Nawaz on divisions among his colleagues on Israel, Newsom denied that the subject is “even controversial anymore,” stressing that “the condemnation of what Bibi Netnayahu’s doing is almost universal.” The governor slammed the Israeli military’s conduct in Gaza and condemned the settler violence that has expanded in the West Bank.

“We want a democratic and secure Israel, and we want a secure and democratic Palestinian state as well right next door,” Newsom said, adding that Netanyahu has proved counterproductive to achieving a two-state solution.

Though he repeatedly maintained that Democrats are not divided on Israel, the governor acknowledged that “some of the language” by fellow Democrats  “has been weaponized.” Certain “aspects of rhetoric” from individual candidates, he added, are on “the spectrum of concern,” Newsom said.

A number of candidates from the party’s far left place  most if not all of the blame on Israel for a war in Gaza that has resulted in tens of thousands of Palestinian deaths. and downplay the role of Hamas in launching the war with the Oct. 7, 2023 raid inside Israel in which 1,200 people were killed and more than 250 were abducted. Newsom’s rhetoric is of a piece with party moderates who are critical of the Israeli government but who call for a secure Israel, reject Hamas and who resist pressure from the left to call Israel’s actions “genocide.”

Newsom nonetheless insisted that the party is unified on the issue. “But I think universally, everyone agrees, even if you don’t think it’s genocide, that it’s been a moral catastrophe,” he said of the war in Gaza. “The vast majority of us also agree about the atrocities on Oct. 7th and how horrific and unacceptable it was, and the terrorism that was perpetrated by Hamas.”

Newsom was among the many U.S. politicians to visit Israel in October 2023, meeting with survivors and families impacted by the attacks.

During a March book tour, Newsom sparked a backlash when he said that some people were referring to Israel “appropriately as sort of an apartheid state.” He quickly walked back these remarks, telling Politico that he had used the term “in the context of the direction that Bibi is going.”

“I revere the state of Israel,” he declared at the time.

The governor warned, however, that if Netanyahu proceeds in the direction of West Bank annexation, apartheid could become “a word you may hear others use.”

In addition to amplifying his condemnation of Netanyahu this weekend, Newsom also addressed the fact that fewer Democrats are accepting funds from political action committees affiliated with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the pro-Israel lobbying group.

As for Newsom himself, Track AIPAC, an organization that compiles Federal Election Commission data to flag pro-Israel campaign contributions, did not log any such donations to the likely presidential candidate. But the group did flag him as “pro-Israel.”

“It’s a minority of Democrats that are accepting AIPAC,” the governor said, noting a “dramatic change” over the last couple years.

“The vast majority of Democrats I talk to, even Democrats in the past that have in the past have taken AIPAC money, are pledging not to now,” Newsom added. “That’s more of a mainstream position, interestingly, within the Democratic Party.”

The post California Gov. Newsom, a presidential hopeful, slams Netanyahu and AIPAC in PBS interview appeared first on The Forward.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News